The Missing Event in Mc Donald's Conspiracy Timeline

Introduction

The most consequential missing event in many conspiracy retellings of James E. McDonald’s death is not obscure government activity but something much closer to the event itself: McDonald had already attempted suicide by shooting himself in the head roughly two months before his fatal shooting in June 1971. He survived the earlier attempt, suffered serious damage to his vision and received psychiatric treatment. Accounts based on the authorised biographical tradition place that attempt amid an acute personal crisis, including the breakdown of his marriage.[ufos.wiki]ufos.wikiJames E. Mc DonaldJames E. McDonald - UFOs Wiki…

That does not prove every detail of the official interpretation of his later death. Nor does it erase the genuine government secrecy, surveillance and professional conflict surrounding McDonald’s UFO work. But it profoundly changes the evidential question. A narrative that moves directly from “prominent UFO critic of government secrecy” to “found shot dead in the desert” creates a much stronger appearance of suspicious causation than the fuller chronology supports. The earlier attempt is therefore a particularly useful test of decades-later claims that McDonald was murdered because of what he knew about UFOs.

What is known about the earlier suicide attempt

McDonald was an atmospheric physicist at the University of Arizona and one of the most scientifically prominent advocates for serious investigation of unidentified flying objects during the 1960s. His standing within atmospheric science was substantial enough that the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society published an obituary reviewing his scientific career after his death.[kirkmcd.princeton.edu]kirkmcd.princeton.eduSHG - McCarthy Dissertation…June 26, 2009…Published: June 26, 2009 His UFO activities were controversial, but they were only one part of a wider scientific and political life.

By early 1971, McDonald was under severe pressure. His UFO campaign had generated professional conflict, and during congressional proceedings concerning the proposed supersonic transport, Congressman Silvio Conte attacked his credibility by invoking his UFO views. Accounts of McDonald’s final months also describe a much more immediate personal crisis: in March 1971 his wife Betsy told him that she wanted a divorce. The later biographical account summarised by several sources says that McDonald subsequently finished or organised work and made arrangements concerning his papers before attempting suicide.[ufos.wiki]ufos.wikiJames E. Mc DonaldJames E. McDonald - UFOs Wiki…

On 9 April 1971, according to accounts giving the specific date, McDonald shot himself in the head and survived. The gunshot damaged his optic nerve and severely impaired his sight. He was hospitalised and at one point treated in a psychiatric ward. Later accounts differ somewhat in their shorthand descriptions of the resulting disability — some call him blind, while others report that he subsequently recovered a degree of peripheral vision — so claims about his exact visual capacity should be stated cautiously.[uapmurders.com]uapmurders.comMurdering UAP Experts James E. Mc Donald | Murdering UAP ExpertsMurdering UAP Experts James E. Mc Donald | Murdering UAP Experts

Crucially, knowledge of the attempt was not invented after his final death to rationalise an inconvenient case. Jacques Vallée’s published diary material records that on 7 May 1971, more than a month before McDonald died, astronomer J. Allen Hynek had told him that McDonald had shot himself in the head and survived. Vallée noted contemporary speculation about the reasons for the failed attempt. Whatever one thinks of Vallée’s later views on UFOs, the dated diary entry is important because it independently places knowledge of the first shooting firmly before the fatal event of 13 June.[dokumen.pub]dokumen.pubForbidden ScienceVolume Two [Fifth American ed.] 0578032317, 9780578032313 - DOKUMEN.PUBNovember 1, 2009…Published: November 1, 2009

That temporal point matters more than the precise interpretation attached to the attempt. The first shooting cannot reasonably be treated as an explanation manufactured by authorities after McDonald’s death if people within his professional and UFO-research circle were already discussing it while he was alive.

