How Should We Treat Evidence the Public Cannot Inspect?

Introduction

Suspicious-death claims involving UFO, antigravity and unconventional-propulsion researchers often turn on an evidential problem that is easy to miss: some of the most striking allegations rest on material that the public cannot independently inspect. A private message may show that a researcher feared for their safety; a friend may say that photographs or medical records exist; an investigator may refer to an unreleased police file. Such material can be important, but it is not equivalent to an authenticated record whose provenance, completeness and context can be tested.

Amy Eskridge’s 2022 death is the clearest example in this branch. Her death and leadership of Huntsville’s Institute for Exotic Science are publicly documented, while later accounts say that she privately warned that she would not kill herself and believed she was being targeted. At the same time, Alabama law restricts public access to recent death certificates and law-enforcement investigative records. The resulting evidence gap supports continued scrutiny, but not a confident conclusion that either homicide or a research-related suppression operation has been established.[al.com]obits.al.comamy eskridge obituaryEskridge Obituary (1987 - 2022) - Huntsville, AL - AL.com (Huntsville)June 21, 2022…Published: June 21, 2022

Private messages are evidence, but evidence of what?

Private correspondence can be unusually valuable in suspicious-death cases because it may be contemporaneous rather than reconstructed years later. A message written before a person’s death can establish that the sender expressed a particular fear, expectation or allegation at that time. That is substantially stronger than an anonymous retrospective claim that the person “must have known something”.

The difficulty is determining exactly what proposition the message supports. In Eskridge’s case, recent reporting has circulated a message attributed to her from May 2022 in which she reportedly said that if she were later reported to have killed herself, that account should not be accepted. The allegation has been associated particularly with Franc Milburn, a former British military officer who says he corresponded with her before her death. These claims have helped bring Eskridge into the wider 2026 debate over deaths and disappearances among scientists connected, sometimes loosely, with sensitive technology.[The Wall Street Journal]wsj.comThe case of Melissa Casias, a New Mexico administrative assistant gone missing, became a flashpoint, with internet theorists linking her…

If the message is authentic, it is significant evidence about Eskridge’s stated expectations and state of mind. It is not automatically evidence that another person killed her. That second proposition requires additional proof.

This distinction can be expressed as a sequence:

Evidence can strongly support the first few propositions while leaving the later ones unresolved. Collapsing that chain into “she predicted her murder” gives private correspondence more evidential force than it actually carries.

The US Federal Rules of Evidence offer a useful benchmark, even though public historical analysis is not a court proceeding. Rule 901 requires sufficient evidence to support a finding that an item “is what the proponent claims it is”. Authentication may be supported by testimony from someone with knowledge or by distinctive characteristics and surrounding circumstances. The rule therefore illustrates a basic principle relevant to screenshots and copied messages: before asking whether a document proves an allegation, first establish that the document itself is genuine.[congress.gov]congress.govCPRT 118HPRT57151FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCEDecember 1, 2024…Published: December 1, 2024

Authenticity, however, is only the first stage. An authentic message can still contain an incorrect inference. If somebody genuinely writes that they believe they are being watched, the message proves that the belief existed; it does not independently establish surveillance. The same principle applies to allegations that injuries resulted from directed-energy devices or that harassment was connected to propulsion research.

Why screenshots are weaker than the underlying record

Much of the public evidence in controversial cases circulates as screenshots rather than original digital records. Screenshots can preserve useful information, but they remove some of the features investigators would normally want to examine.

A cropped image may not show messages immediately before or after the quoted passage. It may omit the account identifier, original timestamp information or attachment history. Readers generally cannot tell whether the image was captured from the original device, forwarded through several people, or reconstructed from another copy. None of those limitations proves manipulation. They simply make independent authentication harder.

Digital-forensics standards explain why preservation matters. The US National Institute of Standards and Technology says digital evidence presents preservation problems beyond those associated with conventional physical material and emphasises maintaining evidence in a usable state while protecting it against alteration or degradation. NIST’s broader evidence-management guidance likewise stresses documenting chain of custody and safeguarding material from compromise or contamination.[NIST]nist.govdigital evidencedigital evidence

In practical terms, a stronger release of important private correspondence would ideally include the complete conversation rather than selected excerpts, a reliable explanation of who preserved it, relevant account and timestamp information, and, where justified, an independent forensic extraction of the device or application database. Such measures do not determine whether the claims made inside the messages are true. They answer the prior question of whether researchers are analysing an authentic and substantially complete record.

That distinction is particularly important where a message has become central to a murder allegation. A screenshot can reasonably justify asking investigators to look further. It is much harder to justify treating it as dispositive forensic proof.

