What Mc Donald's Final Months Actually Show

Introduction

James E. McDonald’s death is sometimes presented in UFO literature as a compact suspicious-death story: a respected atmospheric physicist challenged official handling of UFO reports, attracted government attention, was publicly attacked, and was then found shot dead in the Arizona desert. Those facts are not wholly invented. What changes their meaning is the chronology.

The final months contain an important fact that compressed retellings can minimise or omit: McDonald had already made a serious suicide attempt by gunshot before his fatal death on 13 June 1971. Contemporary reporting and later historical accounts also place his death amid acute personal and professional pressures. Restoring those events does not prove that every circumstance is fully explained, nor does it erase genuine FBI interest in him. It does, however, make a straightforward assassination narrative substantially harder to sustain. The case becomes less a mysterious death following UFO advocacy than a documented personal crisis culminating in a second, fatal shooting.[Arizona Daily Star]tucson.comArizona Daily Star Tales from the Morgue: UFOs are realArizona Daily StarTales from the Morgue: UFOs are realMarch 23, 2012…Published: March 23, 2012

The sequence from controversy to personal crisis

McDonald entered 1971 as an unusually visible scientist who had spent years challenging mainstream and governmental treatment of UFO reports. This was no retrospective embellishment. The University of Arizona’s archive holds correspondence with government and military officials, hundreds of Project Blue Book reports, investigative journals, case files and more than 80 audio recordings from his UFO work. It also records his involvement in other contentious public questions, including the environmental consequences of supersonic transport aircraft.[University of Arizona Libraries]lib.arizona.eduOpen source on arizona.edu.

That distinction matters because the controversy immediately preceding his death was not simply another UFO confrontation. McDonald was appearing in the political battle over the American supersonic transport programme, arguing that large-scale SST operations could alter the upper atmosphere and increase exposure to ultraviolet radiation. Congressional records show that his calculations concerning ozone and skin-cancer risk were being discussed in March 1971.[GovInfo]govinfo.govGPO CRECB 1971 pt6 3March 19, 1971March 28, 2024…Published: March 19, 1971

His UFO reputation nevertheless followed him into that dispute. On 18 March, Representative Silvio Conte brought McDonald’s earlier UFO testimony onto the floor of the House while discussing the SST controversy. The Congressional Record explicitly identifies McDonald as the scientist who had appeared before an appropriations subcommittee and then turns to his history before another House committee. Contemporary congressional material therefore confirms an important part of the later story: McDonald’s UFO advocacy was being used politically against his credibility in an unrelated scientific controversy.[GovInfo]govinfo.govGPO CRECB 1971 pt6 2CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-HOUSE…

That episode is significant evidence of ridicule and reputational pressure. It is not, by itself, evidence of a plan to kill him. Indeed, conflating the two obscures something historically important about McDonald: there is strong documentary evidence that advocacy of UFO research could carry professional costs even without assuming a covert assassination programme.

The chronology then turns sharply towards his private life. Later biographical accounts place the breakdown of his marriage in March 1971, when his wife Betsy sought a divorce. In April, McDonald attempted suicide by shooting himself in the head. He survived but suffered severe damage to his sight and required psychiatric treatment. Accounts differ in some peripheral details about his subsequent recovery and movements, but the existence of this earlier attempt is not merely a late sceptical counter-story. The Arizona Daily Star’s retrospective account states that McDonald had attempted suicide several months before his death, also by shooting himself in the head, and that he left a note on both occasions.[Arizona Daily Star]tucson.comArizona Daily Star Tales from the Morgue: UFOs are realArizona Daily StarTales from the Morgue: UFOs are realMarch 23, 2012…Published: March 23, 2012

This is the pivotal chronological fact. Any theory that the fatal shooting was staged to resemble suicide must explain why the supposed assassins chose a method closely matching a genuine, recent attempt by McDonald himself. That does not make homicide logically impossible. It changes the evidential burden dramatically.

