Within UFO Research Deaths
Why Cold Fusion Entered the UFO Researcher Death Story
Mallove's inclusion shows how a UFO and antigravity story can expand into a broader mythology about suppression of unconventional science.
On this page
- Mallove's cold fusion advocacy
- Why the field differs from antigravity research
- How broader suppression narratives merge them
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
Cold fusion entered the story of allegedly suppressed UFO and antigravity researchers largely through one man: Eugene Mallove. Mallove was not primarily an antigravity researcher, and his murder in 2004 was ultimately prosecuted as a killing arising from circumstances around a rental property. What made him important to the broader narrative was his role as a prominent advocate for cold fusion and for other unconventional-energy research, combined with his long-running claim that scientific institutions had unfairly marginalised evidence for anomalous energy effects.[thehour.com]thehour.comNorwalk Hour Man gets 16 years in prison for killing scientistNorwalk HourMan gets 16 years in prison for killing scientistJune 28, 2012…
That distinction matters. There is good evidence that cold fusion became professionally stigmatised after the failed replication crisis that followed Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons’s 1989 announcement. There is also evidence that Mallove believed institutional interests and scientific politics had distorted the debate. But professional exclusion, hostile peer reaction and disputed experimental practice are different propositions from a programme of physically eliminating scientists. Later narratives often collapse those categories together, allowing Mallove’s real murder to serve as a bridge between the comparatively well-documented marginalisation of cold fusion and much less substantiated claims about murdered UFO or antigravity researchers.[Nature]nature.comRevisiting the cold case of cold fusion | NatureRevisiting the cold case of cold fusion | NatureMay 27, 2019…
Mallove made suppression central to the cold-fusion story
The original cold-fusion controversy began in March 1989, when Fleischmann and Pons announced that electrochemical cells using palladium and heavy water had generated anomalous heat that they attributed to nuclear fusion. If correct, the implication would have been extraordinary: nuclear-scale energy from comparatively simple laboratory apparatus. But laboratories attempting rapid replication produced conflicting results, while expected nuclear signatures such as neutrons and tritium did not appear at levels consistent with the heat being claimed. A US Department of Energy panel concluded later that year that the evidence did not convincingly establish either useful energy production or a nuclear origin for the anomalous heat.[OSTI]osti.govCold fusion research (Technical Report) | OSTI.GO VCold fusion research (Technical Report) | OSTI.GOVNovember 1, 1989…
Mallove’s importance was that he interpreted the controversy very differently from most physicists. An MIT-trained engineer who was then chief science writer in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology news office, he became convinced that at least some cold-fusion results were genuine and that critics were prematurely shutting the subject down. His 1991 book Fire from Ice presented cold fusion not merely as an unresolved scientific anomaly but as a case in which institutional rivalry, funding interests and hostile scientific gatekeeping had obstructed recognition of a potentially revolutionary discovery.[Google Books]books.google.comBooks Fire from Ice: Searching for the Truth Behind the Cold Fusion FurorBooks Fire from Ice: Searching for the Truth Behind the Cold Fusion Furor
His dispute with MIT gave that argument a concrete institutional focus. Mallove objected to the handling of calorimetry results from an MIT Plasma Fusion Center replication attempt and alleged that presentation of the data understated a possible anomalous heat signal. Contemporary reporting recorded his accusations that researchers had manipulated or inadequately disclosed data; Ronald Parker, then director of the Plasma Fusion Center, rejected Mallove’s allegations as unfounded. Mallove also objected to MIT’s public treatment of cold fusion and to Technology Review declining an article he had prepared on the controversy.[Deseret News]deseret.comOpen source on deseret.com.
