Within Myth Reversals
Why Army Funding Did Not Prove Antigravity
The Army paid to test Ning Li's superconducting gravity idea, but the award itself never showed that antigravity had been achieved.
On this page
- What the 2001 Army award was intended to test
- Why experimental funding is not proof of success
- How military involvement strengthened later UFO lore
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
The US Army really did fund Ning Li’s unconventional gravity research. In 2001, the Army Aviation and Missile Command awarded her company, AC Gravity, an agreement worth $448,970 for a “Gravito-Electro Magnetic Superconductivity Experiment”. That fact is unusually solid by the standards of antigravity lore. What it does not establish is the claim often built on top of it: that Li had already demonstrated antigravity, or that the Pentagon acquired a working gravity-control technology.
The surviving description of the programme says almost the opposite. The Army was paying for an experimental attempt to determine whether Li’s theoretical predictions could be confirmed. Her earlier published experiment had found no large gravity anomaly from a stationary superconductor, instead setting a stringent upper limit on such an effect.[ZPEnergy]zpenergy.comGravity-Waves & Missing Scientists at American Antigravity.ComAgreement Number: DAAH01-01-9-R001 Type of Agreement: Other Transac…
That distinction — between funding a risky experiment and validating its premise — is crucial. Military involvement gave Li’s work a factual anchor strong enough to survive decades of retelling, while the absence of publicly available results left room for the much stronger story that antigravity had been proved and then hidden.
What the 2001 Army award was intended to test
The key document is identified in contemporary reproductions as the Department of Defense’s annual report on cooperative agreements and other transactions for fiscal year 2001. Its entry gives agreement number DAAH01-01-9-R001, identifies the awardee as AC Gravity, and lists $448,970 in US government funding. The awarding organisation was the US Army Aviation and Missile Command, or AMCOM, in Huntsville, Alabama. The agreement ran from 25 April 2001 to 25 September 2002 and was classified as an Other Transaction for Prototype.[ZPEnergy]zpenergy.comGravity-Waves & Missing Scientists at American Antigravity.ComAgreement Number: DAAH01-01-9-R001 Type of Agreement: Other Transac…
The programme description is particularly revealing because it states where Li’s idea stood scientifically. It explains that she had developed a theoretical model under which a type-II superconducting disc, subjected to a particular magnetic field, might generate a significant gravitational field. It then describes the Army-funded work as the first attempt to experimentally confirm some of the theoretical predictions.[ZPEnergy]zpenergy.comGravity-Waves & Missing Scientists at American Antigravity19 Jul 2004 — Approximately 10 years ago Dr. Ning Li, then a research physicist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, began working…
That wording matters. A project intended to confirm a prediction is not evidence that the prediction has already been experimentally confirmed. The award documents an Army decision to investigate a proposed effect, not an Army certification that the effect existed.
The contractual mechanism reinforces that interpretation. “Other Transaction” agreements are flexible Department of Defense arrangements used for research and prototype development. Modern Defense Department guidance describes prototype activities as including proof-of-concept work, models, pilots and demonstrations of technical or operational utility. The Government Accountability Office likewise describes prototype OT agreements as mechanisms through which the Department of Defense develops prototypes, with terms tailored to the project.[Acquisition Innovation]acquisitioninnovation.darpa.milAcquisition Innovation Other Transactions 101§ 4022. (formally 10 U.S.C. § 2371b). Page 10. Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release. 10. • There…Read more…
Calling Li’s agreement a “prototype” therefore should not be read as meaning that the Army possessed a prototype antigravity vehicle, propulsion system or operational gravity generator. In defence acquisition language, the category encompasses much earlier proof-of-concept work.
