Mallove Was Murdered, But Was Research the Motive?

Introduction

Eugene Mallove’s death is one of the clearest genuine homicides in discussions of allegedly suspicious deaths among researchers associated with unconventional energy. The cold-fusion advocate and former MIT science writer was beaten to death on 14 May 2004 at a family rental property in Norwich, Connecticut. The unresolved question is not whether he was murdered, but why.

Mallove’s prominence in controversial energy research made a research-related assassination theory understandable as an early hypothesis, particularly while the crime remained unsolved. Yet the later criminal investigation and court record developed a much more specific explanation: a confrontation connected to recently evicted tenants and possessions being cleared from the property, followed by the taking of Mallove’s belongings and efforts to disguise what had happened. One participant ultimately pleaded guilty to manslaughter and robbery-related charges. The prosecution of another produced a murder conviction, although that conviction was vacated in 2025 because of a due-process violation and a new trial was ordered. Nothing in that ruling established a research-related motive.[Justia Law]law.justia.comJustia LawBrown v. Commissioner of Correction:: 2025:: Connecticut Appellate Court Decisions:: Connecticut Case Law:: Connecticut Law…

Why Mallove’s death invited research-related speculation

Mallove was not merely a scientist who happened to have an interest in unconventional subjects. He had become an unusually visible advocate for cold fusion and other disputed energy research. He had served as chief science writer at the MIT News Office, wrote Fire from Ice about the cold-fusion controversy, founded the New Energy Foundation and edited Infinite Energy. The Planetary Society also records his engineering background and work on unconventional approaches to space propulsion.[The Planetary Society]planetary.orgThe Planetary Society Eugene Mallove | The Planetary SocietyThe Planetary Society Eugene Mallove | The Planetary Society

That biography inevitably affected perceptions of his murder. Mallove had publicly argued that cold-fusion evidence had been unfairly dismissed or suppressed, so his violent death could readily be incorporated into a larger narrative in which unconventional-energy researchers faced powerful opposition. Richard Hoagland, writing immediately after the killing, explicitly raised the significance of its timing in relation to Mallove’s energy campaign and the US Department of Energy’s reconsideration of cold fusion. Other alternative-energy discussions went further, entertaining the possibility that Mallove had been deliberately silenced.[Enterprise Mission]enterprisemission.orgEnterprise Mission In Memory of Dr. Eugene MalloveEnterprise MissionIn Memory of Dr. Eugene MalloveMay 14, 2004…Published: May 14, 2004

But the contemporary record contains an important counterweight that is easy to lose when the story is retold retrospectively. Reports from within Mallove’s own new-energy community were already mentioning a possible property dispute within days of his death. New Energy Times reported on 17 May 2004 that Mallove had been killed ‘possibly in relation to a property dispute’, saying this had been confirmed with Norwich police. A contemporary notice circulated among alternative-energy supporters likewise described his death as apparently involving such a dispute.[New Energy Times]newenergytimes.comNew Energy TimesNew Energy Times - Tribute to Dr. Eugene MalloveMay 17, 2004…Published: May 17, 2004

Nor was robbery an explanation invented years later to dispose of conspiracy claims. Contemporary Associated Press reporting said that the initial police investigation indicated that a robbery and fight had occurred. Mallove’s minivan was missing from the property and was subsequently recovered at a Foxwoods casino employee car park.[North Texas Skeptics]ntskeptics.orgNorth Texas Skeptics Skeptical NewsNorth Texas SkepticsSkeptical NewsMay 21, 2004…Published: May 21, 2004

The Norwich Police Department later publicised a more detailed list of missing property: Mallove’s wedding ring, digital camera, mobile telephone, wallet, identification and credit cards. Its 2005 appeal said his van had also been stolen during the crime. These facts did not by themselves establish why the violence began — theft can occur after a killing motivated by something else — but they provided a concrete ordinary-crime dimension that any assassination theory had to explain.[Eugene Mallove]eugenemallove.comEugene Mallove Press Releases on Mallove InvestigationEugene MallovePress Releases on Mallove InvestigationJanuary 24, 2005…Published: January 24, 2005

This distinction is crucial. Mallove’s scientific work supplied a conceivable motive to speculate about; the crime scene supplied evidence of a different set of possibilities. In 2004, before the perpetrators had been established, neither observation alone could settle the question.