Secondhand reporting can look like independent corroboration when it is not

Another weakness arises when the same private allegation is repeated through multiple outlets. A claim may begin with one correspondent, appear in an interview, be reported by a news site, be copied into social-media posts and then be cited by later commentators as though several independent sources have confirmed it.

They have not necessarily done so.

The relevant question is the number of independent evidential origins, not the number of webpages containing the allegation. If five articles all derive from one individual’s account of a private exchange, they constitute five publications but largely one underlying source.

This problem is visible in the current “missing scientists” controversy. The Wall Street Journal reported in 2026 that theories tying a series of deaths and disappearances to UFOs, clean energy or secret technology spread online before gaining political and federal attention. Its reporting also noted that families of some of the people included in the alleged pattern disputed conspiratorial interpretations.[The Wall Street Journal]wsj.comThe case of Melissa Casias, a New Mexico administrative assistant gone missing, became a flashpoint, with internet theorists linking her…

CNN likewise reported that Eskridge’s family cautioned against making too much of her inclusion in the pattern, telling the network that people should recognise that scientists die as well. CNN’s survey also demonstrated why apparently similar cases need individual examination: some deaths included in the viral cluster already had documented conventional circumstances, while other disappearances remained genuinely unresolved.[CNN Transcripts]transcripts.cnn.comTranscripts CNN.comTranscripts CNN.com

That does not settle Eskridge’s case. It does show why private testimony must be separated from later repetition. A message allegedly written by Eskridge is one source category; Milburn’s account of his correspondence with her is another evidential layer; a news outlet accurately reporting Milburn’s account is not automatically a third independent confirmation of the underlying allegation.

Unreleased records are a real limitation — but secrecy has ordinary causes

The other side of the public-versus-private problem concerns official documents. Readers sometimes assume that if a death certificate, police report or investigative file cannot be found online, its absence itself suggests unusual government secrecy.

For an Alabama death, that assumption is unsafe.

The Alabama Department of Public Health states that death certificates are confidential for 25 years after the date of death. During that period, copies are restricted to specified relatives, legal representatives and other authorised people. Amy Eskridge died on 11 June 2022, so in 2026 her death certificate remains squarely inside this statutory restriction. A member of the general public failing to obtain it is therefore not evidence that authorities have specially sealed her case.[Alabama Department of Public Health]alabamapublichealth.govOpen source on alabamapublichealth.gov.

Police investigative material is subject to a different but equally important rule. Alabama Code §12-21-3.1 states that law-enforcement investigative reports and related investigative materials are not public records and specifically protects reports, field notes, witness statements and other investigative writings or recordings from ordinary disclosure. Alabama Supreme Court decisions have applied the statute as a genuine disclosure restriction, including in disputes over attempts to obtain investigative documents through civil proceedings.[Justia Law]law.justia.comJustia LawAlabama Code § 12-21-3.1 (2024) - Subpoena of Law Enforcement Officers and Investigative Reports; Disposition of Criminal Matte…

These rules have two consequences that pull in opposite directions.

First, the non-availability of Eskridge’s complete investigative record cannot reasonably be treated, by itself, as proof of a cover-up. Alabama law provides a routine explanation for why members of the public may be unable to inspect sensitive death and investigative records.

Second, the same restrictions also prevent outsiders from fully verifying whatever official determination was made. If the underlying forensic material is unavailable, the public cannot independently check scene evidence, toxicology, ballistic findings, witness accounts or investigative reasoning merely by repeating a reported manner of death.

The defensible description is therefore an evidence gap, not “proof of suppression” and not “the matter has been publicly proved beyond doubt”.

Amy Eskridge shows the gap at its sharpest

Eskridge’s case matters because the public record contains facts on both sides of the evidential divide.

The uncontested foundation is fairly clear. Her published obituary records that she died on 11 June 2022 at 34 and identifies her as president and chairwoman of the Institute for Exotic Science in Huntsville. It also records her University of Alabama in Huntsville background and describes her interests across scientific and engineering fields.[Legacy.com]obits.al.comamy eskridge obituaryEskridge Obituary (1987 - 2022) - Huntsville, AL - AL.com (Huntsville)June 21, 2022…Published: June 21, 2022

Publicly available recordings and subsequent reporting also establish that Eskridge discussed the perceived risks surrounding unconventional aerospace research before her death. That makes later claims that she was worried about personal safety more relevant than they would be if they first appeared only after her death.

Yet the strongest later allegation — that she explicitly wrote shortly before dying that she would not commit suicide — remains principally dependent on privately held correspondence and the people who have published or described it. Meanwhile, the official materials needed to reconstruct the death independently are not available in a comparably complete public form.

That produces an unusually important asymmetry. The public can see enough to understand why suspicions arose, but not enough to determine conclusively whether those suspicions describe the cause of death.