McDonald did not simply disappear from intellectual life after the attempt. Accounts say that he regained some peripheral vision, contemplated returning to teaching and continued thinking about scientific and UFO-related work. Such signs of future planning are sometimes cited as reasons to question whether somebody remained suicidal. They deserve acknowledgement, but they do not cancel the documented earlier attempt. Human behaviour after a suicide attempt is not reducible to a simple rule that either future plans or continuing work proves what someone will do later. The historically defensible claim is narrower: a serious self-inflicted shooting had occurred shortly before the second shooting.[William Branham Historical Research]william-branham.orgWilliam Branham Historical Research James E McdonaldWilliam Branham Historical ResearchJames E Mcdonald - William Branham Historical ResearchJuly 3, 2012…Published: July 3, 2012

The two shootings change the timeline

The fatal event occurred on 13 June 1971, about nine weeks after the April attempt. Contemporary reporting described McDonald as having been found dead in a desert area near Tucson and characterised the death as an apparent suicide. The archived New York Times report, based on United Press International reporting from Tucson, identified him as a nationally known University of Arizona physicist and reported the authorities’ assessment of apparent suicide.[Wikidata]wikidata.orgJames E. Mc DonaldJames E. McDonald - WikidataApril 8, 2026…Published: April 8, 2026

Later accounts provide additional details: a.38-calibre revolver was found near his body, together with what was described as a suicide note.[nicap.org]nicap.orgJames E. Mc DonaldJames E. McDonald - Wikipedia… Taken alone, those details might still leave room for speculative alternatives. Taken together with the earlier self-inflicted gunshot, however, they create a materially different evidential picture.

The difference can be expressed through two chronologies.

A compressed conspiracy chronology looks approximately like this:

McDonald challenges official UFO explanations → encounters secrecy and ridicule → government agencies take an interest in him → McDonald is found shot dead → possible assassination.

Each component can contain something true. McDonald did challenge official handling of UFO reports. He did encounter classified material. He did accuse agencies of withholding information. Government records concerning him did exist. And he was ultimately found dead from a gunshot wound. The problem lies in what disappears between those facts.

Restoring the intermediate events produces a more complicated sequence:

McDonald campaigns aggressively over UFOs and other scientific-political issues → suffers professional conflict and public ridicule → experiences a severe marital crisis → attempts suicide by shooting himself in the head → survives with serious injuries and receives psychiatric care → lives for roughly another two months → is later found dead from another gunshot, with a firearm and reported suicide note nearby.[ufos.wiki]ufos.wikiJames E. Mc DonaldJames E. McDonald - UFOs Wiki…

The second chronology does not logically demonstrate suicide beyond every imaginable alternative. What it does is remove a major premise on which the suspicious appearance of the first chronology depends: that the fatal shooting arrived unexpectedly in the life of someone with no known recent history of suicidal behaviour.

Real government scrutiny does not establish murder

McDonald’s case remains unusually attractive to conspiracy interpretation because there really are government records concerning him. This is not a situation in which every element of official interest has been invented retrospectively.

A CIA historical study acknowledges McDonald’s confrontation with UFO secrecy. In June 1966 he saw the Durant report concerning the CIA-sponsored Robertson Panel at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. When he returned later that month intending to copy it, the Air Force refused him further access because it was classified. McDonald subsequently publicly accused the CIA of being involved in Air Force secrecy over UFOs and pressed for release of the material.[CIA]cia.govcias role in the study of ufosCIA's Role in the Study of UFOs, 1947-1990 - CSI…

FBI material released under the Freedom of Information Act adds another genuine strand. The released records describe McDonald as a prominent atmospheric physicist, discuss his UFO activities and political contacts, and contain substantial redactions. One 1969 document noted that an earlier 1962 investigation had been favourable concerning his loyalty, character and reputation; another source described him as a respected scientist who was outspoken in his scientific and political views. The files also touch on peace-movement and campus political matters.[Computer UFO Network]cufon.orgComputer UFO NetworkFBI FILE OF DR. JAMES E. McDONALDJanuary 1, 1999…Published: January 1, 1999

Those documents are legitimately interesting. They establish that agencies gathered or retained information about McDonald. They also explain why later readers already suspicious of government UFO secrecy may approach his death differently from an ordinary suicide case.

