Within Coordination
What Would Actually Link Separate Researcher Deaths?
A coordinated-killing theory becomes persuasive only when separate cases share actors, communications, motives or operational signatures.
On this page
- Recurring actors and organisations across cases
- Shared communications, surveillance and forensic signatures
- Why thematic similarity alone does not establish coordination
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
A coordinated-killing claim becomes persuasive only when evidence crosses the boundaries between individual cases. It is not enough that several researchers worked on UFOs, unconventional propulsion or antigravity, or that several deaths appear unusual when viewed separately. The decisive question is whether independent evidence shows that the same people, organisation, communications network, motive or operational machinery touched more than one case.
That is how genuine crime series are identified. The US National Institute of Justice describes forensic intelligence as combining evidence and situational data across incidents to uncover links; the FBI’s Violent Criminal Apprehension Program similarly compares homicides and suspicious disappearances for common features. Crucially, a possible similarity is a lead, not proof.[National Institute of Justice]nij.ojp.govNational Institute of JusticeUsing Forensic Intelligence To Combat Serial and Organized Violent Crimes | National Institute of JusticeOct…
Applied to alleged deaths of UFO and antigravity researchers, the publicly documented record currently lacks the kind of cross-case bridge that would transform a collection of suspicions into evidence of a coordinated campaign. What would change that assessment is quite specific.
Recurring actors would be the strongest bridge
The most important discovery would be an identifiable person or organisation appearing in operationally significant roles around two or more researchers. That means something substantially narrower than discovering that several people had worked with the US military, aerospace contractors, universities or government agencies. Those are large institutional worlds containing many thousands of employees, contractors and collaborators.
A meaningful recurring actor might instead be the same security official contacting two researchers shortly before separate deaths; the same intermediary arranging meetings with several victims; the same company obtaining their unpublished material; or the same small government unit demonstrably monitoring multiple researchers. Financial records showing payments from one sponsor to people involved in separate incidents could be still stronger. An authenticated document naming multiple targets would be stronger again.
The distinction between association and operational involvement matters particularly in this subject. Ning Li, for example, genuinely conducted unconventional gravity research and lived in Huntsville, Alabama. Her obituary identifies her as a researcher in superconductivity and antigravity and records that she died there in July 2021. Amy Eskridge also lived in Huntsville, studied at the University of Alabama in Huntsville and co-founded the Institute for Exotic Science; her 2022 obituary describes her interests in physics and other scientific fields.[Berryhill Funeral Home]berryhillfh.comBerryhill Funeral Home Ning Li ObituaryBerryhill Funeral HomeNing Li Obituary July 27, 2021 - Berryhill Funeral Home & CrematoryJuly 27, 2021…
That geographical and intellectual overlap is worth documenting, but it does not by itself establish a common perpetrator. Huntsville is an unusually dense aerospace and defence research centre, so researchers interested in unconventional propulsion being found in the same scientific community is not intrinsically surprising. A genuinely probative Huntsville connection would need to become much narrower: the same threatening individual, surveillance team, restricted programme, unusual visitor, financial transaction or documented attempt to obtain research from both people.
This illustrates a central principle of crime-linkage analysis: useful similarities must be not merely consistent but sufficiently distinctive to discriminate a genuine series from unrelated cases. Research reviewing crime-linkage practice identifies behavioural consistency and distinctiveness as its two fundamental assumptions.[DOI]doi.orgThe practice of crime linkage: A review of the literatureThe practice of crime linkage: A review of the literature - Davies - 2019 - Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling…
Communications could turn coincidence into evidence of intent
Documents and communications would be especially important because a coordinated killing is fundamentally a claim about a common plan. The ideal evidence would therefore reveal not merely that researchers felt threatened, but that the threats or instructions themselves connect separate cases.
Imagine, for example, that authenticated records from two researchers contained messages from the same sender using the same unusual terminology and referring to the same undisclosed project. That would create a testable cross-case connection. If telephone records then showed the sender communicating with people present around both deaths, the inference would become considerably stronger. An internal memorandum ordering surveillance of several named researchers would be more direct still.
The evidential hierarchy matters:
- Strong linkage: independently authenticated communications explicitly naming several researchers, a common operation or instructions concerning them.
- Potentially significant linkage: the same identifiable sender, telephone number, account, intermediary or unusual threat wording independently documented in separate cases.
- Weak linkage: different researchers reporting that unspecified people were following, intimidating or suppressing them.
