Within Death Lists
How UFO Connections Get Added After the Fact
Researchers can be added after death because later writers reinterpret gravity, plasma or astronomy work as evidence of UFO relevance.
On this page
- From ordinary research specialties to retrospective UFO relevance
- Why absence from public view encourages stronger reinterpretation
- How retrospective links widen the eligible pool
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
Researchers do not have to describe themselves as UFO investigators to enter a UFO-related death narrative. In many cases, the connection is made retrospectively. A later writer starts with a scientist’s genuine work on gravity, superconductors, plasma, propulsion, astronomy or defence technology, then interprets that work as adjacent to the technological problem posed by extraordinary UFO claims. If the researcher subsequently dies, disappears from public view or stops publishing, that biographical fact can be folded back into the technological interpretation: perhaps the work was more important than it appeared, perhaps it became classified, perhaps somebody wanted it suppressed.
This mechanism matters because it changes how researcher death lists grow. The relevant question stops being “Was this person demonstrably investigating UFOs?” and becomes “Could this person’s research conceivably explain how a UFO might work?” That second test admits a much larger population. The recent treatment of physicist Ning Li provides an unusually clear example: documented superconductivity and gravity research, followed by reduced public visibility, gradually became an internet story about an “anti-gravity scientist” who had disappeared — even though later reporting established that she had never been a missing person.[Huntsville Business Journal]huntsvillebusinessjournal.comHuntsville Business JournalUncovering The Mystery Of Huntsville’s Brilliant Anti-gravity Scientist - Huntsville Business Journal…
From ordinary research to retrospective UFO relevance
The key step is usually technological reinterpretation rather than evidence of UFO involvement. A researcher studies a phenomenon that is scientifically interesting in its own right. Later commentators ask whether the same phenomenon could provide propulsion, gravity control, extreme acceleration or some other capability attributed to UFOs. Once that bridge has been made, the scientist can be described as “UFO-connected” even when UFOs were not the original subject of the research.
Ning Li illustrates the process particularly well. In 1992, Li and D. G. Torr published a paper in Physical Review B on gravitational effects in the magnetic attenuation of superconductors. Its abstract discussed theoretical relationships between gravitational effects and superconductivity; it did not present itself as UFO research.[Physical Review Journals]journals.aps.orgOpen source on aps.org. Li later pursued proposed gravity-related effects commercially through AC Gravity, and the US Department of Defense funded further work. Her scientific biography therefore contained exactly the ingredients that retrospective narratives can use: gravity, superconductors, potential propulsion applications, defence interest and eventually classified work.[Huntsville Business Journal]huntsvillebusinessjournal.comHuntsville Business JournalUncovering The Mystery Of Huntsville’s Brilliant Anti-gravity Scientist - Huntsville Business Journal…
By 2023, however, the public story surrounding Li had acquired another layer. Huntsville Business Journal reporter Noah Logan encountered a YouTube video titled “The Scientist That Discovered Antigravity Then Disappeared Completely”, viewed millions of times. Logan subsequently interviewed Li’s son, George Guangyu Men, and found that the central premise was false in a literal sense: Li had never been an officially missing person and had not disappeared from her family. She had remained in the United States. In 2014 she was struck by a vehicle, suffered permanent brain damage, was cared for by her son for six years and died in 2021.[Huntsville Business Journal]huntsvillebusinessjournal.comHuntsville Business JournalUncovering The Mystery Of Huntsville’s Brilliant Anti-gravity Scientist - Huntsville Business Journal… Her funeral-home obituary independently records her death in Huntsville on 27 July 2021.[Berryhill Funeral Home]berryhillfh.comBerryhill Funeral Home Ning Li ObituaryBerryhill Funeral HomeNing Li Obituary July 27, 2021 - Berryhill Funeral Home & CrematoryJuly 27, 2021…
Yet the “disappearance” narrative had a real informational gap on which to build. Li stopped publishing openly after moving from university research into defence-related work. Her son told the Huntsville Business Journal that after receiving a top-secret clearance she could no longer discuss her work publicly. The results of the 2001 defence grant were not published, and the reporter said his Freedom of Information Act requests for them were denied.[Huntsville Business Journal]huntsvillebusinessjournal.comHuntsville Business JournalUncovering The Mystery Of Huntsville’s Brilliant Anti-gravity Scientist - Huntsville Business Journal…
That distinction is central to how retrofitting works. Disappearance from the scientific literature is not the same thing as disappearance as a person, but repeated retellings can collapse the two. Once “she stopped publishing” becomes “nobody knew what happened to her”, it takes only another small step to reach “the anti-gravity scientist disappeared”.