On 13 June 1971, McDonald was found dead near the Cañada del Oro wash outside Tucson. A revolver was beside him, and his death was ruled suicide. The contemporary New York Times/UPI report described it immediately as an apparent suicide, rather than that interpretation first emerging years later. The American Meteorological Society’s 1971 obituary independently confirms his date of death while concentrating primarily on his scientific career.[Reddit]reddit.comRemembering Dr. James E. Mc DonaldRemembering Dr. James E. McDonald - Let us not forget what is at stake and how deliberate obfuscation has long been the tactic of t…

Put in order, the final stretch is therefore not simply UFO challenge → mysterious death. It is closer to:

long-running UFO advocacy and institutional conflict → SST controversy and public attacks on his credibility → marital crisis → non-fatal gunshot suicide attempt → psychiatric and physical recovery period → fatal gunshot death approximately two months later, accompanied by another note.[govinfo.gov]govinfo.govGPO CRECB 1971 pt6 2CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-HOUSE…

That sequence does not tell us everything about McDonald’s state of mind. It does tell us what any alternative explanation has to overcome.

Where later retellings compress the timeline

Retrospective assassination narratives usually become more persuasive when the middle of this sequence disappears. McDonald’s career supplies several authentic ingredients from which such a narrative can be constructed: he disputed official UFO conclusions; he corresponded internationally; government agencies kept records on him; he had scientific prestige; his UFO advocacy generated antagonism; and he died violently at 51. If those points are placed directly beside one another, the resulting pattern looks considerably more ominous than the complete chronology.

That compression remains visible in modern discussion. Recent UFO-community posts place McDonald in lists of scientists allegedly killed or lost under suspicious circumstances, sometimes reducing his case essentially to his scientific credentials, congressional UFO advocacy and death from a gunshot wound. Other discussions explicitly ask whether he was murdered to preserve a UFO cover-up. Such posts are useful evidence for the retrospective narrative itself, but they are not independent evidence that an assassination occurred.[Reddit]reddit.com34 Scientists and connected people gone34 Scientists and connected people goneJuly 2, 2026…Published: July 2, 2026

More elaborate versions add genuine government records. Released FBI material shows that McDonald did attract federal attention. A 1969 FBI memorandum identified him as a prominent atmospheric physicist associated with UFO claims and discussed an inquiry involving his contacts and activities. The files also document attention to anti-war and related political associations. They describe McDonald as highly respected and repeatedly report favourable assessments of his loyalty. One memorandum states that he did not then have access to classified research material.[Computer UFO Network]cufon.orgComputer UFO Network FBI FILE OF DR. JAMES E. Mc DONALDComputer UFO Network FBI FILE OF DR. JAMES E. Mc DONALD

The files contain another detail that understandably attracts suspicion: a White House name-check request produced an FBI summary concerning McDonald dated 18 March 1971, with material transmitted to Deputy Assistant to the President Alexander Butterfield. The surviving record says the request concerned several individuals, includes McDonald among them, and summarises earlier investigations and political-association material.[Computer UFO Network]cufon.orgComputer UFO Network FBI FILE OF DR. JAMES E. Mc DONALDComputer UFO Network FBI FILE OF DR. JAMES E. Mc DONALD

The date is striking because it falls less than three months before McDonald’s death. But chronology has to be applied in both directions. A nearby date establishes temporal proximity, not causal connection. The surviving document does not order surveillance intended to silence McDonald, threaten him, discuss killing him, or identify his death as an objective. Nor does the record establish from the visible material why McDonald’s name was among those requested. Treating the existence of the name check as proof of assassination therefore adds a causal conclusion that the document itself does not contain.[Computer UFO Network]cufon.orgComputer UFO Network FBI FILE OF DR. JAMES E. Mc DONALDComputer UFO Network FBI FILE OF DR. JAMES E. Mc DONALD

There is also a revealing complication in the earlier FBI records. In September 1969, the Phoenix office decided against interviewing McDonald because an interview might be unproductive and could cause embarrassment to the Bureau. The record describes concern that the FBI might be publicly denounced for such an approach. Whatever one makes of the broader intelligence interest, this particular document records bureaucratic caution about contacting him, not an escalating operation against his life.[Computer UFO Network]cufon.orgComputer UFO Network FBI FILE OF DR. JAMES E. Mc DONALDComputer UFO Network FBI FILE OF DR. JAMES E. Mc DONALD

None of this means the files are uninteresting. Their redactions and classification history leave legitimate historical questions, and they show that McDonald existed inside the much wider Cold War security environment surrounding political activism, foreign contacts and sensitive scientific work. But “the FBI had a file on McDonald” and “the FBI or another agency murdered McDonald because of UFO research” are two very different propositions. The first is documented; the second requires evidence that has not emerged from these records.

