Within Contemporary Records
Why Modern Mc Donald Murder Claims Need New Evidence
Online murder claims from the 2020s are evidence that the story persists, but not evidence that the alleged killing occurred in 1971.
On this page
- How recent discussions frame Mc Donald's death
- Why later claims cannot retroactively replace early records
- What genuinely new evidence would need to demonstrate
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
Modern claims that atmospheric physicist and UFO researcher James E. McDonald was murdered are evidence that suspicion about his 1971 death remains alive; they are not, by themselves, evidence that a murder occurred. The distinction is unusually important in McDonald’s case because recent UFO discussions sometimes connect his death to present-day allegations that people were harmed to protect secrets about unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP). A prominent 2023 discussion, for example, explicitly asked whether McDonald might have been murdered in light of David Grusch’s allegations, while similar lists continued circulating in 2026.[Reddit]reddit.comPossible Grusch testimony on murders corroborationWas prominent UFO researcher James E. McDonald murdered? Why did the FBI have several files mentioning his UFO research? Many were never…
The evidential problem is chronological. Sources actually produced in 1971 described McDonald’s death as an apparent suicide, and the surviving historical record includes circumstances that existed before his death rather than being reconstructed from today’s disclosure debate. A later murder theory can overturn that account, but only if it supplies genuinely new evidence capable of explaining why those contemporary indications were misleading.
How recent discussions frame McDonald’s death
The modern argument is usually not based on newly discovered forensic evidence. Instead, it assembles several established facts into a new causal story: McDonald was a highly qualified scientist; he publicly challenged official handling of UFO reports; government agencies possessed information they did not disclose; he encountered classified material; and he died relatively young from a gunshot wound. Those facts make him an intuitively attractive candidate for contemporary lists of supposedly silenced UFO researchers.
The revival became especially visible during the post-2023 UAP disclosure debate. In July 2023, a widely discussed Reddit post asked whether McDonald might be an example of someone murdered to preserve a UFO cover-up, explicitly connecting the question to Grusch-era allegations. The post pointed to McDonald’s UFO work and FBI files as reasons for suspicion. Importantly, however, discussion beneath the same post immediately raised the strongest contrary fact: McDonald had survived a self-inflicted gunshot wound only months before his fatal shooting.[Reddit]reddit.comPossible Grusch testimony on murders corroborationWas prominent UFO researcher James E. McDonald murdered? Why did the FBI have several files mentioning his UFO research? Many were never…
The claim has persisted. A 2025 article at the Jesse A. Marcel Library said that McDonald and several other figures “may have been murdered” to maintain UFO secrecy. A specialised site appearing in 2026, Murdering UAP Experts, places McDonald among alleged or suspected victims and emphasises that his “career and marriage” were destroyed before he was found dead. Yet even that site’s detailed McDonald page acknowledges an earlier suicide attempt, a subsequent psychiatric admission, a revolver beside his body and a suicide note.[The Jesse A. Marcel Library]jaml.orgThe Jesse A. Marcel Library2025 – The Jesse A. Marcel LibraryDecember 9, 2025…
Other recent UFO-oriented writing reaches a substantially different conclusion. A 2026 UFOUAP case survey categorises McDonald as having died by suicide after a previous attempt and explicitly states that no foul play was alleged, while treating his story instead as an example of the damaging stigma and pressures surrounding UFO research.[UFOUAP]ufouap.comuap missing dead suspicious patternThe Missing and the Dead: UFO Figures Who Vanished or Died Under Suspicious Circumstances — UFOUAPMarch 3, 2026…
This disagreement illustrates what has changed since 1971: not necessarily the underlying evidence about McDonald’s death, but the interpretive environment around it. A death formerly discussed primarily in relation to McDonald’s personal and professional crisis can now be inserted into a much larger narrative about alleged UAP secrecy and suppression.
What sources created in 1971 actually establish
The most useful comparison is not between one modern website and another. It is between modern claims and records generated in or immediately around 1971.
