Branchoria UFO Research Deaths UFO Research Deaths

Evidence-led scrutiny of deaths, disappearances and suppression claims around unconventional research.

Within Info Vacuums

Why Military Secrecy Makes Silence Look Sinister

Military funding plus sparse public output can look suspicious, but neither fact alone proves a scientist was hidden or successful technology was suppressed.

228 sources 3 graphics
Preview for Why Military Secrecy Makes Silence Look Sinister

On this page

  • How documented defense involvement changes reader expectations
  • The unsupported leap from classified work to personal disappearance
  • Separating secrecy about research from secrecy about a person

Introduction

Military involvement can make an otherwise ordinary gap in a scientist’s public record look sinister. A defence contract establishes that a government agency considered some work worth investigating; classification can genuinely prevent researchers and contractors from discussing sensitive results. But those facts do not establish the much stronger claims often attached to UFO and antigravity stories: that the research succeeded, that officials suppressed a breakthrough, or that the researcher was physically “disappeared”.

Secrecy Leap illustration 1
Explanatory illustration 1

The distinction is especially important in the case of physicist Ning Li. Her published superconductivity-and-gravity research was real, defence interest was real, and her later public output became sparse. Yet subsequent reporting established that Li herself had not vanished: she remained in Huntsville and eventually died there in 2021. Her story demonstrates how authentic military secrecy can supply a plausible explanation for scientific silence while simultaneously encouraging unsupported conclusions about what that silence supposedly conceals.[aps.org]journals.aps.orgPhysical Review JournalsGravitational effects on the magnetic attenuation of superconductors | Phys. Rev. BSeptember 1, 1992…Published: September 1, 1992

How defence involvement changes expectations

Before Li moved into defence-linked work, outsiders could follow at least part of her research through normal academic channels. She and Douglas Torr published papers on gravitational effects and superconductors in Physical Review D in 1991 and Physical Review B in 1992. Whatever one thinks of their proposed physics, these are identifiable publications with authors, affiliations, dates and claims that can be scrutinised.[Physical Review Journals]journals.aps.orgPhys Rev D.43.457Physical Review JournalsEffects of a gravitomagnetic field on pure superconductors | Phys. Rev. DJanuary 15, 1991…Published: January 15, 1991

That expectation changes when research enters the defence world. The US National Industrial Security Program exists specifically to safeguard classified information held by contractors performing contracts, programmes and research-and-development work. The Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency says roughly 12,500 contractor facilities fall under its security oversight. For classified contracts, the DD Form 254 communicates what information requires protection and the security requirements applying to the contractor. In other words, a scientist can move from a professional environment designed around publication to one where withholding particular information is an ordinary contractual and national-security obligation.[DCSA]dcsa.milNational Industrial Security Program OversightNational Industrial Security Program Oversight…

US classification rules explicitly allow protection of scientific and technological matters when disclosure could reasonably be expected to damage national security. They also impose important limits: Executive Order 13526 says basic scientific research not clearly related to national security should not be classified, and classification must not be used merely to prevent embarrassment, restrain competition or delay material that does not require national-security protection.[National Archives]archives.govcnsi eoNational ArchivesThe President Executive Order 13526 | National ArchivesDecember 29, 2009…Published: December 29, 2009

That framework produces a crucial interpretive distinction. Evidence that someone worked on classified defence research can explain why detailed publications stopped. It does not tell outsiders what the classified results were. Silence is compatible with success, failure, inconclusive testing, a change of direction, continuing engineering work or material whose sensitivity comes from military applications rather than extraordinary scientific performance.

Real classification systems are also imperfect. The US Government Accountability Office (GAO) has documented classification errors and inconsistent implementation within the Department of Defense, while another GAO investigation examined an allegation that classification had been used to stifle criticism of missile-defence work. Such disputes are legitimate reasons not to treat every classification decision as infallible. They still do not justify reversing the burden of proof and treating every inaccessible result as evidence of successful suppressed technology.[GAO]gao.govgaoManaging Sensitive Information: DOD Can More Effectively Reduce the Risk of Classification Errors | U.S. GAOJune 30, 2006…Published: June 30, 2006

Ning Li shows how the inference grows

Li is unusually useful for examining this mechanism because several ingredients of the secrecy narrative can be verified independently.

