Does Being Submitted to Congress Confirm a Claim?

Introduction

Material submitted to Congress can establish that an allegation existed, who presented it and when it entered an official congressional archive. It does not establish that Congress independently verified the allegation. That distinction is especially important in the case of Amy Eskridge. Michael Shellenberger’s written testimony for a 13 November 2024 House Oversight hearing included a long public-domain UAP timeline whose Eskridge entry attributed the central murder allegation to retired British officer Franc Milburn.[Oversight Committee]oversight.house.govOversight Committee

The congressional provenance is therefore genuine, but its evidential meaning is limited. The document proves that Shellenberger supplied Congress with material containing Milburn’s claim; it does not show that a committee, federal investigator or congressional fact-finding process confirmed that Eskridge was murdered, attacked with a directed-energy weapon or targeted because of advanced-propulsion research. Confusing those propositions creates a classic risk of circular confirmation: a claim acquires the appearance of independent authority merely by passing through an official archive and then being cited back as a “congressional” source.

How the Eskridge allegation entered congressional testimony

On 13 November 2024, two House Oversight subcommittees held the joint hearing “Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Exposing the Truth”. The four witnesses were retired Rear Admiral Tim Gallaudet, former Department of Defense official Luis Elizondo, former NASA official Michael Gold and journalist Michael Shellenberger. The House’s own repository identifies Shellenberger’s document as his Witness Statement, while the committee hearing page likewise lists it under “Witnesses and testimonies”.[House Document Repository]docs.house.govHouse Document Repository“Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Exposing the Truth” | Committee Repository | U.S. House of RepresentativesNov…

That terminology matters. Shellenberger’s submission was not a report issued by the committee. It was evidence and argument supplied by a witness to the committee.

The Eskridge material appears very deep inside that submission, in an appended chronological document. Its entry is explicitly marked “PUBLIC DOMAIN”. It says that Eskridge, described there as a scientist and co-founder of the Institute for Exotic Science, died in Huntsville in June 2022. The crucial sentence does not present a congressional finding. It says that Franc Milburn “claims” Eskridge was targeted with directed-energy weapons and murdered by a private aerospace company because of her involvement with UAP discussion and advanced propulsion.[Oversight Committee]oversight.house.govOversight Committee

The entry then refers to Eskridge’s public discussion of antigravity research and to a 2018 presentation associated with HoloChron Engineering. Its accompanying references are public-domain links, including an obituary, social-media posts and the 2018 presentation.[Oversight Committee]oversight.house.govOversight Committee The structure therefore preserves an important provenance clue: this was a public-source timeline reproducing an attributed allegation, not a committee investigative finding announcing that the allegation had been proved.

There is an additional archival distinction worth making. The Government Publishing Office’s subsequently published hearing volume identifies Shellenberger as a witness and records his oral statement, but tells readers that the witnesses’ prepared statements are available separately through the House repository. Its index lists specific documents submitted during the hearing, while the Daily Digest for 13 November simply records that the subcommittees held the hearing and heard testimony from public witnesses.[GovInfo]govinfo.govCHRG 118hhrg57440CHRG 118hhrg57440

Accordingly, phrases such as “in congressional testimony” or “in material submitted to a House committee” are accurate. Saying that Congress itself determined Eskridge was murdered goes substantially beyond what these records demonstrate.

Why attribution is not official verification

Congressional hearings routinely receive written statements from witnesses. That process is designed to create a record from which legislators can ask questions and conduct oversight; it is not a certification procedure under which every factual assertion in a witness’s statement becomes a finding of Congress.

The Congressional Research Service explains that House witnesses generally provide advance written testimony and that electronic submission facilitates inclusion in the hearing record and public availability. After the opening statement, questioning allows members to probe what witnesses have said. Nothing in that process implies that the committee has independently authenticated every proposition contained in the submitted statement.[Congress.gov]congress.govHouse Committee Hearings: Witness Testimony | Congress.gov | Library of CongressAugust 14, 2015…Published: August 14, 2015

This distinction is particularly important when a statement contains layers of attribution. In simplified form, the Eskridge chain is:

Milburn’s allegation → public-domain UAP timeline → Shellenberger’s appended written testimony → House repository → later reporting and online discussion.

At the congressional stage, the chain gains a new and valuable fact: the allegation was formally placed before a House committee in a named witness’s submission. It does not automatically gain a new independent witness to the underlying event.