A contemporary New York Times report, published on 16 June 1971 from a United Press International dispatch, reported that the 51-year-old University of Arizona physicist had been found dead in a desert area near Tucson and described the death as an “apparent suicide”. The report simultaneously acknowledged McDonald’s scientific standing, including his work in cloud physics, weather modification and the environmental controversy over supersonic transport. In other words, the early account did not erase either his prominence or his controversial interests in order to reach its description of the death.[Wikidata]wikidata.orgJames E. Mc DonaldJames E. McDonald - WikidataApril 8, 2026…
Another particularly valuable 1971 source is striking precisely because it concerns McDonald’s UFO work rather than his personal life. The July issue of Astronautics & Aeronautics, the journal of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, published McDonald’s detailed analysis of the famous 1957 RB-47 UFO incident. At the end, an editorial notice simply recorded that on 13 June McDonald had been found dead in the desert near Tucson, aged 51.[Kirk McDonald]kirkmcd.princeton.eduKirk McDonaldAstronautics & Aeronautics July 1971February 12, 2026…
That publication matters in two ways. First, it demonstrates that McDonald was still producing serious UFO-related material close to the time of his death; his work did not disappear from the professional record. Secondly, its death notice contains no suggestion that colleagues publishing his UFO research regarded his death as a suspected assassination. Silence cannot prove that no crime occurred, but it is relevant when a later theory proposes that suspicious circumstances should have been obvious to people involved at the time.
The professional record from the same year also contains Louis J. Battan’s obituary, “James Edward McDonald 1920–1971”, in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, as well as a University of Arizona memorial resolution by Battan, A. Richard Kassander Jr, Paul S. Martin and Cornelius Steelink. Bibliographic records identify both as 1971 publications.[HandWiki]handwiki.orgHand Wiki Biography:James E. Mc DonaldBiography:James E. McDonald - HandWikiMarch 11, 2026…
There is also an unusually substantial documentary archive against which later claims can potentially be tested. The University of Arizona’s James E. McDonald Papers, collection MS 412, preserve correspondence, research material and other records extending through the period of his UFO investigations. The collection guide describes material covering McDonald’s life and work rather than a retrospective conspiracy narrative assembled decades afterwards.[Kirk McDonald]kirkmcd.princeton.eduKirk Mc Donald Arizona Archives OnlineKirk Mc Donald Arizona Archives Online
Taken together, these sources do not make the 1971 account infallible. They do something more limited but essential: they establish the evidential baseline that any murder hypothesis has to beat.
The prior suicide attempt changes the evidential problem
The most consequential fact for evaluating a murder claim is not that McDonald died from a gunshot wound. It is that the fatal shooting followed a previous self-inflicted gunshot wound by only about two months.
Later accounts based on biographical and archival material place that earlier attempt on 9 April 1971. McDonald survived a gunshot to the head but suffered severe damage to his sight and spent time in psychiatric care. On 13 June he was found dead near Tucson; a.38-calibre revolver and a note identified as a suicide note were reportedly found nearby.[Murdering UAP Experts]uapmurders.comMurdering UAP Experts James E. Mc Donald | Murdering UAP ExpertsMurdering UAP Experts James E. Mc Donald | Murdering UAP Experts
This sequence sharply changes what a murder theory must explain. If the June death were considered in isolation, a gunshot death in an isolated location might reasonably prompt questions about homicide. Once the April attempt is incorporated, however, the June event becomes part of an already documented behavioural sequence. The murder hypothesis must therefore explain either why the April event has been misunderstood, or why an assassin later chose to reproduce the method of a recent suicide attempt while also leaving circumstances consistent with another suicide.
That does not make homicide logically impossible. Evidence can be planted; official conclusions can be wrong; people with histories of self-harm can also become victims of crime. But those possibilities are hypotheses, not evidence. A murder case would require positive support for one of them.
The distinction is sometimes blurred in modern retellings because phrases such as “found dead in the desert” or “gunshot wound to the head” are inherently dramatic when separated from the preceding chronology. The 2026 Murdering UAP Experts summary page, for instance, describes McDonald as having been found dead in the Arizona desert after his first attempt left him blind. Its fuller case page, however, supplies substantially more context, including the earlier attempt and reported suicide note.[Murdering UAP Experts]uapmurders.comOpen source on uapmurders.com.