Her earlier scientific record is public. Her work investigated proposed connections between superconductors and gravitational or gravitomagnetic phenomena. Later, AC Gravity, the company she founded after leaving the University of Alabama in Huntsville, received US military support. Contemporary records reproduced in later sources identify an Army Aviation and Missile Command agreement worth $448,970 for a “Gravito-Electro Magnetic Superconductivity Experiment”, with work scheduled from April 2001 to September 2002.[Physical Review Journals]journals.aps.orgPhysical Review JournalsGravitational effects on the magnetic attenuation of superconductors | Phys. Rev. BSeptember 1, 1992…Published: September 1, 1992

Her public scientific trail did not terminate instantaneously when that agreement appeared. A 2003 paper attributed to Li and James Bradas, “Measurability of AC Gravity Fields”, was associated with a MITRE gravitational-wave conference. Later technical literature also cites that paper. This matters because a clean narrative — scientist obtains military funding, discovers something revolutionary and immediately disappears — is less faithful to the surviving chronology than the internet version suggests.[Google Groups]groups.google.comOpen source on google.com.

What happened afterwards is where the information vacuum becomes powerful. There was no comparable stream of conventional publications showing outsiders exactly what AC Gravity had achieved. That absence left readers with two documented observations — military interest and reduced publication — but without the information needed to connect them.

The missing middle can then be filled with increasingly strong assumptions:

Gravity Buster T. Townsend Brown: The Man, Myth and Legend!!!

Channel: The Cosmic Summit

Open on YouTube

  1. The military funded unusual gravity research.
  2. The researcher subsequently published very little.
  3. Therefore the later work must have been classified.
  4. Therefore it must have produced an important result.
  5. Therefore the government suppressed that result.
  6. Therefore the scientist herself was deliberately hidden or “disappeared”.

Only the first two propositions can be established directly from the basic public chronology. Later reporting provides testimony supporting some classified continuation of Li’s work, but each subsequent step still requires evidence of its own. Classification does not logically demonstrate technological success, and secrecy surrounding work does not demonstrate coercive secrecy surrounding a person.[Huntsville Business Journal]huntsvillebusinessjournal.comHuntsville Business JournalUncovering The Mystery Of Huntsville’s Brilliant Anti-gravity Scientist - Huntsville Business Journal…

Classified work is not a classified person

The strongest corrective to the disappearance narrative came from reporting in Huntsville, where Li had actually lived.

In 2023, the Huntsville Business Journal interviewed Li’s son, George Guangyu Men. He said his mother had continued working with the Department of Defense and that, after receiving a top-secret clearance, she was no longer able to discuss her work as she had during her university career. This is family testimony rather than a released government project file, so it cannot independently establish what her classified research achieved. It does, however, provide a straightforward explanation for the abrupt contrast between her earlier publication-heavy career and later silence.[Huntsville Business Journal]huntsvillebusinessjournal.comHuntsville Business JournalUncovering The Mystery Of Huntsville’s Brilliant Anti-gravity Scientist - Huntsville Business Journal…

More importantly for disappearance claims, Men said Li had not secretly returned to China or defected. According to his account, she remained in the United States. In 2014 she was struck by a vehicle while crossing a street on the University of Alabama in Huntsville campus, suffered permanent brain damage and never returned to work. Her son cared for her during her final years. Li died in Huntsville on 27 July 2021; the local funeral home published her obituary and service information.[Huntsville Business Journal]huntsvillebusinessjournal.comHuntsville Business JournalUncovering The Mystery Of Huntsville’s Brilliant Anti-gravity Scientist - Huntsville Business Journal…

Those details sharply separate two propositions that had become entangled online:

Her research became difficult for outsiders to follow. There is meaningful evidence for that, and defence secrecy offers a plausible partial explanation.

