Within UFO Research Deaths
Does James Mc Donald's Death Support a UFO Murder Theory?
McDonald's documented suicide attempt sharply complicates claims that his later death was an assassination tied to UFO research.
On this page
- Mc Donald's scientific standing and UFO work
- The documented suicide attempt and death
- Why later foul play claims remain weak
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
James E. McDonald’s death is often cited in lists of supposedly murdered UFO researchers because he was an unusually credible scientist who publicly challenged official and academic handling of the subject. Yet the strongest available evidence points in a different direction. McDonald died from a gunshot wound near Tucson, Arizona, on 13 June 1971, and his death was treated as suicide. Crucially, this was not an isolated, unexplained shooting: roughly two months earlier he had already shot himself in the head in a documented suicide attempt and survived with severe damage to his eyesight.[American Meteorological Society Journals]journals.ametsoc.orgMcDonald, profes- sor of atmospheric sciences at the Institute of Atmo-spheric Physics at the Uni-versity of Arizona and AMS Fellow, died…
That prior attempt does not make every question about his final death illegitimate. McDonald had made enemies, suffered public ridicule and become deeply embroiled in disputes over UFO research and other scientific controversies. But those facts establish professional conflict, not homicide. The foul-play theory remains weak because it has never been supported by comparably strong forensic, documentary or eyewitness evidence connecting his death to an effort to silence his UFO work.
Why McDonald was such an important UFO figure
McDonald was not merely a popular UFO writer who happened to have scientific training. He was an established atmospheric physicist at the University of Arizona, with a doctorate in physics, substantial work in cloud physics and weather modification, and recognised standing within meteorology. His colleague Louis J. Battan’s obituary in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society described his contributions to cloud modification, atmospheric optics and weather research and called him a scientist of unusual energy, integrity and courage.[American Meteorological Society Journals]journals.ametsoc.orgMcDonald, profes- sor of atmospheric sciences at the Institute of Atmo-spheric Physics at the Uni-versity of Arizona and AMS Fellow, died…
The University of Arizona’s Special Collections catalogue provides unusually strong evidence for the scale of his UFO work. McDonald’s surviving papers contain correspondence with government, military and scientific figures, case investigations, interviews, material on Project Blue Book and the Condon study, approximately 580 copies of Project Blue Book sighting reports, four handwritten journals and more than 80 audio recordings. The archive covers UFO investigations extending through the years immediately before his death.[University of Arizona Libraries]lib.arizona.eduOpen source on arizona.edu.
This matters when assessing later suspicions. McDonald really was challenging prevailing institutional attitudes towards UFOs. In July 1968 he appeared before the US House Committee on Science and Astronautics at a symposium on unidentified flying objects, where the official record introduced him as a University of Arizona senior physicist with a distinguished scientific career. He argued that a residue of UFO reports deserved much more rigorous investigation.[UFO Transparency]ufotransparency.comHouse of Representatives (90th Congress, 2d Sess, No. 7), U.S. House Committee on Science and Astronautics · 1968 · UFO TransparencyJuly…
He was also an aggressive critic of what became known as the Condon Report, the University of Colorado study whose conclusions discouraged further scientific investigation of UFO reports. McDonald believed that the report’s broad dismissal was not justified by some of its own unresolved cases. His surviving archive accordingly documents not only his interest in sightings but his efforts to challenge governmental and scientific treatment of the subject.[University of Arizona Libraries]lib.arizona.eduOpen source on arizona.edu.
That genuine conflict is one reason the death lends itself so readily to a murder narrative. A respected physicist publicly challenged official UFO investigations, was ridiculed for doing so, and died at 51. The sequence sounds suggestive when compressed into a few lines. The difficulty is that the fuller chronology contains evidence that the compressed version leaves out.
The earlier suicide attempt changes the case
The most important fact in evaluating a murder theory is McDonald’s earlier attempt to take his own life. Accounts drawing on Ann Druffel’s detailed biography of McDonald describe him shooting himself in the head on 9 April 1971. He survived, but the shot badly damaged his optic nerve and severely impaired his sight. A scholarly review of Druffel’s biography, published in the Journal of Scientific Exploration, specifically concluded from the biographical evidence that McDonald’s suicide was not secretly caused by his UFO investigations and treated the death as the culmination of a personal crisis rather than an assassination.[henry.pha.jhu.edu]henry.pha.jhu.edu17, No. 4, pp. 743–782, 2003 0892-3310/03 BOOK REVIEWS Firestorm: Dr. James E. McDonald’s Fight for UFO Science by Ann Druffel. Columbus…
The significance is hard to overstate. A murder theory must account not only for the fatal shooting of 13 June but for a closely preceding, independently documented self-inflicted gunshot. It would require either evidence that the April attempt itself was somehow staged or coerced, or evidence that an assassin exploited an existing suicidal crisis in June. Claims of either kind appear in later conspiracy discussion, but robust supporting documentation has not emerged.