This episode is important because the basic suppression narrative was already present more than a decade before Mallove’s death. His argument was not originally that cold-fusion scientists were being assassinated. It was that mainstream institutions could suppress an unconventional field through control of prestige, publication, research funding and public interpretation. When he resigned from the MIT News Office in 1991, he described the institution’s response to cold fusion as intolerant and obstructive; contemporary coverage also noted that he said he had not been personally pressured to resign because of his book.[Deseret News]deseret.comNews MIT WRITER WILL RESIGN, CITING UNFAIR' CRITICISM OF FUSION – Deseret News</span><span class="citation-popover-snippet">Deseret NewsMIT WRITER WILL RESIGN, CITING UNFAIR' CRITICISM OF FUSION – Deseret News…
Mallove subsequently helped build an alternative research infrastructure. He founded Infinite Energy magazine and the New Energy Foundation, promoted cold-fusion experiments and provided grants to researchers working on cold fusion and other unconventional-energy claims. His own correspondence shows that by the early 2000s his interests had broadened beyond cold fusion into a much wider “new energy” world. That expansion is one reason his later image could be absorbed so easily into antigravity and UFO-adjacent narratives even though cold fusion itself concerns claimed nuclear or condensed-matter effects rather than gravity modification.[Eugene Mallove]eugenemallove.comEugene Mallove Quest for Life and Knowledge 1Eugene Mallove Quest for Life and Knowledge 1
Cold fusion is scientifically different from antigravity research
Cold fusion and antigravity are frequently grouped together in suppression literature because both can be presented as technologies that would overturn existing energy or aerospace systems. Scientifically, however, they are quite different categories.
Cold fusion — increasingly discussed by researchers under the broader label low-energy nuclear reactions, or LENR — grew out of specific electrochemical experiments involving deuterium and metals such as palladium. Its central experimental questions concern anomalous heat, reaction products, material loading and whether any observed effect has a nuclear origin. These are laboratory claims that can, at least in principle, be tested through calorimetry, particle detection, isotope measurements and reproducibility studies.[Wikisource]en.wikisource.orgPage:DOE Report of the Review of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions.djvu/3Page:DOE Report of the Review of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions.djvu/3
Antigravity claims instead involve alleged manipulation, shielding or modification of gravitational effects, sometimes through superconductors, electromagnetic fields or more speculative mechanisms. UFO narratives add a further layer by linking such research to hypothetical propulsion systems supposedly associated with unidentified craft. None of those propositions follows from a cold-fusion result. A successful cold-fusion experiment could potentially affect energy generation without demonstrating anything about gravity control, inertial reduction or UFO propulsion.
The distinction is particularly important when assessing claims of motive. A theory that somebody wished to suppress a cheap energy source is not automatically evidence for suppression of breakthrough propulsion, and neither establishes a motive for murder. In conspiracy literature, however, the economic stakes are often treated as interchangeable: a technology said to threaten fossil fuels, centralised power generation, conventional nuclear fusion or aerospace monopolies can be placed within the same narrative even when the underlying physics and historical evidence are unrelated.
Cold fusion also has a much more visible record of formal institutional reassessment than a simple suppression story suggests. In 2004, at the request of researchers in the field, the Department of Energy convened another review. The reviewers remained divided over whether some experiments showed excess heat, but two-thirds of those addressing the nuclear-reaction evidence did not consider the case conclusive. The review nevertheless identified lines of investigation that could merit further work.[nature.com]nature.comUS review rekindles cold fusion debate: Nature NewsUS review rekindles cold fusion debate: Nature News
A major privately funded reassessment reached a similarly nuanced result in 2019. Google-backed researchers organised a multi-institution programme specifically because they thought cold fusion might have been dismissed too quickly. They reported no evidence of cold fusion, while also arguing that the work produced useful insights into highly hydrided metals and other underexplored physical regimes. Nature described the subject’s post-1989 status as effectively taboo, but stressed that bringing it back under rigorous experimental examination was preferable to either uncritical belief or automatic rejection.[nature.com]nature.comGoogle revives controversial cold-fusion experiments | NatureGoogle revives controversial cold-fusion experiments | Nature
Government involvement has continued as well. In 2023, the US Advanced Research Projects Agency–Energy awarded $10 million across eight LENR projects at institutions including MIT, Stanford, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Texas Tech and the University of Michigan. ARPA-E framed the programme not as acceptance of cold fusion but as an attempt to obtain decisive, publishable evidence using modern diagnostics and hypothesis-driven experiments. As of 2026, several projects were still listed by ARPA-E as active.[ARPA-E]arpa-e.energy.govOpen source on energy.gov.