The official hearing record reinforces that distinction. The published transcript describes the purpose of the hearing as investigating government UAP programmes, secrecy, spending and transparency. Chairwoman Nancy Mace said Congress was seeking to determine what government programmes had done and what knowledge they had produced. The committee’s own post-hearing summary similarly concentrated on Department of Defense transparency, UAP programmes and national-security issues.[GovInfo]govinfo.govCHRG 118hhrg57440CHRG 118hhrg57440 Neither document presents an Eskridge homicide finding.

That leaves several different propositions that should not be collapsed into one another:

• Well established: a House Oversight hearing took place on 13 November 2024 and Shellenberger was an invited witness.[Oversight Committee]oversight.house.govOversight Committee Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Exposing the TruthOversight CommitteeUnidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Exposing the Truth - United States House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform…
• Directly established by the document: his written submission contained an appended timeline that named Eskridge and attributed a murder and directed-energy allegation to Milburn.[Oversight Committee]oversight.house.govOversight Committee
• Not established merely by inclusion: that Milburn’s account was correct; that a directed-energy attack occurred; that a particular aerospace company was responsible; or that Eskridge’s death resulted from a conspiracy connected with UAP or propulsion research.

That last category requires evidence independent of the fact that the allegation was submitted to Congress.

How circular confirmation develops

Circular confirmation becomes especially easy when each retelling shortens the source description. “Milburn claims X, according to a public-domain timeline appended to Shellenberger’s written testimony” can gradually become “Shellenberger told Congress X”, then “X was submitted to Congress”, then “X is in the congressional record”, and finally “Congress confirmed X”.

Each sentence sounds only slightly stronger than the previous one. Collectively, however, they transform provenance into apparent corroboration.

The problem is visible in later discussion of the Eskridge case. Online posts have highlighted precisely the fact that the allegation appears in Shellenberger’s congressional submission, sometimes using the submission itself as the reason the allegation should be regarded as especially significant.[Reddit]reddit.comMichael Shellenberger's write up on deceased antigravity researcher Amy Eskridge submitted to the Congressional record - "murdered… An earlier archived discussion of the same public-domain timeline was more cautious: its author explicitly questioned whether the timeline’s attribution to Milburn accurately reflected what Milburn had publicly said at the time.[Archive.ph]archive.phAMY ESKRIDGE: The DEATH of a promising ANTI-GRAVITY researcher. Conducting anti-gravity research? You probably work in Huntsville, cease… That uncertainty is important because a citation chain is only as strong as its underlying links.

A second complication is that the word source can mean two different things. The House-hosted PDF is an excellent primary source for the proposition “this statement was supplied as congressional testimony”. It is not automatically a primary source for the proposition “Eskridge was murdered”. For that claim, the PDF itself points backwards to an attributed assertion and public-domain material.

This is why an official web address cannot substitute for source criticism. Hosting establishes custody and provenance of the document. It does not transfer governmental endorsement to every sentence inside it.

The same principle applies beyond Eskridge. A congressional hearing can preserve allegations that later prove true, allegations that remain unresolved and allegations that prove false. Preserving them is part of Congress’s information-gathering function. The Congressional Research Service explicitly describes questioning as an opportunity to clarify assertions, expand statements, build a public record and gather information for possible future action.[Congress.gov]congress.govDecember 6, 2017…Published: December 6, 2017 A record is therefore a starting point for scrutiny, not synonymous with the result of that scrutiny.

What the congressional record actually adds

None of this makes the Eskridge entry worthless. It adds several concrete pieces of historical evidence.

First, it fixes a date and institutional setting. By November 2024, the allegation had moved beyond private discussion and internet circulation into the written submission of an invited witness at a House Oversight hearing. The House repository, Congress.gov and GovInfo independently document the hearing, its witnesses and its official archival record.[house.gov]docs.house.govHouse Document Repository“Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Exposing the Truth” | Committee Repository | U.S. House of RepresentativesNov…

Second, the submission preserves the wording and attribution used at that stage of the story. Researchers do not have to rely on later paraphrases to discover whether the congressional document itself called the allegation proven. It did not: the relevant passage explicitly identifies Milburn as the person making the claim.[Oversight Committee]oversight.house.govOversight Committee

Third, it allows a cleaner separation between history of an allegation and evidence for an allegation. The House archive is strong evidence for the former. It establishes that the claim was circulating in a form considered relevant enough by Shellenberger to include in his testimony. Whether it accurately describes Eskridge’s death is a different question requiring independent forensic, investigative, medical, documentary or first-hand evidence.