Sources within the UFO research community themselves acknowledge this problem. UFO Research NSW, which preserves and discusses material connected to McDonald’s archives, describes his 1971 death straightforwardly as suicide while emphasising his importance as a UFO researcher.[UFOR]ufor.asn.auUFORDr James E Mc Donald’s ArchivesDr James E McDonald’s Archives - UFO Research (NSW) Incorporated, Sydney, AustraliaApril 15, 2016 — Dr James E McDonald’s Archives… Even highly sympathetic discussions of McDonald therefore do not necessarily endorse foul play.
The April attempt also fits a broader personal crisis described in biographical treatments. McDonald’s marriage had deteriorated, his intense working habits had taken a toll, and he was experiencing acute distress. Those circumstances do not prove what happened on 13 June, but they provide an independently plausible pathway to suicide that does not require a clandestine operation.[henry.pha.jhu.edu]henry.pha.jhu.edu17, No. 4, pp. 743–782, 2003 0892-3310/03 BOOK REVIEWS Firestorm: Dr. James E. McDonald’s Fight for UFO Science by Ann Druffel. Columbus…
What is known about the final death
On 13 June 1971, McDonald was found dead near Tucson from a gunshot wound to the head. Contemporary professional commemoration records his death on that date, while later accounts describe a.38-calibre revolver and a note associated with the scene.[American Meteorological Society Journals]journals.ametsoc.orgMcDonald, profes- sor of atmospheric sciences at the Institute of Atmo-spheric Physics at the Uni-versity of Arizona and AMS Fellow, died…
Later biographical retellings, drawing heavily on Druffel’s work, add a more detailed sequence: McDonald obtained another handgun, travelled out towards an isolated area and was later found dead. These details appear repeatedly in secondary literature sympathetic to UFO research as well as in sceptical treatments.[Scribd]scribd.comTimothy BeckleyTimothy Beckley - UFOs - Wicked This Way Comes: The Dark Side of The Ultra-Terrestrials, 2013 | PDF | Unidentified Flying Object |…
There are discrepancies in internet retellings about precise locations, timing and other particulars, which is a reason to avoid treating every colourful detail as equally established. The core elements, however, are consistent across much stronger and weaker sources alike: McDonald had recently survived a self-inflicted gunshot; he subsequently died from another gunshot; a firearm was present; and the death was classified as suicide.
That evidentiary pattern is fundamentally different from a case in which a researcher with no known suicidal history is found dead in unexplained circumstances.
Where the foul-play theory comes from
Suspicion appears to have grown from several real features of McDonald’s career that were subsequently connected by inference.
First, he antagonised powerful institutions intellectually. He criticised Project Blue Book, objected to the handling of UFO reports and rejected the Condon study’s dismissive implications. His University of Arizona archive confirms that he corresponded with officials and scientists and actively pursued disagreements over governmental investigations.[University of Arizona Libraries]lib.arizona.eduOpen source on arizona.edu.
Second, he endured professional ridicule. One frequently cited episode arose not directly from a UFO hearing but during debate over the proposed American supersonic transport aircraft. McDonald had raised environmental concerns about high-altitude aircraft, and his UFO interests were used by opponents as a means of attacking his credibility. Later accounts have understandably treated this episode as evidence that UFO involvement could damage a scientist’s reputation.[Wikipedia]WikipediaJames E. Mc DonaldJames E. Mc Donald
Third, McDonald was unusually persistent. The 1968 congressional UFO symposium demonstrates that he had succeeded in getting his arguments before elected officials, while his archive shows sustained efforts to investigate cases and contest official conclusions.[UFO Transparency]ufotransparency.comHouse of Representatives (90th Congress, 2d Sess, No. 7), U.S. House Committee on Science and Astronautics · 1968 · UFO TransparencyJuly…
From those facts, some later writers have moved to a much stronger proposition: because McDonald threatened an alleged UFO cover-up, his death may have been arranged. Modern websites explicitly devoted to alleged murders of UAP researchers repeat this interpretation, often proposing a pattern of discrediting, isolating and then eliminating troublesome scientists. Yet such sources generally supply the motive as conjecture rather than producing documentary evidence of an operation against McDonald. One current site that labels his death “suspicious”, for example, simultaneously concedes that his mental-health crisis and prior suicide attempt support the official ruling.[Murdering UAP Experts]uapmurders.comMurdering UAP Experts James EMcDonald | Murdering UAP ExpertsJAMES E. MCDONALD Senior atmospheric physicist whose career and marriage were systematically destroyed be…
That distinction is essential. Evidence that somebody had opponents is not evidence that those opponents killed him.