Li herself disappeared. The later biographical record contradicts that claim. The Huntsville Business Journal found no legal or official missing-person disappearance and interviewed the son who had cared for her.[Huntsville Business Journal]huntsvillebusinessjournal.comHuntsville Business JournalUncovering The Mystery Of Huntsville’s Brilliant Anti-gravity Scientist - Huntsville Business Journal…

The distinction is not semantic. A researcher who cannot answer questions about classified work is still observable through family life, residence records, professional contacts, accidents, medical events, business records or ultimately an obituary. A genuine disappearance claim concerns the person’s whereabouts. Evidence that publications or project results are unavailable concerns information.

Secrecy Leap illustration 2
Explanatory illustration 2

Secret does not mean successful

There is another reason the defence connection can distort interpretation: military interest is easily mistaken for military validation.

Defence and intelligence organisations investigate speculative technologies precisely because they have to consider technological surprise. Funding or evaluating a concept therefore establishes institutional interest, not confirmation that its underlying claims are correct. GAO describes a defence research ecosystem in which contractors pursue high-technology research partly because the Department of Defense wants to identify technologies that might provide military advantage. The existence of such research is not itself a performance result.[GAO]gao.govOpen source on gao.gov.

An especially relevant example comes from high-frequency gravitational-wave research. In 2008, the JASON scientific advisory group was asked by US intelligence officials to assess proposed high-frequency gravitational-wave applications. Its publicly released report concluded that proposed applications including communications, detection and vehicle propulsion were not credible threats and that aspects of the Li-Baker detector concept were wrong by many orders of magnitude. The study itself was defence/intelligence-sponsored — yet it was released publicly and was strongly sceptical of extraordinary practical claims.[Federation of American Scientists]fas.orgFederation of American Scientists High Frequency Gravitational WavesFederation of American Scientists High Frequency Gravitational Waves

This does not retrospectively tell us exactly what happened inside Li’s earlier contract, nor does it prove that every unconventional propulsion programme failed. It demonstrates something narrower and more useful: national-security interest can coexist with a negative technical assessment. An intelligence agency asking whether an exotic technology might work is not equivalent to that agency concluding that it does.

The same problem appears in the wider UFO record. The Pentagon’s All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) reported in its 2024 historical review that intense secrecy around military programmes helped shape UFO beliefs, and that some historical sightings were likely misidentifications of previously unseen experimental systems, including aircraft, rockets, space systems and later drones. AARO also noted how unauthorised disclosures of genuine classified programmes could be mistaken for evidence of UAP-related programmes.[AARO]aaro.milFor Open Publication Mar 06, 2024 DeAugust 19, 2024…Published: August 19, 2024

That is a particularly potent combination: the public may correctly detect that something is secret while incorrectly identifying what the secret is.

Secrecy Leap illustration 3
Explanatory illustration 3

Real secrecy can create false certainty

None of this requires pretending defence secrecy is trivial. Classified programmes genuinely withhold information, restrict access and impose non-disclosure obligations. Special-access arrangements can impose still tighter controls. Historical oversight reports show that classified information held by defence contractors is subject to extensive security procedures, inspections and document controls.[GAO]gao.govOpen source on gao.gov.

The difficulty is epistemic: genuine secrecy reduces the evidence available for judging what lies behind it. That makes confident conclusions harder, not easier.

A useful example from the modern UAP debate is KONA BLUE. AARO says interviewees described it as a sensitive government compartment connected with retrieving and exploiting alleged non-human material. Its investigation instead found that KONA BLUE was a proposed special access programme that was never approved or formally established and received neither funding nor materials. The existence of authentic programme paperwork therefore did not validate the extraordinary interpretation subsequently attached to it.[AARO]aaro.milOpen source on aaro.mil.

The parallel is methodological rather than an assertion that KONA BLUE and antigravity research were connected. In both situations, words such as classified, defence, special access or Pentagon can acquire evidential weight they do not actually possess. They establish something about administrative handling or government interest. They do not automatically establish the truth of the technological claim inside the story.