What the later court proceedings established

The case remained difficult for years and initially went badly wrong. Two other men, Gary McAvoy and Joseph Reilly, were arrested in 2005. According to the later Connecticut appellate record, investigators subsequently eliminated them as sources of DNA profiles connected with Mallove’s death and prosecutors dropped the charges. The eventual case against Chad Schaffer, Candace Foster and Mozzelle Brown developed after new information reached police in 2009.[Justia Law]law.justia.comJustia LawBrown v. Commissioner of Correction:: 2025:: Connecticut Appellate Court Decisions:: Connecticut Case Law:: Connecticut Law…

The later court record is especially important because it connects the killing directly to the rental property rather than merely noting that Mallove happened to die there. Connecticut’s Appellate Court records that Mallove had recently evicted Roy and Patricia Anderson from 119 Salem Turnpike and had travelled from New Hampshire to clean out the property. Patricia Anderson’s son, Chad Schaffer, and Schaffer’s girlfriend, Candace Foster, had also lived there.[Justia Law]law.justia.comJustia LawBrown v. Commissioner of Correction:: 2025:: Connecticut Appellate Court Decisions:: Connecticut Case Law:: Connecticut Law…

The investigation eventually produced testimony tying Schaffer to both the violence and an effort to make the killing resemble robbery. The appellate decision recounts evidence from Keishon Dullivan that Schaffer said he had assaulted Mallove and taken possessions ‘to stage the attack as a robbery’. Foster eventually admitted involvement herself, telling police that she had kicked Mallove and struck him with a pipe, driven Mallove’s van to Foxwoods and that Schaffer had taken several of Mallove’s possessions.[Justia Law]law.justia.comJustia LawBrown v. Commissioner of Correction:: 2025:: Connecticut Appellate Court Decisions:: Connecticut Case Law:: Connecticut Law…

Contemporary coverage of the later prosecution supplied the immediate trigger alleged by police: Schaffer and Brown confronted Mallove while he was clearing the property because possessions belonging to Schaffer’s recently evicted parents were being thrown away. At Brown’s 2014 probable-cause hearing, The Day reported that police alleged the two men attacked Mallove for that reason.[New Energy Times]newenergytimes.comNew Energy Times Printer-friendly versionNew Energy Times Printer-friendly version

That is much more probative of motive than the coincidence that Mallove worked on controversial subjects. It identifies people with a personal connection to the precise property where the killing occurred, a recent dispute involving that property and an alleged confrontation over belongings taking place during the clean-out.

The criminal outcomes strengthened that interpretation, although they need to be described carefully. In April 2012, Schaffer pleaded guilty to first-degree manslaughter and third-degree robbery. Foster later pleaded guilty to hindering prosecution and tampering with physical evidence. Brown was convicted by a jury of murder and conspiracy to commit murder in 2014 and received a 58-year sentence in January 2015.[Justia Law]law.justia.comJustia LawBrown v. Commissioner of Correction:: 2025:: Connecticut Appellate Court Decisions:: Connecticut Case Law:: Connecticut Law…

The Brown conviction, however, is no longer legally intact. On 28 January 2025, the Connecticut Appellate Court held that the prosecution had failed to disclose material information concerning an informal understanding with Foster, a cooperating witness, which could have affected the defence’s ability to challenge her credibility. The court found a reasonable probability that disclosure could have produced a different trial result. It therefore ordered Brown’s murder and conspiracy convictions vacated and directed that he receive a new trial.[Justia Law]law.justia.comJustia LawBrown v. Commissioner of Correction:: 2025:: Connecticut Appellate Court Decisions:: Connecticut Case Law:: Connecticut Law…

That development matters to an evidence-led account. It would now be inaccurate simply to say that Brown’s conviction permanently ‘solved’ the case. But the appellate ruling also does not replace the property-dispute evidence with evidence of a cold-fusion or unconventional-energy plot. It concerns the fairness of Brown’s trial and the prosecution’s disclosure obligations, particularly regarding Foster’s incentive to cooperate. Schaffer’s guilty plea, Foster’s admitted role, the former-tenancy connection and the documented circumstances surrounding the property remain separate parts of the record.[Justia Law]law.justia.comJustia LawBrown v. Commissioner of Correction:: 2025:: Connecticut Appellate Court Decisions:: Connecticut Case Law:: Connecticut Law…

Why homicide and motive must be evaluated separately

Mallove’s case illustrates a recurring problem when obituaries and memorials are used to assess allegedly suspicious researcher deaths. There are really three questions, and answering one does not automatically answer the others: Was the death a homicide? Who participated? Why did it happen?