But evidence that an agency possessed a file on someone is not evidence that the agency killed that person. Nor does a classification marking or FOIA redaction supply the missing connection. To turn documented surveillance or secrecy into an assassination case requires evidence linking government actors to the circumstances of the death: operational records, credible witness testimony, forensic contradictions, communications indicating intent, or comparable material. The records located here establish government interest and McDonald’s conflict with official UFO policy, but not that causal bridge.[Computer UFO Network]cufon.orgComputer UFO NetworkFBI FILE OF DR. JAMES E. McDONALDJanuary 1, 1999…Published: January 1, 1999

This distinction is particularly important because genuine secrecy can lend plausibility to claims for which the crucial evidence is absent. McDonald was correct that information concerning official UFO investigations had been classified. A later CIA historian explicitly documented that episode. But being correct about secrecy in 1966 does not make every hypothesis about McDonald’s death in 1971 equally well supported.[FAS Project on Government Secrecy]sgp.fas.orgFAS Project on Government SecrecyCIA's Role in the Study of UFOs, 1947-90…

How the earlier attempt disappears from conspiracy accounts

Later treatments range from careful biographies to overt claims of assassination or government “neutralisation”. At the more speculative end, McDonald is sometimes grouped with other UFO researchers whose deaths are presented collectively as evidence that dangerous knowledge was being suppressed.

One accessible example simply describes McDonald as a major scientist who continued UFO research until he “came under the gaze” of a hidden organisation and was found shot in the head, while emphasising that the government called the death suicide. In that telling, the earlier April attempt disappears altogether.[KZMS]kzms.orgDajjāl II: The International Dajjālī Government: From InceptionDajjāl II: The International Dajjālī Government: From InceptionNovember 4, 2025…Published: November 4, 2025 The omission makes the June shooting appear as a sudden, unexplained endpoint to McDonald’s UFO work.

Other conspiracy treatments do acknowledge the April attempt but reinterpret it rather than omit it. A contemporary website devoted explicitly to alleged murders of UAP researchers records the 9 April attempt, hospitalisation and June death, yet still rates the case “suspicious” by proposing a broader pattern in which McDonald was discredited, isolated and effectively neutralised. Significantly, the same page concedes that his documented mental-health difficulties and previous attempt support the suicide ruling.[Murdering UAP Experts]uapmurders.comMurdering UAP Experts James E. Mc Donald | Murdering UAP ExpertsMurdering UAP Experts James E. Mc Donald | Murdering UAP Experts

That represents a different kind of argument. Instead of claiming that the fatal gunshot itself must have been externally inflicted, it shifts towards the possibility that outside actors somehow engineered the pressures that drove McDonald towards suicide. Such a proposition is harder to falsify because genuine episodes of ridicule, government scrutiny and professional controversy can be incorporated into it. But it also requires more evidence, not less: showing that somebody experienced pressure is different from demonstrating that the pressure was deliberately orchestrated to cause self-destruction.

Online discussion illustrates how readily these interpretations circulate. Recent UFO forums have revived the question of whether McDonald was murdered, citing FBI records and his confrontations over government UFO secrecy. Yet in those same discussions, participants have pointed out that the earlier attempt substantially weakens the assassination hypothesis.[Reddit]reddit.comPossible Grusch testimony on murders corroborationWas prominent UFO researcher James E. McDonald murdered? Why did the FBI have several files mentioning his UFO research? Many were never… Such discussions are useful evidence for the later conspiracy narrative, rather than reliable evidence about the 1971 death itself.

The distinction is essential. The existence of an assassination theory tells us something about McDonald’s posthumous place in UFO culture. It does not independently tell us what happened in the Arizona desert.

Why the missing event changes the causal claim

The earlier attempt matters because historical explanations are comparative. The relevant question is not whether assassination is theoretically possible, but which explanation better accommodates the known sequence without requiring unsupported additional assumptions.

Before the April attempt is considered, several facts may seem to point towards suppression: McDonald was a vocal UFO researcher; he accused government bodies of secrecy; official agencies possessed records about him; he experienced ridicule; and he eventually died from a gunshot wound. In isolation, that combination is memorable and suggestive.