Even a verified warning would leave a further problem of causation. Someone expecting harm may be correctly identifying a genuine threat, misidentifying an unrelated source of stress or fear, or describing circumstances that later played no causal role in their death. Investigators would need corroborating evidence to distinguish among those possibilities.

The present evidence therefore supports a narrower conclusion than either side of the debate often presents: Eskridge made unusual and concerning statements before her death, but publicly inspectable evidence has not established that she was killed because of antigravity, UFO or advanced-propulsion research. Her family’s later caution about the conspiracy narrative is also part of the public evidential record and should not simply be omitted because it conflicts with the suspicious interpretation.[CNN Transcripts]transcripts.cnn.comTranscripts CNN.comTranscripts CNN.com

Ning Li shows how private information can correct a public mystery

The case of physicist Ning Li demonstrates a different failure mode: too little public information can create a “disappearance” that later proves not to have been a disappearance at all.

Li conducted real research into possible gravitational effects associated with superconductors and then largely vanished from the open scientific literature. For years, her absence from public research was treated in parts of UFO and antigravity culture as a mystery. Some speculation suggested that she had defected to China, been absorbed into a secret programme or met an unknown fate.

A major change occurred in 2023 when the Huntsville Business Journal located Li’s son, George Men. He said his mother had remained in Huntsville and continued defence-related work rather than disappearing overseas. He also described a 2014 accident in which she was struck by a vehicle, leaving her badly injured; according to his account, she later suffered severe cognitive decline and died in 2021.[Huntsville Business Journal]huntsvillebusinessjournal.comOpen source on huntsvillebusinessjournal.com.

A funeral-home record independently confirms that Ning Li died in Huntsville on 27 July 2021 and identifies her surviving son.[Berryhill Funeral Home]berryhillfh.comBerryhill Funeral Home Ning Li ObituaryBerryhill Funeral Home Ning Li Obituary

This example is especially valuable for evaluating suspicious-death narratives because the earlier mystery was not wholly irrational. Li really had stopped publishing publicly, and people interested in her work genuinely lacked information. The error came in converting absence from the public record into physical disappearance.

Private family knowledge eventually supplied missing context, and the obituary provided an independently inspectable anchor. The result did not prove every claim about Li’s classified or defence-related work, but it decisively changed what could responsibly be said about her fate.

It is a warning against treating silence as a positive finding. A researcher can disappear from journals without disappearing from life.

Eugene Mallove shows what stronger public evidence looks like

Eugene Mallove offers the opposite type of comparison. Mallove was a prominent advocate of cold fusion and unconventional energy research, and he was unquestionably murdered in Connecticut in 2004. Because his work was controversial, his violent death naturally attracted claims that his research might have been the motive.

Unlike many suspicious-death stories, however, Mallove’s case produced an extensive criminal record.

A 2025 Connecticut Appellate Court decision recounts that Mallove’s body was found at a rental property in Norwich on 14 May 2004. Police investigation focused on people connected to tenants whom Mallove had recently evicted. The litigation ultimately involved a defendant convicted by a jury of murder and conspiracy to commit murder.[Justia Law]law.justia.comOpen source on justia.com.

The significance here is not that a court record makes every conceivable alternative impossible. It is that a research-related assassination theory must compete with a detailed, publicly inspectable evidential record identifying defendants, circumstances, testimony and an ordinary property dispute surrounding the crime.

That is a much stronger evidential environment than one consisting mainly of private warnings and unavailable investigative files.

Mallove’s case also illustrates why “scientist murdered” and “scientist murdered because of research” are fundamentally different claims. The first can be established without proving the second. The motive connection needs its own evidence.

Public does not mean reliable, and private does not mean worthless

The distinction between public and private evidence should not be turned into a simplistic hierarchy in which everything public is trustworthy and everything private is dismissed.

Public misinformation can be extremely weak evidence. An anonymous social-media post, an unsourced “death list” or a webpage copying another webpage may be completely inspectable yet badly sourced. Conversely, a private medical record, original phone database or police case file may contain excellent evidence even though ordinary readers cannot access it.

The meaningful questions are therefore broader:

NIST’s emphasis on preservation and documented custody reflects the same underlying principle: evidence becomes more trustworthy when its handling history is known and its integrity can be assessed.[NIST]nist.govdigital evidencedigital evidence

The 2026 federal inquiry does not itself validate the theory

The public-versus-private distinction has become particularly important because claims about missing and dead researchers moved into official scrutiny in 2026.

On 21 April, the Los Angeles Times reported that the FBI had begun examining deaths and disappearances involving at least ten scientists and staff associated with sensitive research. The agency said it was looking for connections in cooperation with other federal and local bodies. Crucially, however, the same reporting stated that there was then no evidence establishing that the cases were connected. NASA said nothing involving its personnel indicated a national-security threat, while the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department said investigators had found no connection between a missing JPL researcher and similar cases elsewhere.[Los Angeles Times]latimes.comOpen source on latimes.com.