The earlier attempt is the hardest fact for an assassination theory

The April suicide attempt is especially damaging to retrospective accounts that treat the June shooting itself as the principal indication of foul play. Method alone cannot distinguish homicide from suicide: a gun beside a body and a note could theoretically be staged. But this was not an isolated first episode.

McDonald had recently shot himself in the head and survived. The later fatal event repeated the same broad method. The Arizona Daily Star retrospective specifically records notes in connection with both episodes. Other biographical accounts likewise describe the April attempt as preceding psychiatric hospitalisation and the June death.[Arizona Daily Star]tucson.comArizona Daily Star Tales from the Morgue: UFOs are realArizona Daily StarTales from the Morgue: UFOs are realMarch 23, 2012…Published: March 23, 2012

For a suppression hypothesis to fit that chronology, it must therefore become more complicated. It must propose either that the April attempt was itself somehow engineered or misrepresented, or that conspirators later exploited McDonald’s demonstrated suicidality to disguise a murder. Either scenario is possible as an abstract hypothesis. Neither follows from the currently available evidence.

The distinction is fundamental to chronology testing. A fact that makes a hypothetical assassination conceivable is not necessarily evidence that makes it probable. McDonald’s earlier attempt certainly could have provided camouflage to a hypothetical killer. Much more directly, however, it demonstrates that McDonald himself had already engaged in the same category of lethal self-harm shortly before his death.

The timing also prevents a different distortion: attributing his entire crisis exclusively to the UFO controversy. His public treatment over UFOs plainly contributed to professional pressure, and his UFO reputation was demonstrably weaponised during the SST dispute. Yet accounts of the final months also identify the breakdown of his marriage as an immediate personal crisis. The most defensible historical reconstruction therefore resists replacing a complex convergence of pressures with one single cause.[Academic Dictionaries and Encyclopedias]en-academic.comAcademic Dictionaries and Encyclopedias James E. Mc DonaldAcademic Dictionaries and Encyclopedias James E. Mc Donald

McDonald was still scientifically active

Another feature sometimes used to create suspicion is that McDonald had unfinished work. This is true in the ordinary and important sense that he remained an active researcher. The University of Arizona collection contains journals running through 1971, an outline for an unpublished book, correspondence, talks and extensive investigative material. His death unquestionably cut short an unusually energetic scientific and UFO-related programme.[University of Arizona Libraries]lib.arizona.eduOpen source on arizona.edu.

But unfinished research is weak evidence of assassination unless it can be connected to a specific discovery, threat or intervention. Researchers who die unexpectedly almost invariably leave projects incomplete. A claim that McDonald had uncovered information dangerous enough to motivate murder therefore needs more than evidence that he was still investigating UFOs.

One later strand of the story illustrates the problem. UFO-oriented secondary accounts report a recollection from aerospace physicist Robert Wood that, shortly before McDonald’s death, McDonald suggested he had discovered something important that he was not yet ready to reveal. Such recollections are potentially interesting leads, but they do not establish what the supposed discovery was, whether McDonald’s assessment of it was correct, whether anyone else knew about it, or whether it had anything to do with his death.[UFOs Scientific Research]ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.comUFOs Scientific Research Unidentified Anomalous PhenomenaUFOs Scientific Research Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena

The archive itself provides a useful counterweight to the idea of a researcher whose work simply vanished with him. McDonald’s papers survived in exceptional volume. They include correspondence, hundreds of Blue Book reports, journals, tapes, photographs, case investigations and research notes. Paul E. McCarthy subsequently received access to McDonald’s materials for his 1975 University of Hawaii doctoral dissertation on McDonald and the UFO controversy.[University of Arizona Libraries]lib.arizona.eduOpen source on arizona.edu.