After the April event is restored, another explanation gains powerful case-specific support. McDonald had recently engaged in essentially the same form of self-harm that later killed him. The earlier episode was sufficiently well known before his death to appear in Vallée’s dated diary. It followed an acute period of personal and professional distress, resulted in hospital and psychiatric treatment, and occurred only weeks before the fatal shooting.[dokumen.pub]dokumen.pubForbidden ScienceVolume Two [Fifth American ed.] 0578032317, 9780578032313 - DOKUMEN.PUBNovember 1, 2009…Published: November 1, 2009

This does not justify psychological overconfidence. No historical source can reconstruct every thought McDonald had, and simplistic claims that any one humiliation, professional dispute or marital event “caused” his death should be treated cautiously. The evidence supports a cluster of severe pressures and a documented prior attempt; it does not permit outsiders to assign a precise percentage of responsibility to UFO controversy, marriage difficulties, depression, professional setbacks or any other factor.

The same caution must apply in the opposite direction. McDonald’s suicide attempt cannot be turned into evidence for assassination merely because the broader history contains real government secrecy. An argument that intelligence agencies first subjected him to psychological operations and then killed him, or deliberately drove him to suicide, needs affirmative evidence for those additional actions. The FBI files and CIA history located in the public record demonstrate scrutiny and secrecy, but they do not document such an operation against McDonald.[Computer UFO Network]cufon.orgComputer UFO NetworkFBI FILE OF DR. JAMES E. McDONALDJanuary 1, 1999…Published: January 1, 1999

Intermediate events are the strongest test of the conspiracy timeline

McDonald’s case demonstrates why suspicious-death narratives should be tested at their least dramatic point: the events between the supposed motive and the death.

If only two points are retained — McDonald challenged government UFO secrecy and McDonald later died by gunshot — the mind naturally searches for a connection between them. Adding the documented April suicide attempt introduces a major competing causal pathway. Adding his marital crisis, hospitalisation and psychiatric treatment strengthens that pathway further. None of those facts makes government misconduct elsewhere impossible. They simply alter what must be explained.

This is why chronology is more than a collection of dates. It acts as a safeguard against what might be called narrative compression: removing intermediate events until two distant facts appear directly connected.

McDonald’s history also illustrates a particularly difficult feature of UFO conspiracy claims. Some underlying suspicions arose from facts that were genuine. Official UFO work was sometimes secret; McDonald genuinely fought agencies over classified information; and the FBI genuinely retained records concerning him.[Computer UFO Network]cufon.orgComputer UFO NetworkFBI FILE OF DR. JAMES E. McDONALDJanuary 1, 1999…Published: January 1, 1999 A responsible assessment therefore cannot dismiss the entire surrounding history as fantasy.

But precisely because those facts are real, the evidential boundary matters. They explain why a suppression narrative could develop; they do not establish that the narrative explains his death.

The earlier suicide attempt is consequently not a minor biographical detail. It is the central missing event against which the later assassination story has to be tested. The strongest available chronology supports a man undergoing profound personal and professional distress who survived one self-inflicted gunshot before dying from another roughly two months later. Contemporary reporting treated the June death as an apparent suicide, while later biographical accounts preserve the intervening attempt and psychiatric treatment.[reddit.com]reddit.comRemembering Dr. James E. Mc DonaldRemembering Dr. James E. McDonald - Let us not forget what is at stake and how deliberate obfuscation has long been the tactic of t…

A murder hypothesis remains imaginable in the abstract, as alternative hypotheses almost always do. What the documented April event changes is the evidential burden. Once that event is restored to the timeline, McDonald’s death no longer presents the simple pattern on which many suspicious-death narratives depend: a troublesome UFO researcher abruptly dying under unexplained circumstances. Any stronger conspiracy claim must explain not only the final shooting, but also why a separately documented, pre-existing suicide attempt using the same general method should be discounted — and it must do so with evidence rather than with the suspicious appearance created by leaving that event out.

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to The Missing Event in Mc Donald's Conspiracy Timeline. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

Book

The Craft of Research

By Wayne C. Booth, Gregory G. Colomb et al.

Rating: 4.3/5 from 6 Google Books ratings

Since 1995, students, researchers, and professionals have turned to The Craft of Research for clear and helpful guidance on how to conduc...