The same technological reinterpretation can happen even when the underlying physics itself is disputed. Thomas Townsend Brown spent decades arguing that high-voltage asymmetric capacitors revealed an electrogravitational effect. Later research has continued to study the measurable thrust associated with the Biefeld–Brown effect, but experiments and modelling have supported explanations involving charged-particle movement rather than gravity manipulation. One analysis explicitly notes the widespread internet speculation that the phenomenon represents antigravity or a space-warp effect before presenting experimental results consistent with ion wind.[arXiv]arxiv.orgarXiv An analysis of the Brown-Biefeld effectarXiv An analysis of the Brown-Biefeld effect
Brown is different from scientists who acquire a wholly retrospective UFO connection because he actually helped establish the National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena (NICAP), an early American UFO organisation.[Nicap]nicap.orgBolster… But his case demonstrates the conceptual bridge later list-makers use elsewhere: electrical propulsion → “electrogravity” → antigravity → technology capable of explaining UFO performance. Once that chain is accepted, researchers need not have investigated sightings themselves to occupy the same narrative category.
Public silence can become evidence in its own right
The most powerful retrofit often occurs when a researcher leaves an incomplete public record. Ordinarily there are many reasons for such gaps: retirement, illness, commercial confidentiality, a change of career, unsuccessful experiments, defence classification or simply a project ending without publication. Within a suppression narrative, however, absence can acquire positive explanatory force.
Li’s case shows the sequence almost step by step. She had legitimate academic publications. She left academia for AC Gravity. The company received US defence funding. Results did not appear openly. Attempts by outsiders to contact her went unanswered. By 2008, physicist Jack Sarfatti was publicly saying that she had disappeared and possibly returned to China. The 2023 interview with her son contradicted that account: she remained in the United States, rejected an approach to return to China and continued defence-related work before her 2014 accident.[Huntsville Business Journal]huntsvillebusinessjournal.comHuntsville Business JournalUncovering The Mystery Of Huntsville’s Brilliant Anti-gravity Scientist - Huntsville Business Journal…
The informational void nevertheless helped the stronger story survive. The absence of publications could be interpreted as evidence that the research had become secret; inability to contact her could be treated as evidence that she had vanished; defence involvement could then explain the secrecy. Each proposition appeared to support the next.
This produces a difficult-to-falsify pattern:
- A researcher publishes unusual work.
- The researcher becomes less publicly visible.
- The lack of information is attributed to classification or suppression.
- The researcher’s earlier work is interpreted as having greater technological significance than the public evidence establishes.
- Later death or prolonged absence is read in light of that interpretation.
- The resulting biography is added to a wider UFO or antigravity researcher narrative.
The important point is not that classification never occurs. In Li’s case, her son specifically described classified work, and the absence of public results is real.[Huntsville Business Journal]huntsvillebusinessjournal.comHuntsville Business JournalUncovering The Mystery Of Huntsville’s Brilliant Anti-gravity Scientist - Huntsville Business Journal… The evidential problem arises when classification is used to fill in what the missing evidence supposedly contains. “The results are unavailable” and “the unavailable results demonstrated revolutionary propulsion” are fundamentally different claims.
The same principle applies to a death. A person can genuinely have worked on unusual technology and genuinely have died without those two facts explaining each other. The causal connection has to be demonstrated independently; otherwise the biography itself becomes the argument.
Existing UFO figures can also be retrofitted after death
Retrofitting does not only transform non-UFO scientists into UFO researchers. It can also transform someone who genuinely studied UFOs into a more dramatic kind of figure after death: a researcher who supposedly knew too much.
