Within Motive Test
Did Cold Fusion's Revival Make Mallove a Target?
A federal reconsideration of cold fusion shortly before Mallove's death made the timing notable, but timing alone does not identify a motive.
On this page
- Mallove's role in the cold fusion debate
- The federal review underway before his death
- Why suspicious timing is not a causal link
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
The timing around Eugene Mallove’s murder is genuinely striking, but it is often described too loosely. In March and April 2004, the US Department of Energy (DOE) publicly confirmed that it would reconsider the scientific evidence for cold fusion — more commonly called low-energy nuclear reactions (LENR) by its advocates. Mallove, one of the field’s most outspoken campaigners, welcomed the development and hoped it would reverse years of scientific and funding resistance. He was murdered in Connecticut on 14 May 2004, before the review was completed.[AIP Publishing]pubs.aip.orgPublishing DOE Warms to Cold FusionAIP PublishingDOE Warms to Cold Fusion - Physics Today…
That sequence helps explain why speculation about a research-related motive arose. There is even a remarkable one-day coincidence in an insider history: LENR proponents and DOE officials reportedly held a planning conference call on 13 May, the day before Mallove was killed. But the official review record also supplies an important corrective. Mallove was not one of the scientists submitting the DOE review document, and the substantive peer-review process occurred after his death. Meanwhile, the later murder case produced evidence centred on people connected to tenants recently evicted from his rental property, rather than on cold fusion interests.[newenergytimes.com]newenergytimes.comNew Energy TimesNew Energy Times - Issue #34: U.S. Department of Energy 2004 LENR Review – The Inside Story…
Mallove’s role in the cold-fusion revival
Mallove mattered to the 2004 moment principally as a public advocate, publisher and organiser, not as one of the formal architects of the DOE submission. By then he had spent years arguing that the scientific establishment had prematurely rejected the anomalous heat and nuclear effects reported after Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons announced their controversial experiments in 1989. He edited Infinite Energy, ran the New Energy Foundation and promoted a broader category of unconventional energy research.
His reaction to the new DOE review was anything but indifferent. Contemporary reporting from 31 March 2004 described him as “excited about the DOE review”. Mallove hoped that a favourable reassessment would redirect federal policy towards funding LENR and away from some expenditure on conventional high-temperature fusion. He told the Deseret News that the long-running “war against cold fusion” was “coming to an end, a screeching halt”.[Deseret News]deseret.comNews DOE to review a new batch of claims in cold-fusion quest – Deseret NewsDeseret NewsDOE to review a new batch of claims in cold-fusion quest – Deseret News…
That quotation is important when evaluating the later speculation. It establishes that Mallove himself regarded the federal reconsideration as potentially consequential. This was not a connection invented entirely after his death. The DOE decision concerned the scientific controversy to which he had devoted much of his public career, and he believed that official recognition could change research funding and scientific attitudes.
Yet his position was more complicated than the simplified image of Mallove as the central scientist taking cold fusion back to Washington. Surviving correspondence attributed to him shows that in November 2003 he was actually sceptical that the proposed DOE review would happen, and worried that, if it did, it might be “led astray”. By March 2004 he was discussing the forthcoming review while also criticising what he regarded as an overly narrow mainstream within the LENR community itself.[eugenemallove.com]eugenemallove.comQuest for Life and Knowledge 2.5Quest for Life and Knowledge 2.5
Most importantly, the people formally pushing the reconsideration were others. Physics Today identified MIT theorist Peter Hagelstein and researchers including Michael McKubre and Randall Hekman as central figures in obtaining the new hearing. The DOE’s eventual report names Hagelstein, McKubre, David Nagel, Talbot Chubb and Hekman as the authors of the review document submitted to the department. Mallove’s name is absent from that list.[AIP Publishing]pubs.aip.orgPublishing DOE Warms to Cold FusionAIP PublishingDOE Warms to Cold Fusion - Physics Today…
The distinction matters. Mallove was a prominent champion of the scientific cause under review, but the evidence does not support portraying the DOE reconsideration as a proceeding dependent upon Mallove personally, or as a hearing at which he alone was about to present decisive evidence.
What was actually happening before his death?
The most useful way to assess the suspicious-timing argument is to reconstruct the review’s stages precisely.