The specific claims of suspicious circumstances are poorly supported
Some versions of the murder theory focus on supposed anomalies at the death scene. These have included claims that the bullet wound was incompatible with the recovered weapon, that McDonald could not realistically have travelled to the location because of his impaired vision, that the weapon’s position was suspicious, or that he was shot from an angle inconsistent with suicide.
The main problem is provenance. One early UFO-periodical account preserved in an archive introduced a second-hand claim from a serviceman alleging that the wound could not have been caused by the reported.38-calibre weapon. The account does not provide the sort of primary forensic documentation needed to establish that assertion, and the allegation subsequently became part of UFO lore.[UFO Magazine Archive]ufomagazines.comOpen source on ufomagazines.com.
Modern online discussion adds still more dramatic variations. Reddit threads, for example, repeat stories that McDonald was right-handed but shot from the left, that he should have been unable to obtain a gun, or that a firearm supposedly came from a location inaccessible to him. Such posts are useful for tracing how the suspicion circulates, but they are not substitutes for a coroner’s report, police file, autopsy documentation or direct testimony from identifiable investigators.[Reddit]reddit.comOpen source on reddit.com.
This is a central weakness of the assassination theory: its most incriminating details generally become less well sourced as they become more dramatic.
Institutional hostility is not evidence of assassination
There is a credible historical argument that McDonald paid a professional and emotional price for his UFO advocacy. His scientific stature did not protect him from ridicule, and his willingness to accuse institutions of mishandling a controversial subject made him an unusually polarising figure.
Battan’s 1971 scientific obituary is revealing in this respect. It praises McDonald’s atmospheric-science achievements while also noting that he had become deeply concerned with UFO reports, believed they deserved serious scientific explanation and found relatively few scientific allies.[American Meteorological Society Journals]journals.ametsoc.orgMcDonald, profes- sor of atmospheric sciences at the Institute of Atmo-spheric Physics at the Uni-versity of Arizona and AMS Fellow, died… That is strong evidence of isolation around the subject.
But it is a large evidentiary leap from “he encountered institutional resistance” to “an institution murdered him”. A plausible homicide case would ordinarily need something more: forensic inconsistencies, reliable witnesses, documentary evidence of a threat, communications discussing violence, an identifiable perpetrator, evidence of staging or demonstrable falsification of the death investigation. No comparably strong body of evidence has surfaced publicly in McDonald’s case.
The distinction is especially important within UFO history because professional stigma itself was real. Scientists could be mocked or marginalised for treating UFO reports seriously without any covert assassination programme being required. McDonald’s story can therefore illustrate institutional hostility even if his death was exactly what the contemporary evidence said it was.
Why the earlier attempt outweighs speculative motive
The fairest way to compare the two interpretations is to separate motive from event evidence.
The foul-play argument offers a conceivable motive: McDonald was a persistent scientific critic who accused official UFO investigations of inadequacy. That establishes that some officials and scientists disliked his conclusions. It does not establish intent to kill him.
The suicide interpretation contains direct behavioural evidence that is much closer to the event: McDonald had already attempted suicide with a gun only weeks before his fatal shooting. Biographical material also describes an acute personal crisis and severe consequences from the first attempt.[henry.pha.jhu.edu]henry.pha.jhu.edu17, No. 4, pp. 743–782, 2003 0892-3310/03 BOOK REVIEWS Firestorm: Dr. James E. McDonald’s Fight for UFO Science by Ann Druffel. Columbus…
This asymmetry matters. The murder theory asks readers to infer a covert operation from McDonald’s public disputes. The suicide interpretation does not require an inferred hidden mechanism; it is consistent with a recent, documented act of the same general kind.