The Guardian similarly described the alleged common pattern as a conspiracy theory that had moved from the internet into federal and political attention despite the absence of concrete evidence tying the cases together.[The Guardian]theguardian.comscientists connected to space, nuclear, or defense research has rapidly spread online, drawing the attention of right-wing media, Congres…

An investigation therefore changes the status of one proposition: authorities consider the possibility worth checking. It does not establish the proposition being investigated.

That distinction is particularly important when government interest itself becomes incorporated into the conspiracy argument — “the FBI is investigating, therefore the pattern must be real”. Investigations routinely test hypotheses that later prove unsupported. The eventual evidential value will lie in whatever facts the inquiry establishes, not in the fact that an inquiry exists.

What evidence would actually change the assessment?

A suspicious interpretation of a researcher’s death becomes substantially stronger when separate evidential strands converge.

For Eskridge, original message data independently authenticated from the relevant accounts or devices would strengthen claims about what she communicated before her death. Complete correspondence would also reveal whether widely circulated passages have been quoted in their proper context.

Contemporaneous medical documentation could test claims about unexplained injuries. Photographs alone can establish the appearance of an injury but usually cannot establish its cause. A clinical examination, diagnostic findings or other physical evidence linking an injury to a proposed mechanism would carry far more weight.

The death investigation itself would require a different category of evidence: scene documentation, autopsy or medical-examiner findings where applicable, toxicology, ballistic analysis if a firearm was involved, witness interviews and the reasoning supporting the official manner-of-death determination. Alabama’s disclosure restrictions help explain why outsiders may not presently possess those materials.[Justia Law]law.justia.comJustia LawAlabama Code § 12-21-3.1 (2024) - Subpoena of Law Enforcement Officers and Investigative Reports; Disposition of Criminal Matte…

Finally, even proving homicide would not establish the claim central to this topic: that the death was connected to UFO or antigravity research. That requires evidence of motive and linkage — communications referring to the research, surveillance attributable to identifiable actors, attempts to acquire or suppress technical material, financial or organisational connections, admissions, credible witnesses or comparable evidence directly tying the perpetrators to the scientific work.

Without that final bridge, “unusual researcher plus suspicious death” remains a correlation rather than an explanation.

Standards for cautious public conclusions

The strongest public approach is neither to dismiss private evidence automatically nor to let inaccessible evidence carry unlimited weight.

Private messages should be treated as potentially important primary material when their authorship and context can be established. Secondhand testimony should be identified as such rather than silently upgraded into direct evidence. Screenshots should be distinguished from original digital records. Multiple reports should be traced back to determine whether they represent independent corroboration or merely repeated sourcing.

Unreleased official files require equal discipline. Researchers should first determine whether the records would normally be public. In Eskridge’s Alabama case, recent death certificates and law-enforcement investigative files face explicit legal restrictions, so their absence from the open web cannot responsibly be presented as extraordinary secrecy.[Alabama Department of Public Health]alabamapublichealth.govOpen source on alabamapublichealth.gov.

At the same time, restricted access places a genuine ceiling on public certainty. Outsiders cannot independently verify every forensic conclusion while the underlying evidence remains unavailable. “The public record does not prove foul play” is therefore a stronger and more accurate statement than “the public record proves there was no foul play”.

The cases surrounding UFO and antigravity research show why this distinction matters. Ning Li’s supposed disappearance largely dissolved once family testimony and an independently verifiable death record became available. Eugene Mallove’s murder acquired a substantial public criminal record pointing towards a conventional dispute rather than his unconventional-energy advocacy. Amy Eskridge remains harder to assess because important claims come from private communications while core investigative records are not comparably accessible.[huntsvillebusinessjournal.com]huntsvillebusinessjournal.comOpen source on huntsvillebusinessjournal.com.

The appropriate evidential judgement can therefore remain provisional without becoming evasive. There is publicly verifiable evidence that Eskridge made unusual comments about risk and that later witnesses attributed explicit warnings to her. There is not currently comparable public evidence demonstrating that an identifiable person or organisation killed her because of antigravity or UFO-related research. The gap between those two propositions is precisely where careful evaluation of private and public evidence matters most.

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to How Should We Treat Evidence the Public Cannot Inspect?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

Book

The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark

By Carl Sagan, Ann Druyan

Rating: 4.5/5 from 43 Google Books ratings

NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER • From the renowned astronomer and author of Cosmos comes a “powerful [and] stirring defense of informed ration...