What suppression would actually require

A defensible suppression claim needs more than a gap. There should be evidence that identifiable information once existed, that a specific actor deliberately prevented its release or removed it, and ideally some indication of why. A claim that a scientist was suppressed requires evidence concerning actions directed at that scientist, not merely restrictions applying to a project.

This produces several different evidential categories that are often collapsed together in UFO and antigravity narratives:

  • Classified research: there is evidence that information was formally protected for national-security reasons.
  • Non-public research: results cannot be found publicly, but the reason may be classification, proprietary restrictions, abandonment, failure to publish or something else.
  • Suppressed research: evidence indicates that someone deliberately prevented information that otherwise would have appeared from becoming available.
  • A suppressed researcher: evidence indicates coercive action against the person because of their work.
  • A disappeared researcher: evidence indicates that the person’s whereabouts genuinely became unknown to the people or institutions who would normally know them.

These categories can overlap, but none follows automatically from the previous one.

That is particularly important because formal classification itself leaves institutional traces. The United States has defined classification authorities, contractor-security systems and procedures through which authorised holders can challenge classification decisions. GAO reports that Department of Defense personnel and contractors with the necessary access can formally challenge information they believe has been improperly classified, with appeal mechanisms available. Such procedures do not guarantee transparency, but they show why “the government would classify valuable military technology” and “therefore every unexplained silence proves suppression” are fundamentally different propositions.[GAO]gao.govOpen source on gao.gov.

APEC 8/28, Part #4 - Glen "Tony" Robertson - NASA Superconductor Gravity Team

Channel: Alt Propulsion

Open on YouTube

Why the secrecy leap remains persuasive

The leap persists because its starting point is often true. Governments really do conduct secret technological research. Contractors really do sign security agreements. Scientists really can become unable to discuss work they previously discussed freely. Experimental military aircraft really have generated sightings whose explanations could not be disclosed at the time.[DCSA]dcsa.milNational Industrial Security Program OversightNational Industrial Security Program Oversight…

Those realities make the stronger story feel plausible before the stronger evidence appears.

Ning Li illustrates the problem unusually clearly. There is no need to deny the interesting parts of her history: she published unconventional gravity-related physics, established a private company, attracted Army funding and then became much less visible scientifically. Her son’s later account also supports the view that classified defence work constrained what she could say.[Physical Review Journals]journals.aps.orgPhysical Review JournalsGravitational effects on the magnetic attenuation of superconductors | Phys. Rev. BSeptember 1, 1992…Published: September 1, 1992

But the same case demonstrates why restraint matters. The woman described online as a scientist who “disappeared” was living in Huntsville. The public absence was principally an absence of accessible information about her work, not evidence that the person had ceased to be locatable. And the surviving public record does not establish that her military-funded research produced a working antigravity technology that was subsequently suppressed.[Huntsville Business Journal]huntsvillebusinessjournal.comHuntsville Business JournalUncovering The Mystery Of Huntsville’s Brilliant Anti-gravity Scientist - Huntsville Business Journal…

That leaves a narrower mystery than the conspiracy narrative promises, but a more defensible one: what exactly did Li’s later defence-linked research produce, and how much of it remains unavailable? The answer may genuinely involve classified information. Until evidence answers that question, however, classification explains why outsiders may not know; it cannot legitimately be used to prove whatever they imagine must be hidden.

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to Why Military Secrecy Makes Silence Look Sinister. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

BookCover for The Demon-haunted World

The Demon-haunted World

By Carl Sagan

Rating: 4.5/5 from 43 Google Books ratings

Are we on the brink of a new Dark Age of irrationality and superstition? In this book, the writer shows how scientific thinking is necess...

See on Amazon
Browse more on Amazon:The Pentagon's Brain: An Uncensored History of DARPA, America's Top Secret Military Research AgencyThe Demon haunted WorldMilitary Secrecy biography

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.

UsingUSA

Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.

Browse more oneBay.co.uk

Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.

