Branchoria UFO Research Deaths UFO Research Deaths

Evidence-led scrutiny of deaths, disappearances and suppression claims around unconventional research.

Within Credentials

What Ning Li's Army Funding Really Establishes

US Army funding confirms official interest in testing Ning Li's model, but it does not by itself show successful antigravity results or later coercion.

174 sources 3 graphics
Preview for What Ning Li's Army Funding Really Establishes

On this page

  • What the funded experimental programme was meant to test
  • Which conclusions the funding record can support
  • Why a defence contract cannot establish suppression or homicide

Introduction

The strongest documentary point in Ning Li’s story is also narrower than it is sometimes made to sound: the US Army really did fund her company to investigate an unconventional superconductivity-and-gravity concept. Contemporary records identify an Army Aviation and Missile Command project called the “Gravito-Electro Magnetic Superconductivity Experiment”, beginning in April 2001, with roughly $449,000 in US government funding.[ZPEnergy]zpenergy.comGravity-Waves & Missing Scientists at American Antigravity19 Jul 2004 —…

Army Funding illustration 1
Explanatory illustration 1

That establishes genuine official interest. It shows that defence officials considered Li’s proposed effect sufficiently interesting to warrant a prototype experiment rather than merely leaving it as an academic speculation. It does not establish that the experiment produced antigravity, that the Army secretly developed a working propulsion system, or that Li’s later low public profile resulted from coercion or suppression.

That distinction matters because the funding record is unusually good evidence for one proposition — the Army wanted the claim tested — but very weak evidence for the much larger claims subsequently built around it.

What the Army programme was meant to test

Li’s Army-funded work did not appear from nowhere. During the 1990s, while associated with the University of Alabama in Huntsville, she and Douglas Torr developed theoretical arguments about possible gravitational or gravitomagnetic effects associated with superconductors. One of their papers appeared in the American Physical Society’s Physical Review B in 1992.[APS Link]link.aps.orgNing Li and D. G. Torr… Physical Review B™ is a trademark of the American…

The proposal was controversial even within the technical literature. In 1994, Mark Kowitt published a Physical Review B critique arguing that Li and Torr had grossly overestimated the proposed gravitomagnetic effect because of the way magnetic permeability had been interpreted in their superconductivity model.[Physical Review Journals]journals.aps.orgPhysical Review Journals Physical Review BPhysical Review JournalsPhysical Review B - Recent Articles… This is important context for understanding the later Army award: the government was not buying a technology already established by scientific consensus. It was investigating a disputed physical proposition.

There had also been experimental work. A 1997 paper by Li and colleagues, including researchers associated with NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center, tested type-II yttrium-barium-copper-oxide superconductors with a sensitive gravimeter. Rather than demonstrating a large gravitational anomaly, the experiment found changes in acceleration smaller than two parts in 100 million of normal gravitational acceleration, thereby placing limits on the proposed effect under those static experimental conditions. NASA’s Technical Reports Server preserves the paper as a public record.[ScienceDirect]sciencedirect.comStatic test for a gravitational force coupled to type II YBCO superconductors - ScienceDirectAugust 1, 1997…Published: August 1, 1997

The subsequent Army project was therefore a move from speculative theory and preliminary experimental investigation towards a more purpose-built prototype test. Surviving reproductions of the Department of Defense’s FY2001 reporting identify:

  • agreement DAAH01-01-9-R001;[zpenergy.com]zpenergy.comGravity-Waves & Missing Scientists at American Antigravity.ComAgreement Number: DAAH01-01-9-R001 Type of Agreement: Other Transac… * the agreement type as an “Other Transaction for Prototype”;[zpenergy.com]zpenergy.comGravity-Waves & Missing Scientists at American Antigravity.ComAgreement Number: DAAH01-01-9-R001 Type of Agreement: Other Transac… * the title “Gravito - Electro Magnetic Superconductivity Experiment”;[zpenergy.com]zpenergy.comGravity-Waves & Missing Scientists at American Antigravity.ComAgreement Number: DAAH01-01-9-R001 Type of Agreement: Other Transac… * the awarding office as the US Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM);[zpenergy.com]zpenergy.comGravity-Waves & Missing Scientists at American Antigravity19 Jul 2004 —…
  • Li’s company, AC Gravity, as the recipient;
  • an effective date of 25 April 2001 and completion date of 25 September 2002;
  • $448,970 in US government funding.[thelivingmoon.com]thelivingmoon.comThe Living Moon Gravity-Waves & Missing Scientists at American Antigravity.ComThe Living MoonGravity-Waves & Missing Scientists at American Antigravity.ComJuly 19, 2004…Published: July 19, 2004