- Very weak linkage: later commentators describing unrelated experiences using similar language such as “silenced”, “watched” or “threatened”.
This distinction becomes important when claims about Amy Eskridge are incorporated into broader researcher-death theories. Recent reporting has circulated alleged messages in which Eskridge reportedly expressed fear for her safety before her 2022 death. Even if such messages were fully authenticated, however, they would primarily bear on her individual case. To support a coordinated researcher-killing theory, investigators would need to identify the people she feared and then connect those people, their communications or their organisation to another relevant death.[Hindustan Times]hindustantimes.comHindustan TimesAmy Eskridge update: UFO scientist's old texts cast doubt on cause of death; ‘would never kill myself’ | Hindustan TimesAp…
The difference is easy to miss. Evidence that researcher A expected harm can increase suspicion about what happened to A. It does not automatically make the death of researcher B evidence of the same plot.
Shared surveillance and forensic signatures would be harder to dismiss
Physical and digital evidence can create cross-case links without anyone leaving behind an explicit written order. Modern forensic intelligence is designed precisely to uncover connections that investigators might otherwise miss by examining incidents separately. NIJ describes the approach as combining forensic and situational information to connect evidence, suspects, cases and crime scenes.[National Institute of Justice]nij.ojp.govNational Institute of JusticeForensic Intelligence | National Institute of JusticeOctober 10, 2023…
Ballistics provide an unusually clear illustration. The US Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives operates the National Integrated Ballistic Information Network (NIBIN), which compares cartridge-case markings across crimes. A potential association must still be examined and confirmed, but a genuine match can establish that the same firearm was used at otherwise apparently unrelated scenes.[ATF]atf.govnational integrated ballistic information network nibinnational integrated ballistic information network nibin
An equivalent evidential breakthrough in alleged researcher killings might involve the same weapon, DNA profile, unusual chemical substance, vehicle, surveillance equipment, forged identity or digital infrastructure appearing independently in multiple cases. Repeated access to the same anonymised communications account, for example, could be far more significant than similarities in the victims’ scientific interests.
Digital evidence could be particularly revealing. Device records might establish that one operative was near multiple researchers at relevant times. Server logs could connect threatening communications sent to different researchers. Travel, hotel or vehicle records could show the same surveillance personnel repeatedly converging on victims shortly before critical incidents. Financial data could connect ostensibly independent perpetrators to a common payer.
None of those hypothetical discoveries would automatically prove a killing programme, but they would provide something presently missing from the public narrative: an evidential pathway that runs from one case into another.
A common motive must be specific enough to test
“Researching antigravity” is too broad to function as a persuasive common motive. Even “working on technology that threatened powerful interests” remains a hypothesis unless investigators can identify what technology, whose interests and how each researcher came into conflict with them.
A much stronger common-motive case would look more concrete. Suppose several researchers independently possessed copies of the same restricted technical material and each received demands from the same organisation to surrender it. Or suppose internal correspondence showed that several named scientists were regarded as disclosure risks for one particular programme. If adverse events then followed identifiable disclosure attempts, the sequence could be investigated against documents, dates, witnesses and communications.
This requirement also prevents unrelated deaths from being forced into one narrative. Eugene Mallove’s murder is a useful stress test. Because Mallove promoted cold fusion and unconventional energy research, his 2004 killing can appear superficially compatible with a theory that controversial energy researchers were being eliminated. Yet the subsequent criminal case developed a much more specific, local chain of evidence.
A 2025 Connecticut Appellate Court decision recounting the case states that Mallove was found dead at his Norwich rental property after having recently evicted tenants. It records the investigation into people connected with that property and the eventual murder and conspiracy-to-commit-murder conviction of Chad Schaffer.[Justia Law]law.justia.comOpen source on justia.com.
For Mallove’s death to become evidence of a broader researcher-elimination operation, therefore, proponents would need evidence connecting those participants or the circumstances behind the murder to another researcher case. Merely observing that Mallove advocated controversial energy research does not overcome the case-specific evidence developed in the criminal proceedings.
That is exactly why cross-case evidence is so valuable: it can distinguish a genuinely common motive from a theme imposed retrospectively on very different events.
Why the cases must be tested against one another
A useful way to investigate a suspected series is to build a matrix rather than a narrative. The FBI’s ViCAP system exists to compare violent crimes and suspicious missing-person cases across jurisdictions, using information about victims, offenders, crime scenes, laboratory findings and other investigative details. Its analysts conduct case-linkage analysis, timelines, mapping and crime-series comparisons.[FBI]fbi.govBehavioral Analysis — FBIBehavioral Analysis — FBI…
Applied conceptually to alleged researcher deaths, the rows would be individual cases and the columns would contain testable features: named threats, organisations, known visitors, communications identifiers, weapons, toxicology, vehicles, financial transactions, research projects, disclosure events and precise timelines.