Endnotes

1. Source: dcsa.mil
Title: National Industrial Security Program Oversight
Link:https://www.dcsa.mil/Industrial-Security/National-Industrial-Security-Program-Oversight/Security-Review-and-Rating-Process/

Source snippet

National Industrial Security Program Oversight...

2. Source: dcsa.mil
Link:https://www.dcsa.mil/About-Us/Leadership/National-Industrial-Security-Program-NISP-Contract-Classification-System-NCCS/

Source snippet

National Industrial Security Program (NISP) Contract Classification System (NCCS)...

3. Source: archives.gov
Title: cnsi eo
Link:https://www.archives.gov/isoo/policy-documents/cnsi-eo.html

Source snippet

National ArchivesThe President Executive Order 13526 | National ArchivesDecember 29, 2009...

Published: December 29, 2009

4. Source: archives.gov
Title: National Archives Basic Laws and Authorities | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/about/laws/appendix/13526.html

5. Source: gao.gov
Title: gao 06 706
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/gao

Source snippet

Managing Sensitive Information: DOD Can More Effectively Reduce the Risk of Classification Errors | U.S. GAOJune 30, 2006...

Published: June 30, 2006

6. Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-01-737r

Source snippet

DOD Officials Acted in Accordance With Executive Order for Addressing Security Classification Concerns | U.S. GAO...

7. Source: groups.google.com
Link:https://groups.google.com/g/sci.space/c/RKfc3i7Xc1g

8. Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/gao

9. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Portals/136/PDFs/AARO_Historical_Record_Report_Volume_1_2024.pdf

Source snippet

For Open Publication Mar 06, 2024 DeAugust 19, 2024...

Published: August 19, 2024

10. Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/130581

11. Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/gao

12. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Inactive-Parent/Next-AARO-UAP-DT-Records/

13. Source: aaro.mil
Title: UAP Records
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Records/fbclid/IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR0F9nbI4TTQyu8d96BuOtBb1uVQuvapZEvLug7mWxQC4ZqlNDrM5_ejMt4_aem_q0czZMebJdVWJ-6XDLdWAA/

14. Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/gao

15. Source: gao.gov
Title: gao 26 108435
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-26-108435

16. Source: files.gao.gov
Link:https://files.gao.gov/reports/GAO-26-108435/index.html

17. Source: gao.gov
Title: gao 26 107738
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-26-107738

18. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Next-UAP-Report-Documents/poster/

19. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Next-UAP-Report-Documents/

20. Source: gao.gov
Title: gao 26 107544
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-26-107544

21. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/

22. Source: archives.gov
Title: Redaction Codes | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/declassification/iscap/redaction-codes.html

23. Source: archives.gov
Title: Exemptions from Automatic Declassification | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/declassification/iscap/auto-declass-exemptions.html

24. Source: archives.gov
Title: e o 13526 and 32 cfr part 2001
Link:https://www.archives.gov/isoo/faqs/e-o-13526-and-32-cfr-part-2001

25. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/1006079/dvpcc/false/

26. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/1006074/dvpcc/false/

27. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/988676/dvpcc/false/

28. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/1006106/dvpcc/false/

29. Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-23-105670

30. Source: archives.gov
Title: FOI A Resources | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/ogis/resources

31. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/1007720/dvpcc/false/

32. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/1010276/dvpcc/false/

33. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/1014100/dvpcc/false/

34. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/1010272/dvpcc/false/

35. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/988673/dvpcc/false/

36. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/1006060/dvpcc/false/

37. Source: archives.gov
Title: NAR A 101, PART 7. Agency Services | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/foia/directives/nara0101-part07

38. Source: dcsa.mil
Title: 32 CFR Part 117 NISPOM Rule
Link:https://www.dcsa.mil/Industrial-Security/National-Industrial-Security-Program-Oversight/32-CFR-Part-117-NISPOM-Rule/ddd/

39. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/1007707/dvpcc/false/

40. Source: gao.gov
Title: gao 12 800
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/gao

41. Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/gao

42. Source: archives.gov
Title: isoo implementing directive
Link:https://www.archives.gov/isoo/policy-documents/isoo-implementing-directive.html

