Why Frame Dragging Is Not an Antigravity Drive

Introduction

Frame-dragging is real, measured gravitational physics. It is also much less like an “antigravity drive” than the name can make it sound. General relativity predicts that the angular momentum of a rotating mass slightly alters the spacetime around it, producing effects on gyroscope orientations and satellite orbits. Gravity Probe B measured the Earth-induced effect, later laser-ranging experiments tested it through satellite motion, and a 2026 LARES-2 analysis reported agreement with general relativity at roughly the one-part-in-a-thousand level.[aps.org]journals.aps.orgPhysical Review JournalsGravity Probe B: Final Results of a Space Experiment to Test General Relativity | Phys. Rev. Lett.May 31, 2011…Published: May 31, 2011

None of those measurements shows that rotation can screen Earth’s ordinary gravitational attraction, make an object weightless or generate a freely selectable propulsion field. That distinction is particularly important when frame-dragging is invoked in UFO or unconventional-propulsion discussions: confirming that rotating matter affects spacetime establishes the relativistic mechanism, not the much stronger proposition that an engineering device can amplify and exploit it for lift or thrust.

What rotating mass actually does to spacetime

Newtonian gravity does not distinguish between an ideal spherical body that rotates and one that does not when considering its external gravitational field. General relativity does. Mass-energy and momentum source spacetime geometry, so the angular momentum of a rotating body contributes an additional rotational component to its gravitational field. In the weak-field limit this is commonly described as gravitomagnetism, by analogy with the magnetic effects associated with moving electric charge. Frame-dragging, or the Lense-Thirring effect, is one manifestation of that physics.[Einstein Online]einstein-online.infoEinstein Onlineframe-dragging « Einstein-OnlineEinstein Onlineframe-dragging « Einstein-Online

The electromagnetic analogy is useful but potentially misleading. “Gravitomagnetic” does not mean that general relativity supplies a gravitational equivalent of an electromagnet whose field can simply be strengthened until a spacecraft lifts. It describes particular terms in the relativistic gravitational field. Around a rotating body these terms can make a gyroscope’s spin direction precess and can shift the orbital plane of a satellite. The weak-field Lense-Thirring precession falls rapidly with distance — characteristically with the inverse cube of distance in the standard gyroscope expression — and depends on the angular momentum of the source.[Wikipedia]WikipediaLense–Thirring precessionLense–Thirring precession

That behaviour matters when evaluating propulsion claims. Earth’s entire mass, about 6×1024 kilograms, rotating continuously, produces a frame-dragging effect so small that measuring it required exceptionally sensitive experiments. The established phenomenon is therefore not evidence that an ordinary laboratory rotor should create a large gravitational field merely because it spins rapidly.

Nor does frame-dragging mean that the normal gravitational attraction of the rotating body has disappeared. Earth’s ordinary gravitational field continues to pull objects towards the planet while its rotation adds a much smaller relativistic correction. A measurement of that correction is consequently different in kind from demonstrating gravitational shielding, cancellation or reversal.

What Gravity Probe B actually measured

[NASA's Gravity Probe B mission]nasa.govWhat is Gravity Probe B?What is Gravity Probe B? - NASAJune 12, 2020…Published: June 12, 2020 provides the cleanest experimental example of what “detecting frame-dragging” means. Launched in April 2004, the NASA-Stanford spacecraft carried four extremely precise cryogenic gyroscopes in a polar orbit roughly 400 miles above Earth. Their spin axes were monitored relative to a distant guide star. General relativity predicted that spacetime curvature and Earth’s rotation would cause two distinct changes in their orientations: the much larger geodetic effect and the much smaller frame-dragging effect.[NASA]nasa.govWhat is Gravity Probe B?What is Gravity Probe B? - NASAJune 12, 2020…Published: June 12, 2020

The final peer-reviewed results, published in Physical Review Letters in 2011, reported a frame-dragging drift of −37.2 ± 7.2 milliarcseconds per year, compared with the general-relativistic prediction of −39.2 milliarcseconds per year. For comparison, the measured geodetic drift was about −6,602 milliarcseconds per year.[Physical Review Journals]journals.aps.orgPhysical Review JournalsGravity Probe B: Final Results of a Space Experiment to Test General Relativity | Phys. Rev. Lett.May 31, 2011…Published: May 31, 2011

That scale is revealing. Gravity Probe B was not observing a gyroscope being propelled around its spacecraft, levitated or relieved of its weight. It was detecting an extraordinarily slow change in the orientation of its spin axis. The predicted frame-dragging rotation amounted to only a few tens of milliarcseconds over an entire year.