The published experiments did not establish antigravity
The strongest check on later claims is Li’s own scientific record before the Army award. Her gravity-superconductor ideas were not merely internet speculation: she and University of Alabama in Huntsville physicist Douglas Torr published theoretical work in mainstream physics journals. Their papers included a 1991 Physical Review D study of gravitomagnetic effects in superconductors and a 1992 Physical Review B paper examining possible gravitational effects on superconducting electromagnetic behaviour.[Springer]link.springer.comLi and D. G. Torr, “Gravitational effects on the magnetic attenuation of superconductors,” Phys. Rev. D 46, 5489 (1992). Article…Read…
But theoretical publication is different from experimental demonstration. By the late 1990s, interest in superconducting gravity effects had been heightened by much larger anomalous-weight claims associated with rotating superconductors. Li participated in an experimental test with David Noever, Tony Robertson, Ron Koczor and Whitt Brantley, published in Physica C in 1997. Their apparatus used a sensitive gravimeter while bulk YBCO — yttrium barium copper oxide — superconductors were levitated in a magnetic field.[ScienceDirect]sciencedirect.comChanges in acceleration were measured to be less than 2 parts in 108 of the normal gravitational acceleration.Read more…
The result was a limit, not an antigravity demonstration. Changes in acceleration were measured at less than two parts in 100 million of normal gravitational acceleration. The authors said the measurement imposed new limits on the strength and range of the proposed coupling between static superconductors and gravity.[ScienceDirect]sciencedirect.comChanges in acceleration were measured to be less than 2 parts in 108 of the normal gravitational acceleration.Read more…
That makes the chronology especially important:
Theory → experimental constraint → Army-funded attempt at further experimental confirmation.
It was not:
Discovery of antigravity → Army purchase of proven technology.
The first sequence is supported by the published literature and surviving award information. The second requires evidence that has never publicly appeared.
Why experimental funding is not proof of success
Government research agencies routinely spend money precisely because they do not yet know whether an idea will work. Prototype and proof-of-concept programmes are methods of resolving uncertainty. An award therefore demonstrates institutional interest and willingness to spend resources on a question; it does not convert the proposed mechanism into an established scientific result.
Current Department of Defense descriptions make that distinction easy to see. Prototype Other Transactions can cover proof of concept, models, pilots, development and demonstrations of technical utility. Moreover, Defence Acquisition University guidance says prototype agreements should specify conditions for determining successful completion. In other words, the agreement exists before success has been established and provides a framework within which success or failure can be assessed.[DAU]aaf.dau.eduPrototype OTsPrototype OTs
The distinction is particularly important with speculative research. An organisation such as the Army has reasons to investigate ideas whose probability of success may be low if the potential military payoff would be extraordinary. Controlled gravity, were it physically possible and technologically practical, would obviously have profound implications for propulsion and other military systems. Paying several hundred thousand dollars to test such a proposition is therefore compatible with scepticism as well as optimism.
The $448,970 figure consequently answers one historical question very well: did the military take Li’s proposal seriously enough to fund an experiment? Yes. It does not answer the much larger scientific question: did the experiment demonstrate controllable gravity? The publicly accessible award information provides no such result.[ZPEnergy]zpenergy.comGravity-Waves & Missing Scientists at American Antigravity.ComAgreement Number: DAAH01-01-9-R001 Type of Agreement: Other Transac…
That evidential boundary can be expressed simply:
ClaimPublic evidenceLi developed theories connecting superconductors and gravitational effectsSupported by peer-reviewed publications[APS Journals]link.aps.orgNing Li and D. G. Torr. Center for Space Plasma and Aeronomic Research…Read more… team experimentally investigated superconducting gravity effectsSupported by the 1997 Physica C paper[ScienceDirect]sciencedirect.comChanges in acceleration were measured to be less than 2 parts in 108 of the normal gravitational acceleration.Read more… US Army funded AC Gravity in 2001Supported by the reproduced DoD award entry[ZPEnergy]zpenergy.comGravity-Waves & Missing Scientists at American Antigravity.ComAgreement Number: DAAH01-01-9-R001 Type of Agreement: Other Transac… Army programme was intended to test theoretical predictions experimentallyExplicit in the reproduced programme description[ZPEnergy]zpenergy.comGravity-Waves & Missing Scientists at American Antigravity19 Jul 2004 — Approximately 10 years ago Dr. Ning Li, then a research physicist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, began working… publicly demonstrated a practically useful antigravity effectNot established by the cited published experimental recordThe Army award proves that the technology workedNot supported by the award’s purpose or the meaning of prototype experimental funding
The unpublished result is a gap, not a positive finding
The part of the story that legitimately remains uncertain is what happened during the Army-funded experiment. The programme was scheduled to finish in September 2002, but its experimental results do not appear in the ordinary public scientific literature. A 2023 Huntsville Business Journal investigation reported that the grant results were never published and that Li produced no further conventional scientific publications after 2002.[Huntsville Business Journal]huntsvillebusinessjournal.comsolving the mystery of huntsvilles brilliant scientist disappearingsolving the mystery of huntsvilles brilliant scientist disappearing
There is evidence that her interest in the subject continued. A programme from a 2003 MITRE gravitational-wave conference lists a paper called “Measurability of AC Gravity Fields” by Li; a surviving reproduction identifies James C. Bradas of the US Army Aviation and Missile Command as her co-author.[Google Groups]groups.google.comOpen source on google.com.