The initiative began in 2003. According to the DOE’s final report, its Office of Science was approached in late 2003 by scientists asking it to revisit the evidence for LENR. Physics Today reported on 1 April 2004 that James Decker, deputy director of the DOE Office of Science, had committed to a review after scientists met him late the previous year. At that point, however, DOE was still working out how the review would operate; Decker expected it to begin within roughly a month and take weeks or months.[Wikisource]en.wikisource.orgPage:DOE Report of the Review of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions.djvu/1Page:DOE Report of the Review of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions.djvu/1 - Wikisource, the free online library…
Cold-fusion advocates therefore had legitimate reason for optimism in the weeks immediately before Mallove died. The planned review represented something they had lacked since the first DOE assessment in 1989: another formal hearing from the federal agency whose earlier judgement had helped define cold fusion’s marginal scientific status. Physics Today reported that advocates hoped the reconsideration could bring “vindication, funding” and improved prospects for developing applications, while also recording continued deep scepticism among mainstream physicists.[AIP Publishing]pubs.aip.orgPublishing DOE Warms to Cold FusionAIP PublishingDOE Warms to Cold Fusion - Physics Today…
There is an especially noteworthy detail in Steven Krivit’s later reconstruction of the review. According to his 2010 account in New Energy Times, Hagelstein, McKubre, Nagel and Hekman held a conference call with four DOE representatives on 13 May 2004 to settle the review’s structure and process. Mallove was killed the following day.[New Energy Times]newenergytimes.comNew Energy TimesNew Energy Times - Issue #34: U.S. Department of Energy 2004 LENR Review – The Inside Story…
That one-day interval is the strongest version of the timing coincidence. It is more precise than saying simply that Mallove died “while cold fusion was making a comeback”. But it also has to be interpreted carefully. Krivit’s account does not place Mallove on the call. The four named proponents were Nagel, Hagelstein, McKubre and Hekman. Nor does it identify anything decided during that meeting that would create an evidential connection between the DOE process and Mallove’s death.[New Energy Times]newenergytimes.comNew Energy TimesNew Energy Times - Issue #34: U.S. Department of Energy 2004 LENR Review – The Inside Story…
The formal scientific work also lay ahead. The DOE’s own final report states that the proponents’ document, New Physical Effects in Metal Deuterides, was not submitted until July 2004, about two months after Mallove’s death. Nine scientists then reviewed it by mail, and a separate group participated in a one-day review on 23 August 2004, when six research groups gave presentations. Eighteen reviewer comments were ultimately received.[Wikisource]en.wikisource.orgPage:DOE Report of the Review of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions.djvu/1Page:DOE Report of the Review of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions.djvu/1 - Wikisource, the free online library…
A later review of the episode by the DOE’s Advanced Research Projects Agency–Energy (ARPA-E) gives essentially the same chronology: the second DOE review was confirmed in March 2004, the review document arrived in July, reviewers met the proponents in August and the conclusions were published in December.[ARPA-E]arpa-e.energy.govARPA-EPower Point PresentationARPA-EPower Point Presentation
So the most accurate description is that Mallove was killed during the preparatory phase of a newly confirmed federal reconsideration, not immediately before a DOE verdict, demonstration or presentation by Mallove himself.
The review did not depend on Mallove
What happened after 14 May provides a useful test of the idea that Mallove’s death was intended to prevent federal scrutiny of cold fusion.
The DOE process continued. Hagelstein, McKubre, Nagel, Chubb and Hekman prepared the submission; the department circulated it to reviewers; researchers appeared before a second panel in August; and DOE published its findings on 1 December 2004.[Wikisource]en.wikisource.orgPage:DOE Report of the Review of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions.djvu/1Page:DOE Report of the Review of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions.djvu/1 - Wikisource, the free online library…
The outcome was mixed but substantially sceptical. Reviewers were divided over whether the experimental evidence demonstrated excess heat, but the majority did not consider the evidence conclusive for low-energy nuclear reactions. No reviewer recommended establishing a federally funded LENR programme, although reviewers were nearly unanimous that funding agencies should remain willing to consider individual, well-designed proposals through ordinary peer review.[ARPA-E]arpa-e.energy.govARPA-EPower Point PresentationARPA-EPower Point Presentation
That outcome matters in two different ways. From the perspective of cold-fusion supporters, the fact that DOE reconsidered the subject at all was significant: a field widely treated as discredited had obtained another formal scientific hearing. From the perspective of the suppression hypothesis, however, the process does not show that Mallove’s removal stopped the reconsideration. The review proceeded without him and reached a conclusion through panels examining material supplied by the researchers who had organised the effort.
Nor does the documentary record establish that Mallove possessed unique evidence without which the case for LENR could not be made. The DOE report explicitly identifies the scientists who assembled its evidentiary submission, and Mallove was not among them.[Wikisource]en.wikisource.orgPage:DOE Report of the Review of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions.djvu/1Page:DOE Report of the Review of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions.djvu/1 - Wikisource, the free online library…
This is an important difference between being influential in a scientific movement and being indispensable to a particular government review. Mallove clearly satisfied the first description. The surviving record does not establish the second.
Why the timing generated suspicion
The speculation nevertheless has an understandable historical origin. Several unusually evocative facts appeared together.
Mallove had spent years alleging that institutional hostility had impeded cold-fusion research. He publicly believed the 2004 review might begin reversing that situation. Physics Today reported in April that DOE had committed to the reconsideration; contemporary newspaper coverage recorded Mallove predicting an end to what he called the “war” on the field. Then, only weeks later, he was violently killed.[AIP Publishing]pubs.aip.orgPublishing DOE Warms to Cold FusionAIP PublishingDOE Warms to Cold Fusion - Physics Today…
For people who already accepted Mallove’s broader argument that powerful scientific and financial institutions had unfairly suppressed unconventional energy research, his murder naturally appeared to fit an existing narrative. Later accounts within unconventional-energy circles explicitly raised the possibility that the killing was related to his work. Even contemporary reporting about the investigation acknowledged that theories of a cold-fusion connection were circulating.[eugenemallove.com]eugenemallove.comPress Releases on Mallove InvestigationJanuary 24, 2005…
The 13 May DOE planning call makes the chronology still more memorable. In isolation, “DOE meeting one day, Mallove murdered the next” sounds extraordinarily suggestive. Yet that formulation leaves out the central evidential fact: Mallove was not identified as a participant in that meeting. It was a planning discussion between DOE personnel and the scientists directly organising the review.[New Energy Times]newenergytimes.comNew Energy TimesNew Energy Times - Issue #34: U.S. Department of Energy 2004 LENR Review – The Inside Story…
There is another complication. Mallove was not merely promoting the same scientific programme as Hagelstein and the other DOE proponents. Surviving correspondence attributed to him shows disagreements with figures within the cold-fusion community and dissatisfaction with aspects of its theoretical direction. In late March he wrote that DOE could review whatever Hagelstein, McKubre and others chose to submit while he pursued a broader conception of anomalous-energy research.[eugenemallove.com]eugenemallove.comQuest for Life and Knowledge 2.5Quest for Life and Knowledge 2.5
That does not make his advocacy less important. It does make the simple story — Mallove was leading the decisive DOE cold-fusion breakthrough and was killed just before achieving it — difficult to reconcile with the documentary chronology.
Why suspicious timing is not a causal link
A coincidence becomes evidence of motive only when something connects the two events. For a research-suppression explanation of Mallove’s murder, useful connecting evidence might include communications discussing him as a threat, financial or organisational ties between perpetrators and interests affected by LENR, surveillance connected to his research, attempts to obtain scientific material, threats referring to his advocacy, or evidence that the killers knew about the DOE reconsideration.
The publicly documented criminal case instead developed in another direction.
Mallove was killed at his rental property at 119 Salem Turnpike in Norwich, Connecticut. FBI records describe him travelling from New Hampshire that day to clean and repair the house; its previous tenants had been evicted the month before. The FBI certainly knew who Mallove was: its case summary explicitly describes him as a scientist, author, speaker and strong proponent of cold fusion. Yet the documented circumstances of the homicide centred on the rental property where he was working.[The Black Vault Documents]documents.theblackvault.comThe Black Vault Documents
Years later, the investigation produced witnesses linking the killing to people associated with those former occupants. A 2025 Connecticut Appellate Court decision records that Chad Schaffer was the son of one of the evicted tenants and had previously lived at the property. Witnesses eventually told police that Schaffer had returned with blood on his clothing and had admitted assaulting Mallove. Candace Foster later admitted her own involvement and said that Mallove’s possessions were taken and his van moved to Foxwoods. Schaffer pleaded guilty to first-degree manslaughter and third-degree robbery in 2012; Mozzelle Brown was subsequently convicted of murder and conspiracy to commit murder.[Justia Law]law.justia.comJustia LawBrown v. Commissioner of Correction:: 2025:: Connecticut Appellate Court Decisions:: Connecticut Case Law:: Connecticut Law…
The same appellate record is valuable precisely because it is not perfectly tidy. Brown later pursued habeas proceedings alleging constitutional and evidential problems, including claims concerning Foster’s testimony and possible benefits connected with her cooperation. Those disputes mean that caution is appropriate when describing every detail of individual responsibility. They do not, however, supply evidence of a cold-fusion or DOE-related motive.[Justia Law]law.justia.comJustia LawBrown v. Commissioner of Correction:: 2025:: Connecticut Appellate Court Decisions:: Connecticut Case Law:: Connecticut Law…
The FBI material similarly records Mallove’s cold-fusion prominence while describing the case as a “single homicide”. It notes the recent eviction, his presence at the property to perform repairs, the violent struggle and property missing from the scene. Nothing in the portions of the released federal record reviewed here identifies the DOE reconsideration as the reason he was attacked.[The Black Vault Documents]documents.theblackvault.comThe Black Vault Documents
What the 2004 sequence actually establishes
The strongest evidence-supported chronology is narrower, but more interesting, than either dismissing the timing as meaningless or treating it as proof of assassination.
In late 2003, LENR researchers persuaded DOE officials to consider revisiting the subject. By March 2004 the reconsideration had become public knowledge. On 31 March, Mallove enthusiastically predicted that the review could help end institutional opposition to cold fusion. On 1 April, Physics Today reported DOE’s commitment to proceed. According to a later insider history, DOE officials and four LENR proponents settled important procedural details on 13 May. Mallove was murdered on 14 May. The proponents submitted their formal scientific document in July, the main face-to-face review followed in August, and DOE issued its conclusions in December.[deseret.com]deseret.comNews DOE to review a new batch of claims in cold-fusion quest – Deseret NewsDeseret NewsDOE to review a new batch of claims in cold-fusion quest – Deseret News…
That is a genuinely notable event window. It explains why Mallove’s death became embedded in wider narratives about suppressed energy research, including claims sometimes grouped with UFO and antigravity researchers. But the chronology also supplies its own limiting evidence. Mallove was an enthusiastic advocate for the reconsideration rather than one of its named proposers; the DOE review continued after his death; and the later homicide investigation developed evidence of a confrontation rooted in the recently vacated rental property.
The careful conclusion is therefore not that the timing was irrelevant. The timing was real, unusually close and historically important in explaining the subsequent speculation. What has not been demonstrated is the additional step from temporal coincidence to research-related motive. On the currently documented record, the federal cold-fusion revival explains why Mallove’s murder looked suspicious to supporters of unconventional energy research far better than it explains why he was actually killed.[Wikisource]en.wikisource.orgPage:DOE Report of the Review of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions.djvu/1Page:DOE Report of the Review of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions.djvu/1 - Wikisource, the free online library…
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to Did Cold Fusion's Revival Make Mallove a Target?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
Fire from Ice: Searching for the Truth Behind the Cold Fusion...
Discusses the furor over the announcement that scientists had succeeded in producing controlled nuclear fusion at ordinary temperatures,...
Cold Fusion: The Scientific Fiasco of the Century
First published 1992. Subjects: Cold fusion, History, Kalte Kernfusion, Koude kernfusie, Science, moral and ethical aspects.
Bad Science: The Short Life and Weird Times of Cold Fusion
Documents the bizarre 1989 episode of 2 scientists who announced they had created a sustained nuclear-fusion reaction at room temperature...
Excess Heat: Why Cold Fusion Research Prevailed
First published 2000. Subjects: Cold fusion, Research.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.
Endnotes
1.
Source: pubs.aip.org
Title: Publishing DOE Warms to Cold Fusion
Link:https://pubs.aip.org/physicstoday/article-abstract/57/4/27/412504
Source snippet
AIP PublishingDOE Warms to Cold Fusion - Physics Today...
2.
Source: deseret.com
Title: News DOE to review a new batch of claims in cold-fusion quest – Deseret News
Link:https://www.deseret.com/2004/3/31/19820492/doe-to-review-a-new-batch-of-claims-in-cold-fusion-quest
Source snippet
Deseret NewsDOE to review a new batch of claims in cold-fusion quest – Deseret News...
3.
Source: en.wikisource.org
Title: Page:DOE Report of the Review of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions.djvu/1
Link:https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Page%3ADOE_Report_of_the_Review_of_Low_Energy_Nuclear_Reactions.djvu/1
Source snippet
Page:DOE Report of the Review of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions.djvu/1 - Wikisource, the free online library...
4.
Source: law.justia.com
Link:https://law.justia.com/cases/connecticut/court-of-appeals/2025/ac46658.html
Source snippet
Justia LawBrown v. Commissioner of Correction:: 2025:: Connecticut Appellate Court Decisions:: Connecticut Case Law:: Connecticut Law...
5.
Source: eugenemallove.com
Title: Quest for Life and Knowledge 2.5
Link:https://www.eugenemallove.com/emwords_quest2.5.html
6.
Source: arpa-e.energy.gov
Title: ARPA-EPower Point Presentation
Link:https://arpa-e.energy.gov/sites/default/files/migrated/2021LENR_workshop_Greco.pdf
7.
Source: eugenemallove.com
Title: Press Releases on Mallove Investigation
Link:https://www.eugenemallove.com/em_investigation.html
Source snippet
January 24, 2005...
Published: January 24, 2005
8.
Source: documents.theblackvault.com
Title: The Black Vault Documents
Link:https://documents.theblackvault.com/documents/fbifiles/scientists/eugenemallove-fbi1.pdf
9.
Source: eugenemallove.org
Link:https://www.eugenemallove.org/
10.
Source: infinite-energy.com
Title: Issue 61 Table of Contents
Link:https://infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue61/index.html
11.
Source: en.wikisource.org
Title: Page:DOE Report of the Review of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions.djvu
Link:https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Page%3ADOE_Report_of_the_Review_of_Low_Energy_Nuclear_Reactions.djvu/4
12.
Source: en.wikisource.org
Title: Page:DOE Report of the Review of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions.djvu
Link:https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Page%3ADOE_Report_of_the_Review_of_Low_Energy_Nuclear_Reactions.djvu/5
13.
Source: en.wikisource.org
Title: Page:DOE Report of the Review of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions.djvu
Link:https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Page%3ADOE_Report_of_the_Review_of_Low_Energy_Nuclear_Reactions.djvu/3
15.
Source: infinite-energy.com
Link:https://www.infinite-energy.com/resources/pressreleasedoe.html
16.
Source: eugenemallove.com
Title: 2003 Turning point
Link:https://www.eugenemallove.com/Writings/2003_Turning_point.html
17.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Title: eugene mallove
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/eugene-mallove
18.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/eugene-mallove/eugene-mallove-final/view
19.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=Eugene+Little
20.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/search?SearchableText=Eugene+Little&b_start%3Aint=960
21.
Source: pubs.aip.org
Title: 27 1 online
Link:https://pubs.aip.org/physicstoday/article-pdf/57/4/27/9877079/27_1_online.pdf
22.
Source: physicstoday.aip.org
Title: doe warms to cold fusion
Link:https://physicstoday.aip.org/news/doe-warms-to-cold-fusion
23.
Source: arpa-e-foa.energy.gov
Link:https://arpa-e-foa.energy.gov/Default.aspx?Search=lenr&SearchType=
24.
Source: arpa-e-foa.energy.gov
Link:https://arpa-e-foa.energy.gov/Default.aspx?Search=move&SearchType=
25.
Source: arpa-e-foa.energy.gov
Title: File Content.aspx
Link:https://arpa-e-foa.energy.gov/FileContent.aspx?FileID=50d48a6a-22a4-411b-9a78-c92de1bef5b9
26.
Source: arpa-e-foa.energy.gov
Link:https://arpa-e-foa.energy.gov/Default.aspx?Search=CONNECT&SearchType=
27.
Source: arpa-e-foa.energy.gov
Link:https://arpa-e-foa.energy.gov/Default.aspx?Search=focus&SearchType=
28.
Source: arpa-e-foa.energy.gov
Title: File Content.aspx
Link:https://arpa-e-foa.energy.gov/FileContent.aspx?FileID=6f3acb2f-315e-48c1-9dee-e6e133bbc0e2
29.
Source: arpa-e-foa.energy.gov
Title: File Content.aspx
Link:https://arpa-e-foa.energy.gov/FileContent.aspx?FileID=68c066ad-2aa8-4bbe-bfbf-fcb73762fdda
30.
Source: arpa-e-foa.energy.gov
Title: File Content.aspx
Link:https://arpa-e-foa.energy.gov/FileContent.aspx?FileID=5dced896-1a4a-4d38-88ec-1e9f3d3fec53
31.
Source: infinite-energy.com
Link:https://infinite-energy.com/genemallovecollection/biography.html
32.
Source: infinite-energy.com
Link:https://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/readarticles.html
33.
Source: infinite-energy.com
Link:https://www.infinite-energy.com/whoarewe/gene.html
34.
Source: infinite-energy.com
Title: Infinite Energy Magazine
Link:https://www.infinite-energy.com/whoarewe/whoarewe.html
35.
Source: infinite-energy.com
Link:https://www.infinite-energy.com/genemallovecollection/publications/publications_infiniteenergymagazine.html
36.
Source: infinite-energy.com
Title: In the News
Link:https://www.infinite-energy.com/resources/inthenews.html
37.
Source: infinite-energy.com
Link:https://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue52/ifcc10review.html
38.
Source: mail.infinite-energy.com
Link:https://mail.infinite-energy.com/resources/inthenews.html
39.
Source: infinite-energy.com
Link:https://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue62/mitcolloquium.html
40.
Source: eugenemallove.com
Title: Mallove in His Words
Link:https://eugenemallove.com/
41.
Source: eugenemallove.com
Title: death of IE
Link:https://www.eugenemallove.com/death_of_IE.html
42.
Source: eugenemallove.com
Link:https://www.eugenemallove.com/emwords_quest1.html
43.
Source: eugenemallove.com
Link:https://www.eugenemallove.com/why_write_no_more.html
44.
Source: eugenemallove.com
Link:https://www.eugenemallove.com/emwords_CV.html
45.
Source: uscode.house.gov
Link:https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?edition=prelim&req=granuleid%3AUSC-prelim-title22&saved=%7CZ3JhbnVsZWlkOlVTQy1wcmVsaW0tdGl0bGUyMi1zZWN0aW9uOTIyMWE%3D%7C%7C%7C0%7Cfalse%7Cprelim
46.
Source: en.wikisource.org
Title: Report of the Review of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions
Link:https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Report_of_the_Review_of_Low_Energy_Nuclear_Reactions
47.
Source: en.wikisource.org
Title: Index:DOE Report of the Review of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions.djvu
Link:https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Index%3ADOE_Report_of_the_Review_of_Low_Energy_Nuclear_Reactions.djvu
48.
Source: cold-fusion.org
Title: Cold Fusion & LENR: What We Know | Comprehensive Research Analysis CONTENTS *
Link:https://www.cold-fusion.org/
49.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TZXekFvKZoc
Source snippet
Cold Fusion...
50.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Cold Fusion
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9hxBmSPN7s
Source snippet
Eugene Mallove Cold Fusion DOE Review Cold Fusion...
51.
Source: newenergytimes.com
Link:https://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2010/34/344doereview.shtml
Source snippet
New Energy TimesNew Energy Times - Issue #34: U.S. Department of Energy 2004 LENR Review -- The Inside Story...
52.
Source: wikidata.org
Title: Eugene Mallove
Link:https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1373153
53.
Source: news.newenergytimes.net
Title: news service index 2000 2009
Link:https://news.newenergytimes.net/news-service-index-2000-2009/
54.
Source: yumpu.com
Title: Eugene mallove
Link:https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/18240492/eugene-mallove
55.
Source: newenergytimes.com
Title: New Energy Times
Link:https://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2010/35/3524scienceenergynews.shtml
56.
Source: news.newenergytimes.net
Title: mallove murder case plods along
Link:https://news.newenergytimes.net/2010/06/24/mallove-murder-case-plods-along/
57.
Source: newenergytimes.com
Title: New Energy Times
Link:https://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2010/34/346tragicevent.shtml
58.
Source: newenergytimes.com
Title: New Energy Times
Link:https://newenergytimes.com/v2/archives/bpcf/bpcf.shtml
59.
Source: newenergytimes.com
Link:https://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2008/NET26.shtml
60.
Source: newenergytimes.com
Link:https://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2007/NET22.shtml
61.
Source: newenergytimes.com
Link:https://www.newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2005/NET11.shtml
62.
Source: newenergytimes.com
Title: New Energy Times
Link:https://www.newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2004/DrEugeneMallove.shtml
63.
Source: newenergytimes.com
Title: New Energy Times
Link:https://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/Mallove/DrEugeneMallove-MPMW.shtml
64.
Source: asa3.org
Link:https://www.asa3.org/archive/asa/200403/0244.html
65.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Cold fusion
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_fusion
66.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Cold fusion
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia%3AFeatured_article_review/Cold_fusion
67.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Eugene Mallove
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_Mallove
68.
Source: newenergytimes.com
Title: New Energy Times
Link:https://www.newenergytimes.com/v2/sen/2011.shtml
69.
Source: newenergytimes.com
Title: Issue #34: The Emergence of an Incoherent
Link:https://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2010/34/342incoherentexplanation.shtml
70.
Source: newenergytimes.com
Title: New Energy Times
Link:https://newenergytimes.com/v2/books/Reviews/MalloveByBritz.shtml
71.
Source: newenergytimes.com
Title: LENR and Cold Fusion History Book Index.shtml
Link:https://newenergytimes.com/v2/books/LENR-and-Cold-Fusion-History-Book-Index.shtml
72.
Source: 21sci-tech.com
Title: 2004 W
Link:https://21sci-tech.com/Subscriptions/Archive/2004_W.pdf
73.
Source: uapmurders.com
Link:https://uapmurders.com/uaps/Details/Eugene_Mallove/
74.
Source: wikizero.net
Title: Cold fusion
Link:https://www.wikizero.net/wiki/en/Cold_fusion
75.
Source: planetary.org
Link:https://www.planetary.org/profiles/eugene-mallove
76.
Source: everything.explained.today
Title: Eugene Mallove
Link:https://everything.explained.today/Eugene_Mallove/
77.
Source: everything.explained.today
Title: Cold fusion
Link:https://everything.explained.today/Cold_fusion/
78.
Source: academickids.com
Title: Eugene Mallove
Link:https://academickids.com/encyclopedia/index.php/Eugene_Mallove
Additional References
79.
Source: zpe.quest
Title: Dead Inventors, Vanishing Scientists & The Energy They Knew
Link:https://zpe.quest/
Source snippet
July 3, 2026 — This gave the mainstream physics establishment, led primarily by plasma physicists at institutions including Caltech, MIT...
Published: July 3, 2026
80.
Source: concordmonitor.com
Title: End of an era for cold fusion journal Infinite Energy
Link:https://www.concordmonitor.com/2026/07/27/infinite-energy-magazine-disappears-cold-fusion-nh-eugene-mallove/
Source snippet
Concord MonitorJuly 27, 2026 — GRANITE GEEK: INFINITE ENERGY MAGAZINE HAS PROVED TO BE FINITE, AFTER ALL Image: Avatar photo by David Bro...
Published: July 27, 2026
81.
Source: science.org
Link:https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.306.5703.1873a
82.
Source: govinfo.gov
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-107shrg81928/html/CHRG-107shrg81928.htm
83.
Source: govinfo.gov
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-D101-PURL-gpo136182/pdf/GOVPUB-D101-PURL-gpo136182.pdf
84.
Source: govinfo.gov
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-111hhrg56130/html/CHRG-111hhrg56130.htm
85.
Source: govinfo.gov
Link:https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-111hhrg52894/html/CHRG-111hhrg52894.htm
86.
Source: science.gov
Link:https://www.science.gov/topicpages/c/cold%2Bfusion%2Bresearch.html
87.
Source: science.gov
Link:https://www.science.gov/topicpages/d/d-d%2Bfusion%2Breaction
88.
Source: science.gov
Link:https://www.science.gov/topicpages/d/d-t%2Bfusion%2Breactions