Within Ning Li
Did Classified Work Make Ning Li Seem Missing?
Li's family says classified defense work sharply limited what she could publish or discuss, offering a mundane explanation for years of public silence.
On this page
- The reported security clearance and secrecy
- How her behavior changed after academia
- What classified work does not prove about antigravity
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
Ning Li’s long public silence after the early 2000s is one of the main reasons her story was later recast as a mysterious “disappearance”. Yet the best available evidence points to a less sensational mechanism: Li moved from an unusually public academic career into defence-linked research, and her son says she obtained a Top Secret security clearance that prevented her from discussing the work she was doing. The change was stark because Li had previously published papers, spoken about her ideas and pursued experimental validation in the open.[Huntsville Business Journal]huntsvillebusinessjournal.comHuntsville Business JournalUncovering The Mystery Of Huntsville’s Brilliant Anti-gravity Scientist - Huntsville Business JournalJuly 30…
There are important limits to that explanation. The public record confirms that her company received US Army funding for an experimental gravity-related prototype, and later records place her at a specialist conference in 2003. But the claim that her subsequent work was classified comes principally from her family; publicly accessible documents do not reveal what she worked on, how successful it was, or precisely when and under what programme it became classified. Secrecy can therefore explain why outsiders stopped hearing from Li. It cannot establish that she had invented operational antigravity technology.
The reported security clearance and secrecy
The transition can be traced to Li’s move away from ordinary university research. After leaving the University of Alabama in Huntsville, she established AC Gravity LLC. A surviving reproduction of the Department of Defense’s FY2001 report on “Other Transactions” identifies agreement DAAH01-01-9-R001, awarded by the US Army Aviation and Missile Command to AC Gravity. It describes the project as the “Gravito - Electro Magnetic Superconductivity Experiment”, running from 25 April 2001 to 25 September 2002, with $448,970 in US government funding. Crucially, the agreement was an “Other Transaction for Prototype”: its stated purpose was experimental testing rather than procurement of an already proven antigravity machine.[ZPEnergy]zpenergy.comGravity-Waves & Missing Scientists at AmericanGravity-Waves & Missing Scientists at American
The description nevertheless shows why the work interested the military. It stated that successful results could have “enormous value” for Department of Defense weapons and weapon systems. That is stronger evidence of genuine military interest than the vague suggestion that Li simply vanished into a secret laboratory. At the same time, the document is evidence of an experiment being funded, not evidence that the experiment succeeded.[ZPEnergy]zpenergy.comGravity-Waves & Missing Scientists at AmericanGravity-Waves & Missing Scientists at American
The most consequential account of what happened next comes from Li’s son, George Men, interviewed by the Huntsville Business Journal in 2023. Men said his mother continued working for the Department of Defense and received a Top Secret clearance. He contrasted this period directly with her university career: she had previously enjoyed publishing her results, whereas after obtaining the clearance she could no longer share her work and became markedly quieter. He also recalled asking her about what she was doing and receiving an emphatic warning that he should assume he knew nothing about it.[Huntsville Business Journal]huntsvillebusinessjournal.comHuntsville Business JournalUncovering The Mystery Of Huntsville’s Brilliant Anti-gravity Scientist - Huntsville Business JournalJuly 30…
That testimony fits the basic mechanics of classified defence employment. The Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency defines a security clearance as an eligibility determination for access to national-security information. Top Secret is the highest of the three standard classification levels, covering information whose unauthorised disclosure could cause “exceptionally grave damage” to national security. Even holding the appropriate clearance does not give unrestricted access: classified information is distributed according to a “need to know”.[DCSA]dcsa.milFAQS - Trust Decision (Adjudications)…
That distinction matters when interpreting Li’s silence. A Top Secret clearance would not, by itself, forbid a scientist from ever publishing anything again. Rather, classified information encountered or generated through the relevant work could not simply be disclosed publicly, and material derived from protected work may be subject to controls including pre-publication review. US classification rules expressly recognise such review requirements under approved nondisclosure agreements.[whitehouse.gov]obamawhitehouse.archives.govexecutive order classified national security informationOrder 13526- Classified National Security Information | whitehouse.govDecember 29, 2009…
The careful formulation, therefore, is not that “Top Secret status forced Ning Li to disappear”. It is that her son reports she entered classified defence work, and the normal restrictions associated with such work provide a credible mechanism for why a formerly publishing researcher could abruptly become almost invisible to the scientific community.
