Within Accidents
Do Withheld Records Make an Accident Suspicious?
Withheld government records create uncertainty, but secrecy about a research program does not by itself connect a later accident to that program.
On this page
- What the unreleased defense material leaves unknown
- Why classification can have several explanations
- The evidentiary gap between secrecy and targeted harm
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
Withheld records can make an already unusual story feel more suspicious, but in Ning Li’s case the public-record trail does not establish that secrecy surrounding her defence-funded gravity research had anything to do with the traffic accident that ended her career. The strongest conclusion is narrower: there is a genuine information gap around what AC Gravity produced for the US Department of Defense, while the evidence publicly available about Li’s 2014 accident does not demonstrate targeted harm.
That distinction matters because two different questions are often merged. One asks why Li’s post-2001 research is difficult to reconstruct. The other asks whether the vehicle collision that caused her permanent brain injury was deliberately connected to that research. The first has substantial grounds for uncertainty. The second remains an allegation without comparable evidence. Even the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) history is more complicated than the shorthand claim that the government simply “denied” requests because the work was classified.[muckrock.com]muckrock.comDepartment of Defense Grant for AC Gravity LLC (2001) (Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency) • MuckRockOcto…
What the unreleased defence material leaves unknown
There is good evidence that Li’s company, AC Gravity LLC, received US defence funding. Contemporary descriptions identify an agreement numbered DAAH01-01-9-R001, titled “Gravito - Electro Magnetic Superconductivity Experiment”, awarded through the US Army Aviation and Missile Command. The reported government contribution was $448,970, with an effective date of 25 April 2001 and completion scheduled for 25 September 2002. Its stated purpose was experimental testing of predictions arising from Li’s ideas about superconductors and gravitational effects.[zpenergy.com]zpenergy.comZP Energy.comGravity-Waves & Missing Scientists at American Antigravity.ComJuly 19, 2004…
What is conspicuously absent from the public scientific literature is an ordinary published account of what that project ultimately found. The 2023 Huntsville Business Journal investigation reported that Li produced no further published papers after 2002, although evidence placed her at a 2003 gravitational-wave conference discussing the “Measurability of AC Gravity Fields”. The same investigation, based substantially on an interview with her son George Men, reported that Li subsequently held a top-secret clearance and continued defence work around Redstone Arsenal.[Huntsville Business Journal]huntsvillebusinessjournal.comHuntsville Business JournalUncovering The Mystery Of Huntsville’s Brilliant Anti-gravity Scientist - Huntsville Business Journal…
Those circumstances create legitimate unanswered questions. Did the funded experiment produce a final technical report? Were any results negative, inconclusive or promising? Which organisation ultimately retained the experimental data? Were later results classified, restricted for another reason, or simply never turned into a conventional publication? Publicly available material does not resolve those questions.
There is also evidence that researchers have tried to use FOIA to reconstruct this history. A Defense Technical Information Center FOIA log records a 2019 request for a search on “Ning Li or AC Gravity, LLC” and says material was “Sent to requester”. That entry is significant because it shows that the records story is not simply one of an impenetrable wall: at least one request was processed with something sent back, although the log alone does not tell us what was supplied or whether it included substantive project results.[governmentattic.org]governmentattic.orgDescription of documentNovember 7, 2025…
A later, publicly traceable MuckRock request sought “any paperwork” relating to the 2001 AC Gravity award. It was submitted to several Department of Defense components in October 2022. The surviving correspondence shows the case being closed and, in one component’s later explanation, administratively closed after the requester did not respond to a five-day letter. The Department offered to let the requester reformulate the request under a new tracking number.[MuckRock]muckrock.comDepartment of Defense Grant for AC Gravity LLC (2001) (Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency) • MuckRockOcto…
That detail complicates the widespread description of the episode as a straightforward national-security “denial”. A Department of Defense FOIA log lists case 23-F-0043 under an “Other Reasons” disposition associated with records not being reasonably described. In other words, the accessible administrative record does not establish that this particular request located Li’s files and then withheld them under the FOIA exemption for classified national-defence information.[Scribd]scribd.comFOIA RequestsFOIA Requests Summary and Details | PDF | Firearms | Freedom Of Information Act (United States)…
The distinction is not semantic. Under FOIA, a request must “reasonably describe” the records sought before the agency’s disclosure obligations operate in the normal way. Department of Justice guidance explains that the description must allow an employee familiar with the subject to locate responsive records with a reasonable amount of effort; agencies are encouraged to help requesters reformulate deficient requests.[Department of Justice]justice.govOpen source on justice.gov.