For Mallove, the first question is unusually straightforward. Contemporary police reporting and the medical examiner treated his death as homicide, and subsequent criminal proceedings leave no serious basis for describing it as an accident, natural death or suicide.[North Texas Skeptics]ntskeptics.orgNorth Texas Skeptics Skeptical NewsNorth Texas SkepticsSkeptical NewsMay 21, 2004…Published: May 21, 2004

The second question became substantially clearer through the later investigation, especially because Schaffer pleaded guilty and Foster admitted involvement. Brown’s precise criminal liability must now be treated as legally unresolved following the 2025 order for a new trial, rather than represented through his vacated 2014 conviction as though nothing had changed.[Justia Law]law.justia.comJustia LawBrown v. Commissioner of Correction:: 2025:: Connecticut Appellate Court Decisions:: Connecticut Case Law:: Connecticut Law…

The third question — motive — requires the most care. The strongest documented evidence points towards a violent confrontation rooted in the eviction and disposal of the former tenants’ belongings, with theft and staging of a robbery also forming part of the prosecution’s account. That does not amount to philosophical proof that no undiscovered research-related element could possibly have existed. Historical evidence almost never permits such an absolute negative. It does mean that a research-assassination hypothesis carries a much heavier evidential burden than it did when the crime was fresh and the attackers were unknown.

In particular, the argument from timing is weak on its own. Mallove was deeply involved in controversial energy research when he died, but that describes much of his professional life by 2004. Showing that he had recently written about cold fusion, expected advances in alternative energy or was involved in disputed research establishes opportunity for speculation, not a causal connection between those activities and his killers. To establish that connection would require additional evidence — communications, payments, instructions, surveillance, testimony, financial links or some other demonstrable bridge between the crime and an actor seeking to suppress Mallove’s work. The court materials reviewed here instead document a bridge between the killing and people connected to the recently evicted household.[Justia Law]law.justia.comJustia LawBrown v. Commissioner of Correction:: 2025:: Connecticut Appellate Court Decisions:: Connecticut Case Law:: Connecticut Law…

There is an additional revealing point in the earliest coverage. Even people committed to Mallove’s scientific cause did not uniformly interpret his death as research retaliation. Infinite Energy’s own memorial described him as having been murdered while cleaning his childhood home between tenants and referred to an ‘apparent robbery’. New Energy Times reported a possible property dispute. These sources had every reason to emphasise Mallove’s importance to unconventional-energy research, yet their immediate accounts still preserved the mundane circumstances surrounding the crime.[Infinite Energy]infinite-energy.comInfinite Energy Memorializing GeneInfinite Energy Memorializing Gene

The most defensible reading of the motive evidence

Eugene Mallove therefore belongs in a history of disputed researcher deaths for a specific reason: his murder is confirmed, while the frequently suggested research motive is not. Treating those propositions as interchangeable obscures what makes the case informative.

The evidence supports a graduated assessment. It is established that Mallove was intentionally killed. There is substantial evidence connecting the events to people associated with recently evicted tenants, and the court record describes both a confrontation surrounding the property and efforts involving Mallove’s stolen possessions. Schaffer’s guilty plea and Foster’s admissions are significant evidence within that account. Brown’s former murder conviction can no longer be cited as a final adjudication of his guilt because the Connecticut Appellate Court ordered it vacated and granted him a new trial in 2025.[Justia Law]law.justia.comJustia LawBrown v. Commissioner of Correction:: 2025:: Connecticut Appellate Court Decisions:: Connecticut Case Law:: Connecticut Law…

By contrast, the available court record does not demonstrate that Mallove was killed because of cold fusion, alternative propulsion, ‘free energy’ advocacy or any related research. Such interpretations arose naturally from his public identity and from the uncertainty surrounding an initially unsolved and exceptionally violent homicide, but possibility and evidential support are different things.

That makes Mallove an unusually useful cautionary case for the wider subject of suspicious scientist deaths. An obituary or memorial can correctly say that a controversial researcher was murdered. A later account can also correctly note that his death inspired fears of suppression. Neither fact establishes the motive. Here, the strongest subsequent evidence moved the case towards a local property dispute involving recently evicted occupants rather than towards a demonstrated campaign against Mallove’s research. The proper conclusion is therefore not that every uncertainty has disappeared, but that the research-related murder theory presently lacks the evidential connection that the property-dispute explanation possesses.