That record does not prove that earlier cold-fusion researchers were always treated fairly. It does show why “suppressed science” requires careful definition. A field can experience ridicule, difficulty obtaining funding and barriers to publication while still remaining testable, periodically reviewed and even publicly funded. Those phenomena are materially different from evidence of a clandestine campaign to prevent research altogether.
Mallove’s murder transformed an institutional dispute into a death narrative
Mallove was killed on 14 May 2004 while cleaning a property in Norwich, Connecticut, that had recently been vacated by tenants. Because he was already one of the most outspoken proponents of supposedly suppressed energy technology, speculation that his research had provided a motive appeared quickly. Even early coverage from within the unconventional-energy community acknowledged such theories while reporting that investigators were pursuing a robbery or property-related explanation.[Lewiston Sun Journal]sunjournal.comLewiston Sun Journal Police investigate slayingLewiston Sun Journal Police investigate slaying
The later criminal record sharply weakens the idea that the murder was an attempt to silence cold fusion. Chad Schaffer, whose relatives had been evicted from Mallove’s property, pleaded guilty to manslaughter and received a 16-year sentence in 2012. Mozelle Brown was later convicted of murder and conspiracy and sentenced to 58 years. Prosecutors and police tied the attack to the rental property and the eviction rather than Mallove’s scientific advocacy.[Norwalk Hour]thehour.comNorwalk Hour Man gets 16 years in prison for killing scientistNorwalk HourMan gets 16 years in prison for killing scientistJune 28, 2012…
A lengthy Foreign Policy reconstruction of the investigation shows why the case nevertheless remained fertile ground for speculation. The initial investigation was difficult, early suspects did not lead to a quick resolution, and Mallove’s unusual professional world naturally prompted detectives and supporters to examine whether his work might have mattered. Yet the eventual evidential trail led back to people associated with the property. The extraordinary nature of Mallove’s interests made an extraordinary motive imaginable; it did not make that motive evidentially stronger.[Foreign Policy]foreignpolicy.comForeign Policy The Coldest Case – Foreign PolicyForeign Policy The Coldest Case – Foreign Policy
This is the key point for understanding his place in lists of allegedly suppressed scientists. Mallove’s case combines three facts that are individually genuine: he publicly accused powerful scientific institutions of unfairly suppressing unconventional research; he became a prominent advocate for technologies that he believed could transform the energy system; and he was later murdered. Once those facts are placed side by side, it is easy to imply causation without demonstrating it.
The criminal case provides the missing test. Investigators had to establish who attacked Mallove and why, using witnesses, relationships, physical circumstances and other admissible evidence rather than the symbolic importance of his work. The resulting prosecutions supported a local, personal chain of events around the rental property. That does not logically prove that every possible research-related suspicion was impossible, but it leaves no comparable evidential foundation for the claim that cold fusion caused his death.[Norwalk Hour]thehour.comNorwalk Hour Man gets 16 years in prison for killing scientistNorwalk HourMan gets 16 years in prison for killing scientistJune 28, 2012…
How cold fusion and UFO suppression narratives became merged
Mallove’s inclusion broadens the alleged “UFO researcher death” story because his career provides a conceptual bridge from antigravity to a larger mythology of forbidden technology. Once the category becomes “scientists whose discoveries threatened established interests”, the boundaries can expand almost indefinitely. Cold fusion researchers, alternative-energy inventors, gravity researchers and UFO investigators can all be grouped together even when they did not work on the same phenomena or belong to the same professional networks.
Several recurring ideas make this merger persuasive to believers. First is the world-changing-technology motive: if cold fusion promised extremely cheap energy, while antigravity promised revolutionary transport, existing industries would supposedly have enormous incentives to obstruct both. Second is institutional continuity: criticism by universities, journals or government panels can be interpreted as different expressions of the same suppressive system. Third is retrospective reinterpretation of death: once a researcher associated with unconventional science dies violently or unexpectedly, earlier professional conflicts can be recast as warning signs of physical danger.
Mallove’s own rhetoric helped provide the first two elements. His criticisms of MIT and the scientific establishment supplied a documented history of conflict before his death. But the third element — turning those conflicts into an explanation for his murder — came principally from later interpretation rather than from the criminal evidence. That is precisely where a history of scientific controversy becomes a conspiracy narrative.