Independent approaches have used laser-ranged satellites instead of onboard gyroscopes. Analyses involving LAGEOS, LAGEOS 2 and later LARES tracked the small relativistic precession of satellite orbital planes while modelling Earth’s much larger conventional gravitational effects. A 2016 LARES/LAGEOS analysis obtained a frame-dragging result normalised to general relativity of 0.994, with an estimated systematic uncertainty of about 5 per cent.[arXiv]arxiv.orgA Test of General Relativity Using the LARES and LAGEOS Satellites and a GRACE Earth's Gravity ModelMarch 29, 2016…Published: March 29, 2016

The precision has since improved substantially. The LARES-2 satellite was launched in July 2022 specifically to improve the terrestrial frame-dragging test. A Nature paper published on 8 July 2026 reported that LARES-2, combined with LAGEOS and GRACE gravity data, measured terrestrial frame-dragging with relative uncertainty at approximately the one-part-in-a-thousand level, an order-of-magnitude improvement over previous Solar System determinations. The authors presented the result as a stringent confirmation of general relativity and a constraint on alternative gravity theories.[ScienceDirect]sciencedirect.comOpen source on sciencedirect.com.

This makes frame-dragging an unusually useful benchmark for extraordinary propulsion claims. It is not merely a theoretical curiosity: physicists can calculate its expected magnitude and have increasingly precise observations against which anomalous “gravitomagnetic” effects can be compared.

Why measurement is not propulsion

The conceptual jump from “rotation alters spacetime” to “rotation can propel a craft” skips several separate requirements. A usable propulsion mechanism would need not merely a detectable relativistic perturbation but a controllable effect capable of producing the required acceleration of the craft.

Three distinctions are especially important.

Precession is not lift. Gravity Probe B measured an angular drift of gyroscope spin axes. Satellite experiments measure changes in orbital elements. Neither is a demonstration of an upward force cancelling mg, the familiar gravitational force acting on an object near Earth’s surface.

A field generated by a massive external body is not automatically a self-propulsion mechanism. A spacecraft can certainly exploit an external gravitational field — conventional gravity-assist manoeuvres do so — but that is different from a closed device generating net thrust simply by moving its own components. Showing that angular momentum enters the gravitational field equations does not by itself establish a reactionless drive.

Detectability is not engineering usefulness. Relativistic effects can be measured even when they are fantastically small by propulsion standards. Gravity Probe B illustrates the point: a spacecraft and sophisticated cryogenic instrumentation were required to resolve the tiny frame-dragging contribution produced by the rotating Earth itself.[Physical Review Journals]journals.aps.orgPhysical Review JournalsGravity Probe B: Final Results of a Space Experiment to Test General Relativity | Phys. Rev. Lett.May 31, 2011…Published: May 31, 2011

This does not prove that every conceivable future manipulation of gravity is impossible. It sets a much narrower and more useful evidential standard. A proposed propulsion field that exceeds ordinary frame-dragging by many orders of magnitude needs a new physical mechanism and evidence for that enhancement; the existence of ordinary frame-dragging cannot supply the missing evidence.

The superconducting-rotor claims test the distinction directly

The most relevant experimental episode for antigravity discussions is not Gravity Probe B itself but work in the 2000s on rapidly rotating cryogenic rings. Martin Tajmar and collaborators investigated whether rotating superconductors might produce anomalously large gravitomagnetic effects. Their 2006 report described acceleration signals outside a rotating superconducting system of roughly 10−4g and explicitly said that, if confirmed, the observations could indicate a laboratory gravitomagnetic field far beyond the ordinary general-relativistic expectation.[arXiv]arxiv.orgarXiv Experimental Detection of the Gravitomagnetic London MomentarXiv Experimental Detection of the Gravitomagnetic London Moment

This is important because the proposed effect was not simply “Einstein’s frame-dragging, now made useful”. The expected general-relativistic gravitomagnetic effect of such laboratory apparatus is vastly smaller. The researchers were considering additional physics associated with superconducting matter, partly motivated by an earlier reported anomaly in measurements of Cooper-pair mass. A theoretical proposal invoked a “gravitomagnetic London moment”, analogous in terminology to the ordinary magnetic London moment of a rotating superconductor.[arXiv]arxiv.orgOpen source on arxiv.org.