A genuine series should begin producing intersections that are difficult to explain independently. The same obscure individual appearing around three researchers is more informative than all three having defence connections. The same encrypted account contacting two victims is more informative than both reporting unspecified surveillance. A confirmed forensic match is more informative than two deaths being labelled “mysterious” online.
Statistical crime-linkage research reinforces the danger of treating resemblance as certainty. One NIJ-supported study used Bayes factors to measure whether crimes shared a common offender; even a model capable of identifying 82 per cent of actual links at one operating point still produced a 5 per cent false-positive rate. In other words, apparent matches occur even in formal systems designed specifically to discriminate linked from unlinked offences.[National Institute of Justice]nij.ojp.govOpen source on ojp.gov.
The practical lesson is not that similarities are worthless. It is that they are most useful as search instructions: if two cases share an unusual feature, investigators should look for harder evidence behind it.
Thematic similarity is not operational linkage
The weakest versions of the coordinated-killing argument tend to begin by defining a category — UFO researchers, antigravity scientists, alternative-energy advocates or people associated with sensitive aerospace work — and then collecting deaths and disappearances within it. That procedure risks selecting cases because they already resemble the proposed pattern.
Ning Li demonstrates the problem particularly clearly. Online accounts long described her as having “disappeared” after leaving public antigravity research. Yet her funeral-home obituary records that she died in Huntsville in 2021 and was survived by her son and grandchildren. Whatever legitimate questions remain about the later history of her research, the public evidence does not support treating her as a person who simply vanished without trace.[Berryhill Funeral Home]berryhillfh.comBerryhill Funeral Home Ning Li ObituaryBerryhill Funeral HomeNing Li Obituary July 27, 2021 - Berryhill Funeral Home & CrematoryJuly 27, 2021…
Likewise, the fact that Eskridge and Li were both associated with Huntsville and unconventional gravity research establishes an interesting research-community connection, not a homicide connection. Mallove unquestionably was murdered, but the Connecticut judicial record supplies a specific property-related context and identified defendants. These distinctions become obscured when “researcher who disappeared from public science”, “researcher who died”, “researcher whose death attracts dispute” and “researcher proven to have been murdered” are treated as equivalent events.[al.com]al.comamy eskridge obituaryAlabama ObituariesAmy Eskridge Obituary (1987 - 2022) - Huntsville, AL - AL.com (Huntsville
The FBI’s own linkage framework illustrates why investigators preserve such distinctions. ViCAP collects detailed information so that cases can be compared for meaningful similarities rather than being grouped merely because the victims belong to the same occupation or broad social category.[FBI]fbi.govBehavioral Analysis — FBIBehavioral Analysis — FBI…
What discovery would materially change the picture?
The present evidential gap is therefore narrower and more concrete than the sprawling conspiracy literature sometimes suggests. Researchers would not need to prove every detail of a hypothetical programme before the coordinated-killing claim deserved serious reconsideration. They would need to find at least one robust bridge between cases and then independently corroborate it.
A particularly consequential discovery would be an authenticated record naming multiple researchers as targets; a recurring individual demonstrably involved in several incidents; communications connecting separate perpetrators to one controller; matching forensic evidence; financial transfers linking participants across cases; or surveillance records showing the same operational team repeatedly following different researchers.
Several weaker links could also become powerful if they converged independently. The same obscure intermediary, the same communications infrastructure, matching travel records and a shared specific motive would collectively be much harder to dismiss than any one similarity alone. Conversely, ten cases sharing only an interest in unconventional propulsion would remain evidentially weak because that characteristic was used to select the cases in the first place.
This is the critical distinction between a pattern of subjects and a pattern of perpetrators. The existing public record contains enough unusual histories to justify careful case-by-case scrutiny, and some individual incidents contain genuine questions or documented violence. What it has not yet produced is reliable evidence showing that the same operational machinery caused separate researcher deaths. Until such a cross-case link appears, coordinated killing remains a hypothesis rather than the conclusion established by the cases themselves.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to What Would Actually Link Separate Researcher Deaths?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The Demon-Haunted World
Rating: 4.5/5 from 43 Google Books ratings
NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER • From the renowned astronomer and author of Cosmos comes a “powerful [and] stirring defense of informed ration...