There is nevertheless a useful caution embedded in the story. Mainstream dismissal can become socially self-reinforcing. The Google-led cold-fusion project explicitly observed that repeated failures to reproduce the 1989 claims had effectively disqualified the subject from normal study, and Nature acknowledged the stigma surrounding it. Researchers may therefore have legitimate grounds to ask whether an unfashionable subject is receiving enough careful testing.[Nature]nature.comRevisiting the cold case of cold fusion | NatureRevisiting the cold case of cold fusion | NatureMay 27, 2019…
But the subsequent history also demonstrates the difference between stigma and secret suppression. Cold fusion has been reconsidered by the Department of Energy, investigated by a large privately funded collaboration, discussed in major scientific journals and funded again through ARPA-E. None of those programmes has so far supplied the decisive, reproducible demonstration that would vindicate the strongest cold-fusion claims, but neither does their existence fit a simple picture of authorities preventing the subject from being investigated.[nature.com]nature.comUS review rekindles cold fusion debate: Nature NewsUS review rekindles cold fusion debate: Nature News
For the broader UFO and antigravity death narrative, Mallove is therefore best understood as a boundary case rather than evidence of a common assassination pattern. His career genuinely documents how unconventional scientific claims can become entangled with arguments over reputation, funding, publication and institutional authority. His murder then gave those arguments a much darker symbolic meaning. The available evidence, however, supports keeping the two histories separate: one is a complicated scientific dispute over cold fusion and the treatment of marginal research; the other is a homicide for which the successful criminal cases pointed to a property-related conflict, not suppression of a revolutionary energy technology.[CT Insider]middletownpress.comCT Insider Connecticut man gets 58 years in death of New Hampshire scientistCT Insider Connecticut man gets 58 years in death of New Hampshire scientist
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to Why Cold Fusion Entered the UFO Researcher Death Story. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
Fire from Ice: Searching for the Truth Behind the Cold Fusion...
Discusses the furor over the announcement that scientists had succeeded in producing controlled nuclear fusion at ordinary temperatures,...
Bad Science: The Short Life and Weird Times of Cold Fusion
Documents the bizarre 1989 episode of 2 scientists who announced they had created a sustained nuclear-fusion reaction at room temperature...
Cold Fusion: The Scientific Fiasco of the Century
First published 1992. Subjects: Cold fusion, History, Kalte Kernfusion, Koude kernfusie, Science, moral and ethical aspects.
Excess Heat: Why Cold Fusion Research Prevailed
First published 2000. Subjects: Cold fusion, Research.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.
Endnotes
1.
Source: deseret.com
Title: News MIT WRITER WILL RESIGN, CITING `UNFAIR’ CRITICISM OF FUSION – Deseret News
Link:https://www.deseret.com/1991/6/9/18924935/mit-writer-will-resign-citing-unfair-criticism-of-fusion/
Source snippet
Deseret NewsMIT WRITER WILL RESIGN, CITING `UNFAIR' CRITICISM OF FUSION – Deseret News...
2.
Source: nature.com
Title: Revisiting the cold case of cold fusion | Nature
Link:https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586
Source snippet
Revisiting the cold case of cold fusion | NatureMay 27, 2019...
Published: May 27, 2019
3.
Source: nature.com
Link:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-01675-9
Source snippet
A Google programme failed to detect cold fusion — but is still a success | Nature...
4.
Source: osti.gov
Title: Cold fusion research (Technical Report) | OSTI.GO V
Link:https://www.osti.gov/biblio/5144772
Source snippet
Cold fusion research (Technical Report) | OSTI.GOVNovember 1, 1989...
Published: November 1, 1989
5.
Source: books.google.com
Title: Books Fire from Ice: Searching for the Truth Behind the Cold Fusion Furor
Link:https://books.google.com/books/about/Fire_from_Ice.html?id=LkJwQgAACAAJ
6.
Source: deseret.com
Title: News SCIENTISTS AT MIT EMBROILED IN WRANGLING OVER FUSION – Deseret News
Link:https://www.deseret.com/1991/10/21/18947426/scientists-at-mit-embroiled-in-wrangling-over-fusion/
7.