Morris K. Jessup is an early example. Jessup had studied astronomy and became a prominent 1950s UFO author, so his connection to the subject was real rather than retrospective. What changed after his death was the interpretation of that connection. His 1959 death by carbon-monoxide poisoning was officially ruled suicide. Later UFO literature increasingly linked it to the so-called Philadelphia Experiment — a story alleging extraordinary US Navy experiments involving invisibility or teleportation.[Skeptical Inquirer]skepticalinquirer.orgOpen source on skepticalinquirer.org.
According to a detailed retrospective in Skeptical Inquirer, Jessup had discussed suicide with friends, had suffered personal and professional difficulties, and left evidence consistent with suicidal intent. Yet after his death, writers developed the alternative possibility that he had been eliminated because of secret knowledge. Gray Barker’s The Strange Case of Dr. M.K. Jessup appeared in 1963, and William Moore and Charles Berlitz’s The Philadelphia Experiment: Project Invisibility helped popularise the broader conspiracy story in 1979.[Skeptical Inquirer]skepticalinquirer.orgOpen source on skepticalinquirer.org.
The mechanism is revealing because Jessup did not need to be invented as a UFO researcher. Instead, the significance of his death was retrospectively upgraded. His real interest in UFOs and his involvement with correspondence that became associated with the Philadelphia Experiment supplied narrative raw material; later authors could then interpret his suicide as a consequence of knowledge that the surviving evidence does not establish he possessed.
James E. McDonald presents another instructive boundary case. Unlike scientists linked to UFOs merely because of their technical specialities, McDonald indisputably investigated the subject. The University of Arizona archive of his papers contains roughly 580 Project Blue Book sighting reports, journals documenting UFO investigative activity, interviews, talks, photographs and extensive research material.[Kirk McDonald]kirkmcd.princeton.eduKirk Mc Donald Arizona Archives OnlineKirk McDonaldArizona Archives OnlineFebruary 13, 2026… His inclusion in the history of serious UFO investigation therefore requires no retrofit.
But his death can still undergo one. McDonald died in 1971 in what contemporary reporting described as an apparent suicide, whereas modern online discussions sometimes take the combination of his UFO advocacy, disputes with official investigations and relatively early death as circumstantial evidence of assassination.[Reddit]reddit.comRemembering Dr. James E. Mc DonaldRemembering Dr. James E. McDonald - Let us not forget what is at stake and how deliberate obfuscation has long been the tactic of t… The underlying UFO connection is genuine; the retrofit lies in turning that connection into an explanation for the death.
This distinction is useful when assessing lists. A compiler may accurately establish that a person researched UFOs yet still make an unsupported second inference that the research explains why the person died.
How retrospective links widen the eligible pool
The most consequential effect of retrofitting is mathematical as much as narrative. If inclusion requires documented UFO research, the candidate population is comparatively small. If inclusion expands to anyone whose expertise might conceivably bear on advanced aerospace technology, it becomes enormous.
That widened category can include specialists in plasma physics because plasmas have been proposed in discussions of unusual luminous phenomena; astronomers because they study objects in space; nuclear researchers because UFO narratives sometimes invoke nuclear facilities; materials scientists because exotic craft would require unusual materials; electrical engineers because propulsion systems require power; and gravity or superconductivity researchers because alleged UFO manoeuvres are sometimes imagined to require control of inertia or gravity.