How her behaviour changed after academia
The contrast between Li’s two professional phases is unusually sharp. In academia she left an ordinary scholarly trail: journal papers, collaborators, experiments and outside discussion of her theories. Her superconductivity-and-gravity work was controversial, but it was available for other scientists to read and challenge. A later Defense Intelligence Agency technical review, for example, openly discusses the earlier work of Li and Douglas Torr and places their papers within the history of attempts to connect superconductivity with gravitomagnetic effects.[Defense Intelligence Agency]dia.milDefense Intelligence Agency UNCLASSIFIED//f OR490PKWPM#W01JILSisDefense Intelligence AgencyUNCLASSIFIED//fOR490PKWPM#W01JILSisMarch 4, 2022…
After AC Gravity received Army funding, that trail contracted dramatically. There was no comparable stream of peer-reviewed papers reporting the outcome of the funded prototype experiment. Yet Li did not immediately vanish from professional activity. A bibliography of the 2003 Gravitational-Wave Conference at the MITRE Corporation records a contribution by Ning Li entitled “Measurability of AC gravity fields”, paper HFGW-03-106, at the 6–9 May meeting. The paper is also cited in later technical literature on high-frequency gravitational-wave concepts.[gravwave.com]gravwave.comConference, The MITRE Corporation, May 6-9. Page 6PDF] high-frequency gravitational wave bibliographySeptember 25, 2003 — Ning Li (2003), “Measurability of AC gravity fields,” paper HFGW…
This 2003 appearance is an important chronological anchor. It means that the end of Li’s conventional publication record should not be mistaken for evidence that she had ceased working or had physically disappeared. At least for a time, she was still participating in a specialised research environment connected with subjects close to her earlier work.
Later technical literature also discussed the substance attributed to that 2003 contribution. Robert M. L. Baker Jr., writing about proposed high-frequency gravitational-wave experiments, described Li’s analysis as involving high-temperature superconductors and an estimated 11-kilowatt gravitational-wave output under particular assumed conditions. That should not be confused with independent experimental verification of an 11-kilowatt antigravity device: it is a later technical description of the theoretical or proposed result associated with Li’s conference work.[drrobertbaker.com]drrobertbaker.comHFGW Component Lab ExperimentsHFGW Component Lab Experiments
The subsequent information gap is precisely where the “missing scientist” narrative grew. By 2004, people interested in the field were already trying to locate Li and obtain information about her research. The later Huntsville Business Journal investigation describes attempts to contact her and reports that physicist Eugene Podkletnov told an enquirer she was alive, still involved with Department of Defense work and unable to discuss it. This is useful contemporary corroboration of the broad secrecy explanation, although it remains second-hand evidence rather than an official personnel record.[Huntsville Business Journal]huntsvillebusinessjournal.comHuntsville Business JournalUncovering The Mystery Of Huntsville’s Brilliant Anti-gravity Scientist - Huntsville Business JournalJuly 30…
Men’s account adds a human dimension that cannot be recovered from contract records. He said the secrecy affected his mother’s demeanour: she became quieter and sometimes returned from work visibly worn down. That observation cannot tell outsiders what programme she worked on or whether its experiments succeeded. It does, however, describe the transition from a scientist accustomed to discussing and publishing her research to someone whose family understood that her professional life had become off-limits.[Huntsville Business Journal]huntsvillebusinessjournal.comHuntsville Business JournalUncovering The Mystery Of Huntsville’s Brilliant Anti-gravity Scientist - Huntsville Business JournalJuly 30…
The distinction is fundamental to the disappearance story. Public visibility and physical whereabouts are different things. A scientist can vanish from journals, conferences and searchable databases while continuing to live and work in the same city. According to Men, that is essentially what happened: Li remained associated with defence work in Huntsville rather than secretly relocating abroad.[Huntsville Business Journal]huntsvillebusinessjournal.comHuntsville Business JournalUncovering The Mystery Of Huntsville’s Brilliant Anti-gravity Scientist - Huntsville Business JournalJuly 30…
Why classified work can look like disappearance
Li’s case illustrates a mechanism that readily produces mystery around defence researchers. Academic science normally leaves abundant traces. Researchers publish papers, list affiliations, attend conferences, maintain institutional pages, acknowledge grants and appear in citation databases. When somebody accustomed to that system moves into classified work, several of those signals can disappear simultaneously.