The Huntsville Business Journal nevertheless reported that its own FOIA attempts concerning Li’s research had been denied and described her later work as classified, drawing in part on her son’s account of her security clearance. That is useful evidence that access to the later research has been difficult, but it should not be expanded into the stronger claim that every missing AC Gravity document is known to have been withheld specifically because it contains successful antigravity results.[Huntsville Business Journal]huntsvillebusinessjournal.comHuntsville Business JournalUncovering The Mystery Of Huntsville’s Brilliant Anti-gravity Scientist - Huntsville Business Journal…
Why classification can have several explanations
National-security secrecy is compatible with many scenarios, only some of which are dramatic. FOIA itself expressly allows properly classified national-defence and foreign-policy information to be withheld under Exemption 1. Other exemptions can protect trade secrets or confidential commercial information, internal deliberative material, personal information and certain law-enforcement records. The existence of a withholding therefore does not, without the agency’s stated exemption and the underlying record, reveal why a document is sensitive.[Department of Justice]justice.govfreedom information act amended 1974 public lawfreedom information act amended 1974 public law
More importantly, defence classification is evidence about the sensitivity of information, not evidence that the underlying scientific proposition worked. An experimental programme could generate information considered sensitive because of equipment, military applications, associated programmes or technical capabilities even if its central hypothesis ultimately failed. Conversely, a project can leave a poor public paper trail without being classified at all: records can reside with another component, be inadequately indexed, fall outside a request’s wording, be retained under different programme names, or never have existed in the form a requester expects.
Li’s case therefore contains two claims of very different strength. It is reasonable to say that the public cannot presently reconstruct her later defence work from the material readily available. It is much harder to say why every missing record is missing.
Her family’s account does strengthen the proposition that secrecy became an important part of her professional life. Men told the Huntsville Business Journal that his mother had loved publishing at the university but stopped sharing her work after receiving a top-secret clearance. He also described her as continuing to work at Redstone Arsenal until 2014. Those are important recollections from a close family member, but they are not themselves declassification records identifying the programme, its classification guide, its results or the exemptions applicable to particular documents.[Huntsville Business Journal]huntsvillebusinessjournal.comHuntsville Business JournalUncovering The Mystery Of Huntsville’s Brilliant Anti-gravity Scientist - Huntsville Business Journal…
The appropriate description is therefore documented defence involvement plus an unresolved public-record gap, rather than proven suppression of a successful technology.
Does the records gap make the 2014 accident suspicious?
This is where the evidentiary standard has to change. According to Men’s account, Li continued working until 2014, when a vehicle struck her as she crossed a street on the University of Alabama in Huntsville campus. He said the collision caused permanent brain damage and that she subsequently developed Alzheimer’s disease; he cared for her during the final years of her life. Her husband, who witnessed the collision, reportedly suffered a heart attack and died the following year.[Huntsville Business Journal]huntsvillebusinessjournal.comHuntsville Business JournalUncovering The Mystery Of Huntsville’s Brilliant Anti-gravity Scientist - Huntsville Business Journal…
Li died on 27 July 2021. Her funeral-home obituary independently establishes her death, her Huntsville connection and her identity as a researcher associated with superconductivity and “anti-gravity”, although it says nothing about the circumstances of the 2014 collision.[Berryhill Funeral Home]berryhillfh.comBerryhill Funeral Home Ning Li ObituaryBerryhill Funeral Home Ning Li Obituary
The accident story is understandably striking when placed beside the secrecy surrounding her work. A scientist conducts unusual defence-funded research, stops publishing, works for years outside public view and is then catastrophically injured by a vehicle. That sequence supplies the raw material for a suspicious interpretation. It does not supply evidence that the events were causally connected.