43. Source: obamawhitehouse.archives.gov
Title: executive order classified national security information
Link:https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/executive-order-classified-national-security-information

44. Source: obamawhitehouse.archives.gov
Title: executive order original classification authority
Link:https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/realitycheck/the-press-office/executive-order-original-classification-authority

45. Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/gao

46. Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/assets/a250690.html

47. Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/assets/a250725.html

48. Source: gao.gov
Title: gao 05 681
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/gao

49. Source: gao.gov
Title: nsiad 93 127
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/nsiad

50. Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/127183

51. Source: archives.gov
Title: Executive Orders | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/codification/executive-order/12356.html

52. Source: gao.gov
Title: plrd 81 3
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/plrd

53. Source: gao.gov
Title: lcd 81 13
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/lcd

54. Source: gao.gov
Title: lcd 81 3
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/lcd

55. Source: dcsa.mil
Link:https://www.dcsa.mil/Systems-Applications/National-Industrial-Security-Program-NISP-Contract-Classification-System-NCCS/

56. Source: dcsa.mil
Link:https://www.dcsa.mil/Industrial-Security/National-Industrial-Security-Program-Oversight/NISP-Tools-Resources/

57. Source: dcsa.mil
Link:https://www.dcsa.mil/Systems-Applications/National-Industrial-Security-System-NISS/

58. Source: dcsa.mil
Link:https://www.dcsa.mil/Industrial-Security/National-Industrial-Security-Program-Oversight/Security-Review-Rating-Process/

59. Source: dcsa.mil
Link:https://www.dcsa.mil/Industrial-Security/National-Industrial-Security-Program-Oversight/NISP-Tools-Resources/foci_action_plan/

60. Source: dcsa.mil
Link:https://www.dcsa.mil/Industrial-Security/National-Industrial-Security-Program-Oversight/

61. Source: dcsa.mil
Link:https://www.dcsa.mil/Systems-Applications/National-Industrial-Security-Program-NISP-Contract-Classification-System-NCCS/NCCS-FAQs/

62. Source: dcsa.mil
Link:https://www.dcsa.mil/FCL/Maintaining-Personnel-Security-Clearances/

63. Source: dcsa.mil
Link:https://www.dcsa.mil/Section847/

64. Source: aaro.mil
Title: Congressional Press Products
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Congressional-Press-Products/

65. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Next-Submit-a-Report-dup/

66. Source: aaro.mil
Title: Next AARO Congressional Press Products
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Next-AARO-Congressional-Press-Products/

67. Source: aaro.mil
Title: Congressional Tab DT
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/AARO-Congressional-Tab-DT/

68. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Inactive-Parent/Next-Congressional-Press-Products/

69. Source: aaro.mil
Title: EFOIA Reading Room
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/EFOIA-Reading-Room/

70. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/dvpmoduleid/77396/dvpsearch/searchstring/

71. Source: archives.gov
Title: Executive Orders | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/codification/executive-order/10521.html

72. Source: journals.aps.org
Link:https://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.46.5489

Source snippet

Physical Review JournalsGravitational effects on the magnetic attenuation of superconductors | Phys. Rev. BSeptember 1, 1992...

Published: September 1, 1992

73. Source: huntsvillebusinessjournal.com
Link:https://huntsvillebusinessjournal.com/news/2023/07/30/solving-the-mystery-of-huntsvilles-brilliant-scientist-disappearing/

Source snippet

Huntsville Business JournalUncovering The Mystery Of Huntsville’s Brilliant Anti-gravity Scientist - Huntsville Business Journal...

74. Source: journals.aps.org
Title: Phys Rev D.43.457
Link:https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.43.457

Source snippet

Physical Review JournalsEffects of a gravitomagnetic field on pure superconductors | Phys. Rev. DJanuary 15, 1991...