The European Space Agency discussed this line of investigation publicly, including its potentially significant technological implications if the apparent effect survived further testing. But ESA’s own study description also noted that a straightforward conventional calculation makes the expected gravitomagnetic correction far too small to account for the proposed anomaly.[European Space Agency]esa.intARI studyARI study

Follow-up work complicated rather than cleanly established the claim. A 2007 experiment reported frame-dragging-like signals near spinning rings at cryogenic temperatures, including an unexpected dependence on rotation direction. Crucially, the authors also found that several theoretical models predicting very large superconducting frame-dragging could themselves be excluded by the measurements by as much as four orders of magnitude.[arXiv]arxiv.orgarXiv Search for Frame-Dragging-Like Signals Close to Spinning SuperconductorsarXiv Search for Frame-Dragging-Like Signals Close to Spinning Superconductors

A subsequent fibre-optic gyroscope experiment reported anomalous signals about eight orders of magnitude smaller than the angular velocity applied to the ring. Yet those signals appeared primarily for one direction of rotation, and tests pointed towards rotating low-temperature helium as a possible source rather than establishing a superconductivity-generated gravitational field.[arXiv]arxiv.orgOpen source on arxiv.org.

That history illustrates precisely why “frame-dragging-like” and “frame-dragging” cannot be treated as interchangeable labels. A sensor response correlated with rotation may resemble a predicted gravitational signature, but identifying its cause requires excluding mechanical coupling, vibration, magnetic effects, gas motion, thermal effects and instrumental artefacts. If an observed field were enormously stronger than general relativity predicts, ordinary Lense-Thirring physics would not explain the discrepancy; it would make the discrepancy more conspicuous.

The magnitude gap is the key test

The strongest comparison between established frame-dragging and propulsion-field claims is therefore quantitative rather than semantic.

For Earth, scientists start with a known rotating mass and angular momentum, calculate the expected relativistic perturbation, and then search for that tiny signal among much larger Newtonian and instrumental effects. Gravity Probe B found −37.2 ± 7.2 milliarcseconds per year against a prediction of −39.2. Satellite laser ranging has progressively tightened the comparison, culminating in the 2026 LARES-2 result at approximately the 0.1 per cent uncertainty level.[Physical Review Journals]journals.aps.orgPhysical Review JournalsGravity Probe B: Final Results of a Space Experiment to Test General Relativity | Phys. Rev. Lett.May 31, 2011…Published: May 31, 2011

A laboratory propulsion claim normally runs in the opposite direction: an unexpectedly large force or sensor signal is observed and gravity is proposed as its explanation. The decisive question then becomes whether the apparatus possesses enough mass-energy and angular momentum to produce a field of that magnitude under general relativity. If the answer is no by many orders of magnitude, citing frame-dragging does not rescue the claim. It means that the claim requires physics beyond the measured frame-dragging mechanism.

This gives a practical way to assess claims that appear in UFO or antigravity literature:

NASA’s former Breakthrough Propulsion Physics programme illustrates the difference between investigating such possibilities and claiming their achievement. The programme explicitly considered questions such as gravity-electromagnetism coupling and propulsion without propellant, but described these as speculative, long-range research problems for which credible experiments were needed.[NASA Technical Reports Server]ntrs.nasa.govTechnical Reports Server NASA Breakthrough Propulsion Physics ProgramTechnical Reports Server NASA Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Program

What frame-dragging contributes to the antigravity debate

Frame-dragging occupies an unusual position in discussions of unconventional propulsion because one part of the apparently exotic premise is unquestionably correct: rotation really does affect gravity. General relativity predicted the effect, and increasingly precise measurements have found the expected signatures around Earth.[Einstein Online]einstein-online.infoEinstein Onlineframe-dragging « Einstein-OnlineEinstein Onlineframe-dragging « Einstein-Online

But the experimentally established effect is a poor shortcut to an antigravity conclusion. Gravity Probe B did not show gravity being screened. LAGEOS and LARES did not show mass becoming lighter. LARES-2 did not demonstrate reactionless thrust. They measured relativistic changes in orientation and orbital motion produced by the angular momentum of an enormous rotating planet.