The lesson is methodological rather than rhetorical: the same facts can sound radically different depending on which ones are omitted.
Government secrecy is real evidence, but of a different proposition
McDonald’s documented confrontations with official secrecy make the murder theory superficially stronger than a story based entirely on invented government involvement. He genuinely challenged official UFO investigations and sought access to government material. His surviving papers document extensive research, while his congressional and professional work made him one of the most scientifically credentialled UFO advocates of his era.[UFOR]ufor.asn.auUFORDr James E Mc Donald’s ArchivesUFORDr James E Mc Donald’s Archives
Modern murder speculation sometimes adds FBI interest to that picture. The 2023 discussion linking McDonald to Grusch-era claims emphasised FBI files, UFO references and national-security redactions as possible indications that authorities regarded him as significant.[Reddit]reddit.comPossible Grusch testimony on murders corroborationWas prominent UFO researcher James E. McDonald murdered? Why did the FBI have several files mentioning his UFO research? Many were never…
But evidence that a government agency collected information about McDonald is not evidence that the government killed him. These are separate propositions requiring separate evidential chains. Surveillance, classification, bureaucratic hostility or concealment can establish that McDonald operated in an environment containing genuine secrecy. None establishes who fired the fatal shot.
This distinction matters because real secrecy can make an unsupported inference feel evidentially complete. Once readers know that government agencies withheld UFO information, it becomes tempting to treat every subsequent unexplained or tragic event involving a prominent researcher as another manifestation of that secrecy. Yet the proposition “official agencies concealed information about UFOs” does not logically supply the missing steps between “McDonald challenged them” and “someone murdered McDonald”.
The existence of his archive makes that gap especially important. A credible assassination case should be capable of identifying evidence in McDonald’s correspondence, official records, witness testimony or forensic documentation that links a person or organisation to the death itself—not merely to disputes he had during his lifetime.[Kirk McDonald]kirkmcd.princeton.eduKirk Mc Donald Arizona Archives OnlineKirk Mc Donald Arizona Archives Online
Why later claims cannot replace the 1971 record
Later evidence is not inherently inferior evidence. A document declassified fifty years after an event may reveal something no contemporary newspaper could have known. DNA testing can overturn an old conviction. A previously silent witness can provide verifiable information. Historical conclusions therefore remain open to revision.
But elapsed time does not itself make a later interpretation more informed. A 2023 or 2026 claim gains evidential weight only if it introduces information unavailable to the people recording events in 1971.
That is the central weakness of the modern McDonald murder narrative found in the sources examined here. Recent discussions largely recycle established facts—his UFO advocacy, clashes with official institutions, FBI attention, gunshot death and professional pressures—and rearrange them around the modern premise that people may have been killed to protect UAP secrets.[Reddit]reddit.comPossible Grusch testimony on murders corroborationWas prominent UFO researcher James E. McDonald murdered? Why did the FBI have several files mentioning his UFO research? Many were never…
The resulting argument risks circularity:
McDonald challenged UFO secrecy → people may have been killed to preserve UFO secrecy → McDonald died → therefore McDonald may have been one of those killed.
Each component can be discussed legitimately, but the sequence does not independently demonstrate homicide. The crucial middle connection remains unproved.
This is why quotation marks around the word “suicide”, rhetorical questions about convenient deaths, or inclusion on lists of “suspicious” scientists have little evidential value on their own. They communicate doubt. They do not establish the factual basis for that doubt. Recent online lists continue to place McDonald alongside scientists and UFO figures described as dead or missing under suspicious circumstances, demonstrating the persistence of the narrative without resolving McDonald’s individual case.[Reddit]reddit.com31 gone and counting (18 scientists dead; 6 scientists missing and; 7 connected people dead)…
What genuinely new evidence would need to demonstrate
A serious reassessment would not require accepting the 1971 conclusion on authority. It would require evidence capable of testing it. Several kinds of discovery could materially change the picture.
Forensic contradiction would be highly significant. An original autopsy, scene report, ballistics examination, photographs or other contemporaneous forensic records showing that the wound, weapon, trajectory or physical scene was incompatible with suicide would directly address the mechanism of death. That would be far more probative than evidence that McDonald had enemies.