Published: January 15, 1991

75. Source: fas.org
Title: Federation of American Scientists High Frequency Gravitational Waves
Link:https://fas.org/irp/agency/dod/jason/gravwaves.pdf

76. Source: irp.fas.org
Link:https://irp.fas.org/agency/dod/jason/index.html

77. Source: journals.aps.org
Title: jhgx c8f1
Link:https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/jhgx-c8f1

78. Source: wikidata.org
Title: Ning Li
Link:https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q11170087

79. Source: journals.aps.org
Link:https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.106008

80. Source: journals.aps.org
Link:https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.181402

81. Source: journals.aps.org
Link:https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.L081307

82. Source: journals.aps.org
Link:https://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.054506

83. Source: journals.aps.org
Link:https://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.108.134509

84. Source: journals.aps.org
Link:https://journals.aps.org/prapplied/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.8.064024

85. Source: fas.org
Title: JASO N Study Debunks Gravitational Wave “Threat”
Link:https://fas.org/publication/jason_study/

86. Source: sgp.fas.org
Link:https://sgp.fas.org/news/secrecy/2008/12/121508.html

87. Source: irp.fas.org
Link:https://irp.fas.org/congress/2000_hr/00-03-08campbell.htm

88. Source: irp.fas.org
Title: rivet joint
Link:https://irp.fas.org/program/collect/rivet_joint.htm

89. Source: irp.fas.org
Link:https://irp.fas.org/news/1999/02/radome.htm

90. Source: irp.fas.org
Link:https://irp.fas.org/congress/1998_hr/s980225ds.htm

91. Source: irp.fas.org
Link:https://irp.fas.org/congress/1997_hr/h970320d.htm

92. Source: irp.fas.org
Link:https://irp.fas.org/congress/1996_cr/h960522z.htm

93. Source: journals.aps.org
Link:https://journals.aps.org/prb/issues/46/9

94. Source: journals.aps.org
Link:https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.35.3551

95. Source: sgp.fas.org
Link:https://sgp.fas.org/news/2008/12/index.html

96. Source: irp.fas.org
Link:https://irp.fas.org/agency/army/mipb/1996-2/bunker.htm

97. Source: irp.fas.org
Link:https://irp.fas.org/budget/fy98_navy/0602435n.htm

98. Source: irp.fas.org
Link:https://irp.fas.org/doddir/army/fm34-25-1/Gloss.htm

99. Source: irp.fas.org
Link:https://irp.fas.org/agency/army/mipb/1995-4/letters.htm

100. Source: irp.fas.org
Link:https://irp.fas.org/doddir/army/usfk_j2/J2VED.htm

101. Source: uapmurders.com
Link:https://uapmurders.com/uaps/Details/Ning_Li/

102. Source: journals.aps.org
Link:https://journals.aps.org/pr/abstract/10.1103/PhysRev.136.A1170

Additional References

103. Source: youtube.com
Title: APEC 8/28, Part #4
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJONyLHQ8Oc

Source snippet

Eugene [Podkletnov]({{ 'podkletnov/' | relative_url }}) on Gravitational Shielding in Rotating Superconductors...

104. Source: youtube.com
Title: The disappearance of America’s leading anti-gravity researcher
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qsbz8_G9WcU

Source snippet

APEC 8/28, Part #4 - Glen "Tony" Robertson - NASA Superconductor Gravity Team...

105. Source: youtube.com
Title: Eugene Podkletnov on Gravitational Shielding in Rotating Superconductors
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blXEtLPVE9g

Source snippet

Gravity Buster T. Townsend Brown: The Man, Myth and Legend...

106. Source: osti.gov
Link:https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1838162

107. Source: congress.gov
Link:https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF12080

108. Source: osti.gov
Link:https://www.osti.gov/pages/biblio/1978798

109. Source: osti.gov
Link:https://www.osti.gov/pages/biblio/1570221-img183663-fig

110. Source: osti.gov
Link:https://www.osti.gov/pages/biblio/2471371

111. Source: osti.gov
Link:https://www.osti.gov/pages/biblio/2422265

112. Source: osti.gov
Link:https://www.osti.gov/pages/biblio/1608936