The surviving description says the programme concerned Li’s theoretical model in which an externally applied magnetic field acting on a superconducting disc might generate a significant gravitational field.[The Living Moon]thelivingmoon.comThe Living Moon Gravity-Waves & Missing Scientists at American Antigravity.ComThe Living MoonGravity-Waves & Missing Scientists at American Antigravity.ComJuly 19, 2004…Published: July 19, 2004

That wording is significant. It describes an experimental proposition to be investigated, not an already demonstrated capability being purchased for deployment.

What the funding record actually establishes

Defence funding can sound more evidentially powerful than it is. A contract number, an Army command and a dollar figure create an understandable impression that the government must already have known that the underlying technology worked. Research and prototype programmes do not operate on that assumption.

The Department of Defense uses prototype “other transaction” arrangements precisely to pursue research and development outside the structure of an ordinary procurement contract. Modern congressional descriptions of the mechanism emphasise its flexibility for research, prototyping and production efforts.[GovInfo]govinfo.govCRPT 118srpt188CRPT 118srpt188 A prototype award therefore records a decision that something is worth investigating; it is not equivalent to military certification of the underlying scientific claim.

For Li, the record can reasonably support three conclusions.

First, US defence interest was real. Claims that Li’s military connection was invented later by UFO writers are contradicted by the identifiable Army agreement. The relevant organisation was not an unnamed intelligence agency but Army Aviation and Missile Command, an obvious potential customer for any genuine breakthrough affecting propulsion, vehicle weight or missile technology.[ZPEnergy]zpenergy.comGravity-Waves & Missing Scientists at American Antigravity19 Jul 2004 —…

Secondly, officials were willing to spend meaningful money on an experimental test. Nearly $449,000 in 2001 was more than a token expression of curiosity. The designation “Other Transaction for Prototype” reinforces the point that this was intended as experimental development rather than simply a literature review.[The Living Moon]thelivingmoon.comThe Living Moon Anti-gravity and the Search for DrNing-Li… DAAH01-01-9-R001. Type of Agreement: Other Transaction for Prototype…

Thirdly, the award does not tell us the experimental outcome. Publicly accessible sources located for the later history do not contain a final Army report demonstrating a gravity-modification effect. The Huntsville Business Journal, in its 2023 investigation of Li’s subsequent life, likewise reported that the grant’s results were never published.[Huntsville Business Journal]huntsvillebusinessjournal.comOpen source on huntsvillebusinessjournal.com.

That last point creates an evidence gap, but an evidence gap has to remain an evidence gap. “No public result” cannot safely be converted into “successful classified result”.

Army Funding illustration 2
Explanatory illustration 2

Why the absence of results is not proof of success

The most tempting inference in the Ning Li story runs as follows: the Army funded an antigravity experiment; Li stopped publishing soon afterwards; therefore the experiment probably worked and the technology was classified.

The first two observations have documentary support. The conclusion does not follow from them.

Several possibilities can produce the same public record. An experimental programme can fail. It can produce ambiguous measurements. Equipment or materials can prove inadequate. A contractor can fail to complete all reporting requirements. A programme can end without a publishable result. Information can also be restricted for defence reasons. Merely observing that no public final technical report has surfaced does not distinguish between those explanations.

The state of the public scientific evidence makes caution particularly important. Li’s own earlier static experiment did not report the dramatic gravity reduction sometimes associated with popular descriptions of superconducting “gravity shielding”; it instead imposed a stringent upper limit under the tested conditions.[ScienceDirect]sciencedirect.comStatic test for a gravitational force coupled to type II YBCO superconductors - ScienceDirectAugust 1, 1997…Published: August 1, 1997 Her theoretical approach had also received a specific peer-reviewed criticism years before the Army award.[Physical Review Journals]journals.aps.orgPhysical Review Journals Physical Review BPhysical Review JournalsPhysical Review B - Recent Articles…

There is evidence that Li remained engaged with the subject after the nominal end of the Army agreement. At a 2003 MITRE gravitational-wave meeting she presented “Measurability of AC Gravity Fields”, a paper exploring the proposed generation and measurement of alternating gravitational fields using high-temperature superconducting systems. A surviving meeting account records her presentation, while copies of the paper’s abstract describe the work in theoretical and prospective terms.[google.com]groups.google.comOpen source on google.com.