That distinction also helps interpret Eskridge’s reported pre-death warnings. Even if particular messages or recordings can be authenticated, they would first establish what Eskridge herself said or feared. Milburn’s later interpretation is another evidential layer; its reproduction in a timeline is another; Shellenberger’s submission of that timeline to Congress is another still. Repeating those layers does not create multiple independent confirmations of the underlying threat.

Does being submitted to Congress confirm a claim?

No. In this case, congressional submission confirms documentary history, not the truth of the murder allegation.

The strongest defensible description is that Michael Shellenberger’s written testimony for the House Oversight UAP hearing contained an appended public-domain timeline which recorded an allegation attributed to Franc Milburn that Amy Eskridge had been targeted and murdered because of her UAP and advanced-propulsion involvement. The House officially archived Shellenberger’s witness material, and the hearing itself became part of the published congressional hearing record.[house.gov]oversight.house.govOversight CommitteeOversight Committee

What is missing from that chain is the crucial independent step: a congressional finding, investigative determination or separately substantiated evidential record establishing that Milburn’s allegation was true. The committee’s official description and published wrap-up do not supply such a finding.[Oversight Committee]oversight.house.govOversight Committee Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Exposing the TruthOversight CommitteeUnidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Exposing the Truth - United States House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform…

For claims about suspicious deaths connected with UFO or antigravity research, that is more than a technical distinction. “Submitted to Congress” can sound like corroboration when it may describe only transmission. The congressional documents are valuable because they show what Congress was told. Unless independent evidence closes the gap, they should not be cited as proof of what actually happened to Amy Eskridge.

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to Does Being Submitted to Congress Confirm a Claim?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

Book

The Craft of Research

By Wayne C. Booth, Gregory G. Colomb et al.

Rating: 4.3/5 from 6 Google Books ratings

Since 1995, students, researchers, and professionals have turned to The Craft of Research for clear and helpful guidance on how to conduc...

See on Amazon

Book

Calling Bullshit

By Carl T. Bergstrom, Jevin D. West

Bullshit isn’t what it used to be. Now, two science professors give us the tools to dismantle misinformation and think clearly in a world...

See on Amazon

Book

The Demon-haunted World

By Carl Sagan

Rating: 4.5/5 from 43 Google Books ratings

Are we on the brink of a new Dark Age of irrationality and superstition? In this book, the writer shows how scientific thinking is necess...

See on Amazon

Book

Merchants of Doubt

By Naomi Oreskes, Erik M. Conway

Documents the troubling influence of a small group of scientists who the author contends misrepresent scientific facts to advance key pol...

See on Amazon

Browse more on Amazon:The Craft of ResearchCalling BullshitThe Demon haunted World

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.

Shop location

UsingUSA USA USAUKCanadaAustraliaIreland

Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.

Current eBay listing

I WANT TO BELIEVE X-FILES ALIEN UFO POSTER -FRAMED ART PICTURE PAPER PRINT

GBP 14.99 | Free shippingNewSeller: captivart (99.6% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Current eBay listing

Conspiracy Theory Poster Wall Print Gift UFO Aliens Flat Earth Moon Landing

GBP 5.97 | Free shippingNewSeller: forgevalleyprint (99.3% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Current eBay listing

VINTAGE UFO ABDUCTION ILLUSTRATION FRAMED WALL ART PICTURE POSTER PRINT

GBP 11.99 | Free shippingNewSeller: canvas monkey (99.8% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Current eBay listing

VINTAGE UFO FLYING SAUCERS COMIC ADVERTISING A2 POSTER PRINT

GBP 10.76 | Free shippingNewSeller: andys-prints-uk (99.6% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Browse more oneBay.co.uk

Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.