See on Amazon

Book

Calling Bullshit: The Art of Skepticism in a Data-Driven World

By Carl T. Bergstrom, Jevin Darwin West

It's not just fake news. Bullshit is everywhere. Now, two science professors give us the tools to dismantle misinformation and think clea...

See on Amazon

Book

The Skeptics' Guide to the Universe: How to Know What's Reall...

By Dr. Steven Novella

An all-encompassing guide to skeptical thinking from podcast host and academic neurologist at Yale University School of Medicine Steven N...

See on Amazon

Book

The Data Detective: Ten Easy Rules to Make Sense of Statistics

By Tim Harford

From “one of the great (greatest?) contemporary popular writers on economics” (Tyler Cowen) comes a smart, lively, and encouraging rethin...

See on Amazon

Browse more on Amazon:The Demon Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the DarkCalling Bullshit: The Art of Skepticism in a Data Driven WorldThe Skeptics' to the Universe: How to Know What's Really Real in a World Increasingly Full of Fake books

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.

Shop location

UsingUSA USA USAUKCanadaAustraliaIreland

Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.

Current eBay listing

FS02 VINTAGE UFO FLYING SAUCERS COMIC ADVERTISING A4 POSTER PRINT

GBP 4.71 | Free shippingNewSeller: andys-prints-uk (99.6% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Current eBay listing

The X-FILES I WANT TO BELIEVE UFO METAL SIGN WALL PLAQUE poster A6 A5 A4 A3

GBP 16.95 | Free shippingNewSeller: metal-plaques-uk (99.5% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Current eBay listing

I WANT TO BELIEVE UFO POSTER TV SERIES POSTER A0-A1-A2-A3-A4-A5-A6-MAXI 191

GBP 15.99 | Free shippingNewSeller: big-print-uk (99.8% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Current eBay listing

UFO Over Desert Highway Sci-Fi Abduction Poster Print Framed Canvas Wall Art

GBP 18.99 | Free shippingNewSeller: paradiseposters (99.4% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Browse more oneBay.co.uk

Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.

Endnotes

1. Source: law.justia.com
Link:https://law.justia.com/codes/alabama/2024/title-12/chapter-21/article-1/division-1/division-1/section-12-21-3-1/

2. Source: congress.gov
Title: CPRT 118HPRT57151
Link:https://www.congress.gov/118/cprt/HPRT57151/CPRT-118HPRT57151.htm

Published: December 1, 2024

3. Source: govinfo.gov
Title: USCODE 2023 title28 app federalru dup2 rule901
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCODE-2023-title28/USCODE-2023-title28-app-federalru-dup2-rule901

4. Source: nist.gov
Title: digital evidence
Link:https://www.nist.gov/itl/ssd/software-quality-group/computer-forensics-tool-testing-program-cftt/digital-evidence

5. Source: nist.gov
Title: Evidence Management | NIST
Link:https://www.nist.gov/forensic-science/interdisciplinary-topics/evidence-management

6. Source: transcripts.cnn.com
Title: Transcripts CNN.com
Link:https://transcripts.cnn.com/show/tsiem/date/2026-04-23/segment/02

7. Source: transcripts.cnn.com
Title: Transcripts CNN.com
Link:https://transcripts.cnn.com/show/ctmo/date/2026-04-25/segment/02

8. Source: law.justia.com
Link:https://law.justia.com/cases/alabama/supreme-court/2002/1011080-3.html

9. Source: law.justia.com
Link:https://law.justia.com/cases/alabama/supreme-court/2010/1090941.html

10. Source: law.justia.com
Link:https://law.justia.com/cases/connecticut/court-of-appeals/2025/ac46658.html

11. Source: cnnpressroom.blogs.cnn.com
Link:https://cnnpressroom.blogs.cnn.com/2026/05/13/cnn-original-series-and-jigsaw-productions-unveil-new-docuseries-mind-vs-machine-the-human-story-of-a-i-from-steve-james-alex-gibney/amp/

12. Source: transcripts.cnn.com
Link:https://transcripts.cnn.com/show/arena/date/2026-04-25/segment/01

13. Source: arabic.cnn.com
Title: us deaths disappearances scientists investigation
Link:https://arabic.cnn.com/amphtml/world/article/2026/04/24/us-deaths-disappearances-scientists-investigation

14. Source: transcripts.cnn.com
Link:https://transcripts.cnn.com/date/2026

15. Source: law.justia.com
Link:https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/alabama/alsdce/1%3A2025cv00325/76259/39/

16. Source: cnnpressroom.blogs.cnn.com
Link:https://cnnpressroom.blogs.cnn.com/2026/02/04/cnn-films-imagine-documentaries-and-storyville-films-announce-betsy-west-julie-cohens-amelia/