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to Mallove Was Murdered, But Was Research the Motive?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

Book

Fire from Ice: Searching for the Truth Behind the Cold Fusion...

By Eugene F. Mallove

Discusses the furor over the announcement that scientists had succeeded in producing controlled nuclear fusion at ordinary temperatures,...

See on Amazon

Book

Bad Science: The Short Life and Weird Times of Cold Fusion

By Gary Taubes

Documents the bizarre 1989 episode of 2 scientists who announced they had created a sustained nuclear-fusion reaction at room temperature...

See on Amazon

Book

Unnatural Causes: The Life and Many Deaths of Britain's Top F...

By Richard Shepherd

THE TRUE CRIME BOOK OF THE YEAR AND SUNDAY TIMES TOP 10 BESTSELLER 'One of the most fascinating books I have read in a long time. Engross...

See on Amazon

Book

The Craft of Research

By Wayne C. Booth, Gregory G. Colomb et al.

Rating: 4.3/5 from 6 Google Books ratings

Since 1995, students, researchers, and professionals have turned to The Craft of Research for clear and helpful guidance on how to conduc...

See on Amazon

Browse more on Amazon:Fire from Ice: Searching for the Truth Behind the Cold Fusion FurorBad Science: The Short Life and Weird Times of Cold FusionUnnatural Causes: The Life and Many Deaths of Britain's Top Forensic Pathologist

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.

Shop location

UsingUSA USA USAUKCanadaAustraliaIreland

Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.

Current eBay listing

VINTAGE UFO ABDUCTION ILLUSTRATION FRAMED WALL ART PICTURE POSTER PRINT

GBP 11.99 | Free shippingNewSeller: canvas monkey (99.8% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Current eBay listing

The X-FILES I WANT TO BELIEVE UFO METAL SIGN WALL PLAQUE poster A6 A5 A4 A3

GBP 16.95 | Free shippingNewSeller: metal-plaques-uk (99.5% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Current eBay listing

FS02 VINTAGE UFO FLYING SAUCERS COMIC ADVERTISING A4 POSTER PRINT

GBP 4.71 | Free shippingNewSeller: andys-prints-uk (99.6% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Current eBay listing

COOL FLYING UFO IN FOREST LANDSCAPE FRAMED WALL ART PICTURE POSTER PRINT

GBP 39.99 | Free shippingNewSeller: canvas monkey (99.8% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Browse more oneBay.co.uk

Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.

Endnotes

1. Source: law.justia.com
Link:https://law.justia.com/cases/connecticut/court-of-appeals/2025/ac46658.html

2. Source: planetary.org
Title: The Planetary Society Eugene Mallove | The Planetary Society
Link:https://www.planetary.org/profiles/eugene-mallove

3. Source: infinite-energy.com
Title: Infinite Energy Memorializing Gene
Link:https://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue56/memorial.html

4. Source: docs.justia.com
Link:https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/new-york/nyndce/1%3A2026cv00419/152888/4

5. Source: docs.justia.com
Link:https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/new-york/nyndce/6%3A2025cv01151/149645/15

6. Source: docs.justia.com
Link:https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/maryland/mddce/1%3A2022cv00357/507436/107

7. Source: docs.justia.com
Link:https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/maryland/mddce/1%3A2013cv00474/228511/19

8. Source: docs.justia.com
Link:https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca2/09-4991/920110105

9. Source: law.justia.com
Title: court of appeals
Link:https://law.justia.com/cases/connecticut/court-of-appeals/2021/

10. Source: law.justia.com
Link:https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/caedce/2021/?page=3

11. Source: infinite-energy.com
Link:https://www.infinite-energy.com/resources/unusual-suspects.html

12. Source: infinite-energy.com
Link:https://infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue1/colfusthe.html

13. Source: law.justia.com
Link:https://law.justia.com/cases/alabama/supreme-court/1954/75-so-2d-141-1.html

14. Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2OxNZEyKGs

15. Source: eugenemallove.com
Title: Eugene Mallove Dr. Eugene Mallove Curriculum Vitae
Link:https://www.eugenemallove.com/emwords_CV.html

16. Source: enterprisemission.org
Title: Enterprise Mission In Memory of Dr. Eugene Mallove
Link:https://www.enterprisemission.org/_articles/05-18-2004/eugene_mallove.htm

Published: May 14, 2004

17. Source: newenergytimes.com
Link:https://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2004/DrEugeneMallove.shtml