The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark
Rating: 4.5/5 from 43 Google Books ratings
NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER • From the renowned astronomer and author of Cosmos comes a “powerful [and] stirring defense of informed ration...
Forensic Science: An Introduction to Scientific and Investiga...
Covering a range of fundamental topics essential to modern forensic investigation, the fourth edition of the landmark text Forensic Scien...
The UFO Handbook: A Guide to Investigating, Evaluating, and R...
An explanation of the usual reasons for confusing IFOs (identified flying objects) with UFOs and a survey of the tools used to investigat...
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.
Endnotes
1.
Source: fbi.gov
Title: Behavioral Analysis — FBI
Link:https://www.fbi.gov/how-we-investigate/behavioral-analysis
Source snippet
Behavioral Analysis — FBI...
2.
Source: doi.org
Title: The practice of crime linkage: A review of the literature
Link:https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1531
Source snippet
The practice of crime linkage: A review of the literature - Davies - 2019 - Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling...
3.
Source: atf.gov
Title: national integrated ballistic information network nibin
Link:https://www.atf.gov/firearms/tools-services-law-enforcement/national-integrated-ballistic-information-network-nibin
4.
Source: atf.gov
Title: Fact Sheet
Link:https://www.atf.gov/resource-center/fact-sheet/national-integrated-ballistic-information-network
5.
Source: law.justia.com
Link:https://law.justia.com/cases/connecticut/court-of-appeals/2025/ac46658.html
6.
Source: fbi.gov
Title: Vi CAP — FBI
Link:https://www.fbi.gov/how-we-can-help-you/more-fbi-services-and-information/freedom-of-information-privacy-act/department-of-justice-fbi-privacy-impact-assessments/vicap
7.
Source: fbi.gov
Title: Violent Criminal Apprehension Program, Part 1 — FBI
Link:https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/violent-criminal-apprehension-program-part-1
8.
Source: atf.gov
Link:https://www.atf.gov/firearms/tools-services-law-enforcement/national-integrated-ballistic-information-network-nibin/resources
9.
Source: atf.gov
Title: Fact Sheet
Link:https://www.atf.gov/resource-center/fact-sheet/2024-national-integrated-ballistic-information-network
10.
Source: leb.fbi.gov
Title: identifying serial sexual offenders through cold cases
Link:https://leb.fbi.gov/articles/featured-articles/identifying-serial-sexual-offenders-through-cold-cases
11.
Source: doi.org
Link:https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12144
12.
Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/archives/usam/antitrust-resource-manual-7-elements-offense
13.
Source: fbi.gov
Title: vicap links murders to prolific serial killer 112718
Link:https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/vicap-links-murders-to-prolific-serial-killer-112718
14.
Source: catalog.data.gov
Title: violent crime apprehension program web
Link:https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/violent-crime-apprehension-program-web
15.
Source: fbi.gov
Title: violent criminal apprehension program part 2
Link:https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/violent-criminal-apprehension-program-part-2
16.
Source: justice.gov
Title: Manual | 9-13.000
Link:https://www.justice.gov/jm/jm-9-13000-obtaining-evidence
17.
Source: fbi.gov
Link:https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/serial-killers-part-8-new-research-aims-to-help-investigators-solve-serial-murder-cases
18.
Source: archives.fbi.gov
Title: oversight of the federal bureau of investigation 6
Link:https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/news/testimony/oversight-of-the-federal-bureau-of-investigation-6
19.
Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/atr/case-document/united-states-pre-trial-memorandum-law
20.
Source: fbi.gov
Link:https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/reports-and-publications/serialmurder-pathwaysforinvestigations.pdf/view
21.
Source: fbi.gov
Link:https://www.fbi.gov/wanted/vicap/
22.
Source: fbi.gov
Link:https://www.fbi.gov/wanted/vicap/unidentified-persons
23.
Source: fbi.gov
Link:https://www.fbi.gov/video-repository/newss-fbi-crime-analysts-provide-training-on-violent-criminal-apprehension-program/view
24.
Source: fbi.gov
Link:https://www.fbi.gov/wanted/vicap/homicides-and-sexual-assaults/
25.
Source: fbi.gov
Link:https://www.fbi.gov/wanted/vicap/missing-persons
26.
Source: leb.fbi.gov
Title: vicap alerts
Link:https://leb.fbi.gov/vicap-alerts
27.