The superconducting-rotor experiments are valuable precisely because they explored the more consequential possibility: whether particular states of matter might generate rotational gravitational effects enormously stronger than standard general relativity predicts. The reported anomalies did not mature into an established propulsion mechanism, and later work introduced unresolved features and possible non-gravitational explanations rather than providing the independent, reproducible demonstration that such a conclusion would require.[arXiv]arxiv.orgarXiv Search for Frame-Dragging-Like Signals Close to Spinning SuperconductorsarXiv Search for Frame-Dragging-Like Signals Close to Spinning Superconductors

For claims connecting UFO performance, antigravity research or alleged suppression of scientists to secret “gravity-control” technology, frame-dragging therefore establishes much less than is sometimes implied. It proves that rotation and spacetime are coupled. It supplies precise predictions against which experiments can be tested. What it does not supply is evidence that a laboratory rotor can cancel Earth’s gravitational attraction, amplify gravitomagnetism by extraordinary factors or accelerate a vehicle without an independently demonstrated source of force and momentum transfer. The difference between those propositions is the difference between a measured prediction of general relativity and an unverified propulsion-field claim.

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to Why Frame Dragging Is Not an Antigravity Drive. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

Book

General Relativity: The Essentials

By Carlo Rovelli

A straightforward introduction to General Relativity, explaining the physical, philosophical and mathematical ideas it is built on.

See on Amazon

Book

Gravity: An Introduction to Einstein's General Relativity

By James B. Hartle

Einstein's theory of general relativity is a cornerstone of modern physics. It also touches upon a wealth of topics that students find fa...

See on Amazon

Book

Gravity: How the Weakest Force in the Universe Shaped Our Lives

By Brian Clegg

A history of gravity, and a study of its importance and relevance to our lives, as well as its influence on other areas of science. Physi...

See on Amazon

Book

Einstein Gravity in a Nutshell

By A. Zee

An ideal introduction to Einstein's general theory of relativity This unique textbook provides an accessible introduction to Einstein's g...

See on Amazon

Browse more on Amazon:General Relativity: The EssentialsGravity: An to Einstein's General Relativity booksGravity: How the Weakest Force in the Universe Shaped Our Lives

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.

Shop location

UsingUSA USA USAUKCanadaAustraliaIreland

Selected fromgravity physics poster oneBay.co.uk.

Related eBay result

Earth gravity funny physics Framed Framed Wall Art Poster Canvas Print Picture

GBP 14.99 | Shipping GBP 4.95NewSeller: silkframe (99.7% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Related eBay result

Vintage GRAVITY APPLE TREE Wall Art, Physics Science Decor, Isaac Newton Poster

GBP 39.09 | Shipping GBP 3.55NewSeller: cult kindness (99.6% positive)Ships from: US

View listing on eBay

Related eBay result

Dark Energy Gravity Physics Teacher Framed Wall Art Poster Canvas Print Picture

GBP 14.99 | Shipping GBP 4.95NewSeller: silkframe (99.7% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Browse more oneBay.co.uk

Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.

References

• NASA’s Gravity Probe B mission

Endnotes

1. Source: nature.com
Title: LARES-2 satellite measures frame-dragging effect around the Earth | Nature
Link:https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-10715-0

2. Source: einstein-online.info
Title: Einstein Onlineframe-dragging « Einstein-Online
Link:https://www.einstein-online.info/en/explandict/frame-dragging/

3. Source: arxiv.org
Title: arXiv Elementary derivation of the Lense-Thirring precession
Link:https://arxiv.org/abs/0808.0397

4. Source: Wikipedia
Title: Lense–Thirring precession
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lense%E2%80%93Thirring_precession