The US industrial-security system makes such a transition entirely ordinary in principle. Companies performing government work that requires access to classified information can receive facility clearances, while individual personnel receive eligibility according to the needs of their positions. Access is tied to the contract or governmental requirement and limited by clearance level and need-to-know rules.[DCSA]dcsa.milFacility ClearancesFacility Clearances
For an outsider trying to reconstruct a career years later, that produces an asymmetry. The public can sometimes see that a defence relationship existed — as with AC Gravity’s Army agreement — without being able to see the resulting technical reports, experimental data, later contracts or internal programme history. An information vacuum of that kind invites people to substitute speculation for documentation.
That appears to have happened with Li. In 2008, physicist Jack Sarfatti publicly claimed that she had disappeared and apparently returned to China. The later family account directly contradicts this: Men said his mother remained in the United States and continued her defence work. He did say that Chinese officials approached her about returning to China in 2008, but according to him she rejected the proposal.[Huntsville Business Journal]huntsvillebusinessjournal.comHuntsville Business JournalUncovering The Mystery Of Huntsville’s Brilliant Anti-gravity Scientist - Huntsville Business JournalJuly 30…
The episode shows how easily two different facts can become fused. “Scientists outside her programme could no longer contact her” gradually became “Ning Li disappeared”; speculation about Chinese interest became “Ning Li returned to China”. Once those claims circulated without access to her classified professional life or private family life, absence of public information began functioning as supposed evidence for the story.
In reality, the silence itself requires no extraordinary mechanism. Classified work is designed to remove sensitive technical information from unrestricted circulation. The US government’s own security guidance states that people entrusted with classified information must prevent disclosure to unauthorised persons, including people who lack either the necessary clearance or a specific need to know. A researcher following those obligations could therefore be perfectly visible to colleagues inside a programme while appearing almost completely inaccessible to outsiders.[The Department of Energy's Energy.gov]energy.govOpen source on energy.gov.
What classified work does not prove about antigravity
The strongest version of the Ning Li story makes an attractive inference: the Army funded her unusual research, the results disappeared from public view, she obtained a Top Secret clearance, and therefore her experiments must have worked. The evidence does not justify that final step.
The 2001 agreement proves that the Army considered the proposed experiment worth funding. Its language about potentially enormous military value demonstrates the stakes if the concept succeeded. But speculative defence research is funded precisely because an uncertain idea might be valuable enough to test. A prototype research award is not a certification that the underlying technology already functions.[ZPEnergy]zpenergy.comGravity-Waves & Missing Scientists at AmericanGravity-Waves & Missing Scientists at American
Nor does classification, even if Men’s description of Li’s subsequent programme is completely accurate, reveal the programme’s outcome. Work may be classified because its objectives, methods, potential applications, vulnerabilities, associated programmes or even negative technical findings have national-security relevance. The classification level describes the potential damage caused by unauthorised disclosure; it is not a scientific quality rating and does not tell the public whether an experiment succeeded.[DCSA]dcsa.milTrust Decision (AdjudicationsTrust Decision (Adjudications)…
There is an additional reason for caution. Defence agencies themselves later continued to examine unconventional gravity concepts without treating them as established technology. A Defense Intelligence Agency report prepared under the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications programme reviewed “The Role of Superconductors in Gravity Research” and discussed Li and Torr’s earlier work as part of the field’s technical history. The existence of such later reviews shows continuing government interest in the subject, but not that Li had secretly solved gravity control years earlier.[Defense Intelligence Agency]dia.milDefense Intelligence Agency UNCLASSIFIED/ /1'01!. Ol'l'l@l*L U!II! OHL¥Defense Intelligence Agency UNCLASSIFIED/ /1'01!. Ol'l'l@l*L U!II! OHL¥
The evidence therefore supports three conclusions of very different strength. First, the defence connection is documented: AC Gravity received nearly $449,000 from the Army for a gravity-related superconductivity experiment. Second, classified continuation is credible but less independently documented: Li’s son says she obtained Top Secret clearance and continued defence work, and contemporary accounts are consistent with her becoming unavailable to outside researchers. Third, successful antigravity technology remains unproven: no publicly available experimental record demonstrates that the classified work produced a practical gravity-control system.[ZPEnergy]zpenergy.comGravity-Waves & Missing Scientists at AmericanGravity-Waves & Missing Scientists at American
That separation is the key to understanding Ning Li’s public silence. There is a real secret at the centre of the story in the ordinary sense that some of her later professional activity appears to have been unavailable to the public. But secrecy is not itself evidence of the extraordinary conclusion later built around it. The documented transition into defence-linked work offers a straightforward explanation for why Ning Li seemed to vanish from open science — and why an information gap eventually became mistaken for the disappearance of the scientist herself.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to Did Classified Work Make Ning Li Seem Missing?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The Pentagon's Brain: An Uncensored History of DARPA, America...