That does not rule out the loss of particular documents. It does mean that any claim that McDonald was killed to suppress his research should identify what evidence was supposedly removed and demonstrate that it existed before his death. The survival of such a large documentary record makes a vague claim that his UFO work as a whole was successfully suppressed difficult to maintain.

Which claims remain unresolved after chronology is restored

Restoring the sequence should not be confused with declaring every question closed. Several points remain legitimately open to historical investigation.

The full purpose and context of every government record concerning McDonald are not transparent. Released FBI files contain redactions, classified passages and records of official interest extending beyond UFOs into Cold War political concerns. The March 1971 White House name check is real and unusually close in time to McDonald’s final crisis. These documents warrant careful archival examination rather than dismissal.[Computer UFO Network]cufon.orgComputer UFO Network FBI FILE OF DR. JAMES E. Mc DONALDComputer UFO Network FBI FILE OF DR. JAMES E. Mc DONALD

There is also room to investigate the exact reconstruction of McDonald’s movements immediately before his death, the provenance and surviving documentation of the notes associated with the two shootings, and how contemporary investigators reached their conclusion. Accessible online sources are much stronger on the broad sequence than on a complete primary police or coroner file. Absence of such material from readily searchable collections is a reason for restraint, not permission to fill the gap with either certainty of conspiracy or certainty that every detail is known.

What is considerably less unresolved is the claim that McDonald’s suicide history was invented after his death to neutralise suspicion. Newspaper retrospectives, biographical treatments and the established historical sequence all recognise the earlier attempt. The final death was also reported contemporaneously as an apparent suicide.[Arizona Daily Star]tucson.comArizona Daily Star Tales from the Morgue: UFOs are realArizona Daily StarTales from the Morgue: UFOs are realMarch 23, 2012…Published: March 23, 2012

The strongest conclusion is therefore narrower than either pole of the debate. McDonald really did experience institutional hostility and public ridicule connected to his UFO advocacy. Government records really were maintained on him. His reputation as a UFO researcher really was invoked to attack his credibility in another scientific dispute. Those facts make his story relevant to the history of researcher marginalisation.[GovInfo]govinfo.govGPO CRECB 1971 pt6 2CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-HOUSE…

But the evidence for marginalisation should not silently become evidence for assassination. Once McDonald’s final months are restored to their actual order, the assassination interpretation faces a major evidential obstacle: before the fatal shooting there had already been a severe personal crisis and a closely similar suicide attempt. No released document cited here supplies the missing bridge from government interest or professional hostility to homicide.

That is precisely why McDonald’s case is valuable when testing researcher-suppression theories. Chronology does not make the uncomfortable parts of his story disappear. It separates them. Public ridicule is documented as public ridicule; FBI interest is documented as FBI interest; marital crisis and an earlier suicide attempt belong where they occurred in the sequence; and assassination remains a later hypothesis for which substantially stronger evidence would be required.

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to What Mc Donald's Final Months Actually Show. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

Book

The Demon-Haunted World

By Carl Sagan, Ann Druyan

Rating: 4.5/5 from 43 Google Books ratings

NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER • From the renowned astronomer and author of Cosmos comes a “powerful [and] stirring defense of informed ration...

See on Amazon

Book

UFOs and Government: A Historical Inquiry

By Michael D. Swords

Governments around the world have had to deal with the UFO phenomenon for a good part of a century. How and why they did so is the subjec...

See on Amazon

Book

The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects

By Edward J. Ruppelt

The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects, written by Captain Edward Ruppelt in 1956, was the first serious, unbiased account written abo...

See on Amazon

Book

UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go on the Re...

By Leslie Kean

NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER • Impeccably researched, this riveting journalistic investigation separates fact from fiction, and documents th...