The 2026 “dead or missing scientists” story shows the consequences of this flexible categorisation. PolitiFact traced 14 people whose names had surfaced in circulating claims and found that they did not all work together and were not even all scientists. Some had NASA affiliations, some worked at Los Alamos, while others came from different institutions and fields. The investigation found no public evidence establishing the sweeping claim that the group shared classified UFO or nuclear programmes.[PolitiFact]politifact.comPolitiFact | Fact-checking claims about missing, dead scientists: Were they researching UFOs, nuclear weapons?April 28, 2026…
The US House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform subsequently sought information from federal agencies, but its own wording is important. The committee described the underlying reports as “unconfirmed public reporting” concerning people allegedly connected to nuclear secrets or rocket technology. Its inquiry was intended to determine whether a connection existed, not to certify one already demonstrated.[Oversight Committee]oversight.house.govOversight CommitteeComer & Burlison Seek Information on Missing Nuclear and Rocket Scientists - United States House Committee on Oversigh…
Li’s incorporation into the newer discussion demonstrates how historical retrofits can feed contemporary lists. She died in 2021, years before most of the recent cases, yet PolitiFact found her among the names circulating in 2026. Amy Eskridge, who died in 2022 and co-founded the Institute for Exotic Science, was also added.[PolitiFact]politifact.comPolitiFact | Fact-checking claims about missing, dead scientists: Were they researching UFOs, nuclear weapons?April 28, 2026… Once a list’s implied category changes from “recent colleagues who died or vanished” to something closer to “people connected with sensitive, advanced or unconventional technology”, older figures become eligible without any new event occurring.
The list can then expand backwards indefinitely. A researcher does not have to share an employer, project, speciality, time period or manner of death with the original cases. A thematic resemblance discovered afterwards can suffice.
The retrofit is visible in changing descriptions
One practical way to recognise this mechanism is to compare descriptions written at different points in time. Retrofitting often leaves a linguistic trail.
The earliest technical source may say that a scientist studied gravitational effects in superconductors. A later popular account may call the same work “anti-gravity research”. A UFO-oriented retelling can then describe the person as researching the propulsion system of extraordinary craft. Finally, a death-list post may shorten the biography to “UFO/antigravity scientist” or “scientist working on classified UAP technology”. Each step sounds close enough to the previous one to seem natural, while the cumulative change can be substantial.
Li’s documented publication is a particularly useful control because the original Physical Review B abstract is still available. It discusses gravitational effects and superconductivity in technical terms.[Physical Review Journals]journals.aps.orgOpen source on aps.org. Her obituary, by contrast, called her one of the world’s leading scientists in “super-conductivity anti-gravity”.[Berryhill Funeral Home]berryhillfh.comBerryhill Funeral Home Ning Li ObituaryBerryhill Funeral HomeNing Li Obituary July 27, 2021 - Berryhill Funeral Home & CrematoryJuly 27, 2021… Later internet discussions have gone further by placing her within UFO and missing-scientist narratives. The underlying person has not changed; the category surrounding her has.
This does not mean every later description is necessarily wrong. “Antigravity researcher” is a reasonable shorthand for some of Li’s ambitions, and her defence work genuinely remains partly outside the public record. What requires separate evidence is the additional move from gravity research to UFO technology, and especially from UFO-relevant technology to a suspicious death or disappearance caused by that work.
That separation provides a useful way to read researcher death lists. For each name, three propositions should be tested independently: what the person actually researched; whether there is documented evidence connecting that work to UFOs or classified programmes; and whether there is evidence connecting the work to the person’s death or disappearance. A strong biography in the first category does not automatically establish the second, and neither establishes the third.
Why the mechanism makes death lists look more coherent
Retrospective linking gives heterogeneous cases a common vocabulary. An astronomer, plasma physicist, electrical engineer and superconductivity researcher may have little professional overlap. Describe all four instead as people working on “advanced propulsion”, “exotic physics” or “technology relevant to UAP”, and they suddenly appear to constitute a recognisable group.
That coherence can be created after the events rather than discovered before them. This is why the date of the alleged connection matters. Evidence that a researcher openly investigated UFOs while alive carries a different weight from a blog post written decades later arguing that the research could have explained UFOs. Likewise, documented participation in a named programme is different from an inference based on having worked at an institution that also performs classified research.