Contemporaneous witness evidence could matter. A documented threat naming McDonald, reliable testimony placing another person at the scene, evidence that he was being followed immediately before his death, or communications showing that he feared a specific actor could justify reopening the causal question. Such material would still need authentication and corroboration.
A genuine documentary link to an operation would be stronger still. A government or private record discussing plans to harm McDonald, surveillance specifically connected to preparations for his death, payments to participants, after-action reporting or credible communications among identified conspirators would directly connect institutional secrecy to the fatal event. Merely discovering additional classified UFO files would not do so.
Evidence concerning the reported suicide notes could also alter the assessment. Authentication problems, handwriting inconsistencies, demonstrable fabrication or evidence that descriptions of the notes entered the record only much later could weaken an important part of the suicide narrative. Conversely, authenticated notes with secure provenance would strengthen it.
Finally, any new theory would have to account for the April 1971 suicide attempt rather than treating it as inconvenient background. Evidence that the earlier shooting was misclassified would radically change the case. Without such evidence, a homicide hypothesis for June has to coexist with a documented recent attempt involving the same basic method.[Murdering UAP Experts]uapmurders.comMurdering UAP Experts James E. Mc Donald | Murdering UAP ExpertsMurdering UAP Experts James E. Mc Donald | Murdering UAP Experts
The historical record sets a high bar for a murder claim
James E. McDonald is a compelling figure precisely because there is no need to exaggerate his history. He was a respected atmospheric physicist, an unusually forceful scientific advocate for UFO investigation, a critic of official handling of the subject and a researcher whose surviving papers preserve extensive evidence of that campaign. His final UFO case study was still appearing in a professional aerospace journal in July 1971.[Kirk McDonald]kirkmcd.princeton.eduKirk McDonaldAstronautics & Aeronautics July 1971February 12, 2026…
Those facts make questions about his death understandable. They do not establish its cause.
The presently accessible evidence produces an important asymmetry. Sources created in 1971 record an apparent suicide, while the wider chronology contains a serious suicide attempt shortly before the fatal event. Modern sources demonstrate renewed suspicion, especially after the resurgence of UAP disclosure allegations, but the examples examined here do not supply new forensic or documentary evidence showing that McDonald was murdered.[wikidata.org]wikidata.orgJames E. Mc DonaldJames E. McDonald - WikidataApril 8, 2026…
That conclusion is provisional in the proper historical sense: genuinely new evidence could change it. But the burden cannot be reversed. The existence of government UFO secrecy does not require the 1971 records to prove that assassination was impossible. A modern murder claim must produce evidence showing why the earlier record is wrong—and, above all, evidence connecting another actor to McDonald’s death.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to Why Modern Mc Donald Murder Claims Need New Evidence. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The Craft of Research
Rating: 4.3/5 from 6 Google Books ratings
Since 1995, students, researchers, and professionals have turned to The Craft of Research for clear and helpful guidance on how to conduc...
Firestorm: Dr. James E. McDonald's Fight for UFO Science
The authorised biography of Dr James E McDonald's research into the UFO phenomenon. McDonald worked in the 1950s and 1960s to raise the U...
The Believing Brain
Bestselling author Shermer presents a comprehensive and provocative theory on how beliefs are born, formed, reinforced, challenged, chang...
The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark
Are we on the brink of a new Dark Age of irrationality and superstition? In this book, the writer shows how scientific thinking is necess...
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.
Endnotes
1.
Source: reddit.com
Title: Possible Grusch testimony on murders corroboration
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1575fg3/possible_grusch_testimony_on_murders/
Source snippet
Was prominent UFO researcher James E. McDonald murdered? Why did the FBI have several files mentioning his UFO research? Many were never...
2.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFO_scientists/comments/1tu995j/31_gone_and_counting_18_scientists_dead_6/
Source snippet
31 gone and counting (18 scientists dead; 6 scientists missing and; 7 connected people dead)...
3.