That post-award activity makes the history more interesting, but it still does not supply the missing experimental result. A conference presentation concerned with the measurability or theoretical treatment of AC gravity fields is not equivalent to an independently reproducible demonstration of gravity control.
The absence of a public final result permits several possibilities: the experiment may have failed, produced ambiguous measurements, generated results that were not considered publishable, continued into non-public work, or produced material subject to government restrictions. The available evidence does not allow those possibilities to be ranked confidently.
What cannot logically be done is to turn the absence itself into confirmation. “The result was not published” and “the result was successful and therefore classified” are different propositions. The first is an observable gap in the public record; the second is an explanation for that gap that requires additional evidence.
Later reporting introduces another layer of testimony. Li’s son, George Men, told the Huntsville Business Journal that his mother continued working for the Department of Defense and stopped discussing her research publicly after obtaining a high-level security clearance. That family account is relevant to reconstructing Li’s later life, but it does not provide technical data establishing that her gravity experiments succeeded.[Huntsville Business Journal]huntsvillebusinessjournal.comsolving the mystery of huntsvilles brilliant scientist disappearingsolving the mystery of huntsvilles brilliant scientist disappearing
How Army involvement strengthened later UFO lore
The Army award became unusually powerful raw material for speculation because it combined three things that conspiracy narratives readily amplify: a genuinely unconventional scientific proposal, an authenticated connection to the US military and a subsequent shortage of public information.
By July 2004, the transformation was already visible. An alternative-energy article headed “Missing Scientist Update” reproduced the Department of Defense funding information while treating the award as a clue to Li’s unexplained whereabouts. The factual contract record was thus being used not merely to show that Army research had occurred, but to support a wider mystery narrative.[ZPEnergy]zpenergy.comGravity-Waves & Missing Scientists at American Antigravity19 Jul 2004 — Approximately 10 years ago Dr. Ning Li, then a research physicist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, began working…
The rhetorical progression is easy to miss because each step sounds superficially plausible:
The Army funded Li becomes the Army took antigravity seriously; that becomes the Army tested antigravity technology; and in stronger retellings, the Army obtained antigravity technology that worked.
Only the first three formulations can be supported if “tested” means precisely what the award description says: an attempt to experimentally investigate the prediction. The final leap changes a documented research question into an undocumented successful result.
Military secrecy makes that leap especially resistant to correction. If no results appear, secrecy can be proposed as the reason. If Li stops publishing, that can be interpreted as further confirmation. If public records remain incomplete, the incompleteness itself can be incorporated into the theory. Such reasoning makes the claim difficult to falsify because both evidence and absence of evidence can be made to point towards the same conclusion.
The later history of Li illustrates why that method is risky. For years, gaps in public information helped sustain claims that she had literally disappeared. Later reporting based on her family supplied a far more ordinary personal chronology and established that she remained in Huntsville until her death in 2021.[Huntsville Business Journal]huntsvillebusinessjournal.comsolving the mystery of huntsvilles brilliant scientist disappearingsolving the mystery of huntsvilles brilliant scientist disappearing The correction does not prove what happened inside every government research programme, but it demonstrates how readily a genuine gap can acquire a dramatic explanation that later evidence does not support.
What the Army award actually establishes
The most defensible interpretation is narrower, but also more historically interesting, than either dismissing the episode as fantasy or treating it as proof of a breakthrough.
Ning Li was a real physicist whose unconventional superconducting-gravity ideas reached peer-reviewed journals. Her experimental collaborators performed sensitive measurements rather than simply asserting that antigravity existed. The US Army then committed nearly $449,000 to an AC Gravity prototype agreement whose stated purpose was to attempt experimental confirmation of predictions arising from her theory.[aps.org]link.aps.orgNing Li and D. G. Torr. Center for Space Plasma and Aeronomic Research…Read more…
That is substantial evidence of institutional interest in testing an extraordinary proposition. It is not substantial evidence that the proposition survived the test.