Source: deseret.com
Link:https://www.deseret.com/1991/8/10/18935394/ex-mit-writer-accuses-researchers-of-altering-data-to-discredit-fusion/
8.
Source: en.wikisource.org
Title: Page:DOE Report of the Review of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions.djvu/3
Link:https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Page%3ADOE_Report_of_the_Review_of_Low_Energy_Nuclear_Reactions.djvu/3
9.
Source: nature.com
Title: US review rekindles cold fusion debate: Nature News
Link:https://www.nature.com/news/2004/041202/full/news041129-11.html
10.
Source: en.wikisource.org
Title: Page:DOE Report of the Review of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions.djvu/4
Link:https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Page%3ADOE_Report_of_the_Review_of_Low_Energy_Nuclear_Reactions.djvu/4
11.
Source: nature.com
Title: Google revives controversial cold-fusion experiments | Nature
Link:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-01683-9
12.
Source: arpa-e.energy.gov
Link:https://arpa-e.energy.gov/news-and-events/news-and-insights/us-department-energy-announces-10-million-funding-projects-studying-low-energy-nuclear-reactions
13.
Source: arpa-e.energy.gov
Title: ARPA-ENeutron Emission from Laser-Stimulated Metal Hydrides | ARPA-E
Link:https://arpa-e.energy.gov/programs-and-initiatives/search-all-projects/neutron-emission-laser-stimulated-metal-hydrides
14.
Source: arpa-e.energy.gov
Link:https://arpa-e.energy.gov/programs-and-initiatives/search-all-projects/advanced-materials-characterization-and-nuclear-product-detection-lenr
15.
Source: nature.com
Title: Coming in from the cold | Nature Materials
Link:https://www.nature.com/articles/s41563
16.
Source: energy.gov
Link:https://www.energy.gov/articles/fact-sheet-golden-era-american-nuclear-energy-has-arrived
17.
Source: energy.gov
Link:https://www.energy.gov/articles/department-energy-celebrates-first-advanced-reactor-criticality
18.
Source: energy.gov
Link:https://www.energy.gov/ne/articles/one-year-after-executive-orders-us-nuclear-energy-renaissance-full-swing
19.
Source: arpa-e.energy.gov
Title: doe announces first projects under scaleup ready program 2026
Link:https://arpa-e.energy.gov/news-and-events/news-and-insights/doe-announces-first-projects-under-scaleup-ready-program-2026
20.
Source: arpa-e.energy.gov
Title: us department energy announces 30 million develop transformative technologies
Link:https://arpa-e.energy.gov/news-and-events/news-and-insights/us-department-energy-announces-30-million-develop-transformative-technologies
21.
Source: arpa-e.energy.gov
Link:https://arpa-e.energy.gov/programs-and-initiatives/view-all-programs/recover
22.
Source: osti.gov
Link:https://www.osti.gov/biblio/2569648
23.
Source: arpa-e.energy.gov
Link:https://arpa-e.energy.gov/news-and-events/news-and-insights/arpa-e-announces-40-million-groundbreaking-approach-reduce-impact-used-nuclear-fuel
24.
Source: arpa-e.energy.gov
Link:https://arpa-e.energy.gov/news-and-events/news-and-insights/us-department-energy-announces-15-million-12-projects-developing-high-energy-storage-solutions-electrify-domestic-aircraft-railroads-ships
25.
Source: arpa-e.energy.gov
Title: nuclear product detection deuterated nanoparticles under phonon stimulation
Link:https://arpa-e.energy.gov/programs-and-initiatives/search-all-projects/nuclear-product-detection-deuterated-nanoparticles-under-phonon-stimulation
26.
Source: arpa-e.energy.gov
Link:https://arpa-e.energy.gov/programs-and-initiatives/search-all-projects/ionizing-radiation-detection-exploratory-experiments-low-energy-nuclear-reactions
27.
Source: energy.gov
Link:https://www.energy.gov/nepa/articles/cx-027838-exploratory-topics-low-energy-nuclear-reactions-lenr-program-foa-no-de-foa
28.