Endnotes

1. Source: oversight.house.gov
Title: Oversight Committee
Link:https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Written-Testimony-Shellenberger.pdf

2. Source: oversight.house.gov
Title: Oversight Committee Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Exposing the Truth
Link:https://oversight.house.gov/hearing/unidentified-anomalous-phenomena-exposing-the-truth/

3. Source: docs.house.gov
Link:https://docs.house.gov/committee/calendar/ByEvent.aspx?EventID=117721

4. Source: govinfo.gov
Title: CHRG 118hhrg57440
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-118hhrg57440/pdf/CHRG-118hhrg57440.pdf

5. Source: govinfo.gov
Title: CREC 2024 11 13 dailydigest
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CREC-2024-11-13/pdf/CREC-2024-11-13-dailydigest.pdf

Published: November 13, 2024

6. Source: congress.gov
Title: House Committee Hearings: Witness Testimony | Congress.gov | Library of Congress
Link:https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/98-338

Published: August 14, 2015

7. Source: oversight.house.gov
Link:https://oversight.house.gov/release/hearing-wrap-up-transparency-and-accountability-needed-to-provide-accurate-information-on-uaps-to-the-american-people%EF%BF%BC/

8. Source: congress.gov
Link:https://www.congress.gov/event/118th-congress/house-event/117721

9. Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1lccpao/michael_shellenbergers_write_up_on_deceased/

10. Source: archive.ph
Link:https://archive.ph/O3Pgg

11. Source: congress.gov
Link:https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/98-392

Published: December 6, 2017

12. Source: govinfo.gov
Title: CHRG 118hhrg57440
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/CHRG-118hhrg57440/CHRG-118hhrg57440

13. Source: uscode.house.gov
Link:https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?edition=prelim&num=0&req=granuleid%3AUSC-prelim-title2-section392

14. Source: burlison.house.gov
Title: adopts burlison amendment establishing uap disclosure framework
Link:https://burlison.house.gov/media/press-releases/house-adopts-burlison-amendment-establishing-uap-disclosure-framework

15. Source: budget.house.gov
Title: markup notice house committee on the budget
Link:https://budget.house.gov/hearing/07/14/2026/markup-notice-house-committee-on-the-budget

16. Source: docs.house.gov
Title: By Event.aspx
Link:https://docs.house.gov/Committee/Calendar/ByEvent.aspx?EventID=119139

17. Source: govinfo.gov
Title: Serial No. 119-52
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/CHRG-119hhrg63815

18. Source: docs.house.gov
Title: By Event.aspx
Link:https://docs.house.gov/Committee/Calendar/ByEvent.aspx?EventId=119028

19. Source: budget.house.gov
Title: the congressional budget offices budget and economic outlook
Link:https://budget.house.gov/hearing/02/17/2026/the-congressional-budget-offices-budget-and-economic-outlook

20. Source: govinfo.gov
Title: Serial No. 119-46
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/CHRG-119hhrg63303

21. Source: budget.house.gov
Link:https://budget.house.gov/hearing/hearing-notice-reverse-the-curse-skyrocketing-health-care-costs-and-americas-fiscal-future

22. Source: govinfo.gov
Title: Serial No. 119-50
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/CHRG-119hhrg62624

23. Source: govinfo.gov
Title: House Hearing, 119th Congress
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/CHRG-119hhrg62598/CHRG-119hhrg62598

24. Source: govinfo.gov
Title: House Hearing, 119th Congress
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/CHRG-119hhrg62598

25. Source: congress.gov
Title: P N532
Link:https://www.congress.gov/nomination/119th-congress/532

26. Source: congress.gov
Link:https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R48593

27. Source: congress.gov
Title: ional Record | Congress.gov | Library of Congress
Link:https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/volume-171/issue-45/house-section/article/H1139-1

28. Source: congress.gov
Title: ional Record | Congress.gov | Library of Congress
Link:https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/volume-171/issue-38/senate-section/article/S1391-5

29. Source: docs.house.gov
Title: By Event.aspx
Link:https://docs.house.gov/Committee/Calendar/ByEvent.aspx?EventID=117881

30. Source: congress.gov
Title: ional Record | Congress.gov | Library of Congress
Link:https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/volume-171/issue-14/house-section/article/H377-1

31. Source: congress.gov
Title: ional Record | Congress.gov | Library of Congress
Link:https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/volume-171/issue-14/senate-section/article/S330-1

32. Source: congress.gov
Title: house committee print
Link:https://www.congress.gov/committee-print/119th-congress/house-committee-print/60630

33. Source: agriculture.house.gov
Title: rules and jurisdiction
Link:https://agriculture.house.gov/about/rules-and-jurisdiction.htm

34. Source: docs.house.gov
Title: By Event.aspx
Link:https://docs.house.gov/Committee/Calendar/ByEvent.aspx?EventId=117749

35. Source: govinfo.gov
Title: Serial No. 118-135
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/CHRG-118hhrg57440