Discover the definitive history of DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency, in this Pulitzer Prize finalist from the author o...
Skunk Works: A Personal Memoir of My Years at Lockheed
The former head of Lockheed's SKUNK WORKS reveals the amazing story of the secret aircraft that changed the course of history - from the...
Area 51: An Uncensored History of America's Top Secret Milita...
The explosive, untold story of the Cold War's biggest secret from the bestselling author of NUCLEAR WAR: A SCENARIO 'An extraordinary boo...
The Imagineers of War: The Untold Story of DARPA, the Pentago...
The definitive history of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, the Pentagon agency that has quietly shaped war and technology f...
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.
Endnotes
1.
Source: zpenergy.com
Title: Gravity-Waves & Missing Scientists at American
Link:https://www.zpenergy.com/modules.php?file=article&name=News&sid=838
2.
Source: dcsa.mil
Link:https://www.dcsa.mil/Trust-Decision-Adjudications/FAQS-Trust-Decision-Adjudications/
Source snippet
FAQS - Trust Decision (Adjudications)...
3.
Source: dcsa.mil
Title: Trust Decision (Adjudications)
Link:https://www.dcsa.mil/Trust-Decision-Adjudications/
Source snippet
Trust Decision (Adjudications)...
4.
Source: gravwave.com
Title: Conference, The MITRE Corporation, May 6-9. Page 6
Link:https://www.gravwave.com/pdf/HFGW%20References.pdf
Source snippet
[PDF] high-frequency gravitational wave bibliographySeptember 25, 2003 — Ning Li (2003), “Measurability of AC gravity fields,” paper HFGW...
Published: September 25, 2003
5.
Source: drrobertbaker.com
Title: HFGW Component Lab Experiments
Link:https://www.drrobertbaker.com/docs/HFGW-Component%20Lab%20Experiments.htm
6.
Source: dcsa.mil
Title: Facility Clearances
Link:https://www.dcsa.mil/FCL/
7.
Source: dcsa.mil
Title: FAQs – Facility Security Officers
Link:https://www.dcsa.mil/Industrial-Security/Entity-Vetting-Facility-Clearances-FOCI/Facility-Clearances/FAQs-Facility-Security-Officers/nbsp/
8.
Source: energy.gov
Link:https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2013/12/f6/Chapter_5_Classified_Matter_Protection_and_Control.pdf
9.
Source: pod.wave.co
Link:https://pod.wave.co/podcast/american-alchemy/congressman-president-trump-was-briefed-on-alien-hybrids
10.
Source: energy.gov
Title: Headquarters Facilities Master Security Plan
Link:https://www.energy.gov/ehss/articles/headquarters-facilities-master-security-plan-chapter-4-foci-facility-clearances-and
11.
Source: energy.gov
Title: Overview of Access Authorization Process for Applicants
Link:https://www.energy.gov/ehss/articles/overview-access-authorization-process-applicants-september-2022
12.
Source: energy.gov
Title: Security Policy, CMPC Marking Resource | Department of Energy
Link:https://www.energy.gov/ehss/articles/security-policy-cmpc-marking-resource
13.
Source: energy.gov
Link:https://www.energy.gov/ehss/articles/department-energy-security-briefing-other-governmental-agency-personnel
14.
Source: energy.gov
Link:https://www.energy.gov/oha/articles/adjudicative-guidelines-determining-eligibility-access-classified-information
15.
Source: energy.gov
Title: Inspection Report: INS-O-09-01 | Department of Energy
Link:https://www.energy.gov/node/245467
16.
Source: zpenergy.com
Title: ZP Energy.com
Link:https://www.zpenergy.com/modules.php?file=article&mode=flat&name=News&order=0&sid=838&thold=-1
17.
Source: zpenergy.com
Title: ZP Energy.com
Link:https://www.zpenergy.com/modules.php?file=print&name=News&sid=838
18.