The strongest cases therefore have contemporaneous links: publications, correspondence, project records, talks, contracts or archives showing what the person actually pursued. McDonald’s extensive UFO archive is an example of such direct evidence.[Kirk McDonald]kirkmcd.princeton.eduKirk Mc Donald Arizona Archives OnlineKirk McDonaldArizona Archives OnlineFebruary 13, 2026… Li’s published superconductivity research establishes her interest in gravitational effects, but does not by itself establish participation in a UFO programme.[Physical Review Journals]journals.aps.orgOpen source on aps.org. Her later absence from public scientific life is now substantially explained by classified work followed by catastrophic injury, rather than literal disappearance.[Huntsville Business Journal]huntsvillebusinessjournal.comHuntsville Business JournalUncovering The Mystery Of Huntsville’s Brilliant Anti-gravity Scientist - Huntsville Business Journal…
The difference is crucial to understanding how researcher death lists expand. Later writers do not necessarily invent biographical facts. More often, they rearrange authentic facts into a new causal story: unusual research becomes UFO-relevant research; defence involvement becomes evidence of hidden knowledge; silence becomes suppression; and death becomes the final event that appears to confirm the preceding interpretation.
That process can produce compelling narratives precisely because many individual details are true. The weak point is often not the details themselves but the unproven links between them. When those links are supplied retrospectively, the resulting list tells readers as much about how its inclusion rules evolved as it does about the researchers whose names appear on it.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to How UFO Connections Get Added After the Fact. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry
Cited by the New York Review of Books as "the best brief for visitation," this classic study presents an analysis of UFO reports and conc...
Escaping the Rabbit Hole: How to Debunk Conspiracy Theories U...
Revised and updated for the first time in 2023—Now includes strategies for debunking conspiracies regarding the coronavirus pandemic, ele...
Suspicious Minds: Why We Believe Conspiracy Theories
Suspicious Minds decodes the psychology of why we all believe in conspiracy theories--some of us just hide it better than others.
The Demon-haunted World
Rating: 4.5/5 from 43 Google Books ratings
Are we on the brink of a new Dark Age of irrationality and superstition? In this book, the writer shows how scientific thinking is necess...
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.
Endnotes
1.
Source: arxiv.org
Title: arXiv An analysis of the Brown-Biefeld effect
Link:https://arxiv.org/abs/1011.1393
2.
Source: nicap.org
Link:https://www.nicap.org/bios/NICAP-Bios/Brown.htm
Source snippet
Bolster...
3.
Source: reddit.com
Title: Remembering Dr. James E. Mc Donald
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1fpf49c
Source snippet
Remembering Dr. James E. McDonald - Let us not forget what is at stake and how deliberate obfuscation has long been the tactic of t...
4.
Source: politifact.com
Link:https://www.politifact.com/article/2026/apr/28/missing-dead-scientists-nuclear-weapons-ufos/
Source snippet
PolitiFact | Fact-checking claims about missing, dead scientists: Were they researching UFOs, nuclear weapons?April 28, 2026...
Published: April 28, 2026
5.
Source: oversight.house.gov
Link:https://oversight.house.gov/release/comer-burlison-seek-information-on-missing-nuclear-and-rocket-scientists/
Source snippet
Oversight CommitteeComer & Burlison Seek Information on Missing Nuclear and Rocket Scientists - United States House Committee on Oversigh...
6.
Source: oversight.house.gov
Link:https://oversight.house.gov/index.php?Itemid=29&extid=244&extmode=view&option=com_jcalpro
7.
Source: oversight.house.gov
Title: dow missing scientists letter 4 20 26
Link:https://oversight.house.gov/letter/letter-to-dow-secretary-hegseth-on-missing-scientists/dow-missing-scientists-letter_4-20-26/
8.
Source: oversight.house.gov
Title: doe missing scientists letter 4 20 26
Link:https://oversight.house.gov/letter/letter-to-doe-secretary-wright-on-missing-scientists/doe-missing-scientists-letter_4-20-26/
9.
Source: oversight.house.gov
Title: letter to dow secretary hegseth on missing scientists
Link:https://oversight.house.gov/letter/letter-to-dow-secretary-hegseth-on-missing-scientists/
10.
Source: oversight.house.gov
Title: fbi missing scientists letter 4 20 26
Link:https://oversight.house.gov/letter/letter-to-fbi-director-patel-on-missing-scientists/fbi-missing-scientists-letter_4-20-26/
11.