It is possible in principle for a suicidal person also to be murdered. A previous suicide attempt can never prove that a later death was self-inflicted. But once foul play is alleged, the evidentiary burden shifts to affirmative indicators that the second shooting was not suicide. In the material currently available publicly, those indicators remain weak, mostly second-hand and heavily amplified by later conspiracy literature.
Does McDonald’s death support a UFO murder theory?
Only weakly.
McDonald unquestionably belongs in the history of scientists who faced stigma and institutional resistance while investigating UFO reports. His credentials were genuine, his UFO work was extensive, his congressional involvement is documented and his disagreements with official investigations were real.[University of Arizona Libraries]lib.arizona.eduOpen source on arizona.edu.
Those facts make his death emotionally and historically striking. They also explain why it was absorbed into broader narratives about supposedly silenced UFO researchers.
But the most probative fact points away from assassination: before his fatal shooting, McDonald had already survived a serious self-inflicted gunshot during a period of documented personal crisis. The later foul-play allegations rely far more heavily on inferred motive, second-hand forensic stories and retrospective pattern-building than on primary evidence showing that another person caused his death.[henry.pha.jhu.edu]henry.pha.jhu.edu17, No. 4, pp. 743–782, 2003 0892-3310/03 BOOK REVIEWS Firestorm: Dr. James E. McDonald’s Fight for UFO Science by Ann Druffel. Columbus…
For that reason, James McDonald’s case is better understood as evidence of the personal and professional pressures surrounding controversial UFO research in the late 1960s than as persuasive evidence that UFO researchers were being murdered. The historical question of how scientific institutions treated McDonald remains substantial. The homicide claim does not currently have evidence of comparable strength.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to Does James Mc Donald's Death Support a UFO Murder Theory?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry
Cited by the New York Review of Books as "the best brief for visitation," this classic study presents an analysis of UFO reports and conc...
UFOs and Government: A Historical Inquiry
Governments around the world have had to deal with the UFO phenomenon for a good part of a century. How and why they did so is the subjec...
The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark
Are we on the brink of a new Dark Age of irrationality and superstition? In this book, the writer shows how scientific thinking is necess...
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.
Endnotes
1.
Source: henry.pha.jhu.edu
Link:https://henry.pha.jhu.edu/mcdonald.pdf
Source snippet
17, No. 4, pp. 743–782, 2003 0892-3310/03 BOOK REVIEWS Firestorm: Dr. James E. McDonald’s Fight for UFO Science by Ann Druffel. Columbus...
2.
Source: lib.arizona.edu
Link:https://lib.arizona.edu/special-collections/collections/james-e-mcdonald-papers
3.
Source: ufor.asn.au
Title: UFORDr James E Mc Donald’s Archives
Link:https://www.ufor.asn.au/archives/articles/james-e-mcdonald-ufo-researcher-archives/
Source snippet
Dr James E McDonald’s Archives - UFO Research (NSW) Incorporated, Sydney, AustraliaApril 15, 2016 — Dr James E McDonald’s Archives...
Published: April 15, 2016
4.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: James E. Mc Donald
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_E._McDonald
5.
Source: scribd.com
Title: Timothy Beckley
Link:https://www.scribd.com/document/852199593/Timothy-Beckley-UFOs-Wicked-This-Way-Comes-The-Dark-Side-of-the-Ultra-Terrestrials-2013
Source snippet
Timothy Beckley - UFOs - Wicked This Way Comes: The Dark Side of The Ultra-Terrestrials, 2013 | PDF | Unidentified Flying Object |...
6.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1575fg3/possible_grusch_testimony_on_murders/
7.
Source: scribd.com
Title: Covid-19 and The New Order World | PDF | Philosophy
Link:https://www.scribd.com/document/681003409/Covid-19-and-the-New-Order-World
8.
Source: scribd.com
Title: Project Blue Book, Top Secret UFO Files
Link:https://www.scribd.com/document/498639520/Project-Blue-Book-Top-Secret-UFO-Files-the-Untold-Truth-PDFDrive
9.
Source: ro.scribd.com
Title: Clinical Cases for General Practice Exams 4e
Link:https://ro.scribd.com/document/711028137/Clinical-Cases-for-General-Practice-Exams-4e
10.
Source: tucson.com
Title: Tales from the Morgue: UFOs are real
Link:https://tucson.com/news/blogs/morgue-tales/tales-from-the-morgue-ufos-are-real/article_6593476e-745e-11e1-838d-001871e3ce6c.html
11.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: James Mc Donald
Link:https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_McDonald
12.