Source: zpenergy.com
Title: ZP Energy.com
Link:https://zpenergy.com/modules.php?file=article&name=News&sid=740
19.
Source: energy.gov
Title: audit report ig 0548
Link:https://www.energy.gov/ig/articles/audit-report-ig-0548
20.
Source: dcsa.mil
Link:https://www.dcsa.mil/About-Us/Careers/Application-Process/
21.
Source: dcsa.mil
Link:https://www.dcsa.mil/Industrial-Security/Entity-Vetting-Facility-Clearances-FOCI/Foreign-Ownership-Control-or-Influence/National-Interest-Determinations/
22.
Source: dcsa.mil
Link:https://www.dcsa.mil/Personnel-Vetting/Background-Investigations-for-Security-HR-Professionals/Record-Use-Retention-Dissemination/
23.
Source: dcsa.mil
Link:https://www.dcsa.mil/Personnel-Vetting/Background-Investigations-for-Security-HR-Professionals/Start-a-Background-Investigation/Agency-Use-Block-AUB/
24.
Source: dcsa.mil
Link:https://www.dcsa.mil/Personnel-Vetting/Background-Investigations-for-Applicants/Investigations-Clearance-Process/aspan/
25.
Source: dcsa.mil
Link:https://www.dcsa.mil/Industrial-Security/Entity-Vetting-Facility-Clearances-FOCI/Facility-Clearances/Processing-Applicants/
26.
Source: dcsa.mil
Link:https://www.dcsa.mil/About-Us/Careers/Security-Clearances/
27.
Source: dcsa.mil
Link:https://www.dcsa.mil/Industrial-Security/International-Programs/Outgoing-International-Visits/
28.
Source: energy.gov
Link:https://www.energy.gov/ehss/initial-and-comprehensive-security-briefing
29.
Source: energy.gov
Link:https://www.energy.gov/ehss/human-reliability-program-handbook
30.
Source: ehss.energy.gov
Title: chap13 fn
Link:https://ehss.energy.gov/ohre/roadmap/achre/chap13_fn.html
31.
Source: energy.gov
Link:https://www.energy.gov/nnsa/security-clearances-nuclear-security-enterprise
32.
Source: energy.gov
Link:https://www.energy.gov/ehss/classification
33.
Source: huntsvillebusinessjournal.com
Link:https://huntsvillebusinessjournal.com/news/2023/07/30/solving-the-mystery-of-huntsvilles-brilliant-scientist-disappearing/
Source snippet
Huntsville Business JournalUncovering The Mystery Of Huntsville’s Brilliant Anti-gravity Scientist - Huntsville Business JournalJuly 30...
34.
Source: obamawhitehouse.archives.gov
Title: executive order classified national security information
Link:https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/executive-order-classified-national-security-information
Source snippet
Order 13526- Classified National Security Information | whitehouse.govDecember 29, 2009...
Published: December 29, 2009
35.
Source: archives.gov
Title: isoo implementing directive
Link:https://www.archives.gov/isoo/policy-documents/isoo-implementing-directive.html
Source snippet
National Archives32 CFR Parts 2001 and 2003 Classified National Security Information; Final Rule | National Archives...
36.
Source: dia.mil
Title: Defense Intelligence Agency UNCLASSIFIED//f OR490PKWPM#W01JILSis
Link:https://www.dia.mil/FOIA/FOIA-Electronic-Reading-Room/FileId/170046/
Source snippet
Defense Intelligence AgencyUNCLASSIFIED//fOR490PKWPM#W01JILSisMarch 4, 2022...
Published: March 4, 2022
37.
Source: dia.mil
Title: Defense Intelligence Agency UNCLASSIFIED/ /1’01!. Ol’l’l@l*L U!II! OHL¥
Link:https://www.dia.mil/FOIA/FOIA-Electronic-Reading-Room/FileId/237631/
38.
Source: dia.mil
Title: Defense Intelligence Agency UNCLASSIFIED
Link:https://www.dia.mil/FOIA/FOIA-Electronic-Reading-Room/FileId/237617/
39.
Source: archives.gov
Title: ISO O Notices | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/isoo/notices
40.