The distinction matters particularly when examining UFO and antigravity lore because authentic documents often give later stories their credibility. A genuine military award can function as an evidential anchor around which much less secure claims accumulate. Readers encountering the story decades later may see the authentic contract number, exact dollar figure and Army command and reasonably assume that equally concrete evidence lies behind the claim of successful antigravity.
It does not. The public trail reaches a documented experiment whose outcome remains unavailable, while Li’s last published gravity experiment before that award reported a stringent limit rather than a dramatic gravitational effect.[ScienceDirect]sciencedirect.comChanges in acceleration were measured to be less than 2 parts in 108 of the normal gravitational acceleration.Read more…
The Army funding therefore deserves to remain part of Ning Li’s history — but for what it actually demonstrates. It shows that an unconventional gravity proposal crossed the threshold from academic theory into a military-funded experimental programme. The surviving evidence does not show that it crossed the much more important threshold from experimental proposition to proven antigravity technology.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to Why Army Funding Did Not Prove Antigravity. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The Hunt for Zero Point: Inside the Classified World of Antig...
The atomic bomb was not the only project to occupy government scientists during the 1940's. Antigravity technology, originally spearheade...
The Demon-Haunted World
Rating: 4.5/5 from 43 Google Books ratings
NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER • From the renowned astronomer and author of Cosmos comes a “powerful [and] stirring defense of informed ration...
The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark
Rating: 4.5/5 from 43 Google Books ratings
NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER • From the renowned astronomer and author of Cosmos comes a “powerful [and] stirring defense of informed ration...
The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry
Cited by the New York Review of Books as "the best brief for visitation," this classic study presents an analysis of UFO reports and conc...
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.
Endnotes
1.
Source: zpenergy.com
Link:https://www.zpenergy.com/modules.php?file=article&name=News&sid=838
Source snippet
Gravity-Waves & Missing Scientists at American Antigravity.ComAgreement Number: DAAH01-01-9-R001 Type of Agreement: Other Transac...
2.
Source: sciencedirect.com
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0921453497014627
Source snippet
Changes in acceleration were measured to be less than 2 parts in 108 of the normal gravitational acceleration.Read more...
3.
Source: zpenergy.com
Title: Gravity-Waves & Missing Scientists at American Antigravity
Link:https://www.zpenergy.com/modules.php?file=print&name=News&sid=838
Source snippet
19 Jul 2004 — Approximately 10 years ago Dr. Ning Li, then a research physicist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, began working...
4.
Source: link.springer.com
Link:https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A%3A1021621425670
Source snippet
Li and D. G. Torr, “Gravitational effects on the magnetic attenuation of superconductors,” Phys. Rev. D 46, 5489 (1992). Article...Read...
5.
Source: link.aps.org
Link:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.46.5489
Source snippet
Ning Li and D. G. Torr. Center for Space Plasma and Aeronomic Research...Read more...
6.
Source: sciencedirect.com
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921453497014627
7.
Source: aaf.dau.edu
Title: Prototype OTs
Link:https://aaf.dau.edu/aaf/contracting-cone/ot/prototype/
8.
Source: groups.google.com
Link:https://groups.google.com/g/sci.space/c/RKfc3i7Xc1g
9.
Source: zpenergy.com
Link:https://www.zpenergy.com/modules.php?file=article&mode=flat&name=News&order=0&sid=838&thold=-1
10.
Source: pod.wave.co
Link:https://pod.wave.co/podcast/crime-stories-with-nancy-grace/dead-missing-space-scientists-mystery-raging-unsolved
11.
Source: zpenergy.com
Title: ZP Energy.com
Link:https://zpenergy.com/modules.php?file=article&name=News&sid=740
12.
Source: sciencedirect.com
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/physica-c-superconductivity-and-its-applications/vol/281/issue/2
13.
Source: journals.aps.org
Link:https://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.46.5489
14.
Source: history.defense.gov
Title: Secretary of Defense Annual Reports
Link:https://history.defense.gov/Historical-Sources/Secretary-of-Defense-Annual-Reports/
15.
Source: acquisition.gov
Link:https://www.acquisition.gov/dfarspgi/pgi-206.001-70-exception-prototype-projects-follow-production-contracts
16.
Source: acquisition.gov
Title: 5101.9101 authority and responsibilities
Link:https://www.acquisition.gov/afars/5101.9101-authority-and-responsibilities
17.
Source: acquisition.gov
Title: Part 206
Link:https://www.acquisition.gov/node/34678/printable/print
18.