Published: May 17, 2004

18. Source: ntskeptics.org
Title: North Texas Skeptics Skeptical News
Link:https://www.ntskeptics.org/news/news2004-05-21.htm

Published: May 21, 2004

19. Source: eugenemallove.com
Title: Eugene Mallove Press Releases on Mallove Investigation
Link:https://www.eugenemallove.com/em_investigation.html

Published: January 24, 2005

20. Source: newenergytimes.com
Title: New Energy Times Printer-friendly version
Link:https://newenergytimes.com/v2/inthenews/2014/THEDAY-Judge-Finds-Evidence-Mallove.pdf

21. Source: wikidata.org
Title: Eugene Mallove
Link:https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1373153

22. Source: oxygen.com
Title: Eugene Mallove, Scientist, Murdered After Housing Dispute
Link:https://www.oxygen.com/an-unexpected-killer/crime-news/eugene-mallove-scientist-murdered-after-housing-dispute

23. Source: oxygen.com
Title: Eugene Mallove, Scientist, Murdered After Housing Dispute
Link:https://www.oxygen.com/index.php/an-unexpected-killer/crime-news/eugene-mallove-scientist-murdered-after-housing-dispute

24. Source: slideshare.net
Title: infinite energy issue 127
Link:https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/infinite-energy-issue-127/62910848

25. Source: newenergytimes.com
Title: New Energy Times
Link:https://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2010/35/3524scienceenergynews.shtml

26. Source: news.newenergytimes.net
Title: mallove murder case plods along
Link:https://news.newenergytimes.net/2010/06/24/mallove-murder-case-plods-along/

27. Source: newenergytimes.com
Title: New Energy Times
Link:https://newenergytimes.com/v2/archives/bpcf/bpcf.shtml

28. Source: newenergytimes.com
Title: NET30 jgk39gh12f.shtml
Link:https://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2008/NET30-jgk39gh12f.shtml

29. Source: newenergytimes.com
Link:https://www.newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2006/NET15.shtml

30. Source: newenergytimes.com
Link:https://www.newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2005/NET11.shtml

31. Source: lenr-canr.org
Title: Eugene Mallove dead
Link:https://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?p=287

33. Source: newenergytimes.com
Title: New Energy Times
Link:https://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/Mallove/DrEugeneMallove-MPMW.shtml

34. Source: newenergytimes.com
Title: New Energy Times
Link:https://www.newenergytimes.com/v2/sen/2011.shtml

35. Source: eugenemallove.com
Link:https://www.eugenemallove.com/death_of_IE.html

36. Source: eugenemallove.com
Title: Mallove in His Words
Link:https://eugenemallove.com/

37. Source: eugenemallove.com
Link:https://www.eugenemallove.com/emwords_quest1.html

38. Source: eugenemallove.com
Link:https://www.eugenemallove.com/emwords_quest2.5.html

39. Source: uapmurders.com
Link:https://uapmurders.com/uaps/Details/Eugene_Mallove/

40. Source: everything.explained.today
Title: Eugene Mallove
Link:https://everything.explained.today/Eugene_Mallove/

41. Source: scribd.com
Link:https://www.scribd.com/document/205818911/Infinite-Energy

Additional References

42. Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C8mgrglISxs

43. Source: jud.ct.gov
Link:https://www.jud.ct.gov/lawjournal/Docs/Appellate/2025/5/ap230_8631.pdf

Published: January 28, 2025

44. Source: youtube.com
Title: Court for man charged with scientist’s murder
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2q8nvRL2kc

45. Source: jud.ct.gov
Title: Connecticut Judicial Branch Home
Link:https://jud.ct.gov/lawlib/lawlibnews/Posts/Post.aspx?Id=6178

46. Source: vecteezy.com
Link:https://www.vecteezy.com/editorial/news/chad-schaffer-trial-155843/chad-schaffer-listens-65263214

47. Source: qcodemedia.com
Link:https://qcodemedia.com/crime-waves

48. Source: thecinemaholic.com
Link:https://thecinemaholic.com/dr-eugene-mallove-murder-where-are-candace-foster-chad-schaffer-and-mozzelle-brown-now/

49. Source: truecrimene.com
Link:https://www.truecrimene.com/episodes/p6zagfbyw95khxlki00s3o5zfagrz4

50. Source: murderwithmyhusband.com
Link:https://www.murderwithmyhusband.com/episodes?76b58021_page=9

51. Source: nasw.org
Link:https://www.nasw.org/sites/default/files/sciencewriters/html/sum04tex/memorium.htm