5. Source: nasa.gov
Title: What is Gravity Probe B?
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/image-article/what-gravity-probe-b/

Published: June 12, 2020

6. Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Title: Technical Reports Server The gravity probe B relativity gyroscope program
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19900010644.pdf

7. Source: arxiv.org
Link:https://arxiv.org/abs/1105.3456

8. Source: arxiv.org
Link:https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.09674

Published: March 29, 2016

9. Source: sciencedirect.com
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094576525003546

10. Source: arxiv.org
Title: arXiv Experimental Detection of the Gravitomagnetic London Moment
Link:https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0603033

11. Source: arxiv.org
Link:https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0602591

12. Source: esa.int
Title: ARI study 06 1301
Link:https://www.esa.int/gsp/ACT/doc/ARI/ARI%20Call%20doc/Study%20descriptions/ARI_study_06-1301.pdf

13. Source: esa.int
Title: European Space Agency ESA
Link:https://www.esa.int/Enabling_Support/Preparing_for_the_Future/Discovery_and_Preparation/Towards_a_new_test_of_general_relativity

14. Source: arxiv.org
Title: arXiv Search for Frame-Dragging-Like Signals Close to Spinning Superconductors
Link:https://arxiv.org/abs/0707.3806

15. Source: arxiv.org
Link:https://arxiv.org/abs/0806.2271

16. Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Title: Technical Reports Server NASA Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Program
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19980201240.pdf

17. Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/16245702165902

18. Source: ilrs.gsfc.nasa.gov
Link:https://ilrs.gsfc.nasa.gov/about/reports/biblio/bibliography.2026.html

19. Source: jpl.nasa.gov
Title: fires up powerful lithium fed thruster for trips to mars
Link:https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/nasa-fires-up-powerful-lithium-fed-thruster-for-trips-to-mars/

20. Source: techport.nasa.gov
Link:https://techport.nasa.gov/projects/9509

21. Source: science.nasa.gov
Title: chapter3 2
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/learn/basics-of-space-flight/chapter3-2/

22. Source: heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov
Link:https://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/xte/Greatest_Hits/frame.html

23. Source: science.gsfc.nasa.gov
Link:https://science.gsfc.nasa.gov/sci/projects/474/

24. Source: science.gsfc.nasa.gov
Link:https://science.gsfc.nasa.gov/earth/geodesy/projects/474/

25. Source: science.gsfc.nasa.gov
Link:https://science.gsfc.nasa.gov/699/projects/474/

26. Source: espo.nasa.gov
Link:https://espo.nasa.gov/impacts/content/An_improved_test_of_the_general_relativistic_effect_of_frame-dragging_using_the_LARES_and

27. Source: nasa.gov
Title: Four Gyroscopes
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/image-article/four-gyroscopes/

28. Source: nasa.gov
Title: Leonard Schiff and Birth of Gravity Probe B
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/image-article/leonard-schiff-birth-of-gravity-probe-b/

29. Source: nasa.gov
Title: Results and Implications
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/image-article/results-implications/

30. Source: nasa.gov
Title: A Breakthrough Propulsion Architecture for Interstellar Precursor Missions
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/general/a-breakthrough-propulsion-architecture-for-interstellar-precursor-missions/

31. Source: nature.com
Link:https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-017-02558-1

32. Source: sciencedirect.com
Title: Mach-Effect thruster model
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0094576517308111

33. Source: nasa.gov
Title: Gradient Field Imploding Liner Fusion Propulsion System
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/general/gradient-field-imploding-liner-fusion-propulsion-system/

34. Source: sciencedirect.com
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0273117715007322

35. Source: ilrs.gsfc.nasa.gov
Title: gp b general
Link:https://ilrs.gsfc.nasa.gov/missions/satellite_missions/past_missions/gp-b_general.html

36. Source: einstein-new.stanford.edu
Link:https://einstein-new.stanford.edu/highlights/status1.html

37. Source: news.stanford.edu
Title: s gravity probe b confirms two einstein theories
Link:https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2011/05/stanfords-gravity-probe-b-confirms-two-einstein-theories

38. Source: einstein.stanford.edu
Link:https://einstein.stanford.edu/highlights/status1.html

39. Source: einstein-new.stanford.edu
Title: results nasa hq
Link:https://einstein-new.stanford.edu/Media/results-nasa_hq.html