That is useful chronology, but it is not independent replication of a working antigravity device.

A much-repeated further claim comes from a private 2003 email attributed to Li in which she reportedly referred to an “11 kilowatts of output effect”. The Huntsville Business Journal reported the email but correctly noted that the meaning of the figure is unclear. Without the apparatus description, calibration data, controls, error analysis and an independently verifiable experimental report, the phrase cannot establish a gravitational output of 11 kilowatts — much less a practical propulsion system.[Huntsville Business Journal]huntsvillebusinessjournal.comOpen source on huntsvillebusinessjournal.com.

In other words, there is an important asymmetry in the surviving evidence: the funding is considerably better documented than the claimed breakthrough.

The Anti-Gravity Scientist Who Vanished: Dr. Ning Li

Channel: The Future Past

Open on YouTube

Why an Army contract cannot establish suppression or homicide

This distinction becomes especially important when Ning Li is placed in narratives about disappeared or suspiciously harmed antigravity researchers.

An Army research relationship could, in principle, explain why some technical information was not openly published. But that possibility is fundamentally different from demonstrating that Li was forcibly silenced. To establish suppression, one would need evidence connecting a government or other actor to a deliberate restriction imposed on her against her wishes. To establish an attempted killing or homicide would require much stronger evidence again.

The funding document supplies neither.

Later reporting also substantially changes the popular image of Li as a scientist who simply “vanished” after receiving defence money. In 2023, the Huntsville Business Journal interviewed her son, George Men. According to his account, Li continued defence-related work and became much less able to discuss it publicly, but she remained in Huntsville. He also described a catastrophic 2014 road accident in which Li was struck by a vehicle while crossing the University of Alabama in Huntsville campus. She suffered permanent brain injury and subsequently required extensive care; she died in Huntsville on 27 July 2021.[Huntsville Business Journal]huntsvillebusinessjournal.comOpen source on huntsvillebusinessjournal.com.

That family account is relevant because it replaces the literal-disappearance narrative with a much more ordinary chronology. It does not independently settle every question about what Li worked on during the intervening years, and statements about classified work cannot be treated as proof of successful classified antigravity research. But physical absence from public scientific publishing is not the same thing as an unexplained disappearance.

Nor does the documented 2014 accident become evidence of an assassination attempt merely because Li had previously received Army funding. Establishing such a connection would require evidence about the accident itself — for example, evidence of deliberate targeting or a documented link between those responsible and an actor seeking to suppress Li’s research. The existence of a 2001 research agreement thirteen years earlier supplies no such causal link.

Army Funding illustration 3
Explanatory illustration 3

The crucial distinction: interest, validation and operational success

The Ning Li case becomes much easier to assess when three propositions that are often collapsed together are kept separate.

Official interest is established. The US Army funded AC Gravity to conduct a prototype experiment explicitly concerned with Li’s superconductivity-and-gravity concept. That is a significant historical fact and should not be minimised.[The Living Moon]thelivingmoon.comThe Living Moon Gravity-Waves & Missing Scientists at American Antigravity.ComThe Living MoonGravity-Waves & Missing Scientists at American Antigravity.ComJuly 19, 2004…Published: July 19, 2004

Scientific validation is not established by the award. Li’s underlying ideas remained contested, her earlier static experimental work had produced a stringent null constraint rather than a dramatic gravity anomaly, and a peer-reviewed critique challenged an important element of the theoretical treatment.[ScienceDirect]sciencedirect.comStatic test for a gravitational force coupled to type II YBCO superconductors - ScienceDirectAugust 1, 1997…Published: August 1, 1997

Operational antigravity technology is still less well established. A working military capability would require evidence beyond a research award: reproducible measurements, technical reports demonstrating the effect, independent replication, performance data or comparable documentation. The public funding record contains none of those things.

This is precisely why the Army contract is valuable evidence when assessing Ning Li — but only if its evidential limits are respected. It prevents one overcorrection, the claim that serious institutions never investigated her ideas. They plainly did. At the same time, it provides no warrant for the opposite overcorrection, in which government curiosity is treated as government confirmation.