17. Source: law.justia.com
Link:https://law.justia.com/cases/connecticut/supreme-court/2025/sc21004.html

18. Source: law.justia.com
Link:https://law.justia.com/cases/connecticut/court-of-appeals/2025/ac46189.html

19. Source: law.justia.com
Link:https://law.justia.com/cases/connecticut/supreme-court/2025/sc21006.html

20. Source: law.justia.com
Link:https://law.justia.com/cases/connecticut/supreme-court/2025/sc20869.html

21. Source: govinfo.gov
Title: 29 CFR § 18.901
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/CFR-2025-title29-vol1/CFR-2025-title29-vol1-sec18-901

22. Source: law.justia.com
Link:https://law.justia.com/cases/connecticut/supreme-court/2025/sc20881.html

23. Source: law.justia.com
Link:https://law.justia.com/cases/connecticut/court-of-appeals/2025/ac48082.html

24. Source: law.justia.com
Link:https://law.justia.com/cases/connecticut/court-of-appeals/2025/ac46470.html

25. Source: law.justia.com
Link:https://law.justia.com/cases/connecticut/court-of-appeals/2025/ac47071.html

26. Source: law.justia.com
Link:https://law.justia.com/cases/connecticut/supreme-court/2025/sc20840.html

27. Source: congress.gov
Title: house committee print
Link:https://www.congress.gov/committee-print/118th-congress/house-committee-print/57151

28. Source: legacy.com
Title: amy eskridge obituary
Link:https://www.legacy.com/us/[obituaries

29. Source: legacy.com
Title: amy eskridge memorial
Link:https://www.legacy.com/us/obituaries/legacyremembers/amy-eskridge-memorial?id=35311909

30. Source: law.justia.com
Link:https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/alabama/alndce/5%3A2021cv00704/177188/51/2.html

31. Source: law.justia.com
Link:https://law.justia.com/cases/alabama/supreme-court/2021/1190106.html

32. Source: nist.gov
Title: framework harmonizing forensic
Link:https://www.nist.gov/adlp/spo/organization-scientific-area-committees-forensic-science/framework-harmonizing-forensic

33. Source: cnnpressroom.blogs.cnn.com
Link:https://cnnpressroom.blogs.cnn.com/2020/12/11/cnn-films-bbc-announce-production-of-documentary-following-scientific-journey-to-covid-19-vaccines-for-premiere-in-spring-2021/amp/

34. Source: transcripts.cnn.com
Link:https://transcripts.cnn.com/show/cg/date/2017-06-16/segment/02

35. Source: money.cnn.com
Link:https://money.cnn.com/2017/04/07/news/companies/nigeria-female-oil-boss-ladol/index.html?iid=INTL_SPC

36. Source: nist.gov
Title: biological evidence guidance
Link:https://www.nist.gov/forensic-science/interdisciplinary-topics/evidence-management/biological-evidence-guidance

37. Source: csrc.nist.rip
Link:https://csrc.nist.rip/pubs/sp/800/101/r1/final

38. Source: nist.gov
Title: biological evidence preservation handbook best practices evidence handlers
Link:https://www.nist.gov/publications/biological-evidence-preservation-handbook-best-practices-evidence-handlers

39. Source: transcripts.cnn.com
Link:https://transcripts.cnn.com/show/ng/date/2011-08-31/segment/01

40. Source: govinfo.gov
Title: 29 CFR 18.901
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/CFR-2010-title29-vol1/CFR-2010-title29-vol1-sec18-901

41. Source: law.justia.com
Link:https://law.justia.com/cases/alabama/supreme-court/2010/1090276.html

42. Source: law.justia.com
Link:https://law.justia.com/cases/alabama/supreme-court/2009/1080242.html

43. Source: transcripts.cnn.com
Link:https://transcripts.cnn.com/show/ng/date/2008-03-25/segment/01

44. Source: csrc.nist.gov
Link:https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/86/final

45. Source: law.justia.com
Link:https://law.justia.com/cases/alabama/supreme-court/2004/1020228-4.html

46. Source: law.justia.com
Link:https://law.justia.com/cases/alabama/supreme-court/2001/1001673-1.html

47. Source: law.justia.com
Link:https://law.justia.com/codes/alabama/2014/title-12/chapter-21/section-12-21-3.1

48. Source: law.justia.com
Link:https://law.justia.com/codes/alabama/title-12/chapter-15/article-1/section-12-15-134/

49. Source: csrc.nist.gov
Title: govchain of evidence
Link:https://csrc.nist.gov/glossary/term/chain_of_evidence

50. Source: csrc.nist.gov
Title: govchain of custody
Link:https://csrc.nist.gov/glossary/term/chain_of_custody

51. Source: legacy.com
Title: Search for Obituaries
Link:https://www.legacy.com/obituaries/search?affiliateId=29

52. Source: obits.al.com
Title: amy eskridge obituary
Link:https://obits.al.com/us/obituaries/huntsville/name/amy-eskridge-obituary?id=35311909