Source: oversight.house.gov
Title: nasa missing scientists letter 4 20 26
Link:https://oversight.house.gov/letter/letter-to-nasa-administrator-isaacman-on-missing-scientists/nasa-missing-scientists-letter_4-20-26/
12.
Source: oversight.house.gov
Title: letter to fbi director patel on missing scientists
Link:https://oversight.house.gov/letter/letter-to-fbi-director-patel-on-missing-scientists/
13.
Source: oversight.house.gov
Title: letter to nasa administrator isaacman on missing scientists
Link:https://oversight.house.gov/letter/letter-to-nasa-administrator-isaacman-on-missing-scientists/
14.
Source: oversight.house.gov
Title: letter to office of special counsel
Link:https://oversight.house.gov/letter/letter-to-office-of-special-counsel/
15.
Source: archive.ph
Link:https://archive.ph/O3Pgg
16.
Source: oversight.house.gov
Title: melanie stansbury
Link:https://oversight.house.gov/member/melanie-stansbury/
17.
Source: oversight.house.gov
Title: kelly armstrong 2
Link:https://oversight.house.gov/member/kelly-armstrong-2/
18.
Source: oversight.house.gov
Title: jamie raskin
Link:https://oversight.house.gov/member/jamie-raskin/
19.
Source: oversight.house.gov
Title: greg gianforte
Link:https://oversight.house.gov/member/greg-gianforte/
20.
Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20160007780
21.
Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20160008979
22.
Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20020016600
23.
Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19990104365
24.
Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19990023209
25.
Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19990047463
26.
Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19990019627&hterms=superconducting+gravity
27.
Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19990064220
28.
Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19990039542
29.
Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19900010659.pdf
30.
Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19890052178
31.
Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19870039926
32.
Source: oversight.house.gov
Link:https://oversight.house.gov/all/?a_page=17&f-post-category=biden-family-investigation&f-post-month=&f-post-type=&f-post-year=
33.
Source: oversight.house.gov
Link:https://oversight.house.gov/all/?a_page=17
34.
Source: oversight.house.gov
Link:https://oversight.house.gov/page/5/?month=11&post_type=release&pyear=2014&update=update
35.
Source: oversight.house.gov
Link:https://oversight.house.gov/release/page/8/?month=4&post_type=release&pyear=2013&update=update
36.
Source: oversight.house.gov
Link:https://oversight.house.gov/page/7/?month=3&post_type=release&pyear=2012&update=update
37.
Source: oversight.house.gov
Link:https://oversight.house.gov/release/page/4/?month=7&post_type=release&pyear=2009&update=update
38.
Source: ufos.wiki
Title: James E. Mc Donald
Link:https://ufos.wiki/figure/james-e-mcdonald/
39.
Source: politifact.com
Link:https://www.politifact.com/science/
40.
Source: politifact.com
Link:https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/
41.
Source: politifact.com
Link:https://www.politifact.com/staff/loreben-tuquero/
42.
Source: politifact.com
Link:https://www.politifact.com/search/story/?q=is+trump+jewish
43.
Source: politifact.com
Link:https://www.politifact.com/search/story/?q=shooters
44.
Source: politifact.com
Link:https://www.politifact.com/article/?page=1
45.
Source: politifact.com
Link:https://www.politifact.com/search/story/?q=left-wing
46.
Source: politifact.com
Link:https://www.politifact.com/search/story/?q=shooter%27s
47.
Source: politifact.com
Link:https://www.politifact.com/search/story/?q=solved
48.
Source: politifact.com
Link:https://www.politifact.com/search/story/?q=examinations
49.
Source: politifact.com
Link:https://www.politifact.com/search/story/?q=nasa
50.
Source: lib.arizona.edu
Title: james e mcdonald papers
Link:https://lib.arizona.edu/special-collections/collections/james-e-mcdonald-papers
51.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UnresolvedMysteries/comments/15c9uwk/solving_the_mystery_behind_the_disappearance_of/
52.