40. Source: einstein.stanford.edu
Title: hl 042611
Link:https://einstein.stanford.edu/highlights/hl_042611.html

41. Source: sciencedirect.com
Title: Escape trajectories of solar sails and general relativity
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269309012611

42. Source: einstein.stanford.edu
Title: hl 111209
Link:https://einstein.stanford.edu/highlights/hl_111209.html

43. Source: einstein.stanford.edu
Title: hl 021609
Link:https://einstein.stanford.edu/highlights/hl_021609.html

44. Source: pwg.gsfc.nasa.gov
Link:https://pwg.gsfc.nasa.gov/stargaze/Srelativ.htm

45. Source: sciencedirect.com
Title: Experiment to detect frame dragging in a lead superconductor
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921453407013937

46. Source: sciencedirect.com
Title: Experiment to detect frame dragging in a lead superconductor
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0921453407013937

47. Source: einstein.stanford.edu
Title: hl 120507
Link:https://einstein.stanford.edu/highlights/hl_120507.html

48. Source: nature.com
Title: Dragging of inertial frames | Nature
Link:https://www.nature.com/articles/nature06071

49. Source: sciencedirect.com
Title: Determination of frame-dragging using Earth gravity models from CHAMP and GRACE
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1384107606000182

50. Source: esa.int
Link:https://www.esa.int/ESA_Multimedia/Images/2006/03/Experiment_in_ARC_Seibersdorf_research

51. Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20060000022.pdf

52. Source: sciencedirect.com
Title: Gravitomagnetic London moment and the graviton mass inside a superconductor
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0921453405006210

53. Source: sciencedirect.com
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0094576505001682

54. Source: sciencedirect.com
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0921453405000390

55. Source: pwg.gsfc.nasa.gov
Link:https://pwg.gsfc.nasa.gov/stargaze/Lrotfram.htm

56. Source: nature.com
Link:https://www.nature.com/articles/nature03007

57. Source: nature.com
Title: Frame-dragging confirmed | Nature
Link:https://www.nature.com/articles/431918a

58. Source: nature.com
Title: Spinning Earth twists space: Nature News
Link:https://www.nature.com/news/2004/041018/full/news041018-11.html

59. Source: sciencedirect.com
Title: Gravitomagnetic field of a rotating superconductor and of a rotating superfluid
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921453402023055

60. Source: sciencedirect.com
Title: Gravitomagnetic field of a rotating superconductor and of a rotating superfluid
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0921453402023055

61. Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20040001714

62. Source: imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov
Link:https://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/news/07nov97.html

63. Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19980017317

64. Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19960025450.pdf

65. Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19920000527

66. Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19890018085.pdf

67. Source: einstein-online.info
Link:https://www.einstein-online.info/en/explandict/gravitomagnetism/

68. Source: einstein-online.info
Link:https://www.einstein-online.info/en/essentials/dictionary/?glossary4en-letter=F

69. Source: nature.com
Link:https://www.nature.com/nature-index/topics/l4/relativistic-phenomena-in-rotating-systems

70. Source: nature.com
Link:https://www.nature.com/nature/articles?page=10&searchType=journalSearch&sort=PubDate&year=2026

71. Source: nature.com
Link:https://www.nature.com/nature/articles?page=4&searchType=journalSearch&sort=PubDate&type=article

72. Source: nature.com
Link:https://www.nature.com/nature/articles?page=4&searchType=journalSearch&type=article

73. Source: nature.com
Title: research articles
Link:https://www.nature.com/nature/research-articles?page=4&searchType=journalSearch&sort=PubDate&type=article

74. Source: sciencedirect.com
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1384107611001205

75. Source: sciencedirect.com
Title: Frame-dragging, gravitomagnetism and Lunar Laser Ranging
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1384107609001109

76. Source: sciencedirect.com
Title: Homopolar artificial gravity generator based on frame-dragging
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094576509005128

77. Source: sciencedirect.com
Title: Frame-dragging, gravitomagnetism and Lunar Laser Ranging
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1384107609001109