The accessible sources located for the accident do not establish the features that would be needed to support such a connection: an identified motive, evidence that Li was being monitored or threatened, suspicious conduct by the driver, evidence that the collision was deliberately engineered, a documented attempt to conceal the crash, or investigative findings linking anyone involved to her research. The detailed public account currently rests principally on her son’s recollections reported in 2023, rather than a publicly available police collision file or court record.[Huntsville Business Journal]huntsvillebusinessjournal.comHuntsville Business JournalUncovering The Mystery Of Huntsville’s Brilliant Anti-gravity Scientist - Huntsville Business Journal…
That limitation cuts both ways. It means the open record is not detailed enough to reconstruct every circumstance of the collision independently. But missing detail is not affirmative evidence of assassination or sabotage. The proposition “the complete accident file is not readily available online” is fundamentally different from “the accident was deliberately caused”.
Some later websites explicitly turn the combination of missing research and the collision into a theory of researcher suppression. Their argument is essentially cumulative: Li had sensitive research, the research disappeared from public view, and the accident permanently prevented her from explaining it. Such sources demonstrate that the suspicious-death narrative exists, but they do not provide independent evidence establishing the crucial causal step between the defence programme and the vehicle collision.[Murdering UAP Experts]uapmurders.comMurdering UAP Experts Ning Li | Murdering UAP ExpertsMurdering UAP Experts Ning Li | Murdering UAP Experts
The gap between secrecy and targeted harm
The most useful way to assess the case is to separate what the evidence supports from what would have to be added by inference.
The defence-research gap is real. AC Gravity received documented military funding for an experimental gravity-related project, while a conventional public final report explaining the outcome has not emerged in the material examined here. Li also stopped publishing publicly and, according to her son, worked under security restrictions.[zpenergy.com]zpenergy.comZP Energy.comGravity-Waves & Missing Scientists at American Antigravity.ComJuly 19, 2004…
The FOIA story does not prove successful research was classified. The 2022 request most easily inspected in public records encountered procedural and description problems, including an administrative closure and an invitation to reformulate it. FOIA law separately permits properly classified material to be withheld, but the existence of that legal mechanism cannot be treated as proof that it was the reason particular AC Gravity records were unavailable.[muckrock.com]muckrock.comDepartment of Defense Grant for AC Gravity LLC (2001) (Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency) • MuckRockOcto…
The accident had an extraordinary consequence without being demonstrably extraordinary in cause. The collision reportedly destroyed Li’s ability to continue her scientific work and contributed to years of severe cognitive decline. That consequence makes the accident important to the history of her research. It does not establish that ending her research was the purpose of the collision.[Huntsville Business Journal]huntsvillebusinessjournal.comHuntsville Business JournalUncovering The Mystery Of Huntsville’s Brilliant Anti-gravity Scientist - Huntsville Business Journal…
A stronger suspicious-accident claim would require new evidence. A police report showing unexplained circumstances, witness evidence contradicting an ordinary collision, records identifying the driver and demonstrating a relevant connection, prior documented threats, intelligence or security records linking Li to a protective or coercive operation, or credible investigative findings of deliberate targeting would materially change the assessment. Without evidence of that kind, secrecy about the research and uncertainty about the accident remain two unresolved facts rather than a demonstrated chain of events.
This is the central governance lesson in Ning Li’s case. Government secrecy can create a vacuum in which researchers, journalists and the public cannot readily distinguish failed experiments, sensitive but conventional defence work, successful classified research and mundane records-management problems. That vacuum is a legitimate transparency issue. It also makes causal discipline more important, not less.