Source: ufouap.com
Title: uap missing dead suspicious pattern
Link:https://www.ufouap.com/articles/uap-missing-dead-suspicious-pattern/
Source snippet
The Missing and the Dead: UFO Figures Who Vanished or Died Under Suspicious Circumstances — UFOUAPMarch 3, 2026...
Published: March 3, 2026
4.
Source: wikidata.org
Title: James E. Mc Donald
Link:https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1374577
Source snippet
James E. McDonald - WikidataApril 8, 2026...
Published: April 8, 2026
5.
Source: reddit.com
Title: Remembering Dr. James E. Mc Donald
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1fpf49c
Source snippet
Remembering Dr. James E. McDonald - Let us not forget what is at stake and how deliberate obfuscation has long been the tactic of t...
6.
Source: handwiki.org
Title: Hand Wiki Biography:James E. Mc Donald
Link:https://handwiki.org/wiki/Biography%3AJames_E._McDonald
Source snippet
Biography:James E. McDonald - HandWikiMarch 11, 2026...
Published: March 11, 2026
7.
Source: ufor.asn.au
Title: UFORDr James E Mc Donald’s Archives
Link:https://www.ufor.asn.au/archives/articles/james-e-mcdonald-ufo-researcher-archives/
8.
Source: ufos.wiki
Title: James E. Mc Donald
Link:https://ufos.wiki/figure/james-e-mcdonald/
9.
Source: reddit.com
Title: 34 Scientists and connected people gone
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFO_scientists/comments/1ulo7az/34_scientists_and_connected_people_gone/
10.
Source: wikidata.org
Title: James Mc Donald
Link:https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q133654435
11.
Source: handwiki.org
Title: Unsolved:List of ufologists
Link:https://handwiki.org/wiki/Unsolved%3AList_of_ufologists
12.
Source: tucson.com
Title: New York midwife gave kids pellets instead of vaccines
Link:https://tucson.com/news/nation-world/article_6e6ae68e-55cf-5847-a580-2079fbd4dd86.html
13.
Source: archive.ph
Title: A Bit of History Web Site
Link:https://archive.ph/FAXn5
14.
Source: tucson.com
Title: Tales from the Morgue: UFOs are real
Link:https://tucson.com/news/blogs/morgue-tales/tales-from-the-morgue-ufos-are-real/article_6593476e-745e-11e1-838d-001871e3ce6c.html
15.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=Robert+Jones&=&b_start%3Aint=30
16.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=mind+control&=&b_start%3Aint=450
17.
Source: youtu.be
Title: Red Panda Koala’s UFO History Archive
Link:https://youtu.be/fZvcZfNz45c?si=4yYHys5xIw5Fqso6
Source snippet
UFOLogist James McDonald to AIAA Tom Owens UAP...
18.
Source: jaml.org
Link:https://jaml.org/2025/
Source snippet
The Jesse A. Marcel Library2025 – The Jesse A. Marcel LibraryDecember 9, 2025...
Published: December 9, 2025
19.
Source: uapmurders.com
Title: Murdering UAP Experts James E. Mc Donald | Murdering UAP Experts
Link:https://uapmurders.com/uaps/Details/James_McDonald/
20.
Source: kirkmcd.princeton.edu
Link:https://kirkmcd.princeton.edu/JEMcDonald/mcdonald_aa_9_7_66_71.pdf
Source snippet
Kirk McDonaldAstronautics & Aeronautics July 1971February 12, 2026...
Published: February 12, 2026
21.
Source: kirkmcd.princeton.edu
Title: Kirk Mc Donaldbib_jem.DV I
Link:https://kirkmcd.princeton.edu/JEMcDonald/bib_jem.pdf
22.
Source: kirkmcd.princeton.edu
Title: Kirk Mc Donald Arizona Archives Online
Link:https://kirkmcd.princeton.edu/JEMcDonald/mcdonald_arizona_archives_ms412.pdf
23.
Source: uapmurders.com
Link:https://uapmurders.com/energy/
24.
Source: ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com
Title: Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena
Link:https://ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com/2017/10/westall-and-james-e-mcdonalds-files.html
25.
Source: ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com
Title: Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena
Link:https://ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com/2017/10/westall-and-csiro.html
26.