Source: arpa-e.energy.gov
Title: relevant elements recovery co2 reactive minerals during carbon mineralization
Link:https://arpa-e.energy.gov/programs-and-initiatives/search-all-projects/energy-relevant-elements-recovery-co2-reactive-minerals-during-carbon-mineralization
29.
Source: energy.gov
Link:https://www.energy.gov/articles/doe-announces-400-million-research-funding-advance-scientific-frontiers
30.
Source: arpa-e-foa.energy.gov
Link:https://arpa-e-foa.energy.gov/Default.aspx?Search=lenr&SearchType=
31.
Source: arpa-e.energy.gov
Title: low energy nuclear reactions workshop
Link:https://arpa-e.energy.gov/news-and-events/events/low-energy-nuclear-reactions-workshop
32.
Source: arpa-e.energy.gov
Title: arpa e innovating through unconventional ideas
Link:https://arpa-e.energy.gov/news-and-events/news-and-insights/arpa-e-innovating-through-unconventional-ideas
33.
Source: arpa-e.energy.gov
Link:https://arpa-e.energy.gov/programs-and-initiatives/view-all-programs/bethe
34.
Source: nature.com
Link:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-01716-3
35.
Source: nature.com
Title: Daily briefing: Trump moves to limit climate-change predictions
Link:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-01699-1
36.
Source: nature.com
Link:https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-01673-x
37.
Source: infinite-energy.com
Title: Issue 61 Table of Contents
Link:https://infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue61/index.html
38.
Source: science.osti.gov
Title: Meeting Presentations
Link:https://science.osti.gov/bes/besac/Meetings/Meeting-Presentations/200412
39.
Source: en.wikisource.org
Title: Page:DOE Report of the Review of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions.djvu
Link:https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Page%3ADOE_Report_of_the_Review_of_Low_Energy_Nuclear_Reactions.djvu/1
40.
Source: en.wikisource.org
Title: Page:DOE Report of the Review of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions.djvu
Link:https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Page%3ADOE_Report_of_the_Review_of_Low_Energy_Nuclear_Reactions.djvu/2
41.
Source: en.wikisource.org
Title: Page:DOE Report of the Review of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions.djvu
Link:https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Page%3ADOE_Report_of_the_Review_of_Low_Energy_Nuclear_Reactions.djvu/5
42.
Source: science.osti.gov
Link:https://science.osti.gov/grants/FOAs/FOAs/2004/DE-FG01-04ER04-22
43.
Source: osti.gov
Link:https://www.osti.gov/biblio/861752
44.
Source: science.osti.gov
Link:https://science.osti.gov/grants/FOAs/FOAs/2004/DE-FG01-04ER04-18
45.
Source: deseret.com
Title: DO E to review a new batch of claims in cold-fusion quest – Deseret News
Link:https://www.deseret.com/2004/3/31/19820492/doe-to-review-a-new-batch-of-claims-in-cold-fusion-quest/
46.
Source: infinite-energy.com
Link:https://www.infinite-energy.com/resources/pressreleasedoe.html
47.
Source: reason.com
Title: Cold Fusion Confusion
Link:https://reason.com/1991/12/01/cold-fusion-confusion/
48.
Source: osti.gov
Title: Cold confusion (Conference) | OSTI.GO V
Link:https://www.osti.gov/biblio/6026306
49.
Source: nature.com
Title: Measurement of γrays from cold fusion | Nature
Link:https://www.nature.com/articles/339667a0
50.
Source: arpa-e.energy.gov
Title: news and insights
Link:https://arpa-e.energy.gov/news-and-events/news-and-insights
51.
Source: arpa-e.energy.gov
Title: 2025 arpa e annual fission meeting
Link:https://arpa-e.energy.gov/news-and-events/events/2025-arpa-e-annual-fission-meeting
52.
Source: arpa-e.energy.gov
Title: 2025 arpa e storagebatteries annual meeting
Link:https://arpa-e.energy.gov/news-and-events/events/2025-arpa-e-storagebatteries-annual-meeting
53.
Source: en.wikisource.org
Title: Report of the Review of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions
Link:https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Report_of_the_Review_of_Low_Energy_Nuclear_Reactions
54.