See on Amazon

Book

Firestorm: Dr. James E. McDonald's Fight for UFO Science

By Ann Druffel

The authorised biography of Dr James E McDonald's research into the UFO phenomenon. McDonald worked in the 1950s and 1960s to raise the U...

See on Amazon

Book

The Believing Brain

By Michael Shermer

Bestselling author Shermer presents a comprehensive and provocative theory on how beliefs are born, formed, reinforced, challenged, chang...

See on Amazon

Book

The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark

By Carl Sagan

Are we on the brink of a new Dark Age of irrationality and superstition? In this book, the writer shows how scientific thinking is necess...

See on Amazon

Browse more on Amazon:The Craft of ResearchFirestorm: Dr. James E. McDonald's Fight for UFO ScienceThe Believing Brain

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.

Shop location

UsingUSA USA USAUKCanadaAustraliaIreland

Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.

Current eBay listing

FS02 VINTAGE UFO FLYING SAUCERS COMIC ADVERTISING A4 POSTER PRINT

GBP 4.71 | Free shippingNewSeller: andys-prints-uk (99.6% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Current eBay listing

VINTAGE UFO ABDUCTION ILLUSTRATION FRAMED WALL ART PICTURE POSTER PRINT

GBP 11.99 | Free shippingNewSeller: canvas monkey (99.8% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Current eBay listing

The X-FILES I WANT TO BELIEVE UFO METAL SIGN WALL PLAQUE poster A6 A5 A4 A3

GBP 16.95 | Free shippingNewSeller: metal-plaques-uk (99.5% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Current eBay listing

UFO S4 Framed Picture Poster Print Wall Art A3 Bob Lazar

GBP 21.50 | Shipping GBP 3.71NewSeller: lavishaddict (100.0% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Browse more oneBay.co.uk

Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.

Endnotes

1. Source: ufos.wiki
Title: James E. Mc Donald
Link:https://ufos.wiki/figure/james-e-mcdonald/

2. Source: kirkmcd.princeton.edu
Link:https://kirkmcd.princeton.edu/JEMcDonald/mcdonald_obituary_bams_71.pdf

Published: June 26, 2009

3. Source: nicap.org
Title: James E. Mc Donald
Link:https://www.nicap.org/bios/detailed/James_E_McDonald.pdf

4. Source: dokumen.pub
Title: Forbidden Science
Link:https://dokumen.pub/forbidden-science-volume-two-fifth-americannbsped-0578032317-9780578032313.html

Published: November 1, 2009

5. Source: william-branham.org
Title: William Branham Historical Research James E Mcdonald
Link:https://william-branham.org/blog/20120703_james_e_mcdonald

Published: July 3, 2012

6. Source: wikidata.org
Title: James E. Mc Donald
Link:https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1374577

Published: April 8, 2026

7. Source: reddit.com
Title: Remembering Dr. James E. Mc Donald
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1fpf49c

8. Source: cia.gov
Title: cias role in the study of ufos 1947 1990
Link:https://www.cia.gov/resources/csi/studies-in-intelligence/studies-in-intelligence-1997/cias-role-in-the-study-of-ufos-1947-1990/

9. Source: sgp.fas.org
Link:https://sgp.fas.org/library/ciaufo.html

10. Source: kzms.org
Title: Dajjāl II: The International Dajjālī Government: From Inception
Link:https://www.kzms.org/kitaabs/Dajjal_II_BOOK-2.pdf

Published: November 4, 2025

11. Source: reddit.com
Title: Possible Grusch testimony on murders [corroboration]({{ ‘corroboration/’ | relative_url }})
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1575fg3/possible_grusch_testimony_on_murders/

12. Source: tucson.com
Title: Tales from the Morgue: UFOs are real
Link:https://tucson.com/news/blogs/morgue-tales/tales-from-the-morgue-ufos-are-real/article_6593476e-745e-11e1-838d-001871e3ce6c.html

13. Source: cia.gov
Title: the cias role in the study of ufos 1947 90
Link:https://www.cia.gov/resources/csi/studies-in-intelligence/archives/vol-40-no-5/the-cias-role-in-the-study-of-ufos-1947-90/