The unreleased material leaves a meaningful question — what happened to the results of Li’s defence-funded work? The currently available evidence does not answer a much more serious one in the affirmative — was the 2014 collision arranged because of that work? Until evidence bridges those two questions, the withheld records make Li’s scientific history incomplete, but they do not make targeted harm an established explanation for her accident.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to Do Withheld Records Make an Accident Suspicious?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The Hunt for Zero Point
The atomic bomb was not the only project to occupy government scientists during the 1940's. Antigravity technology, originally spearheade...
The Demon-haunted World
Rating: 4.5/5 from 43 Google Books ratings
Are we on the brink of a new Dark Age of irrationality and superstition? In this book, the writer shows how scientific thinking is necess...
Mirage Men
Seeking the truth about UFOs in America, Mark Pilkington and John Lundberg uncover a 60 year-old story stranger than any conspiracy thril...
UFOs and Government: A Historical Inquiry
Governments around the world have had to deal with the UFO phenomenon for a good part of a century. How and why they did so is the subjec...
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.
Endnotes
1.
Source: muckrock.com
Link:https://www.muckrock.com/foi/united-states-of-america-10/department-of-defense-grant-for-ac-gravity-llc-2001-department-of-defense-defense-security-cooperation-agency-135084/
Source snippet
Department of Defense Grant for AC Gravity LLC (2001) (Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency) • MuckRockOcto...
2.
Source: scribd.com
Title: FOIA Requests
Link:https://www.scribd.com/document/936346104/FOID-FOIA-Log-FY23
Source snippet
FOIA Requests Summary and Details | PDF | Firearms | Freedom Of Information Act (United States)...
3.
Source: zpenergy.com
Title: ZP Energy.com
Link:https://www.zpenergy.com/modules.php?file=article&mode=flat&name=News&order=0&sid=838&thold=-1
Source snippet
Gravity-Waves & [Missing Scientists]({{ 'missing-scientist/' | relative_url }}) at American Antigravity.ComJuly 19, 2004...
Published: July 19, 2004
4.
Source: governmentattic.org
Title: Description of document
Link:https://www.governmentattic.org/38docs/DTICfoiaLog_2010-2020.pdf
Source snippet
November 7, 2025...
Published: November 7, 2025
5.
Source: muckrock.com
Link:https://www.muckrock.com/foi/united-states-of-america-10/department-of-defense-grant-for-ac-gravity-llc-2001-department-of-defense-under-secretary-of-defense-for-intelligence-and-security-135082/
Source snippet
Department of Defense Grant for AC Gravity LLC (2001) (Department of Defense, Under Secretary Of Defense For Intelligence And Sec...
6.
Source: muckrock.com
Link:https://www.muckrock.com/foi/united-states-of-america-10/department-of-defense-grant-for-ac-gravity-llc-2001-department-of-defense-freedom-of-information-policy-office-135081/
Source snippet
Department of Defense Grant for AC Gravity LLC (2001) (Department of Defense, Freedom of Information Policy Office) • MuckRock...
7.
Source: muckrock.com
Link:https://www.muckrock.com/foi/united-states-of-america-10/department-of-defense-grant-for-ac-gravity-llc-2001-department-of-defense-office-of-the-secretary-of-defense-135083/
8.
Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/oip-guidance/guidance-agency-foia-regulations
9.
Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/freedom-information-act-5-usc-552
10.
Source: justice.gov
Title: attorney generals memorandum 1974 amendments foia
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/attorney-generals-memorandum-1974-amendments-foia
11.
Source: justice.gov
Title: freedom information act amended 1974 public law 93 502
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/freedom-information-act-amended-1974-public-law
12.
Source: justice.gov
Title: Office of Information Policy | Office of Information Policy
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip
13.
Source: pod.wave.co
Link:https://pod.wave.co/podcast/crime-stories-with-nancy-grace/dead-missing-space-scientists-mystery-raging-unsolved
14.