What the record leaves unresolved

There remains a legitimate historical question about exactly what happened during the 2001–02 AC Gravity programme. The identifiable award gives unusually specific information about who funded it, how much was provided, what the experiment was called and what it was intended to investigate. What is conspicuously absent from the accessible record is an equally specific final experimental result.[ZPEnergy]zpenergy.comGravity-Waves & Missing Scientists at American Antigravity19 Jul 2004 —…

That missing result is worth distinguishing from a missing scientist.

Li demonstrably continued to engage with gravity-related ideas after the contract period, including the 2003 MITRE presentation. Later family reporting places her in Huntsville and provides a biographical account extending through her 2014 accident and 2021 death.[ResearchGate]researchgate.netOpen source on researchgate.net. The remaining mystery relevant to the Army award is therefore principally documentary and scientific: what experiments were completed, what measurements were obtained, and what assessment did AMCOM ultimately make?

Unless stronger records emerge, the most defensible conclusion is consequently narrower but firmer than either extreme. Ning Li was not merely an internet “antigravity scientist” onto whom a fictional Pentagon connection was later grafted. Her unconventional research attracted genuine US Army funding for a named prototype experiment. But that fact establishes government willingness to test an extraordinary proposition, not confirmation that the proposition was true. And without an additional evidential bridge, it establishes still less about later claims of suppression, disappearance or deliberate harm.

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to What Ning Li's Army Funding Really Establishes. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

BookCover for Bad Science

Bad Science

By Ben Goldacre

Rating: 5.0/5 from 5 Google Books ratings

Have you ever wondered how one day the media can assert that alcohol is bad for us and the next unashamedly run a story touting the benef...

See on Amazon
Browse more on Amazon:The Hunt for Zero Point: Inside the Classified World of Antigravity TechnologyThe Pentagon's Brain: An Uncensored History of DARPA, America's Top Secret Military Research AgencyNing Li's biography

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.

UsingUSA

Selected fromantigravity poster oneBay.co.uk.

Browse more oneBay.co.uk

Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.

Endnotes

1. Source: zpenergy.com
Title: Gravity-Waves & Missing Scientists at American Antigravity
Link:https://www.zpenergy.com/modules.php?file=print&name=News&sid=838

Source snippet

19 Jul 2004 —...

2. Source: zpenergy.com
Link:https://www.zpenergy.com/modules.php?file=article&name=News&sid=838

Source snippet

Gravity-Waves & Missing Scientists at American Antigravity.ComAgreement Number: DAAH01-01-9-R001 Type of Agreement: Other Transac...

3. Source: link.aps.org
Link:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.46.5489

Source snippet

Ning Li and D. G. Torr... Physical Review B™ is a trademark of the American...

4. Source: journals.aps.org
Title: Physical Review Journals Physical Review B
Link:https://journals.aps.org/prb/recent?ei=ntuwkjqa&page=8577

Source snippet

Physical Review JournalsPhysical Review B - Recent Articles...

5. Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/298460654_Gravity-Superconductors_interactions_Theory_and_experiment

6. Source: sciencedirect.com
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0921453497014627

Source snippet

Static test for a gravitational force coupled to type II YBCO superconductors - ScienceDirectAugust 1, 1997...

Published: August 1, 1997

7. Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Title: NTRSStatic Test for a Gravitational Force Coupled to Type 2 YBCO Superconductors
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19990039542

Source snippet

NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)...

8. Source: govinfo.gov
Title: CRPT 118srpt188
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CRPT-118srpt188/pdf/CRPT-118srpt188.pdf

9. Source: groups.google.com
Link:https://groups.google.com/g/sci.space/c/RKfc3i7Xc1g

10. Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316147560_Trip_Report_and_meeting_minutes_from_the_1st_International_HFGW_Workshop

11. Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/403975508_Unified_Classical_Resonance_Cosmology_UCRC_20_A_fully_classical_scale-invariant_wave-mechanical_framework_invoking_no_quantum_postulates

12. Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/402834861Unified_Classical_Resonance_Model_UCRM_Resonant_Plasmoids_Bio-ELFPsionics_Sixth_Oscillator_Remote_ViewingESP_Anomalous_Cognition_Gravity_Control_and_Zero-Point_Energy_Rectification-_The_MC-BE-CIRE_Hy

13. Source: sciencedirect.com
Title: Peptide therapy: new promising therapeutics for acute kidney injury
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S135964462500090X

14. Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354532528_Gravitational-magnetic-electric_interaction_in_controlling_relative_permittivity_and_permeability

15. Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354521867_A_simple_investigation_of_Static_test_for_a_gravitational_force_coupled_to_type_II_YBCO_superconductors_by_Li_and_coworkers

16. Source: researchgate.net
Title: (PDF) GVL pulping facilitates nanocellulose production from woody biomass
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335546610_GVL_pulping_facilitates_nanocellulose_production_from_woody_biomass

17. Source: patents.google.com
Link:https://patents.google.com/patent/DE102004060871A1/en

18. Source: patents.google.com
Link:https://patents.google.com/patent/US6960975B1/en

19. Source: researchgate.net
Title: (PDF) Applications of High-Frequency Gravitational Waves (HFGWs)
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228343813_Applications_of_High-Frequency_Gravitational_Waves_HFGWs

20. Source: zpenergy.com
Title: ZP Energy.com
Link:https://www.zpenergy.com/modules.php?file=article&mode=flat&name=News&order=0&sid=838&thold=-1

21. Source: zpenergy.com
Title: ZP Energy.com
Link:https://zpenergy.com/modules.php?file=article&name=News&sid=740

22. Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/1967822_Weight_Measurements_of_High-Temperature_Superconductors_during_Phase_Transition_in_Stationary_Non-Stationary_Condition_and_under_ELF_Radiation

23. Source: groups.google.com
Title: On Jd Rly8IM
Link:https://groups.google.com/g/sci.space.science/c/On-JdRly8IM

24. Source: sciencedirect.com
Title: Static test for a gravitational force coupled to type II YBCO superconductors
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921453497014627

25. Source: sciencedirect.com
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/physica-c-superconductivity-and-its-applications/vol/281/issue/2

26. Source: history.defense.gov
Title: 2003 DoD AR
Link:https://history.defense.gov/Portals/70/Documents/annual_reports/2003_DoD_AR.pdf?ver=2014-06-24-153754-300

27. Source: comptroller.defense.gov
Link:https://comptroller.defense.gov/Portals/45/Documents/defbudget/fy2008/budget_justification/pdfs/03_RDT_and_E/Vol_3_OSD/BA-3.pdf

28. Source: govinfo.gov
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/link/plaw/118/public/159

29. Source: govinfo.gov
Title: BILLS 118hr5009enr
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BILLS-118hr5009enr/pdf/BILLS-118hr5009enr.pdf

30. Source: govinfo.gov
Title: BILLS 118hr2670rh
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BILLS-118hr2670rh/pdf/BILLS-118hr2670rh.pdf

31. Source: govinfo.gov
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CRPT-106srpt50/pdf/CRPT-106srpt50.pdf

32. Source: govinfo.gov
Title: BILLS 113hr4435eh
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BILLS-113hr4435eh/pdf/BILLS-113hr4435eh.pdf

33. Source: govinfo.gov
Title: CRPT 112hrpt705
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CRPT-112hrpt705/pdf/CRPT-112hrpt705.pdf

34. Source: govinfo.gov
Title: BILLS 118hr5009eah
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BILLS-118hr5009eah/pdf/BILLS-118hr5009eah.pdf

35. Source: govinfo.gov
Title: GOVPUB D5 400 PURL LPS25605
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-D5_400-PURL-LPS25605/pdf/GOVPUB-D5_400-PURL-LPS25605.pdf

36. Source: govinfo.gov
Title: PLAW 116publ283
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-116publ283/pdf/PLAW-116publ283.pdf

37. Source: sciencedirect.com
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1047847706001675

38. Source: sciencedirect.com
Title: Gravitational-magnetic-electric field interaction
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211379718314128

39. Source: sciencedirect.com
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0045794906002999

40. Source: sciencedirect.com
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2092678218300724

41. Source: sites.google.com
Title: ac gravity llc
Link:https://sites.google.com/view/the-asp-foundation/groups-of-interest/technology-creators-researchers/ac-gravity-llc

42. Source: sites.google.com
Link:https://sites.google.com/view/gravitationalfieldstudy/home

43. Source: scholar.google.com
Link:https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=zh-CN&user=i4WQH54AAAAJ

44. Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/402834861Unified_Classical_Resonance_Model_UCRM_Resonant_Plasmoids_Bio-ELFPsionics_Sixth_Oscillator_Remote_ViewingESP_Anomalous_Cognition_Gravity_Control_and_Zero-Point_Energy_Rectification-_The_MC-BE-CIRE_Hy/download