Source: infinite-energy.com
Link:https://www.infinite-energy.com/resources/unusual-suspects.html
55.
Source: infinite-energy.com
Title: Infinite Energy Magazine
Link:https://www.infinite-energy.com/whoarewe/whoarewe.html
56.
Source: infinite-energy.com
Link:https://www.infinite-energy.com/whoarewe/gene.html
57.
Source: infinite-energy.com
Link:https://www.infinite-energy.com/whoarewe/gene_old2013.html
58.
Source: infinite-energy.com
Title: Gene Mallove, Biography Image: s Biography of Dr. Eugene Franklin Mallove
Link:https://www.infinite-energy.com/genemallovecollection/biography.html
59.
Source: infinite-energy.com
Link:https://www.infinite-energy.com/genemallovecollection/publications/publications_infiniteenergymagazine.html
60.
Source: infinite-energy.com
Link:https://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue80/historicperspective.html
61.
Source: infinite-energy.com
Link:https://www.infinite-energy.com/resources/ARPA-E.html
62.
Source: science.osti.gov
Title: ASCR Program Documents Archive
Link:https://science.osti.gov/ascr/Community-Resources/Program-Documents/ASCR-Program-Documents-Archive
63.
Source: science.osti.gov
Title: Meeting Presentations
Link:https://science.osti.gov/bes/besac/Meetings/Meeting-Presentations
64.
Source: science.osti.gov
Title: NP COV
Link:https://science.osti.gov/DDSP/Committees-of-Visitors/NP-COV
65.
Source: science.osti.gov
Link:https://science.osti.gov/hep/hepap/Reports
66.
Source: science.osti.gov
Title: NP COV
Link:https://science.osti.gov/np/About/NP-COV
67.
Source: science.osti.gov
Title: Recent BERAC Reports
Link:https://science.osti.gov/ber/berac/Reports/Recent-BERAC-Reports
68.
Source: science.osti.gov
Title: VERITAS Reports
Link:https://science.osti.gov/hep/hepap/Reports/VERITAS-Reports
69.
Source: science.osti.gov
Title: Tevatron Reports
Link:https://science.osti.gov/hep/hepap/Reports/Tevatron-Reports
70.
Source: youtube.com
Title: They Buried Cold Fusion on Purpose | Max Zamilov
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEOHdrh1KwQ
Source snippet
Eugene Mallove's Missing Shoes Are Clue In His Murder...
71.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Eugene Mallove’s Missing Shoes Are Clue In His Murder
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2OxNZEyKGs
Source snippet
Top 10 Suppressed Inventions That Could Have Changed the World...
72.
Source: thehour.com
Title: Norwalk Hour Man gets 16 years in prison for killing scientist
Link:https://www.thehour.com/news/article/Man-gets-16-years-in-prison-for-killing-scientist-8163651.php
Source snippet
Norwalk HourMan gets 16 years in prison for killing scientistJune 28, 2012...
Published: June 28, 2012
73.
Source: middletownpress.com
Title: CT Insider Connecticut man gets 58 years in death of New Hampshire scientist
Link:https://www.middletownpress.com/news/article/Connecticut-man-gets-58-years-in-death-of-New-11785755.php
74.
Source: foreignpolicy.com
Title: Foreign Policy The Coldest Case – Foreign Policy
Link:https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/07/07/the-coldest-case-cold-fusion-eugene-mallove-mit-infinite-energy/
75.
Source: eugenemallove.com
Title: Eugene Mallove Quest for Life and Knowledge 1
Link:https://www.eugenemallove.com/emwords_quest1.html
76.
Source: eugenemallove.com
Title: Eugene Mallove Dr. Eugene Mallove Curriculum Vitae
Link:https://www.eugenemallove.com/emwords_CV.html
77.
Source: research.google
Title: Google Research Revisiting the cold case of cold fusion
Link:https://research.google/pubs/revisiting-the-cold-case-of-cold-fusion/
78.
Source: sunjournal.com
Title: Lewiston Sun Journal Police investigate slaying
Link:https://www.sunjournal.com/2004/05/17/police-investigate-slaying/
79.