Source: justice.gov
Title: heritage found v doj no 24 645 2026 wl 1429952 ddc may 21 2026 friedrich j
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/heritage-found-v-doj-no-24-645-2026-wl-1429952-ddc-may-21-2026-friedrich-j
15.
Source: akamai-staging.justice.gov
Title: chief foia officer reports 2026
Link:https://akamai-staging.justice.gov/oip/chief-foia-officer-reports-2026
16.
Source: justice.gov
Title: jud watch inc v doj no 23 3004 2026 wl 296249 ddc feb 4 2026 boasberg c j
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/jud-watch-inc-v-doj-no-23-3004-2026-wl-296249-ddc-feb-4-2026-boasberg-c-j
17.
Source: justice.gov
Title: perafan v fbi no 24 09005 2026 wl 413520 cd cal jan 26 2026 vera j
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/perafan-v-fbi-no-24-09005-2026-wl-413520-cd-cal-jan-26-2026-vera-j
18.
Source: justice.gov
Title: am transparency v hhs no 21 02821 2025 wl 2779929 ddc sept 30 2025 mehta j
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/am-transparency-v-hhs-no-21-02821-2025-wl-2779929-ddc-sept-30-2025-mehta-j
19.
Source: oig.justice.gov
Title: foia reading room
Link:https://oig.justice.gov/foia-reading-room
20.
Source: akamai-staging.justice.gov
Title: oip announces additional foia training dates fiscal year 2025
Link:https://akamai-staging.justice.gov/oip/blog/oip-announces-additional-foia-training-dates-fiscal-year-2025
21.
Source: akamai-staging.justice.gov
Title: upgraded foiagov search tool delivers improved results
Link:https://akamai-staging.justice.gov/oip/blog/upgraded-foiagov-search-tool-delivers-improved-results
22.
Source: scribd.com
Link:https://www.scribd.com/document/791080865/Michael-Shellenberger-s-214-page-Written-UAP-Testimony
23.
Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/court-decisions
24.
Source: justice.gov
Title: anand v hhs no 21 1635 2023 wl 2646815 ddc mar 27 2023 kollar kotelly j
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/anand-v-hhs-no-21-1635-2023-wl-2646815-ddc-mar-27-2023-kollar-kotelly-j
25.
Source: es.scribd.com
Title: 23 F 0043 Request Description 1
Link:https://es.scribd.com/document/844571090/23-F-0043-Request-Description-1
26.
Source: justice.gov
Title: gun owners am inc v fbi no 21 1601 2022 wl 856388 ddc mar 23 2022 bates j
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/gun-owners-am-inc-v-fbi-no-21-1601-2022-wl-856388-ddc-mar-23-2022-bates-j
27.
Source: justice.gov
Title: keeping govt beholden inc v doj no 17 1569 2021 wl 5918627 ddc dec 13 2021 pan j
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/keeping-govt-beholden-inc-v-doj-no-17-1569-2021-wl-5918627-ddc-dec-13-2021-pan-j
28.
Source: de.scribd.com
Title: Die Zeit 21 10 2021
Link:https://de.scribd.com/document/553630062/Die-Zeit
29.
Source: scribd.com
Title: NASA CRT 09102021 Production
Link:https://www.scribd.com/document/999223965/NASA-CRT-09102021-Production
30.
Source: fr.scribd.com
Title: Handbook of Anti Gravity Research
Link:https://fr.scribd.com/document/392671265/Handbook-of-Anti-Gravity-Research
31.
Source: justice.gov
Title: passmore v doj no 14 1742 2017 wl 1166301 ddc mar 28 2017 sullivan j
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/passmore-v-doj-no-14-1742-2017-wl-1166301-ddc-mar-28-2017-sullivan-j
32.
Source: de.scribd.com
Title: Die Zeit No 43 13 Oktober 2016
Link:https://de.scribd.com/document/329427196/Die-Zeit-No-43-13-Oktober-2016
33.