78. Source: sciencedirect.com
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/author/6701804819/ignazio-ciufolini

79. Source: sciencedirect.com
Title: Inertial frames and breakthrough propulsion physics
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094576516314011

80. Source: sciencedirect.com
Title: NAS A breakthrough propulsion physics program
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094576599000454/pdf?md5=319c44c42d46bdc84bf89b7db0baa40c&pid=1-s2.0-S0094576599000454-main.pdf

81. Source: sciencedirect.com
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273117706006259

82. Source: sciencedirect.com
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032063306002364

83. Source: ael.gsfc.nasa.gov
Link:https://ael.gsfc.nasa.gov/earth/geodesy/projects/474

84. Source: airbornescience.nasa.gov
Link:https://airbornescience.nasa.gov/nsrc/content/An_improved_test_of_the_general_relativistic_effect_of_frame-dragging_using_the_LARES_and_0

85. Source: www1.grc.nasa.gov
Title: rocket control
Link:https://www1.grc.nasa.gov/beginners-guide-to-aeronautics/rocket-control/

86. Source: einstein.stanford.edu
Link:https://einstein.stanford.edu/MISSION/mission1.html

87. Source: einstein.stanford.edu
Title: hl 061107
Link:https://einstein.stanford.edu/highlights/hl_061107.html

88. Source: einstein.stanford.edu
Title: hl 060807
Link:https://einstein.stanford.edu/highlights/hl_060807.html

89. Source: profiles.stanford.edu
Title: bradford parkinson
Link:https://profiles.stanford.edu/bradford-parkinson?tab=bio

90. Source: einstein.stanford.edu
Title: faqs 2005
Link:https://einstein.stanford.edu/content/faqs/faqs_2005.html

91. Source: einstein.stanford.edu
Link:https://einstein.stanford.edu/Media/

92. Source: einstein.stanford.edu
Link:https://einstein.stanford.edu/SPACETIME/spacetime4.html

93. Source: journals.aps.org
Link:https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.221101

Published: May 31, 2011

94. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4946852/

95. Source: journals.aps.org
Link:https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.084039

96. Source: meetings-archive.aps.org
Title: apr r20
Link:https://meetings-archive.aps.org/smt/2025/apr-r20/8/

97. Source: space.oscar.wmo.int
Title: lares 2
Link:https://space.oscar.wmo.int/satellites/view/lares_2

98. Source: journals.aps.org
Link:https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.024027

99. Source: journals.aps.org
Link:https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.051103

100. Source: physics.aps.org
Link:https://physics.aps.org/articles/v4/43

101. Source: ouci.dntb.gov.ua
Title: l Dd J5n8Y
Link:https://ouci.dntb.gov.ua/en/works/lDdJ5n8Y/

Additional References

102. Source: youtube.com
Title: NASA Gravity Probe finds space-time vortex and proves Einstein was right!
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKJCkqHsiZU

103. Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eira9klYoRU

104. Source: youtube.com
Title: How Black Holes Spin Space Time
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UjgGdGzDFiM

105. Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/386729115_A_Test_of_General_Relativity_Using_the_LARES_and_LAGEOS_Satellites_and_a_GRACE_Earth%27s_Gravity_Model

106. Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321456812_A_new_laser-ranged_satellite_for_General_Relativity_and_space_geodesy_III_De_Sitter_effect_and_the_LARES_2_space_experiment

107. Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/297605527_A_test_of_general_relativity_using_the_LARES_and_LAGEOS_satellites_and_a_GRACE_Earth_gravity_model

108. Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/231030072_Evaluation_of_enhanced_frame-dragging_in_the_vicinity_of_a_rotating_niobium_superconductor_liquid_helium_and_a_helium_superfluid

109. Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/399075740_From_Galactic_Angular_Momentum_to_Local_Propulsion_A_Unified_View_of_Gravitational_Emergence_and_Engineered_Momentum_Systems_and_the_Critical_Test_from_Ultra-Low_Angular_Momentum_Galaxies

110. Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/1968324_Gravitomagnetic_Fields_in_Rotating_Superconductors_due_to_Fractal_Space-Time

111. Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/399617583_MIND_Dragging_A_Dynamic_Reference-Frame_Framework_for_Galaxy_Rotation_Coherence_Without_Dark_Matter