Published: June 21, 2022

53. Source: alabamapublichealth.gov
Link:https://www.alabamapublichealth.gov/vitalrecords/death-certificates.html?iframed=true

54. Source: wsj.com
Link:https://www.wsj.com/politics/national-security/how-a-fringe-conspiracy-theory-about-missing-scientists-got-the-fbis-attention-d61de97c

55. Source: theguardian.com
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/apr/25/conspiracy-theory-ufo-scientists-white-house

56. Source: uscode.house.gov
Title: U.S. Code
Link:https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?edition=prelim&num=0&req=granuleid%3AUSC-prelim-title28a-node232-article9-rule901

57. Source: huntsvillebusinessjournal.com
Link:https://huntsvillebusinessjournal.com/news/2023/07/30/solving-the-mystery-of-huntsvilles-brilliant-scientist-disappearing/

58. Source: berryhillfh.com
Title: Berryhill Funeral Home Ning Li Obituary
Link:https://www.berryhillfh.com/guestbook/ning-li

59. Source: berryhillfh.com
Title: Berryhill Funeral Home Ning Li Obituary
Link:https://www.berryhillfh.com/obituaries/ning-li

60. Source: latimes.com
Link:https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2026-04-21/fbi-probes-missing-or-dead-scientists-including-four-from-la-area

61. Source: obits.al.com
Title: amelia lewis obituary
Link:https://obits.al.com/us/obituaries/birmingham/name/amelia-lewis-obituary?id=61959647

62. Source: obits.al.com
Title: lillian paul obituary
Link:https://obits.al.com/us/obituaries/name/lillian-paul-obituary?id=61856971

63. Source: latimes.com
Link:https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2026-06-17/two-socal-men-are-alleged-co-conspirators-in-plot-to-attack-white-house-ufc-fight?sfmc_id=6532a18025b3640666b6c452&skey_id=705ed08e46f20a200ec84cbe2b2466cb22416589a6e73db97aa77043bc7a67b8

64. Source: latimes.com
Link:https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2026-06-17/two-socal-men-are-alleged-co-conspirators-in-plot-to-attack-white-house-ufc-fight

65. Source: latimes.com
Title: California men allegedly part of plot to attack White House UFC show
Link:https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2026-06-16/multiple-arrests-in-planned-attacks-targeting-white-house-ufc-show

66. Source: latimes.com
Title: Missing worker at high-security lab in N.M. found dead in remote forest
Link:https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2026-06-02/missing-worker-at-high-security-lab-in-n-m-found-dead-in-remote-forest

67. Source: obits.al.com
Title: jennifer payne obituary
Link:https://obits.al.com/us/obituaries/name/jennifer-payne-obituary?id=61623400

68. Source: latimes.com
Title: San Diego shooting: 5 dead in mosque attack; anti-Islam writings found
Link:https://www.latimes.com/california/live/shooting-islamic-center-san-diego-attack

69. Source: alabamapublichealth.gov
Title: Contact Us | Alabama Department of Public Health (ADPH)
Link:https://www.alabamapublichealth.gov/about/contact.html

70. Source: obits.al.com
Title: david langum obituary
Link:https://obits.al.com/us/obituaries/birmingham/name/david-langum-obituary?id=61173256

71. Source: alabamapublichealth.gov
Title: Requesting Access | Alabama Department of Public Health (ADPH)
Link:https://www.alabamapublichealth.gov/edrs/requesting-access.html

72. Source: alabamapublichealth.gov
Title: Frequently Asked Questions | Alabama Department of Public Health (ADPH)
Link:https://www.alabamapublichealth.gov/edrs/faq.html

73. Source: alabamapublichealth.gov
Title: EDR S | Alabama Department of Public Health (ADPH)
Link:https://www.alabamapublichealth.gov/edrs/

74. Source: alabamapublichealth.gov
Title: Vital Records | Alabama Department of Public Health (ADPH)
Link:https://www.alabamapublichealth.gov/houston/vital-records.html

75. Source: obits.al.com
Title: earl porter obituary
Link:https://obits.al.com/us/obituaries/name/earl-porter-obituary?id=61037528

76. Source: obits.al.com
Title: robert falasca obituary
Link:https://obits.al.com/us/obituaries/washingtonpost/name/robert-falasca-obituary?id=60987673

77. Source: latimes.com
Title: la times book prizes finalists 2025
Link:https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/books/story/2026-02-18/la-times-book-prizes-finalists-2025