See on Amazon

Browse more on Amazon:The Demon Haunted WorldUFOs and Government: A Historical InquiryThe Report on Unidentified Flying Objects

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.

Shop location

UsingUSA USA USAUKCanadaAustraliaIreland

Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.

Current eBay listing

The X-FILES I WANT TO BELIEVE UFO METAL SIGN WALL PLAQUE poster A6 A5 A4 A3

GBP 16.95 | Free shippingNewSeller: metal-plaques-uk (99.5% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Current eBay listing

I WANT TO BELIEVE UFO POSTER TV SERIES POSTER A0-A1-A2-A3-A4-A5-A6-MAXI 191

GBP 15.99 | Free shippingNewSeller: big-print-uk (99.8% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Current eBay listing

VINTAGE UFO FLYING SAUCERS COMIC ADVERTISING A2 POSTER PRINT

GBP 10.76 | Free shippingNewSeller: andys-prints-uk (99.6% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Current eBay listing

UFO S4 Framed Picture Poster Print Wall Art A3 Bob Lazar

GBP 21.50 | Shipping GBP 3.71NewSeller: lavishaddict (100.0% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Browse more oneBay.co.uk

Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.

Endnotes

1. Source: tucson.com
Title: Arizona Daily Star Tales from the Morgue: UFOs are real
Link:https://tucson.com/news/blogs/morgue-tales/tales-from-the-morgue-ufos-are-real/article_6593476e-745e-11e1-838d-001871e3ce6c.html

Published: March 23, 2012

2. Source: lib.arizona.edu
Link:https://lib.arizona.edu/special-collections/collections/james-e-mcdonald-papers

3. Source: govinfo.gov
Title: GPO CRECB 1971 pt6 3
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-CRECB-1971-pt6/pdf/GPO-CRECB-1971-pt6-3.pdf

Published: March 19, 1971

4. Source: govinfo.gov
Title: GPO CRECB 1971 pt5 4 2
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-CRECB-1971-pt5/pdf/GPO-CRECB-1971-pt5-4-2.pdf

5. Source: govinfo.gov
Title: GPO CRECB 1971 pt6 2
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-CRECB-1971-pt6/pdf/GPO-CRECB-1971-pt6-2.pdf

6. Source: reddit.com
Title: Remembering Dr. James E. Mc Donald
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1fpf49c

7. Source: reddit.com
Title: 34 Scientists and connected people gone
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFO_scientists/comments/1ulo7az/34_scientists_and_connected_people_gone/

Published: July 2, 2026

8. Source: reddit.com
Title: Possible Grusch testimony on murders [corroboration]({{ ‘corroboration/’ | relative_url }})
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1575fg3/possible_grusch_testimony_on_murders/

9. Source: tucson.com
Title: This popular downtown Tucson bakery opening a 2nd location
Link:https://tucson.com/news/local/business/real-estate/article_74caf727-925d-4b92-9b08-89eb07e9a316.html

10. Source: news.arizona.edu
Title: look inside special collections veronica reyes escudero
Link:https://news.arizona.edu/employee-news/look-inside-special-collections-veronica-reyes-escudero

11. Source: govinfo.gov
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/DCPD-2017DIGEST/related

12. Source: out.com
Link:https://www.out.com/news-opinion/2016/2/09/stephen-fry-talks-attempted-suicide-after-interviewing-anti-gay-ugandan

13. Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=mind+control&amp=&b_start%3Aint=450

14. Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=Robert+Jones&amp=&b_start%3Aint=30

15. Source: ufos.wiki
Title: James E. Mc Donald
Link:https://ufos.wiki/figure/james-e-mcdonald/

16. Source: ia600600.us.archive.org
Title: 492780987 The UFO Book Encyclopedia of the Extraterrestrial PDFDrive
Link:https://ia600600.us.archive.org/32/items/492780987-the-ufo-book-encyclopedia-of-the-extraterrestrial-pdfdrive/492780987-The-UFO-Book-Encyclopedia-of-the-Extraterrestrial-PDFDrive.pdf

17. Source: reddit.com
Title: ciaairforce debunking campaign to decrease public
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1ak4kwe/ciaairforce_debunking_campaign_to_decrease_public/