Source: justice.gov
Title: shapiro v cia no 14 00019 2016 wl 1069646 ddc mar 17 2016 cooper j
Link:https://www.justice.gov/oip/shapiro-v-cia-no-14-00019-2016-wl-1069646-ddc-mar-17-2016-cooper-j
34.
Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/archive/oip/courtdecisions/oct-19-2012.html
35.
Source: foia.gov
Title: FOI A.gov
Link:https://www.foia.gov/iso/opa/foia/oip-101118.html
36.
Source: foia.gov
Title: FOI A.gov
Link:https://www.foia.gov/iso/opa/foia/oip-101012.html
37.
Source: foia.gov
Title: FOI A.gov
Link:https://www.foia.gov/iso/opa/foia/oip-100813.html
38.
Source: foia.gov
Title: FOI A.gov
Link:https://www.foia.gov/iso/opa/foia/oip-100715.html
39.
Source: zpenergy.com
Title: ZP Energy.com
Link:https://www.zpenergy.com/modules.php?file=print&name=News&sid=838
40.
Source: zpenergy.com
Title: ZP Energy.com
Link:https://zpenergy.com/modules.php?file=article&name=News&sid=740
41.
Source: justice.gov
Title: foia guide 2004 edition exclusions
Link:https://www.justice.gov/archives/oip/foia-guide-2004-edition-exclusions
42.
Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/archives/oip/blog/foia-update-freedom-information-act-5-usc-sect-552-amended-public-law-no-104-231-110-stat
43.
Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/archives/oip/blog/foia-update-freedom-information-act-5-usc-sect-552-amended-freedom-information-reform-act
44.
Source: justice.gov
Title: foia update text freedom information act showing changes proposed s 1751hr 4805
Link:https://www.justice.gov/archives/oip/blog/foia-update-text-freedom-information-act-showing-changes-proposed-s-1751hr-4805
45.
Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/archives/oip/blog/foia-update-foia-counselor-what-foia-request
46.
Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/archive/oip/courtdecisions/reasonably-described-records.html
47.
Source: justice.gov
Title: referral request
Link:https://www.justice.gov/archive/oip/courtdecisions/referral-request.html
48.
Source: id.scribd.com
Title: Ning Li Articles
Link:https://id.scribd.com/document/819931363/Ning-Li-Articles
49.
Source: ro.scribd.com
Title: Almanah 2015
Link:https://ro.scribd.com/doc/251922797/Almanah-2015
50.
Source: de.scribd.com
Title: Undrstndin Manga Anime pdf
Link:https://de.scribd.com/document/341851361/UndrstndinManga-Anime-pdf
51.
Source: foia.gov
Title: FOI A.gov
Link:https://www.foia.gov/faq.html
52.
Source: foia.gov
Title: FOI A.gov
Link:https://www.foia.gov/foia-statute.html
53.
Source: foia.gov
Title: FOI A.gov
Link:https://www.foia.gov/foia-contact-download.html
54.
Source: foia.gov
Title: FOI A.gov
Link:https://www.foia.gov/chief-foia-officers-council/foia-reference-model-charter
55.
Source: foia.gov
Title: FOI A.gov
Link:https://www.foia.gov/swagger.html
56.
Source: foia.gov
Title: FOI A.gov
Link:https://www.foia.gov/about.html
57.
Source: foia.gov
Title: FOI A.gov
Link:https://www.foia.gov/chief-foia-officers-council/foia-x-press
58.
Source: foia.gov
Title: FOI A.gov
Link:https://www.foia.gov/data.html
59.
Source: foia.gov
Title: FOI A.gov
Link:https://www.foia.gov/quarterly.html
60.
Source: huntsvillebusinessjournal.com
Link:https://huntsvillebusinessjournal.com/news/2023/07/30/solving-the-mystery-of-huntsvilles-brilliant-scientist-disappearing/
Source snippet
Huntsville Business JournalUncovering The Mystery Of Huntsville’s Brilliant Anti-gravity Scientist - Huntsville Business Journal...
61.