Source: lib.arizona.edu
Title: university arizona biographical files
Link:https://lib.arizona.edu/special-collections/collections/university-arizona-biographical-files
13.
Source: lib.arizona.edu
Title: great soul trial collection
Link:https://lib.arizona.edu/special-collections/collections/great-soul-trial-collection
14.
Source: lib.arizona.edu
Link:https://lib.arizona.edu/special-collections/collections/all/a-z/M?page=3
15.
Source: lib.arizona.edu
Title: lawrence clark powell papers
Link:https://lib.arizona.edu/special-collections/collections/lawrence-clark-powell-papers
16.
Source: lib.arizona.edu
Title: donald m hunten papers
Link:https://lib.arizona.edu/special-collections/collections/donald-m-hunten-papers
17.
Source: lib.arizona.edu
Title: gale monson papers
Link:https://lib.arizona.edu/special-collections/collections/gale-monson-papers
18.
Source: lib.arizona.edu
Title: university arizona
Link:https://lib.arizona.edu/special-collections/collections/university-arizona
19.
Source: lib.arizona.edu
Title: james f mcnulty papers
Link:https://lib.arizona.edu/special-collections/collections/james-f-mcnulty-papers
20.
Source: lib.arizona.edu
Title: james rodney hastings papers
Link:https://lib.arizona.edu/special-collections/collections/james-rodney-hastings-papers
21.
Source: lib.arizona.edu
Title: james jim griffith papers
Link:https://lib.arizona.edu/special-collections/collections/james-jim-griffith-papers
22.
Source: lib.arizona.edu
Title: michael j drake papers
Link:https://lib.arizona.edu/special-collections/collections/michael-j-drake-papers
23.
Source: ufos.wiki
Title: James E. Mc Donald
Link:https://ufos.wiki/figure/james-e-mcdonald/
24.
Source: scribd.com
Link:https://www.scribd.com/document/659330972/Flying-Saucer-to-the-Center-of-Your-Mind-Selected-Writings
25.
Source: scribd.com
Link:https://www.scribd.com/document/972090498/Firestorm-Dr-James-E-McDonald-s-Fight-for-UFO-Science-Voyagers-2nd-Edition-Ann-Druffel-online-pdf
26.
Source: journals.ametsoc.org
Link:https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/bams/52/8/1520-0477-52_8_735.pdf
Source snippet
McDonald, profes- sor of atmospheric sciences at the Institute of Atmo-spheric Physics at the Uni-versity of Arizona and AMS Fellow, died...
27.
Source: ufotransparency.com
Link:https://ufotransparency.com/files/1968-07-29-house-symposium-on-ufos-committee-print-7-house-symposium-on-ufos-1968
Source snippet
House of Representatives (90th Congress, 2d Sess, No. 7), U.S. House Committee on Science and Astronautics · 1968 · UFO TransparencyJuly...
28.
Source: uapmurders.com
Title: Murdering UAP Experts James E
Link:https://uapmurders.com/uaps/Details/James_McDonald/
Source snippet
McDonald | Murdering UAP ExpertsJAMES E. MCDONALD Senior atmospheric physicist whose career and marriage were systematically destroyed be...
29.
Source: ufomagazines.com
Link:https://www.ufomagazines.com/sbi-report-scientific-bureau-of-investigation-sbi-report-no-31-vol-4-no-01/
30.
Source: uapmurders.com
Link:https://uapmurders.com/energy/
31.
Source: wikipediaexposed.org
Link:https://www.wikipediaexposed.org/fisareport.html
32.
Source: journals.ametsoc.org
Link:https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/atot/34/2/jtech-d-16-0118.1.xml
33.
Source: azarchivesonline.org
Link:https://www.azarchivesonline.org/xtf/view?doc.view=print&docId=ead%2Fuoa%2FUAMS412.xml
34.
Source: journals.ametsoc.org
Link:https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/bams/97/4/bams-d-14-00204.1.xml
35.
Source: ufor.asn.au
Title: Overview of UFOs (UAPs)
Link:https://www.ufor.asn.au/archives/articles/overview-of-ufos-uaps/
36.
Source: journals.ametsoc.org
Link:https://journals.ametsoc.org/abstract/journals/bams/94/5/bams-d-11-00006.1.xml
37.