18. Source: en-academic.com
Title: Academic Dictionaries and Encyclopedias James E. Mc Donald
Link:https://en-academic.com/dic.nsf/%20enwiki%20/990977

19. Source: cufon.org
Title: Computer UFO Network FBI FILE OF DR. JAMES E. Mc DONALD
Link:https://www.cufon.org/cufon/fbimcdon.htm

20. Source: ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com
Title: UFOs Scientific Research Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena
Link:https://ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com/2012/02/james-e-mcdonald-in-australia.html

21. Source: mytrailsintothepast.blogspot.com
Title: monday genea pourri week of december 23
Link:https://mytrailsintothepast.blogspot.com/2024/12/monday-genea-pourri-week-of-december-23.html

22. Source: thesaucersthattimeforgot.blogspot.com
Title: The Saucers That Time Forgot: Air Force
Link:https://thesaucersthattimeforgot.blogspot.com/search/label/Air%20Force

23. Source: thesaucersthattimeforgot.blogspot.com
Title: The Saucers That Time Forgot
Link:https://thesaucersthattimeforgot.blogspot.com/search?max-results=7&reverse-paginate=true&updated-max=2022-04-21T08%3A31%3A00-05%3A00

24. Source: ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com
Title: Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena
Link:https://ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com/2017/02/

25. Source: esdocs.com
Link:https://esdocs.com/doc/2485642/phoenix

26. Source: ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com
Title: Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena
Link:https://ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com/2016/03/james-e-mcdonald-digital-recordings.html

27. Source: spookyparadigm.blogspot.com
Title: Spooky Paradigm: Spooky Dissertations Part 2: UFO Culture
Link:https://spookyparadigm.blogspot.com/2010/09/spooky-dissertations-part-2-ufo-culture.html

28. Source: scribd.com
Link:https://www.scribd.com/document/933725503/4880516

29. Source: scribd.com
Link:https://www.scribd.com/document/426506439/0323476740

30. Source: cisu.org
Link:https://www.cisu.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/UFOTheses_by_Paolo_Toselli_updated_20170101a.pdf

31. Source: t.co
Title: f Eslx Vt8CZ
Link:https://t.co/fEslxVt8CZ

32. Source: documents.uow.edu.au
Link:https://documents.uow.edu.au/~bmartin/pubs/79bias/part3.html

33. Source: ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com
Title: Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena
Link:https://ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com/2018/04/

34. Source: ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com
Title: Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena
Link:https://ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com/2012/03/

35. Source: arizona.aviaryplatform.com
Link:https://arizona.aviaryplatform.com/collections/3721

36. Source: connectingsiruius.blogspot.com
Link:https://connectingsiruius.blogspot.com/2015/05/

Additional References

37. Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xSil34LddA

Published: May 7, 1920

38. Source: youtube.com
Title: Dr. James E. Mc Donald
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gzCQvC0cTKI

Published: September 24, 1968

39. Source: youtube.com
Title: “Ridicule” ~ A tribute to UFO researcher Dr. James E. Mc Donald (
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gMaVBfgyrJ4

Published: May 7, 1920

40. Source: youtube.com
Title: Investigating the UFO investigator Dr James E. Mc Donald
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JkLCvKuT80Y

Published: September 24, 1968

41. Source: youtube.com
Title: The Impossible Death of Ufologist James E Mc Donald
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IfY1NxJBisQ

42. Source: nixonlibrary.gov
Link:https://www.nixonlibrary.gov/research/guide-holdings

43. Source: trumanlibrary.gov
Link:https://www.trumanlibrary.gov/library/truman-papers/harry-s-truman-papers-post-presidential-papers

44. Source: science.gov
Link:https://www.science.gov/topicpages/c/calculate%2Bincidence%2Brate

45. Source: science.gov
Link:https://www.science.gov/topicpages/v/variant%2Bslc30a8%2Br325w

46. Source: youtube.com
Title: James E. Mc Donald: The UFO Scientist Who Wouldn’t Back Down
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gwQqhSS4tk