Source: huntsvillebusinessjournal.com
Title: UA H Researchers Use New X-ray Telescope To Probe Dark Matter Decay
Link:https://huntsvillebusinessjournal.com/news/2025/12/19/uah-researchers-use-new-x-ray-telescope-to-probe-dark-matter-decay/
41.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Standard Forms | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/isoo/security-forms
42.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Classified National Security Information (CNSI) Guidance | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/guidance/classified-info-guidance
43.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/isoo/training/mdr
44.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Classification Challenges | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/isoo/training/classification-challenges
45.
Source: dia.mil
Link:https://www.dia.mil/Articles/Speeches-and-Testimonies/Article/1859890/russian-and-chinese-nuclear-modernization-trends/
46.
Source: archives.gov
Title: nisp implementing directive html
Link:https://www.archives.gov/isoo/policy-documents/nisp-implementing-directive-html
47.
Source: dia.mil
Title: Statement for the Record: Worldwide Threat Assessment
Link:https://www.dia.mil/Articles/Speeches-and-Testimonies/Article/1457815/statement-for-the-record-worldwide-threat-assessment-2018/
48.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Documenting Your Public Service | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/records-mgmt/publications/documenting-your-public-service.html
49.
Source: archives.gov
Title: directive 32 cfr part 2003
Link:https://www.archives.gov/isoo/policy-documents/directive-32-cfr-part-2003
50.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Basic Laws and Authorities | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/about/laws/appendix/13526.html
51.
Source: obamawhitehouse.archives.gov
Link:https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/node/28387/
52.
Source: uapmurders.com
Link:https://uapmurders.com/uaps/Details/Ning_Li/
53.
Source: dia.mil
Title: File Id
Link:https://www.dia.mil/FOIA/FOIA-Electronic-Reading-Room/FileId/162645/
54.
Source: dia.mil
Link:https://www.dia.mil/FOIA/FOIA-Electronic-Reading-Room/FileId/162149/
55.
Source: dia.mil
Link:https://www.dia.mil/FOIA/FOIA-Electronic-Reading-Room/FileId/162654/
56.
Source: dia.mil
Link:https://www.dia.mil/FOIA/FOIA-Electronic-Reading-Room/FileId/239277/
57.
Source: dia.mil
Link:https://www.dia.mil/FOIA/FOIA-Electronic-Reading-Room/FileId/209754/
58.
Source: dia.mil
Title: File Id
Link:https://www.dia.mil/FOIA/FOIA-Electronic-Reading-Room/FileId/237623/
59.
Source: dia.mil
Link:https://www.dia.mil/FOIA/FOIA-Electronic-Reading-Room/FileId/239159/
60.
Source: dia.mil
Link:https://www.dia.mil/FOIA/FOIA-Electronic-Reading-Room/FileId/161639/
61.
Source: dia.mil
Link:https://www.dia.mil/FOIA/FOIA-Electronic-Reading-Room/FileId/161469/
62.
Source: dia.mil
Link:https://www.dia.mil/FOIA/FOIA-Electronic-Reading-Room/FileId/161655/
Additional References
63.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5_WVN2w7byo
Source snippet
The Scientist That "Discovered Antigravity" Then Disappeared Completely - An Unsolved Mystery Barely Sociable · 4.1M views The disappeara...
64.
Source: youtube.com
Title: The Scientist That “Discovered Antigravity” Then Disappeared Completely
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eS_rEzKdzBA
Source snippet
The disappearance of America's leading anti-gravity researcher...
65.
Source: youtube.com
Title: This Scientist Got $450k From The Do D, Then She Disappeared
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSrh8goxvxM
Source snippet
The Woman Physicist that 'Discovered Antigravity' is missing since 2004. She Modified Gravitation...
66.
Source: shinysideout.com.au
Link:https://www.shinysideout.com.au/13-ning-li.html
67.
Source: archive.ph
Link:https://archive.ph/O3Pgg
68.
Source: hangar1publishing.com
Link:https://hangar1publishing.com/blogs/ufos-uaps-and-aliens/antigravity-technology
69.
Source: uapmurders.com
Link:https://uapmurders.com/physics/Details/Gravity_Manipulation/
70.
Source: uapmurders.com
Link:https://uapmurders.com/
71.
Source: pubs.aip.org
Link:https://pubs.aip.org/aip/acp/article-pdf/746/1/1306/12173671/1306_1_online.pdf
72.
Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/253972293_Precursor_Proof-of-Concept_Experiments_for_Various_Categories_of_High-Frequency_Gravitational_Wave_HFGW_Generators