Source: eugenemallove.com
Title: Eugene Mallove Press Releases on Mallove Investigation
Link:https://www.eugenemallove.com/em_investigation.html
80.
Source: oxygen.com
Title: Eugene Mallove, Scientist, Murdered After Housing Dispute
Link:https://www.oxygen.com/an-unexpected-killer/crime-news/eugene-mallove-scientist-murdered-after-housing-dispute
81.
Source: solidstatefusion.org
Link:https://solidstatefusion.org/2022/09/arpa-e-foa/
82.
Source: e-catworld.com
Title: Foreign Policy Article on Cold Fusion and the Life and Death of Eugene Mallove
Link:https://e-catworld.com/2016/07/17/foreign-policy-article-on-cold-fusion-and-the-life-and-death-of-eugene-mallove/
83.
Source: thehour.com
Title: Man convicted of killing physicist gets 58 years in prison
Link:https://www.thehour.com/news/article/Man-convicted-of-killing-physicist-gets-58-years-7977379.php
84.
Source: thehour.com
Title: Trial wraps up in killing of physicist
Link:https://www.thehour.com/news/article/Trial-wraps-up-in-killing-of-physicist-8080746.php
85.
Source: middletownpress.com
Title: Connecticut trial wraps up in killing of New Hampshire physicist
Link:https://www.middletownpress.com/news/article/Connecticut-trial-wraps-up-in-killing-of-New-11789755.php
86.
Source: thehour.com
Title: 3rd suspect charged in killing of NH scientist
Link:https://www.thehour.com/news/article/3rd-suspect-charged-in-killing-of-NH-scientist-8234964.php
87.
Source: eugenemallove.com
Title: Mallove in His Words
Link:https://eugenemallove.com/
88.
Source: eugenemallove.com
Title: death of IE
Link:https://www.eugenemallove.com/death_of_IE.html
89.
Source: eugenemallove.com
Link:https://www.eugenemallove.com/emwords_quest2.7.html
90.
Source: eugenemallove.com
Link:https://www.eugenemallove.com/why_write_no_more.html
91.
Source: eugenemallove.com
Title: Quest for Life and Knowledge 2.5>
Link:https://www.eugenemallove.com/emwords_quest2.5.html
92.
Source: gotnuclear.org
Title: Fire from Ice
Link:https://gotnuclear.org/blog/book/fire-from-ice/
93.
Source: ouci.dntb.gov.ua
Link:https://ouci.dntb.gov.ua/en/works/4rz2YYw4/
94.
Source: uapmurders.com
Link:https://uapmurders.com/uaps/Details/Eugene_Mallove/
95.
Source: everything.explained.today
Title: Eugene Mallove
Link:https://everything.explained.today/Eugene_Mallove/
Additional References
96.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Top 10 Suppressed Inventions That Could Have Changed the World
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpRzCECPqA0
Source snippet
Cold Fusion Controversy: The Fight for Unlimited Energy...
97.
Source: files.ncas.org
Title: Files Cold Fusion Research: Executive
Link:https://files.ncas.org/erab/execsumm.htm
Source snippet
NCAS FilesCold Fusion Research: Executive Summary...
98.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Cold Fusion Controversy: The Fight for Unlimited Energy
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xx-EgGrQ5-o
Source snippet
Cold Fusion is Back (there's just one problem)...
99.
Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309634360From_the_History_of_CF_Research-A_Review_of_the_Typical_Papers_on_the_Cold_Fusion_Phenomenon-
100.
Source: mdpi.com
Link:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/15/8/1507
101.
Source: vecteezy.com
Link:https://www.vecteezy.com/editorial/news/chad-schaffer-trial-155843/chad-schaffer-listens-65263214
102.
Source: davidkushner.com
Link:https://davidkushner.com/podcast/crime-waves-cold-truths/
103.
Source: thecinemaholic.com
Link:https://thecinemaholic.com/dr-eugene-mallove-murder-where-are-candace-foster-chad-schaffer-and-mozzelle-brown-now/
104.
Source: truecrimene.com
Link:https://www.truecrimene.com/episodes/p6zagfbyw95khxlki00s3o5zfagrz4
105.
Source: si.edu
Link:https://www.si.edu/object/siris_sil_410580