45. Source: researchgate.net
Title: Gravity Control Foundations
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Alessandro-Rizzo-19/publication/382428376_Gravity_Control_Foundations/links/669fc7a08be3067b4b14f6d1/Gravity-Control-Foundations.pdf

46. Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/386695026_Superconductor_in_a_weak_static_gravitational_field

47. Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Glen-Robertson

48. Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277311313_Gravitoelectromagnetic_Theories_and_Their_Applications_to_Advanced_Science_and_Technology

49. Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mark-Kowitt

50. Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/253972293_Precursor_Proof-of-Concept_Experiments_for_Various_Categories_of_High-Frequency_Gravitational_Wave_HFGW_Generators

51. Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/Ning-Li-2331670917

52. Source: researchgate.net
Title: 365606892 Theory of Artificial Anti gravity
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365606892_Theory_of_Artificial_Anti-gravity

53. Source: journals.aps.org
Link:https://journals.aps.org/prb/issues/101/1

54. Source: thelivingmoon.com
Title: The Living Moon Gravity-Waves & Missing Scientists at American Antigravity.Com
Link:https://www.thelivingmoon.com/49electric_universe/03files/Gravity-Waves_and_Missing_Scientists.html

Source snippet

The Living MoonGravity-Waves & Missing Scientists at American Antigravity.ComJuly 19, 2004...

Published: July 19, 2004

55. Source: thelivingmoon.com
Title: The Living Moon Anti-gravity and the Search for Dr
Link:https://thelivingmoon.com/49electric_universe/03files/Gravity_001.html

Source snippet

Ning-Li... DAAH01-01-9-R001. Type of Agreement: Other Transaction for Prototype...

56. Source: huntsvillebusinessjournal.com
Link:https://huntsvillebusinessjournal.com/news/2023/07/30/solving-the-mystery-of-huntsvilles-brilliant-scientist-disappearing/

57. Source: zamandayolculuk.com
Link:https://www.zamandayolculuk.com/html-3/electrostatic_propulsion.htm

58. Source: uapmurders.com
Link:https://uapmurders.com/uaps/Details/Ning_Li/

59. Source: thelivingmoon.com
Title: Pegasus PDF Database* Gravity
Link:https://thelivingmoon.com/91_PDF_Database/Pegasus_PDF_Database.html

60. Source: independent.academia.edu
Title: Mark Kowitt
Link:https://independent.academia.edu/MarkKowitt

Additional References

61. Source: youtube.com
Title: Eugene [Podkletnov]({{ ‘podkletnov/’ | relative_url }}) on Gravitational Shielding in Rotating Superconductors
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blXEtLPVE9g

Source snippet

[Ning Li antigravity]({{ 'li-s-experiments/' | relative_url }}) The disappearance of America's leading anti-gravity researcher...

62. Source: youtube.com
Title: The disappearance of America’s leading anti-gravity researcher
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qsbz8_G9WcU

Source snippet

The Scientist That "Discovered Antigravity" Then Disappeared Completely - An Unsolved Mystery...

63. Source: congress.gov
Link:https://www.congress.gov/committees/video/house-small-business/hssm00%26lang%3Den

64. Source: youtube.com
Title: The Anti-Gravity Scientist Who Vanished: Dr. Ning Li
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PEHVIZu3-EU

Source snippet

Eugene Podkletnov on Gravitational Shielding in Rotating Superconductors...

65. Source: youtube.com
Title: The Mysterious Demise Of Dr. Ning Li | Jim Landrith
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQJMBdT5WEk

Source snippet

The Anti-Gravity Scientist Who Vanished: Dr. Ning Li...

66. Source: shinysideout.com.au
Link:https://www.shinysideout.com.au/13-ning-li.html

67. Source: scispace.com
Link:https://scispace.com/papers/computerized-design-simulation-of-meshing-and-stress-1veswofuqd

68. Source: archive.ph
Link:https://archive.ph/O3Pgg

69. Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1gp23io/did_garry_nolan_tie_a_patent_that_matches_the_ufo/

70. Source: scribd.com
Link:https://www.scribd.com/document/964115557/Ebook-Gravity-superconductors-Interactions-by-Giovanni-Modanese-Glen-A-Robertson-ISBN-9781608053995-1608053997-available-all-format