Source: reddit.com
Title: james mcdonald, a cloud physicist
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1fpf49c/remembering_dr_james_e_mcdonald_let_us_not_forget/
53.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUlW0dkXhZA
54.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/Ning
55.
Source: ning.com
Link:https://www.ning.com/
56.
Source: youtube.com
Title: The disappearance of America’s leading anti-gravity researcher
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qsbz8_G9WcU
Source snippet
What Happened to Amy Eskridge? | Anti-Gravity, Exotic Science, and Conspiracy Theories...
57.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SSs-GI75nF8
Source snippet
The Woman Physicist that 'Discovered Antigravity' is missing since 2004. She Modified Gravitation...
58.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5_WVN2w7byo
Source snippet
Demand the Truth About the Missing and Dead Scientists...
59.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Demand the Truth About the Missing and Dead Scientists
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F4Ruf1Lf8ns
Source snippet
FBI investigating deaths, disappearances of staff at secretive government laboratories...
60.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HDHK51O__Y0
Source snippet
The Disappearance of America's Leading Anti-Gravity Researcher illustrates how legitimate research into superconductors and physics is re...
61.
Source: huntsvillebusinessjournal.com
Link:https://huntsvillebusinessjournal.com/news/2023/07/30/solving-the-mystery-of-huntsvilles-brilliant-scientist-disappearing/
Source snippet
Huntsville Business JournalUncovering The Mystery Of Huntsville’s Brilliant Anti-gravity Scientist - Huntsville Business Journal...
62.
Source: journals.aps.org
Link:https://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.46.5489
63.
Source: berryhillfh.com
Title: Berryhill Funeral Home Ning Li Obituary
Link:https://www.berryhillfh.com/guestbook/ning-li
Source snippet
Berryhill Funeral HomeNing Li Obituary July 27, 2021 - Berryhill Funeral Home & CrematoryJuly 27, 2021...
Published: July 27, 2021
64.
Source: skepticalinquirer.org
Link:https://skepticalinquirer.org/2021/08/solving-a-ufological-murder-the-case-of-morris-k-jessup/
65.
Source: kirkmcd.princeton.edu
Title: Kirk Mc Donald Arizona Archives Online
Link:https://kirkmcd.princeton.edu/JEMcDonald/mcdonald_arizona_archives_ms412.pdf
Source snippet
Kirk McDonaldArizona Archives OnlineFebruary 13, 2026...
Published: February 13, 2026
66.
Source: t.co
Title: Who Killed The Scientists?
Link:https://t.co/wBG4dAdCGX
67.
Source: wikidisc.org
Title: Thomas Townsend Brown | Wiki Disc
Link:https://www.wikidisc.org/wiki/Thomas_Townsend_Brown
68.
Source: wikidisc.org
Title: Morris K. Jessup | Wiki Disc
Link:https://www.wikidisc.org/wiki/Morris_K._Jessup
69.
Source: anomalydesk.com
Title: philadelphia experiment
Link:https://anomalydesk.com/philadelphia-experiment.html
70.
Source: wikidata.org
Title: Ning Li
Link:https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q11170087
71.
Source: listennotes.com
Title: Ning Li
Link:https://www.listennotes.com/top-podcasts/ning-li/
72.
Source: skeptic.com
Title: The Mystery of Missing and Dead Scientists, Explained
Link:https://www.skeptic.com/article/the-mystery-of-missing-and-dead-scientists-explained/
73.
Source: disclosuremonitor.com
Title: Amy Eskridge | Disclosure Monitor
Link:https://disclosuremonitor.com/people/amy-eskridge-antigravity-researcher
74.
Source: smw.ai
Title: townsend brown
Link:https://smw.ai/research/townsend-brown
75.
Source: ttbrown.com
Title: NICA P and The Many Myths of T. Townsend Brown
Link:https://www.ttbrown.com/nicap-myths/
76.
Source: brighteon.com
Title: Amy Eskridge
Link:https://www.brighteon.com/d5d45714-89b1-447e-8de2-2a30a9d12824
77.
Source: hatch.kookscience.com
Title: Morris K. Jessup
Link:https://hatch.kookscience.com/wiki/Morris_K._Jessup
78.