Source: berryhillfh.com
Title: Berryhill Funeral Home Ning Li Obituary
Link:https://www.berryhillfh.com/obituary/ning-li?lud=4CF765EE88E7526FCBA619C30101F7E6
62.
Source: uapmurders.com
Title: Murdering UAP Experts Ning Li | Murdering UAP Experts
Link:https://uapmurders.com/uaps/Details/Ning_Li/
63.
Source: holonhq.com
Title: Ning_Li | @Holon Citizen’s Holon
Link:https://holonhq.com/UAP_Physics/Details/Ning_Li/
64.
Source: mail.notulaebotanicae.ro
Link:https://mail.notulaebotanicae.ro/index.php/nbha/article/view/15265
65.
Source: wikidata.org
Title: Ning Li
Link:https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q11170087
66.
Source: uapmurders.com
Link:https://uapmurders.com/energy/
67.
Source: eksisozluk.com
Title: ning li
Link:https://eksisozluk.com/ning-li–8030650
68.
Source: tilln.com
Title: Ning Li | This Scientist Got $450k From The Do D, Then She Disappeared
Link:https://tilln.com/season-4/ning-li-this-scientist-got-450k-from-the-dod-then-she-disappeared/
69.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/foia
70.
Source: berryhillfh.com
Title: Ning Li Obituary
Link:https://www.berryhillfh.com/obituary/ning-li/print
71.
Source: berryhillfh.com
Title: Ning Li Obituary
Link:https://www.berryhillfh.com/guestbook/ning-li
72.
Source: archives.gov
Title: The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) | National Archives
Link:https://www.archives.gov/about/laws/foia.html
73.
Source: uapmurders.com
Link:https://uapmurders.com/physics/Details/Gravity_Manipulation/
74.
Source: uapmurders.com
Link:https://uapmurders.com/
75.
Source: uapmurders.com
Link:https://uapmurders.com/uaps/books/
76.
Source: uapmurders.com
Link:https://uapmurders.com/physics/Physics_Math/patents_intl/more_patents/
77.
Source: obamawhitehouse.archives.gov
Link:https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/administration/eop/ostp/library/foia/about/
78.
Source: sites.google.com
Title: ac gravity llc
Link:https://sites.google.com/view/the-asp-foundation/groups-of-interest/technology-creators-researchers/ac-gravity-llc
79.
Source: pravednes.cz
Title: Ning Li
Link:https://pravednes.cz/LiNing.profil
Additional References
80.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SSs-GI75nF8
Source snippet
Eugene [Podkletnov]({{ 'podkletnov/' | relative_url }}): Antigravity, Superconductors & Gravitational Impulse Force Beams...
81.
Source: youtube.com
Title: The disappearance of America’s leading anti-gravity researcher
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qsbz8_G9WcU
Source snippet
What Happened to Amy Eskridge? | Anti-Gravity, Exotic Science, and Conspiracy Theories...
82.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/ogis/resources/foia-ombuds-observer/2024-01
83.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/ogis/foia-advisory-committee/2020-2022-term/meetings/foiaac-mtg-handout
84.
Source: science.gov
Link:https://www.science.gov/topicpages/a/anonyms%2Band%2Bpseudonyms.html
85.
Source: science.gov
Link:https://www.science.gov/topicpages/f/fpga%2Bdevelopment%2Bboard
86.
Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362845772_Dam_Extraction_from_High-Resolution_Satellite_Images_Combined_with_Location_Based_on_Deep_Transfer_Learning_and_Post-Segmentation_with_an_Improved_MBI
87.
Source: shinysideout.com.au
Link:https://www.shinysideout.com.au/13-ning-li.html
88.
Source: wegotthiscovered.com
Link:https://wegotthiscovered.com/fyi/a-scientist-claimed-to-have-created-an-anti-gravity-device-then-she-disappeared-20-years-later-her-son-explains-what-really-happened/
89.
Source: edwardbetts.com
Link:https://edwardbetts.com/monograph/call_centre