Source: journals.ametsoc.org
Link:https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/bams/94/5/bams-d-11-00006.1.xml
38.
Source: azarchivesonline.org
Link:https://www.azarchivesonline.org/xtf/view?doc.view=content&docId=ead%2Fuoa%2FUAMS412.xml&query=university+of+arizona+library+special+collection
39.
Source: journals.ametsoc.org
Link:https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/atsc/67/8/2010jas3379.1.xml
40.
Source: journals.ametsoc.org
Title: 1520 0469 1971 028 1400 msopli 2 0 co 2.xml
Link:https://journals.ametsoc.org/abstract/journals/atsc/28/8/1520-0469_1971_028_1400_msopli_2_0_co_2.xml
41.
Source: journals.ametsoc.org
Title: 1520 0469 1971 028 0995 iapfss 2 0 co 2.xml
Link:https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/atsc/28/6/1520-0469_1971_028_0995_iapfss_2_0_co_2.xml
42.
Source: journals.ametsoc.org
Link:https://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/pdf/10.1175/1520-0477-52.5.397
43.
Source: journals.ametsoc.org
Title: 1520 0450 1971 010 0266 sfahsc 2 0 co 2.xml
Link:https://journals.ametsoc.org/abstract/journals/apme/10/2/1520-0450_1971_010_0266_sfahsc_2_0_co_2.xml
44.
Source: journals.ametsoc.org
Title: apme.10.issue 2.xml
Link:https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/apme/10/2/apme.10.issue-2.xml
45.
Source: journals.ametsoc.org
Title: 1520 0469 1971 028 0254 iditra 2 0 co 2.xml
Link:https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/atsc/28/2/1520-0469_1971_028_0254_iditra_2_0_co_2.xml
46.
Source: journals.ametsoc.org
Title: 1520 0469 1971 028 0120 msopli 2 0 co 2.xml
Link:https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/atsc/28/1/1520-0469_1971_028_0120_msopli_2_0_co_2.xml
47.
Source: william-branham.org
Title: James Mc Donald
Link:https://william-branham.org/research/james_mcdonald
48.
Source: ufomagazines.com
Title: stendek cei eissn 2604 1383 stendek vol 01 no 03 december 1970
Link:https://www.ufomagazines.com/stendek-cei-eissn-2604-1383-stendek-vol-01-no-03-december-1970/
Published: december 1970
49.
Source: uapmurders.com
Link:https://uapmurders.com/physics/Physics_Math/patents_intl/more_patents/
50.
Source: uapmurders.com
Link:https://uapmurders.com/uaps/podcasts/
51.
Source: ancientfaces.com
Title: james mcdonald
Link:https://www.ancientfaces.com/directory/name/james-mcdonald
Additional References
52.
Source: youtube.com
Title: “Ridicule” ~ A tribute to UFO researcher Dr. James E. Mc Donald (
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gMaVBfgyrJ4
Source snippet
Mysterious Deaths of UFO Researchers Date Back to 1940s, Fresh Claim Emerges | GRAVITAS...
Published: May 7, 1920
53.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NP_y9HJdmoM
Source snippet
Mysterious case of missing and dead scientists tied to UFO programs sounds alarms...
54.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tqs6Z3OQSk
Source snippet
James E. McDonald UFO death James E. McDonald: The UFO Scientist Who Wouldn’t Back Down...
55.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xSil34LddA
Source snippet
The Impossible Death of Ufologist James E McDonald...
56.
Source: youtube.com
Title: James E. Mc Donald: The UFO Scientist Who Wouldn’t Back Down
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gwQqhSS4tk
Source snippet
"Ridicule" ~ A tribute to UFO researcher Dr. James E. McDonald (May 7, 1920 – June 13, 1971)...
Published: May 7, 1920
57.
Source: youtube.com
Title: The Impossible Death of Ufologist James E Mc Donald
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IfY1NxJBisQ
Source snippet
James E. McDonald: The UFO Scientist Who Wouldn’t Back Down...
58.
Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/24388898_Laser_ranging_retroreflector
59.
Source: inspiringquotes.us
Link:https://www.inspiringquotes.us/author/8861-james-e-mcdonald
60.
Source: dbpedia.org
Link:https://dbpedia.org/page/James_E._McDonald
61.
Source: expandingfrontiersresearch.org
Link:https://www.expandingfrontiersresearch.org/items-1/ann-druffel-special-collection