Source: acquisition.gov
Title: PG I Part 206
Link:https://www.acquisition.gov/node/55732/printable/print
19.
Source: acquisition.gov
Link:https://www.acquisition.gov/node/63469/printable/pdf
20.
Source: acquisition.gov
Title: PG I Subchapter B
Link:https://www.acquisition.gov/dfarspgi/pgi-subchapter-b-acquisition-planning
21.
Source: acquisition.gov
Title: Part 2
Link:https://www.acquisition.gov/node/63464/printable/print
22.
Source: acquisition.gov
Link:https://www.acquisition.gov/node/40829/printable/print
23.
Source: acquisition.gov
Title: defense federal acquisition regulation
Link:https://www.acquisition.gov/sites/default/files/archives/dfarspgi/pdf/DFARS_PGI_Change_07-29-2024.pdf
24.
Source: acquisition.gov
Title: DFARS Change 05 30 2024
Link:https://www.acquisition.gov/sites/default/files/archives/dfars/pdf/DFARS_Change_05-30-2024.pdf
25.
Source: lineofdeparture.army.mil
Title: Other Transactions Authority
Link:https://www.lineofdeparture.army.mil/Journals/Army-Lawyer/Archive/Issue-2-2025/Other-Transactions-Authority/
26.
Source: army.mil
Title: dau website hosts acquisition prototypes and other transactions guide
Link:https://www.army.mil/article/219639/dau_website_hosts_acquisition_prototypes_and_other_transactions_guide
27.
Source: army.mil
Title: prototyping agreements awarded for autonomous tactical vehicle system
Link:https://www.army.mil/article/272441/prototyping_agreements_awarded_for_autonomous_tactical_vehicle_system
28.
Source: army.mil
Title: the contracting pendulum
Link:https://www.army.mil/article/231379/the_contracting_pendulum
29.
Source: asc.army.mil
Title: mil DRIVIN G CHANGE IN DEFENSE ACQUISITION
Link:https://asc.army.mil/web/news-driving-change-in-defense-acquisition/
30.
Source: asc.army.mil
Title: news accelerating superiority
Link:https://asc.army.mil/web/news-accelerating-superiority/
31.
Source: asc.army.mil
Title: mil The need for speed
Link:https://asc.army.mil/web/news-alt-amj19-the-need-for-speed/
32.
Source: army.mil
Title: running the options
Link:https://www.army.mil/article/215250/running_the_options
33.
Source: army.mil
Title: agile acquisition the acc detroit way
Link:https://www.army.mil/article/294350/agile_acquisition_the_acc_detroit_way
34.
Source: army.mil
Title: aviation missile technology consortium wraps up successful first year
Link:https://www.army.mil/article/228123/aviation_missile_technology_consortium_wraps_up_successful_first_year
35.
Source: journals.aps.org
Link:https://journals.aps.org/prb/issues/46/9
36.
Source: sites.google.com
Title: ac gravity llc
Link:https://sites.google.com/view/the-asp-foundation/groups-of-interest/technology-creators-researchers/ac-gravity-llc
37.
Source: sites.google.com
Link:https://sites.google.com/view/gravitationalfieldstudy/home
38.
Source: books.google.com
Title: Annual Report for Fiscal Year Including
Link:https://books.google.com/books/about/Annual_Report_for_Fiscal_Year_Including.html?id=uyIJAQAAMAAJ
39.
Source: aida.mitre.org
Title: understanding dod contracting
Link:https://aida.mitre.org/demystifying-dod/understanding-dod-contracting/
40.
Source: acquisitioninnovation.darpa.mil
Title: Acquisition Innovation Other Transactions 101
Link:https://acquisitioninnovation.darpa.mil/docs/Training/OT%20101_Overview_Feb%202023.pdf
Source snippet
§ 4022. (formally 10 U.S.C. § 2371b). Page 10. Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release. 10. • There...Read more...
41.
Source: huntsvillebusinessjournal.com
Title: solving the mystery of huntsvilles brilliant scientist disappearing
Link:https://huntsvillebusinessjournal.com/news/2023/07/30/solving-the-mystery-of-huntsvilles-brilliant-scientist-disappearing/
42.
Source: tilln.com
Title: Ning Li | This Scientist Got $450k From The Do D, Then She Disappeared
Link:https://tilln.com/season-4/ning-li-this-scientist-got-450k-from-the-dod-then-she-disappeared/?amp=1
43.