14. Source: information.com
Title: Betsy Mcdonald
Link:https://information.com/people/betsy-mcdonald/

15. Source: extension.arizona.edu
Link:https://extension.arizona.edu/programs/natural-resource-users-law-and-policy-center-nrulpc/team

16. Source: william-branham.org
Title: James Mc Donald
Link:https://william-branham.org/research/james_mcdonald

17. Source: dokumen.pub
Link:https://dokumen.pub/ufos-and-abductions-challenging-the-borders-of-knowledge-0700610324.html

18. Source: dokumen.pub
Link:https://dokumen.pub/failed-fhrers-a-history-of-britains-extreme-right-2019052974-9780415627290-9780415627306-9781315697093.html

19. Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=Robert+Jones&amp=&b_start%3Aint=30

20. Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1ak4kwe/ciaairforce_debunking_campaign_to_decrease_public/

21. Source: kirkmcd.princeton.edu
Title: jem tape achives basterfield
Link:https://kirkmcd.princeton.edu/JEMcDonald/jem_tape_achives_basterfield.pdf

22. Source: paradigmresearchgroup.org
Title: Paradigm Research Group Dr. James Mc Donald bio
Link:https://www.paradigmresearchgroup.org/Hall%20of%20Fame/McDonald_James_E.htm

23. Source: uapmurders.com
Title: Murdering UAP Experts James E. Mc Donald | Murdering UAP Experts
Link:https://uapmurders.com/uaps/Details/James_McDonald/

24. Source: cufon.org
Link:https://www.cufon.org/cufon/fbimcdon.htm

Published: January 1, 1999

25. Source: scribd.com
Link:https://www.scribd.com/document/933725503/4880516

26. Source: isuspecialcollections.wordpress.com
Link:https://isuspecialcollections.wordpress.com/page/16/?archives-list=1

27. Source: cufon.org
Link:https://www.cufon.org/cufon/cufon-v.htm

28. Source: cufon.org
Title: cufon v C
Link:https://www.cufon.org/cufon/cufon-v-C.htm

29. Source: paradigmresearchgroup.org
Link:https://www.paradigmresearchgroup.org/News_Items-3.htm

30. Source: e-yearbook.com
Title: University of Arizona
Link:https://www.e-yearbook.com/yearbooks/University_Arizona_Desert_Yearbook/1988/Page_1.html

31. Source: t.co
Title: f Eslx Vt8CZ
Link:https://t.co/fEslxVt8CZ

32. Source: disclosdex.com
Title: Robertson Panel | Disclosdex
Link:https://disclosdex.com/programs/1953-robertson-panel

Additional References

33. Source: youtube.com
Title: UFO Researcher ENDS SELF, [Missing Scientist]({{ ‘missing-scientist/’ | relative_url }}) Conspiracy GETTING CRAZY
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZZ9RugkX04

Published: July 1967

34. Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HzYns1zmYe4

35. Source: youtube.com
Title: James E. Mc Donald: The UFO Scientist Who Wouldn’t Back Down
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gwQqhSS4tk

36. Source: youtube.com
Title: The Impossible Death of Ufologist James E Mc Donald
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IfY1NxJBisQ

37. Source: youtube.com
Title: Richard Dolan on James Mc Donald: Life, Death, & UFOs
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOcO6Av41Rk

38. Source: inspiringquotes.us
Link:https://www.inspiringquotes.us/author/8861-james-e-mcdonald

39. Source: podchaser.com
Link:https://www.podchaser.com/podcasts/our-strange-skies-ufos-through-1573849/episodes/139-the-robertson-panel-james-261551197

40. Source: medium.com
Link:https://medium.com/an-idea/professor-james-e-mcdonald-a-scientist-s-pursuit-of-the-truth-behind-the-ufo-phenomena-61b369d1b523

41. Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/DailyMailAust/posts/a-troubled-aerospace-researcher-who-claimed-he-was-being-experimented-on-has-bee/1303710478584238/

42. Source: expandingfrontiersresearch.org
Link:https://www.expandingfrontiersresearch.org/items-1/ann-druffel-special-collection