78. Source: alabamapublichealth.gov
Title: Contact Us | Alabama Department of Public Health (ADPH)
Link:https://www.alabamapublichealth.gov/vitalrecords/contact.html

79. Source: latimes.com
Link:https://www.latimes.com/espanol/internacional/articulo/2026-01-23/ryan-wedding-exolimpico-de-snowboard-en-la-lista-de-mas-buscados-del-fbi-ha-sido-arrestado

80. Source: alabamapublichealth.gov
Title: Vital Records | Alabama Department of Public Health (ADPH)
Link:https://www.alabamapublichealth.gov/marengo/vital-records.html

81. Source: alabamapublichealth.gov
Title: Vital Records | Alabama Department of Public Health (ADPH)
Link:https://www.alabamapublichealth.gov/conecuh/vital-records.html

82. Source: alabamapublichealth.gov
Title: Vital Records | Alabama Department of Public Health (ADPH)
Link:https://www.alabamapublichealth.gov/chambers/vital-records.html

83. Source: obits.al.com
Title: mary horton obituary
Link:https://obits.al.com/us/obituaries/name/mary-horton-obituary?id=55182779

84. Source: alabamapublichealth.gov
Link:https://www.alabamapublichealth.gov/blog/2023/09/sho-september.html

85. Source: ufouap.com
Title: amy eskridge
Link:https://www.ufouap.com/case-files/amy-eskridge/

86. Source: alabamapublichealth.gov
Title: Identification required to request Alabama restricted vital records
Link:https://www.alabamapublichealth.gov/blog/2017/04/25.html

87. Source: latimes.com
Title: Amy Adams bares all about ‘American Hustle’s’ emotional scenes
Link:https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/moviesnow/la-et-mn-amy-adams-american-hustle-20140206-story.html

88. Source: latimes.com
Title: Scientist Angrily Denies Role in Anthrax Attacks
Link:https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2002-aug-12-na-hatfill12-story.html

89. Source: latimes.com
Title: Scientists Weigh In With Deductions on Anthrax Killer
Link:https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2002-apr-21-mn-39193-story.html

90. Source: uscode.house.gov
Link:https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?edition=2010&num=0&req=granuleid%3AUSC-2010-title28a-node253-article9-rule901

91. Source: uscode.house.gov
Link:https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?edition=prelim&path=%2Fprelim%40title28%2Ftitle28a%2Fnode232%2Farticle9

92. Source: uscode.house.gov
Link:https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?edition=1999&req=granuleid%3AUSC-1999-title28a-node246-article9

93. Source: enewspaper.latimes.com
Title: article share.aspx
Link:https://enewspaper.latimes.com/infinity/article_share.aspx?guid=639e6c77-ab68-4253-acb6-dada773984d8

94. Source: law.cornell.edu
Title: rule 901
Link:https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_901

95. Source: theguardian.com
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/education/science

96. Source: theguardian.com
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/uk%2Bscience/science?page=5

97. Source: obits.al.com
Link:https://obits.al.com/obituaries/search?firstName=betty&lastName=rowland

98. Source: obits.al.com
Link:https://obits.al.com/obituaries/search?firstName=charley&lastName=taylor

99. Source: obits.al.com
Link:https://obits.al.com/obituaries/search?firstName=amy&lastName=o

100. Source: obits.al.com
Title: betty rowland obituary
Link:https://obits.al.com/us/obituaries/mobile/name/betty-rowland-obituary?pid=undefined

Additional References

101. Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QatWn2nMQnw

102. Source: youtube.com
Title: The Mystery of Amy Eskridge: Anti-Gravity, NASA, and the Rocket City
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8AdMhAHU8Vo

103. Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90TAHL-NxWw

104. Source: youtube.com
Title: The Mysterious Death of Antigravity Scientist Amy Eskridge | Julian Dorey
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4X4gUnJchpo

105. Source: youtube.com
Title: Amy Eskridge death investigations discrepencies
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bVkcz-WLzk

106. Source: ojp.gov
Link:https://www.ojp.gov/library/publications/evidence-management-steering-committee-report-opportunities-strengthen

107. Source: jud.ct.gov
Link:https://www.jud.ct.gov/lawjournal/Docs/Appellate/2025/5/ap230_8631.pdf

Published: January 28, 2025

108. Source: shinysideout.com.au
Link:https://www.shinysideout.com.au/00-amy-eskridge.html

109. Source: oann.com
Link:https://www.oann.com/newsroom/12th-person-added-to-list-of-missing-or-dead-govt-scientists-and-officials/

110. Source: wegotthiscovered.com
Link:https://wegotthiscovered.com/fyi/a-scientist-claimed-to-have-created-an-anti-gravity-device-then-she-disappeared-20-years-later-her-son-explains-what-really-happened/