Source: ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com
Title: Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena
Link:https://ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com/2017/02/
27.
Source: ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com
Title: Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena
Link:https://ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com/2016/11/observation-by-australian-pilot-over.html
28.
Source: ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com
Title: Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena
Link:https://ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com/2016/03/james-e-mcdonald-digital-recordings.html
29.
Source: ufor.asn.au
Title: Overview of UFOs (UAPs)
Link:https://www.ufor.asn.au/archives/articles/overview-of-ufos-uaps/
30.
Source: ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com
Title: Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena
Link:https://ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com/2012/03/james-e-mcdonald-on-cover-up-vs-foul-up.html
31.
Source: ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com
Title: Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena
Link:https://ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com/2012/03/pre-1947-ufo-reports-and-james-e.html
32.
Source: ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com
Title: Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena
Link:https://ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com/2012/02/james-e-mcdonald-in-australia.html
33.
Source: scribd.com
Link:https://www.scribd.com/document/933725503/4880516
34.
Source: archive.dartmouthalumnimagazine.com
Link:https://archive.dartmouthalumnimagazine.com/article/1971/10/1/deaths
35.
Source: uapmurders.com
Link:https://uapmurders.com/physics/Physics_Math/patents_intl/more_patents/
36.
Source: uapmurders.com
Link:https://uapmurders.com/
37.
Source: uapmurders.com
Link:https://uapmurders.com/uaps/podcasts/
38.
Source: ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com
Title: Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena
Link:https://ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com/2012/03/
39.
Source: ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com
Title: Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena
Link:https://ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com/2018/04/
40.
Source: ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com
Title: Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena
Link:https://ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com/2016/
41.
Source: daviddarling.info
Link:https://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/U/UFOs.html
42.
Source: data.maplight.org
Link:https://data.maplight.org/US/2016/summaries/all.html
43.
Source: silverland.info
Title: James Edward Mc Donald
Link:https://www.silverland.info/ufo-s-people/james-edward-mc-donald/
44.
Source: t.co
Title: f Eslx Vt8CZ
Link:https://t.co/fEslxVt8CZ
Additional References
45.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tqs6Z3OQSk
Source snippet
James E McDonald UFO Dr. James E. McDonald September 24, 1968 lecture, UFOs: A Case Study in Public Mis-information, at K...
Published: September 24, 1968
46.
Source: readkong.com
Title: UFO ENCOUNTER 1 Sample Case Selected by the UFO Subcommittee of the AIAA
Link:https://www.readkong.com/page/ufo-encounter-1-sample-case-selected-by-the-ufo-3702540
Source snippet
UFO ENCOUNTER 1 Sample Case Selected by the UFO Subcommittee of the AIAA...
47.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NP_y9HJdmoM
Source snippet
UFO mystery: [Researcher deaths]({{ 'missing-denominator/' | relative_url }}), disappearances unrelated, ex-FBI agent says...
48.
Source: youtube.com
Title: UFO mystery: Researcher deaths, disappearances unrelated, ex-FBI agent says
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Fm-0B0Gd9o
Source snippet
Mysterious case of missing and dead scientists tied to UFO programs sounds alarms...
49.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Dr. James E. Mc Donald
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gzCQvC0cTKI
Source snippet
'Science In Default' by Professor James E. McDonald...
Published: September 24, 1968
50.
Source: youtube.com
Title: James E. Mc Donald: The UFO Scientist Who Wouldn’t Back Down
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gwQqhSS4tk
Source snippet
Dr. James E. McDonald September 24, 1968 lecture, UFOs: A Case Study in Public Mis-information...
Published: September 24, 1968
51.
Source: youtube.com
Title: ‘Science In Default’ by Professor James E. Mc Donald
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=krMjwsEl0PA
Source snippet
Mysterious Deaths of UFO Researchers Date Back to 1940s, Fresh Claim Emerges | GRAVITAS...
52.
Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/usao-cdca/pr/health-care-fraud-takedown-results-10-socal-defendants-federally-charged-defrauding
53.
Source: science.gov
Link:https://www.science.gov/topicpages/n/neurosurgery%2Bcongress%2Bheld
54.
Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr