Within Huntsville
How Classified Work Can Mimic a Disappearance
Security clearances, publication limits and inaccessible records can make a scientist seem to vanish from public research without vanishing at all.
On this page
- How clearances and publication restrictions reduce visibility
- Why missing records encourage stronger interpretations
- What evidence separates secrecy from suppression
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
A scientist can appear to “disappear” from public research without disappearing physically at all. In a defence-heavy research environment such as Huntsville, Alabama, the transition from university science to government or contractor work can sharply reduce the traces that outsiders normally use to follow a career: journal papers, conference talks, grant descriptions, laboratory webpages and candid conversations with colleagues. That change is real, but it is not by itself evidence of coercion or suppression.
US policy actually draws a deliberate boundary between open “fundamental research” and work requiring national-security controls. Once research crosses that boundary, classified-information rules, contract clauses and public-release reviews can make previously visible work difficult or impossible to discuss publicly. Even some unclassified defence-contract information can require approval before release.[nsf.gov]nsf.govU.S. National Science Foundation Research Security Guidelines | NSFU.S. National Science FoundationResearch Security Guidelines | NSF - U.S. National Science Foundation…
That mechanism is especially important when assessing stories about UFO or antigravity researchers. A sudden publication gap is evidence that the public trail has ended. It does not, on its own, establish why.
How classified work reduces a scientist’s public visibility
The starting point is an important distinction: US government policy does not treat ordinary academic research as presumptively secret. National Security Decision Directive 189 established the concept of “fundamental research” — basic and applied science whose results are broadly shared — and stated that its products should remain unrestricted to the maximum extent possible. The National Science Foundation continues to identify that principle as valid, while the Office of the Director of National Intelligence describes NSDD-189 as drawing a boundary between fundamental and classified research.[NSF - U.S. National Science Foundation]nsf.govU.S. National Science Foundation Research Security Guidelines | NSFU.S. National Science FoundationResearch Security Guidelines | NSF - U.S. National Science Foundation…
This means a researcher publishing unconventional propulsion or gravity papers at a university is not automatically participating in a classified programme simply because the subject might interest the military. The important question is whether later work crossed into a different legal and contractual regime.
Once classified information is involved, access is governed by more than possession of a security clearance. The Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA) states that a cleared person must also have a need to know. Cleared defence contractors operate within the National Industrial Security Program, which exists specifically to safeguard classified information held by industry while it performs contracts, programmes and research and development. DCSA says roughly 12,500 contractor facilities fall under its security oversight.[DCSA]dcsa.milFAQs – Facility Security OfficersFAQs – Facility Security Officers…
People receiving classified access normally assume formal nondisclosure obligations. Standard Form 312, the Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement, binds its signer to protect classified information received through that access. The form also contains a security-debriefing acknowledgement reaffirming that obligation when access ends. In other words, leaving a programme or employer does not turn previously classified knowledge into something a scientist may publish afterwards.[National Archives]archives.govNational ArchivesCLASSIFIED INFORMATION NONDISCLOSURE AGREEMENTFebruary 13, 2026…
For an outside observer, the practical effect can be striking. A researcher who previously explained experiments at conferences, corresponded freely with colleagues and published technical papers may move into work where those normal signals cease. That can look like a vanished career even though the person remains employed and scientifically active.
The restrictions can also extend beyond material carrying a classification marking. Under the National Industrial Security Program rules, contractors may not publicly disclose classified information, and unclassified information concerning a classified contract can also require prior review and clearance. The Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement likewise contains a disclosure clause under which certain unclassified information connected with a defence contract or related programme cannot be released outside the contractor without approval, unless an applicable exception applies.[Cornell Law School]law.cornell.eduLaw School32 CFR § 117.15Cornell Law School32 CFR § 117.15 - Safeguarding classified information. | Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (e-CFR) | US Law | LII…
That distinction is easy to lose in retrospective accounts. “There are no published results” and “there were no results” are not equivalent propositions.
Ning Li and the difference between silence and disappearance
The career of Huntsville physicist Ning Li provides an unusually clear example of how the distinction matters. Li had once been highly visible: she worked at the University of Alabama in Huntsville and published gravity-related research associated with superconductors. She later left the university and formed AC Gravity LLC. According to reporting by the Huntsville Business Journal, the US Department of Defense awarded AC Gravity approximately $449,000 in 2001 for further research, but the resulting work was not publicly published. After the early 2000s, Li’s publication trail largely stopped.[Huntsville Business Journal]huntsvillebusinessjournal.comHuntsville Business JournalUncovering The Mystery Of Huntsville’s Brilliant Anti-gravity Scientist - Huntsville Business JournalJuly 30…
That silence eventually mutated online into a much stronger story: Li had supposedly “disappeared”. Yet the 2023 Huntsville Business Journal investigation found that she had never been a missing person in the ordinary meaning of the term. Reporter Noah Logan located and interviewed her son, George Guangyu Men, who described a much less sensational sequence of events. Li had remained in Huntsville, continued her life there and died in 2021.[Huntsville Business Journal]huntsvillebusinessjournal.comHuntsville Business JournalUncovering The Mystery Of Huntsville’s Brilliant Anti-gravity Scientist - Huntsville Business JournalJuly 30…
The period that generated the mystery nevertheless contained signs that her research activity had continued after her academic publication record faded. The investigation identified a 2003 presentation, “Measurability of AC Gravity Fields”, associated with a MITRE conference and an official from the US Army Aviation and Missile Command at Redstone Arsenal. It also reported correspondence from physicist Eugene Podkletnov indicating in 2004 that Li was alive and doing Department of Defense work but could not discuss it.[Huntsville Business Journal]huntsvillebusinessjournal.comHuntsville Business JournalUncovering The Mystery Of Huntsville’s Brilliant Anti-gravity Scientist - Huntsville Business JournalJuly 30…
Li’s son subsequently told the newspaper that his mother had continued antigravity-related work for the Department of Defense and stopped publishing or discussing her results after receiving a Top Secret clearance. That is family testimony rather than a publicly released government personnel or programme record, so it should not be inflated into proof of exactly what programme existed or what it achieved. It does, however, offer a mundane mechanism consistent with the observed pattern: a formerly public researcher became much less publicly communicative after entering sensitive defence work.[Huntsville Business Journal]huntsvillebusinessjournal.comHuntsville Business JournalUncovering The Mystery Of Huntsville’s Brilliant Anti-gravity Scientist - Huntsville Business JournalJuly 30…
The case also illustrates how an information vacuum changes character over time. In 2008, physicist Jack Sarfatti publicly asserted that Li had disappeared and was allegedly back in China. Later reporting contradicted that account: Li had remained in Huntsville. A statement that originally sounded like insider confirmation of a mysterious disappearance therefore turned out to be unreliable as a description of her physical whereabouts.[Huntsville Business Journal]huntsvillebusinessjournal.comHuntsville Business JournalUncovering The Mystery Of Huntsville’s Brilliant Anti-gravity Scientist - Huntsville Business JournalJuly 30…
For the broader antigravity narrative, that correction matters. Li’s story contains a genuine public-record gap and reported defence involvement. It does not require a literal disappearance to explain that gap.
Why inaccessible records can make the story look stronger
Once public output stops, attempts to investigate what happened next can produce frustrating results — and those results are easily misinterpreted.
The Freedom of Information Act gives the public broad rights to request federal executive-branch records, but it does not guarantee disclosure of everything an agency possesses. FOIA contains nine exemptions. Exemption 1 covers information properly classified for national defence or foreign policy, while other exemptions protect such things as confidential commercial information and personal privacy.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives FOIA Resources | National ArchivesNational ArchivesFOIA Resources | National ArchivesJune 15, 2023…
In especially sensitive national-security cases, the government may sometimes decline even to confirm or deny whether responsive records exist — the response commonly known as “Glomar”. The Department of Justice explains that such a response may be used where acknowledging the existence of records would itself harm an interest protected by a FOIA exemption. Courts have upheld its use in national-security circumstances where merely revealing the existence or non-existence of requested material could cause damage.[Justice.gov]justice.govUSDO J: OIP: FOIA Guidance and Resources: Court Decisions: GlomarUSDO J: OIP: FOIA Guidance and Resources: Court Decisions: Glomar
For someone investigating an alleged secret propulsion programme, that creates a difficult evidential trap. A withheld document can easily be read as confirmation that the dramatic theory is true. But withholding establishes much less than that. A record may contain genuinely classified material without validating the requester’s interpretation of it; an unclassified document can also be withheld or redacted for other lawful reasons. Conversely, an unsuccessful records search does not prove that a programme never existed, because records can be held by a different agency, contractor or record system.
Age does not necessarily solve the problem quickly. Executive Order 13526 generally provides for automatic declassification of permanently valuable classified records after 25 years, but it contains exceptions and mechanisms for delaying release of information that remains sensitive. The National Archives also notes that classified records can be sought through Mandatory Declassification Review, while other statutory or FOIA restrictions may continue to affect access.[National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Basic Laws and Authorities | National ArchivesNational Archives Basic Laws and Authorities | National Archives
This produces precisely the documentary landscape in which disappearance narratives flourish: an early run of accessible papers, a government connection, then an abrupt shortage of public technical information followed by inconclusive records requests. The pattern is intriguing, but the pattern itself cannot distinguish several very different explanations.
What separates ordinary secrecy from evidence of suppression
The most useful test is not whether a researcher’s public trail became sparse. It is whether independent evidence shows that something happened beyond the normal consequences of classified or proprietary work.
A clearance is evidence of access rules, not evidence of a breakthrough. DCSA explicitly distinguishes eligibility for classified access from actual access, which additionally requires a need to know. A statement that somebody held a Secret or Top Secret clearance therefore does not reveal what information that person saw, whether it concerned gravity research, or whether the underlying research succeeded.[DCSA]dcsa.milFAQs – Facility Security OfficersFAQs – Facility Security Officers…
Publication silence is consistent with sensitive work, but has many other causes. A scientist may move into classified research, proprietary industrial development, management, consulting or retirement. A company can also perform government work without producing papers intended for academic publication. The inference becomes stronger only when contracts, programme documents, credible first-hand testimony or declassified records connect the publication gap to particular restricted research.
Government interest is not scientific validation. Defence agencies routinely fund exploratory technologies because their potential consequences would be important if they worked. A defence contract therefore establishes that somebody considered a question worth investigating; it does not establish that the proposed effect was reproduced, weaponised or secretly deployed.
Contemporaneous records are more valuable than later lore. In the Li case, the reported DoD award, conference activity and correspondence indicating continuing defence work are more useful for reconstructing the quiet period than later claims that she had physically vanished. Most importantly, direct reporting with her family eventually established that the central “missing scientist” premise was wrong.[Huntsville Business Journal]huntsvillebusinessjournal.comHuntsville Business JournalUncovering The Mystery Of Huntsville’s Brilliant Anti-gravity Scientist - Huntsville Business JournalJuly 30…
Evidence for actual suppression would require something more specific: authenticated instructions improperly blocking otherwise releasable research; credible records documenting threats or coercion intended to silence a scientist; evidence that records were unlawfully destroyed or concealed; corroborated testimony from people directly involved; or declassified documentation establishing a covert programme and connecting the researcher to it. Classification itself does not meet that standard. It is a legal mechanism for restricting national-security information, not proof that the government classified a successful antigravity technology.
The appearance of disappearance
The central lesson for Huntsville’s UFO and antigravity stories is therefore narrower, but more useful, than either extreme interpretation.
It would be mistaken to argue that scientists cannot genuinely become difficult to trace because they enter classified defence work. The rules make precisely that outcome possible. Contractors can be prohibited from releasing classified material and can face prior-review requirements even for certain unclassified information related to sensitive contracts. Cleared personnel have continuing nondisclosure obligations. Historical records can remain inaccessible for years.[cornell.edu]law.cornell.eduLaw School32 CFR § 117.15Cornell Law School32 CFR § 117.15 - Safeguarding classified information. | Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (e-CFR) | US Law | LII…
But the opposite inference — that a quiet publication record proves a scientist was forcibly silenced — goes much further than those facts permit. The mechanisms of legitimate secrecy can produce many of the outward signs that later become ingredients in a conspiracy narrative: unanswered technical questions, missing experimental results, colleagues who say they cannot discuss the work, incomplete archives and years without publications.
Ning Li is particularly instructive because the distinction can be tested. The public research trail really did become unusually quiet, and credible reporting supports continuing defence-related activity. Yet the scientist who became famous online for having “disappeared” had not disappeared from Huntsville at all.[Huntsville Business Journal]huntsvillebusinessjournal.comHuntsville Business JournalUncovering The Mystery Of Huntsville’s Brilliant Anti-gravity Scientist - Huntsville Business JournalJuly 30…
In this branch of UFO and antigravity history, therefore, absence from the scientific record should be treated first as an information problem, not as a missing-person event. Classified work is one plausible explanation for such an absence. Establishing deliberate suppression, abduction or a concealed technological breakthrough requires independent evidence beyond the silence itself.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to How Classified Work Can Mimic a Disappearance. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The Right Stuff
Rating: 4.5/5 from 8 Google Books ratings
The first Americans in space--Yeager, Conrad, Grissom, and Glenn--battle the Russians for control of the heavens and put their lives on t...
Skunk Works: A Personal Memoir of My Years at Lockheed
The former head of Lockheed's SKUNK WORKS reveals the amazing story of the secret aircraft that changed the course of history - from the...
Area 51: An Uncensored History of America's Top Secret Milita...
The explosive, untold story of the Cold War's biggest secret from the bestselling author of NUCLEAR WAR: A SCENARIO 'An extraordinary boo...
The Imagineers of War: The Untold Story of DARPA, the Pentago...
The definitive history of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, the Pentagon agency that has quietly shaped war and technology f...
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromspace program patch oneBay.co.uk.
Endnotes
1.
Source: nsf.gov
Title: U.S. National Science Foundation Research Security Guidelines | NSF
Link:https://www.nsf.gov/research-security/guidelines
Source snippet
U.S. National Science FoundationResearch Security Guidelines | NSF - U.S. National Science Foundation...
2.
Source: law.cornell.edu
Title: Law School32 CFR § 117.15
Link:https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/32/117.15
Source snippet
Cornell Law School32 CFR § 117.15 - Safeguarding classified information. | Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (e-CFR) | US Law | LII...
3.
Source: dcsa.mil
Title: FAQs – Facility Security Officers
Link:https://www.dcsa.mil/Industrial-Security/Entity-Vetting-Facility-Clearances-FOCI/Facility-Clearances/FAQs-Facility-Security-Officers/nbsp/
Source snippet
FAQs – Facility Security Officers...
4.
Source: dcsa.mil
Title: National Industrial Security Program Oversight
Link:https://www.dcsa.mil/Industrial-Security/National-Industrial-Security-Program-Oversight/Security-Review-and-Rating-Process/
Source snippet
National Industrial Security Program Oversight...
5.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/isoo/security-forms/sf312.pdf
Source snippet
National ArchivesCLASSIFIED INFORMATION NONDISCLOSURE AGREEMENTFebruary 13, 2026...
Published: February 13, 2026
6.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/files/isoo/security-forms/sf312.pdf
Source snippet
National ArchivesStandard Form 312, Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement, January 2000...
Published: January 2000
7.
Source: archives.gov
Title: National Archives FOIA Resources | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/ogis/resources
Source snippet
National ArchivesFOIA Resources | National ArchivesJune 15, 2023...
Published: June 15, 2023
8.
Source: archives.gov
Title: National Archives Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/foia
9.
Source: justice.gov
Title: USDO J: OIP: FOIA Guidance and Resources: Court Decisions: Glomar
Link:https://www.justice.gov/archive/oip/courtdecisions/glomar.html
10.
Source: justice.gov
Title: united states department justice 2025 chief foia officer report
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/united-states-department-justice-2025-chief-foia-officer-report
11.
Source: archives.gov
Title: National Archives Basic Laws and Authorities | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/about/laws/appendix/13526.html
12.
Source: archives.gov
Title: National Archives Exemptions from Automatic Declassification | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/declassification/iscap/auto-declass-exemptions.html
13.
Source: archives.gov
Title: National Archives Declassified Records | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/declassification.html
14.
Source: justice.gov
Title: united states department justice 2024 chief foia officer report
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/united-states-department-justice-2024-chief-foia-officer-report
15.
Source: nsf.gov
Title: Prohibition on Collaborations with Restricted Entities | NSF
Link:https://www.nsf.gov/funding/information/dcl-prohibition-collaborations-entities-us-prohibited-party
16.
Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/doj-guide-freedom-information-act-0
17.
Source: acquisition.gov
Title: Part 252
Link:https://www.acquisition.gov/dfars/part-252-solicitation-provisions-and-contract-clauses?partname=242
18.
Source: acquisition.gov
Title: Subpart 204.4
Link:https://www.acquisition.gov/dfars/subpart-204.4-safeguarding-classified-information-within-industry
19.
Source: acquisition.gov
Title: 204.404-70 Additional contract clauses. | Acquisition.GO V
Link:https://www.acquisition.gov/dfars/204.404-70-additional-contract-clauses
20.
Source: acquisition.gov
Title: Subpart 204.74
Link:https://www.acquisition.gov/dfars/subpart-204.74-disclosure-information-litigation-support-contractors
21.
Source: acquisition.gov
Title: Subpart 205.4
Link:https://www.acquisition.gov/dfars/subpart-205.4-release-information
22.
Source: acquisition.gov
Title: Part 205
Link:https://www.acquisition.gov/index.php/dfars/part-205-publicizing-contract-actions
23.
Source: acquisition.gov
Title: Subchapter H
Link:https://www.acquisition.gov/dfars/subchapter-h-clauses-and-forms
24.
Source: acquisition.gov
Title: Subpart 227.71
Link:https://www.acquisition.gov/dfars/subpart-227.71-technical-data-and-associated-rights
25.
Source: justice.gov
Title: richards v nsa no 25 2098 2026 wl 1221780 wd ark may 4 2026 brooks cj
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/richards-v-nsa-no-25-2098-2026-wl-1221780-wd-ark-may-4-2026-brooks-cj
26.
Source: justice.gov
Title: dhakal v fbi no 24 02525 2026 wl 787865 ddc mar 20 2026 mcfadden j
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/dhakal-v-fbi-no-24-02525-2026-wl-787865-ddc-mar-20-2026-mcfadden-j
27.
Source: acquisition.gov
Link:https://www.acquisition.gov/far/3.104-4
28.
Source: dcsa.mil
Title: Security Review Proceedings FAQ
Link:https://www.dcsa.mil/Trust-Decision-Adjudications/Appeal-an-Investigation-Decision/Security-Review-Proceedings-FAQ/
29.
Source: nsf.gov
Title: Extraordinary Possibility | NSF
Link:https://www.nsf.gov/nsb/updates/extraordinary-possibility
30.
Source: archives.gov
Title: foia guide
Link:https://www.archives.gov/foia/foia-guide
31.
Source: dcsa.mil
Link:https://www.dcsa.mil/About-Us/News/Article/Article/4382910/dcsa-is-addressing-sf-312-digital-submission-issue-in-diss-provides-guidance-fo/
32.
Source: justice.gov
Title: conte v fbi no 23 3729 2025 wl 3037877 ddc oct 30 2025 kelly j
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/conte-v-fbi-no-23-3729-2025-wl-3037877-ddc-oct-30-2025-kelly-j
33.
Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/2026-chief-foia-officer-report-guidelines-agencies-receiving-100-or-more-requests-fiscal-year
34.
Source: ncses.nsf.gov
Link:https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20257/introduction
35.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Redaction Codes | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/declassification/iscap/redaction-codes.html
36.
Source: archives.gov
Title: File Series Exemptions | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/declassification/iscap/file-series-exemptions.html
37.
Source: ncses.nsf.gov
Link:https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/ncses25215/section/24064
38.
Source: dcsa.mil
Link:https://www.dcsa.mil/About-Us/Leadership/National-Industrial-Security-Program-NISP-Contract-Classification-System-NCCS/
39.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Marking | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/isoo/faqs/marking
40.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Using FOIA to Access Intelligence Community Records | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/ogis/resources/foia-ombuds-observer/2025-02
41.
Source: law.cornell.edu
Title: edu48 CFR § 952.204-70
Link:https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/48/952.204-70
42.
Source: nsf.gov
Title: NS F enhances research security with new TRUST proposal assessment process | NSF
Link:https://www.nsf.gov/news/nsf-enhances-research-security-new-trust-proposal-assessment
43.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Basic Laws and Authorities | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/about/laws/appendix/12958.html
44.
Source: nsf.gov
Title: NS F announces guidelines for agency research security analytics practice | NSF
Link:https://www.nsf.gov/news/nsf-announces-guidelines-agency-research-security
45.
Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/blog/implementing-foias-statutory-exclusion-provisions
46.
Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/opcl/overview-privacy-act-1974-2020-edition/exemptions
47.
Source: ncses.nsf.gov
Link:https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/ncses22209
48.
Source: law.cornell.edu
Link:https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/32/2001.80
49.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/records-mgmt/accessioning/annual-move-laws-and-regulations
50.
Source: archives.gov
Title: NAR A 101, PART 7. Agency Services | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/foia/directives/nara0101-part07
51.
Source: justice.gov
Title: foia guide 2004 edition exemption 1
Link:https://www.justice.gov/archives/oip/foia-guide-2004-edition-exemption-1
52.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Classified National Security Information (CNSI) Guidance | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/guidance/classified-info-guidance
53.
Source: dcsa.mil
Title: 32 CFR Part 117 NISPOM Rule
Link:https://www.dcsa.mil/Industrial-Security/National-Industrial-Security-Program-Oversight/32-CFR-Part-117-NISPOM-Rule/ddd/
54.
Source: law.cornell.edu
Title: edu32 CFR § 117.1
Link:https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/32/117.1
55.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/ogis/foia-advisory-committee/2020-2022-term/meetings/foiaac-mtg-handout
56.
Source: law.cornell.edu
Link:https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/15/4a.8
57.
Source: justice.gov
Title: willis v nsa no 17 2038 2019 wl 1924249 ddc apr 30 2019 jackson j
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/willis-v-nsa-no-17-2038-2019-wl-1924249-ddc-apr-30-2019-jackson-j
58.
Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/james-madison-project-v-cia-no-17-1231-2018-wl-4623036-ddc-sept-26-2018-jackson-j
59.
Source: justice.gov
Title: igoshev v nsa no 17 1363 2018 wl 2045530 d md may 1 2018 hollander j
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/igoshev-v-nsa-no-17-1363-2018-wl-2045530-d-md-may-1-2018-hollander-j
60.
Source: justice.gov
Title: jaber v dod no 16 00742 2018 wl 692917 ddc feb 1 2018 mcfadden j
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/jaber-v-dod-no-16-00742-2018-wl-692917-ddc-feb-1-2018-mcfadden-j
61.
Source: law.cornell.edu
Title: 252.204 7000
Link:https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/48/252.204-7000
62.
Source: archives.gov
Title: General Information about Restricted Records | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/declassification/ndc/restricted-records.html
63.
Source: petitions.obamawhitehouse.archives.gov
Title: charge hillary rodham clinton pursuant 18 usc 641 793 794 798 952 and 1924
Link:https://petitions.obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/petition/charge-hillary-rodham-clinton-pursuant-18-usc-641-793-794-798-952-and-1924
64.
Source: pclt.defense.gov
Title: dwhs e03
Link:https://pclt.defense.gov/DIRECTORATES/Privacy-and-Civil-Liberties-Directorate/Privacy/SORNsIndex/Article/4014383/dwhs-e03/
65.
Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/mosier-v-cia-no-213-cv-00744-mce-kjn-2013-wl-6198197-ed-cal-november-27-2013-england-jr-cj
66.
Source: acquisition.gov
Link:https://www.acquisition.gov/reg-change-notice/dpn20130808
67.
Source: archives.gov
Title: isoo implementing directive
Link:https://www.archives.gov/isoo/policy-documents/isoo-implementing-directive.html
68.
Source: obamawhitehouse.archives.gov
Title: executive order classified national security information
Link:https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/realitycheck/the-press-office/executive-order-classified-national-security-information
69.
Source: obamawhitehouse.archives.gov
Link:https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/21stcenturygov/actions/classification/
71.
Source: nsf.gov
Link:https://www.nsf.gov/funding/opportunities/nscc-social-behavioral-dimensions-national-security-conflict/503294/nsf08-594/solicitation
72.
Source: archives.gov
Title: ig1600 3
Link:https://www.archives.gov/foia/directives/ig1600-3.html
73.
Source: law.cornell.edu
Title: edu10 CFR § 25.23
Link:https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/10/25.23
74.
Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/archives/oip/blog/foia-update-oip-guidance-privacy-glomarization
75.
Source: justice.gov
Title: Office of Information Policy | FOIA Update: FOIA Counselor: Questions & Answers
Link:https://www.justice.gov/archives/oip/blog/foia-update-foia-counselor-questions-answers-22
76.
Source: obamawhitehouse.archives.gov
Link:https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/administration/eop/ostp/library/foia/about/
77.
Source: georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov
Link:https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/omb/foia/index.html
78.
Source: obamawhitehouse.archives.gov
Link:https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/omb/budget/fy2017/assets/ggp.html
79.
Source: dcsa.mil
Link:https://www.dcsa.mil/Industrial-Security/Entity-Vetting-Facility-Clearances-FOCI/Facility-Clearances/Maintaining-Personnel-Vetting-Clearances/
80.
Source: dcsa.mil
Link:https://www.dcsa.mil/Systems-Applications/National-Industrial-Security-System-NISS/
81.
Source: dcsa.mil
Link:https://www.dcsa.mil/Industrial-Security/National-Industrial-Security-Program-Oversight/NISP-Tools-Resources/foci_news/
82.
Source: dcsa.mil
Link:https://www.dcsa.mil/Systems-Applications/Defense-Information-System-for-Security-DISS/FAQs-DISS/
83.
Source: dcsa.mil
Link:https://www.dcsa.mil/About-Us/News/News-Display/Article/2773676/dcsa-security-reviews/?Page=2
84.
Source: dcsa.mil
Link:https://www.dcsa.mil/Industrial-Security/National-Industrial-Security-Program-Oversight/Security-Review-Rating-Process/
85.
Source: dcsa.mil
Link:https://www.dcsa.mil/Personnel-Vetting/Background-Investigations-for-Security-HR-Professionals/Request-Background-Investigation-Files/
86.
Source: dcsa.mil
Link:https://www.dcsa.mil/About-Us/News/News-Display/Article/2823968/dcsa-director-updates-dod-government-industry-and-university-leaders-on-dcsa-co/?Page=2
87.
Source: dcsa.mil
Link:https://www.dcsa.mil/Industrial-Security/National-Industrial-Security-Program-Oversight/
88.
Source: dcsa.mil
Link:https://www.dcsa.mil/Industrial-Security/NISP-Cybersecurity-Office-NCSO/
89.
Source: dcsa.mil
Link:https://www.dcsa.mil/Systems-Applications/National-Industrial-Security-Program-NISP-Contract-Classification-System-NCCS/
90.
Source: dcsa.mil
Link:https://www.dcsa.mil/mc/isd/foci/cimp/
91.
Source: dcsa.mil
Link:https://www.dcsa.mil/Trust-Decision-Adjudications/FAQS-Trust-Decision-Adjudications/
92.
Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/archive/oip/courtdecisions/exemption1.html
93.
Source: dodcio.defense.gov
Title: DOD Web Policy
Link:https://dodcio.defense.gov/DOD-Web-Policy/
94.
Source: law.cornell.edu
Title: edu32 CFR § 117.8
Link:https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/32/117.8
95.
Source: law.cornell.edu
Title: edu32 CFR § 197.5
Link:https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/32/197.5
96.
Source: law.cornell.edu
Title: edu32 CFR § 117.13
Link:https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/32/117.13
97.
Source: law.cornell.edu
Title: edu32 CFR § 117.17
Link:https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/32/117.17
98.
Source: law.cornell.edu
Title: edu32 CFR § 117.3
Link:https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/32/117.3
99.
Source: law.cornell.edu
Title: edu32 CFR § 117.10
Link:https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/32/117.10
100.
Source: law.cornell.edu
Title: edu32 CFR § 117.19
Link:https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/32/117.19
101.
Source: law.cornell.edu
Title: edu32 CFR § 117.16
Link:https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/32/117.16
102.
Source: law.cornell.edu
Title: edu32 CFR § 117.18
Link:https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/32/117.18
103.
Source: law.cornell.edu
Title: edu32 CFR § 117.21
Link:https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/32/117.21
104.
Source: nsf.gov
Title: Research Security | NSF
Link:https://www.nsf.gov/research-security
105.
Source: nsf.gov
Title: NS F Public Access Initiative | NSF
Link:https://www.nsf.gov/public-access
106.
Source: nsf.gov
Title: Security and Preparedness (SAP) | NSF
Link:https://www.nsf.gov/funding/opportunities/sap-security-preparedness
107.
Source: everything.explained.today
Link:https://everything.explained.today/Ning_Li_%28physicist%29/
108.
Source: origin-acquisition.gov
Title: 252.204 7000 disclosure information
Link:https://origin-www.acquisition.gov/dfars/252.204-7000-disclosure-information
Source snippet
Acquisition.gov252.204-7000 Disclosure of Information. | Acquisition.GOV...
109.
Source: huntsvillebusinessjournal.com
Link:https://huntsvillebusinessjournal.com/news/2023/07/30/solving-the-mystery-of-huntsvilles-brilliant-scientist-disappearing/
Source snippet
Huntsville Business JournalUncovering The Mystery Of Huntsville’s Brilliant Anti-gravity Scientist - Huntsville Business JournalJuly 30...
110.
Source: huntsvillebusinessjournal.com
Title: ABOV E Space Development Names Former NASA Leader Jim Reuter Board Chairman
Link:https://huntsvillebusinessjournal.com/news/2026/07/27/above-space-development-names-former-nasa-leader-jim-reuter-board-chairman/
111.
Source: huntsvillebusinessjournal.com
Title: UA H Captures First Place In NASA Student Launch Competition
Link:https://huntsvillebusinessjournal.com/news/2026/06/10/uah-captures-first-place-in-nasa-student-launch-competition/
112.
Source: huntsvillebusinessjournal.com
Title: Jel Mojana: Owner And Artist Of Mojana Soaps, Nurse, Medical Scientist
Link:https://huntsvillebusinessjournal.com/news/2026/05/29/jel-mojana-owner-and-artist-of-mojana-soaps-nurse-medical-scientist/
113.
Source: origin-acquisition.gov
Title: acquisition.gov Subpart 203.10
Link:https://origin-www.acquisition.gov/dfars/subpart-203.10-contractor-code-business-ethics-and-conduct
114.
Source: huntsvillebusinessjournal.com
Title: Demolition Of MSFC Facilities Makes Way For NASA’s Next Era
Link:https://huntsvillebusinessjournal.com/news/2026/01/15/demolition-of-msfc-facilities-makes-way-for-nasas-next-era/
115.
Source: doresearch.stanford.edu
Title: fundamental research
Link:https://doresearch.stanford.edu/resources/glossary-term/fundamental-research
116.
Source: tilln.com
Title: Ning Li | This Scientist Got $450k From The Do D, Then She Disappeared
Link:https://tilln.com/season-4/ning-li-this-scientist-got-450k-from-the-dod-then-she-disappeared/
117.
Source: archive.ph
Link:https://archive.ph/O3Pgg
118.
Source: huntsvillebusinessjournal.com
Title: Above: Orbital Announces Successful Test At NASA Marshall Space Flight Center
Link:https://huntsvillebusinessjournal.com/news/2023/07/20/above-orbital-announces-successful-test-at-nasa-marshall-space-flight-center/
119.
Source: huntsvillebusinessjournal.com
Link:https://huntsvillebusinessjournal.com/news/2022/12/09/orbital-assembly-announces-new-equity-offering-to-help-advance-space-station-development/
120.
Source: huntsvillebusinessjournal.com
Title: Orbital Assembly Corporation Announces Huntsville Relocation
Link:https://huntsvillebusinessjournal.com/news/2022/03/24/orbital-assembly-corporation-to-relocate-to-huntsville/
121.
Source: huntsvillebusinessjournal.com
Title: Space & Rocket Center Unveils New Mannequin Skywalker Exhibit
Link:https://huntsvillebusinessjournal.com/news/2021/11/02/space-rocket-center-unveils-new-mannequin-skywalker-exhibit/
122.
Source: huntsvillebusinessjournal.com
Title: msfc director pleased with fiscal year 2021 nasa budget
Link:https://huntsvillebusinessjournal.com/news/2021/06/10/msfc-director-pleased-with-fiscal-year-2021-nasa-budget/
123.
Source: huntsvillebusinessjournal.com
Title: Get The Inside Scoop Out In The Yard; Milkshake Bar To Open At Town Madison
Link:https://huntsvillebusinessjournal.com/news/2021/02/03/get-the-inside-scoop-out-in-the-yard-milkshake-bar-to-open-at-town-madison/
124.
Source: sgp.fas.org
Link:https://sgp.fas.org/isoo/sf312.html
125.
Source: sbir.gov
Link:https://www.sbir.gov/awards/11003
126.
Source: sbir.gov
Link:https://www.sbir.gov/awards/25249
127.
Source: sbir.gov
Link:https://www.sbir.gov/awards/76207
128.
Source: sbir.gov
Link:https://www.sbir.gov/awards/105693
129.
Source: huntsvillebusinessjournal.com
Title: top4under40 2026
Link:https://huntsvillebusinessjournal.com/people/top4under40-2026/
130.
Source: uapmurders.com
Link:https://uapmurders.com/uaps/Details/Ning_Li/
Additional References
131.
Source: youtube.com
Title: The Dark History of Anti-Gravity (Biggest Secret in Science)
Link:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eBA3RUxkZdc
Source snippet
Ning Li disappearance anti-gravity research The disappearance of America's leading anti-gravity researcher...
132.
Source: youtube.com
Title: The Scientist That “Discovered Antigravity” Then Disappeared Completely
Link:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eS_rEzKdzBA
Source snippet
NASA Anti-Gravity Files Revealed: The Ning Li Story...
133.
Source: youtube.com
Title: The disappearance of America’s leading anti-gravity researcher
Link:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qsbz8_G9WcU
Source snippet
The Scientist That "Discovered Antigravity" Then Disappeared Completely - An Unsolved Mystery...
134.
Source: irs.gov
Link:https://www.irs.gov/irm/part10/irm
135.
Source: energy.gov
Link:https://www.energy.gov/intelligence/doe-prepublication-review-process
136.
Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/gao
137.
Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-22-105727
138.
Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/products/gao
139.
Source: congress.gov
Link:https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R48541
140.
Source: gao.gov
Link:https://www.gao.gov/assets/a240569.html