Source: ufouap.com
Title: amy eskridge
Link:https://www.ufouap.com/case-files/amy-eskridge/
79.
Source: ufouap.com
Title: amy eskridge
Link:https://www.ufouap.com/es/case-files/amy-eskridge/
80.
Source: berryhillfh.com
Title: Ning Li Obituary
Link:https://www.berryhillfh.com/obituary/ning-li?lud=4CF765EE88E7526FCBA619C30101F7E6
81.
Source: berryhillfh.com
Title: Ning Li Obituary
Link:https://www.berryhillfh.com/obituary/ning-li/print
82.
Source: people.howstuffworks.com
Title: philadelphia experiment
Link:https://people.howstuffworks.com/philadelphia-experiment.htm
83.
Source: ttbrown.com
Title: NICA P
Link:https://www.ttbrown.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=460
84.
Source: ufoconnect.com
Link:https://ufoconnect.com/journalist-profile/morris-jessup/
85.
Source: ttbrown.com
Title: Thomas Townsend Brown
Link:https://www.ttbrown.com/page/2/
86.
Source: scientists.fandom.com
Title: Thomas Townsend Brown
Link:https://scientists.fandom.com/wiki/Thomas_Townsend_Brown
87.
Source: theufodatabase.com
Link:https://theufodatabase.com/organizations/nicap
88.
Source: tributearchive.com
Title: ning li
Link:https://www.tributearchive.com/[obituaries
89.
Source: danielfry.com
Link:https://danielfry.com/controversies/nicap-and-fry/
90.
Source: daviddarling.info
Link:https://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/U/UFOs.html
91.
Source: daviddarling.info
Link:https://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/A/antigravity.html
92.
Source: airandspace.si.edu
Link:https://airandspace.si.edu/learn/programs/soar-together/ufos
93.
Source: xwhos.com
Title: Morris K. Jessup
Link:https://www.xwhos.com/person/morris_k_jessup-whois.html
94.
Source: uapmurders.com
Link:https://uapmurders.com/uaps/Details/Ning_Li/
95.
Source: conspira.fi
Title: institute for exotic science
Link:https://conspira.fi/entity/institute-for-exotic-science
96.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Title: National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena (NICAP)
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/National%20Investigations%20Committee%20on%20Aerial%20Phenomena%20%28NICAP%29
97.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/National%20Investigations%20Committee%20on%20Aerial%20Phenomena%20%28NICAP%29/National%20Investigations%20Committee%20on%20Aerial%20Phenomena%20%28NICAP%29%20Part%2001/view
98.
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link:https://vault.fbi.gov/view/1000?b_start%3Aint=200
99.
Source: crystalinks.com
Title: Philadelphia Experiment
Link:https://www.crystalinks.com/PhiladelphiaExperiment.html
100.
Source: Wikipedia
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ning
101.
Source: kirkmcd.princeton.edu
Title: mcdonald zenith city 120612
Link:https://kirkmcd.princeton.edu/JEMcDonald/mcdonald_zenith_city_120612.pdf
102.
Source: henry.pha.jhu.edu
Link:https://henry.pha.jhu.edu/mcdonald.pdf
103.
Source: files.ncas.org
Link:https://files.ncas.org/ufosymposium/mcdonald.html
Additional References
104.
Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/0005516065
105.
Source: osti.gov
Link:https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1838162
106.
Source: osti.gov
Link:https://www.osti.gov/pages/biblio/1570221-img183663-fig
107.
Source: osti.gov
Link:https://www.osti.gov/pages/biblio/2471371
108.
Source: osti.gov
Link:https://www.osti.gov/pages/biblio/2422265
109.
Source: osti.gov
Link:https://www.osti.gov/pages/biblio/1608936
110.
Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp86b00985r000400150011-1
111.
Source: osti.gov
Link:https://www.osti.gov/pages/biblio/1220725-img19724-fig
112.
Source: osti.gov
Link:https://www.osti.gov/pages/biblio/1986461
113.
Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp84b00890r000500020009-4