Source: zamandayolculuk.com
Link:https://www.zamandayolculuk.com/html-3/electrostatic_propulsion.htm
44.
Source: darpa.mil
Link:https://www.darpa.mil/about/offices/contracts-management/proposer-transactions
45.
Source: acquisitioninnovation.darpa.mil
Title: mil ARTICL E
Link:https://acquisitioninnovation.darpa.mil/docs/Articles/Kuyath%201995%20-%20The%20Untapped%20Potential%20of%20the%20DoDs%20Other%20Transactions%20Authority.PDF
46.
Source: darpa.mil
Link:https://www.darpa.mil/sites/default/files/attachment/2025-03/model-other-transaction-ot-prototype-amendment-1.docx
47.
Source: darpa.mil
Link:https://www.darpa.mil/sites/default/files/attachment/2025-11/model-ot-for-Prototype.docx
48.
Source: darpa.mil
Title: acquisition innovation
Link:https://www.darpa.mil/news/2024/acquisition-innovation
49.
Source: acquisitioninnovation.darpa.mil
Title: GUIDE TO RESEARCH OTHER TRANSACTIONS 2026.02.12
Link:https://acquisitioninnovation.darpa.mil/docs/Guides/GUIDE%20TO%20RESEARCH%20OTHER%20TRANSACTIONS%20-%202026.02.12.pdf
50.
Source: acquisitioninnovation.darpa.mil
Title: mil XP P-PDF Support Utility
Link:https://acquisitioninnovation.darpa.mil/docs/Articles/Federal%20Contracts%20Report%20extension%20of%20authority%20to%20military%20services%201996.pdf
51.
Source: darpa.mil
Title: mto spark tank contracting
Link:https://www.darpa.mil/sites/default/files/attachment/2025-09/darpa-mto-spark-tank-contracting.pdf
52.
Source: acquisitioninnovation.darpa.mil
Title: mil Untitled
Link:https://acquisitioninnovation.darpa.mil/docs/GAO%20and%20Congressional%20Reports/IG%20Report%20Financial%20and%20Cost%20Aspects%20of%20OTs%201998.pdf
53.
Source: inspirehep.net
Link:https://inspirehep.net/literature/1359113
54.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/groups/988383225240729/posts/1092614001484317/
55.
Source: catalog.hathitrust.org
Link:https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/000078799
56.
Source: uapmurders.com
Link:https://uapmurders.com/uaps/Details/Ning_Li/
57.
Source: wikiland.org
Link:https://wikiland.org/wiki/Antigravity
Additional References
58.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DsHC8aU2cg
Source snippet
Eugene [Podkletnov]({{ 'podkletnov/' | relative_url }}): Antigravity, Superconductors & Gravitational Impulse Force Beams...
59.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Xhxml67glM
Source snippet
The Woman Physicist that 'Discovered Antigravity' is missing since 2004...
60.
Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-25-107546.pdf
Source snippet
Government Accountability OfficeGAO-25-107546, OTHER TRANSACTION AGREEMENTS3 Sept 2025 — The Department of Defense (DOD) can use a contra...
61.
Source: govinfo.gov
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GOVPUB-D-5fa934a6dfa082e2745019a803f682f9
62.
Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/assets/a244981.html
63.
Source: tile.loc.gov
Link:https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/sgp/sgpmbb/00416159531/0001.pdf
64.
Source: youtube.com
Title: The Ning Li Disappearance | Noah Logan
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SUeQWs1vWDw
Source snippet
NASA Scientist Explains Why Anti-Gravity Research is Making No Progress | Kevin Knuth...
65.
Source: thelivingmoon.com
Title: The Living Moon Anti-gravity and the Search for Dr
Link:https://thelivingmoon.com/49electric_universe/03files/Gravity_001.html
Source snippet
Ning-Li... DAAH01-01-9-R001. Type of Agreement: Other Transaction for Prototype...
66.
Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354521867_A_simple_investigation_of_Static_test_for_a_gravitational_force_coupled_to_type_II_YBCO_superconductors_by_Li_and_coworkers
67.
Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/402834861Unified_Classical_Resonance_Model_UCRM_Resonant_Plasmoids_Bio-ELFPsionics_Sixth_Oscillator_Remote_ViewingESP_Anomalous_Cognition_Gravity_Control_and_Zero-Point_Energy_Rectification-_The_MC-BE-CIRE_Hy