36. Source: congress.gov
Link:https://www.congress.gov/event/118th-congress/house-event/LC73681/text

37. Source: congress.gov
Link:https://www.congress.gov/event/118th-congress/joint-event/LC73860/text

38. Source: congress.gov
Link:https://www.congress.gov/event/118th-congress/house-event/117722

39. Source: oversight.house.gov
Title: mace grothman open joint hearing on unidentified anomalous phenomena
Link:https://oversight.house.gov/release/mace-grothman-open-joint-hearing-on-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena/

40. Source: oversight.house.gov
Title: written testimony shellenberger
Link:https://oversight.house.gov/hearing/unidentified-anomalous-phenomena-exposing-the-truth/written-testimony-shellenberger/

41. Source: oversight.house.gov
Title: mace grothman announce joint hearing on unidentified anomalous phenomena
Link:https://oversight.house.gov/release/mace-grothman-announce-joint-hearing-on-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena%EF%BF%BC/

42. Source: docs.house.gov
Title: By Event.aspx
Link:https://docs.house.gov/Committee/Calendar/ByEvent.aspx?EventId=117722

43. Source: docs.house.gov
Title: By Event.aspx
Link:https://docs.house.gov/Committee/Calendar/ByEvent.aspx?EventId=117675

44. Source: govinfo.gov
Title: House Hearing, 118th Congress
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/CHRG-118hhrg56237/CHRG-118hhrg56237

45. Source: docs.house.gov
Title: By Event.aspx
Link:https://docs.house.gov/Committee/Calendar/ByEvent.aspx?EventID=117261

46. Source: govinfo.gov
Title: Serial No. 118-94
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/CHRG-118hhrg55181/CHRG-118hhrg55181

47. Source: docs.house.gov
Title: By Event.aspx
Link:https://docs.house.gov/Committee/Calendar/ByEvent.aspx?EventId=116615

48. Source: congress.gov
Link:https://www.congress.gov/event/118th-congress/senate-event/334781/text

49. Source: docs.house.gov
Title: By Event.aspx
Link:https://docs.house.gov/Committee/Calendar/ByEvent.aspx?EventID=115561

50. Source: docs.house.gov
Title: By Event.aspx
Link:https://docs.house.gov/committee/calendar/ByEvent.aspx?EventID=115442

51. Source: govinfo.gov
Title: Serial No. 117-7 (House Hearing)
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/CHRG-117hhrg49354/CHRG-117hhrg49354

52. Source: congress.gov
Title: house committee print
Link:https://www.congress.gov/committee-print/117th-congress/house-committee-print/48217

53. Source: docs.house.gov
Title: By Event.aspx
Link:https://docs.house.gov/Committee/Calendar/ByEvent.aspx?EventID=114185

54. Source: congress.gov
Link:https://www.congress.gov/event/116th-congress/house-event/LC65616/text

55. Source: govinfo.gov
Title: H. Doc. 116-95, Volume II Part 1
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/CDOC-116hdoc95/CDOC-116hdoc95-vol2-pt1

56. Source: congress.gov
Link:https://www.congress.gov/event/116th-congress/house-event/LC65691/text

57. Source: congress.gov
Link:https://www.congress.gov/event/115th-congress/house-event/108057

58. Source: congress.gov
Title: Zimbabwe After Mugabe | Congress.gov | Library of Congress
Link:https://www.congress.gov/event/115th-congress/house-event/106914

59. Source: congress.gov
Link:https://www.congress.gov/event/115th-congress/house-event/106315

60. Source: congress.gov
Link:https://www.congress.gov/event/115th-congress/house-event/105508

61. Source: congress.gov
Title: house committee print
Link:https://www.congress.gov/committee-print/115th-congress/house-committee-print/27270

62. Source: congress.gov
Link:https://www.congress.gov/event/114th-congress/house-event/LC41525/text

63. Source: congress.gov
Link:https://www.congress.gov/event/114th-congress/house-event/LC51909/text

64. Source: congress.gov
Link:https://www.congress.gov/event/112th-congress/house-event/LC2988/text

65. Source: congress.gov
Title: CHRG 111hhrg54077
Link:https://www.congress.gov/111/chrg/CHRG-111hhrg54077/generated/CHRG-111hhrg54077.htm

66. Source: congress.gov
Link:https://www.congress.gov/event/110th-congress/house-event/LC10292/text

67. Source: congress.gov
Title: ional Record | Congress.gov | Library of Congress
Link:https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/volume-147/issue-37/house-section/article/H990-3

68. Source: congress.gov
Title: 100th congress
Link:https://www.congress.gov/nomination/100th-congress/1234

69. Source: uscode.house.gov
Link:https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?edition=prelim&num=0&req=granuleid%3AUSC-prelim-title18a-node35-node77-rule26.2

70. Source: govinfo.gov
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/chrg/106/senate/Committee%20on%20Governmental%20Affairs

71. Source: govinfo.gov
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/CHRG/112/HOUSE/Committee%20on%20Appropriations

72. Source: govinfo.gov
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/chrg/118/house/Committee%20on%20Oversight%20and%20Accountability

73. Source: congress.gov
Title: house committee print
Link:https://www.congress.gov/committee-print/118th-congress/house-committee-print/53578

74. Source: congress.gov
Title: How Our Laws Are Made
Link:https://www.congress.gov/help/learn-about-the-legislative-process/how-our-laws-are-made

75. Source: congress.gov
Title: house committee print
Link:https://www.congress.gov/committee-print/110th-congress/house-committee-print/38094

76. Source: congress.gov
Link:https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/congressional-record-index/116th-congress/1st-session/shellenberger-michael/549104

77. Source: congress.gov
Link:https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/congressional-record-index/116th-congress/1st-session/shellenberger-dick/549105

78. Source: congress.gov
Link:https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/congressional-record-index/116th-congress/1st-session/grand-canyon-centennial-protection-act/555139

79. Source: democrats-waysandmeans.house.gov
Title: committee submissions
Link:https://democrats-waysandmeans.house.gov/committee-activity/committee-submissions

80. Source: cha.house.gov
Title: joint committee on printing
Link:https://cha.house.gov/joint-committee-on-printing

81. Source: cha.house.gov
Title: committee rules 119
Link:https://cha.house.gov/committee-rules-119

82. Source: house.gov
Link:https://www.house.gov/the-house-explained/the-legislative-process/in-committee

83. Source: democrats-armedservices.house.gov
Title: committee rules
Link:https://democrats-armedservices.house.gov/committee-rules

84. Source: uscode.house.gov
Link:https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?edition=2023&req=granuleid%3AUSC-2023-title28a-node230-article6

85. Source: oversight.house.gov
Title: national security the border and foreign affairs
Link:https://oversight.house.gov/category/national-security-the-border-and-foreign-affairs/

86. Source: oversight.house.gov
Link:https://oversight.house.gov/page/52/?month=3&post_type=release&pyear=2014&update=update

87. Source: oversight.house.gov
Link:https://oversight.house.gov/all/?a_page=68

88. Source: oversight.house.gov
Link:https://oversight.house.gov/page/53/?month=8&post_type=release&pyear=+&update=update

89. Source: uap.gg
Link:https://uap.gg/

90. Source: ufouap.com
Title: amy eskridge
Link:https://www.ufouap.com/case-files/amy-eskridge/

91. Source: ufouap.com
Title: amy eskridge
Link:https://www.ufouap.com/es/case-files/amy-eskridge/

92. Source: outcomecounseling.com
Link:https://outcomecounseling.com/timeline

93. Source: imdb.com
Title: Franc Milburn
Link:https://www.imdb.com/name/nm18471285/

Additional References

94. Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKksMTQYepo

95. Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hp0MPCoEYYE

96. Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tyuw9H_Ew9Q

97. Source: youtube.com
Title: UFO House Hearing LIVE: House Oversight Committee Holds Hearing On UFOs
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TsjPoTsqJNA

98. Source: shinysideout.com.au
Link:https://www.shinysideout.com.au/00-amy-eskridge.html

99. Source: shinysideout.com.au
Link:https://www.shinysideout.com.au/13-ning-li.html

100. Source: disclosuredossier.com
Link:https://disclosuredossier.com/about

101. Source: btlv.fr
Link:https://btlv.fr/mystere-inexplique-enigme/mystere-actu/amy-eskridge-de-nouveaux-elements-relancent-les-interrogations-de-sa-mort-face-a-ses-recherches-sur-les-ovnis/

102. Source: tribune.com.pk
Link:https://tribune.com.pk/story/2604381/amy-eskridge-death-resurfaces-in-online-debate-amid-renewed-ufo-community-speculation?amp=1

103. Source: hindustantimes.com
Link:https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/us-news/amy-eskridge-update-ufo-scientists-old-texts-cast-doubt-on-cause-of-death-would-never-kill-myself-101776897906208-amp.html