Source: justice.gov
Title: criminal resource manual 2167 jury instruction conspiracy 18 usc 1956h
Link:https://www.justice.gov/archives/usam/criminal-resource-manual-2167-jury-instruction-conspiracy-18-usc-1956h
28.
Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-923-18-usc-371-conspiracy-defraud-us
29.
Source: justice.gov
Title: criminal resource manual 2482 pinkerton vs aiding and abetting
Link:https://www.justice.gov/archives/usam/criminal-resource-manual-2482-pinkerton-vs-aiding-and-abetting
30.
Source: justice.gov
Title: Office of the Solicitor General | Whitfield v. United States
Link:https://www.justice.gov/osg/brief/whitfield-v-united-states-brief-merits
31.
Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/civil-resource-manual-162-sample-odometer-fraud-jury-instructions
32.
Source: ufos.wiki
Title: James E. Mc Donald
Link:https://ufos.wiki/figure/james-e-mcdonald/
33.
Source: nij.ojp.gov
Link:https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/using-forensic-intelligence-combat-serial-and-organized-violent-crimes
Source snippet
National Institute of JusticeUsing Forensic Intelligence To Combat Serial and Organized Violent Crimes | National Institute of JusticeOct...
34.
Source: nij.ojp.gov
Link:https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/understanding-forensic-intelligence-nij-framework
35.
Source: berryhillfh.com
Title: Berryhill Funeral Home Ning Li Obituary
Link:https://www.berryhillfh.com/obituary/ning-li?lud=4CF765EE88E7526FCBA619C30101F7E6
Source snippet
Berryhill Funeral HomeNing Li Obituary July 27, 2021 - Berryhill Funeral Home & CrematoryJuly 27, 2021...
Published: July 27, 2021
36.
Source: obits.al.com
Title: amy eskridge obituary
Link:https://obits.al.com/us/[obituaries
Source snippet
abama ObituariesAmy Eskridge Obituary (1987 - 2022) - Huntsville, AL - AL.com (Huntsville)...
37.
Source: hindustantimes.com
Link:https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/us-news/amy-eskridge-update-ufo-scientists-old-texts-cast-doubt-on-cause-of-death-would-never-kill-myself-101776897906208.html
Source snippet
Hindustan TimesAmy Eskridge update: UFO scientist's old texts cast doubt on cause of death; ‘would never kill myself’ | Hindustan TimesAp...
38.
Source: nij.ojp.gov
Link:https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/forensics/forensic-intelligence
Source snippet
National Institute of JusticeForensic Intelligence | National Institute of JusticeOctober 10, 2023...
Published: October 10, 2023
39.
Source: nij.ojp.gov
Link:https://nij.ojp.gov/library/publications/understanding-forensic-intelligence-nij-framework
40.
Source: nij.ojp.gov
Link:https://nij.ojp.gov/library/publications/statistical-approach-crime-linkage
41.
Source: ojp.gov
Link:https://www.ojp.gov/library/publications/statistical-approach-crime-linkage
42.
Source: obits.al.com
Title: lillian paul obituary
Link:https://obits.al.com/us/obituaries/name/lillian-paul-obituary?id=61856971
43.
Source: obits.al.com
Title: jennifer payne obituary
Link:https://obits.al.com/us/obituaries/name/jennifer-payne-obituary?id=61623400
44.
Source: wikidata.org
Title: Ning Li
Link:https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q11170087
45.
Source: disclosuremonitor.com
Title: Amy Eskridge | Disclosure Monitor
Link:https://disclosuremonitor.com/people/amy-eskridge-antigravity-researcher
46.
Source: obits.al.com
Title: earl porter obituary
Link:https://obits.al.com/us/obituaries/name/earl-porter-obituary?id=61037528
47.
Source: ojp.gov
Link:https://www.ojp.gov/library/publications/introducing-nij-forensic-intelligence-framework-pillars-and-guiding-principles
48.
Source: obits.al.com
Title: mary horton obituary
Link:https://obits.al.com/us/obituaries/name/mary-horton-obituary?id=55182779
49.
Source: ufouap.com
Title: amy eskridge
Link:https://www.ufouap.com/case-files/amy-eskridge/
50.
Source: ufouap.com
Title: amy eskridge
Link:https://www.ufouap.com/es/case-files/amy-eskridge/
51.
Source: obits.al.com
Title: dwayne croston obituary
Link:https://obits.al.com/us/obituaries/name/dwayne-croston-obituary?id=33599278
52.
Source: berryhillfh.com
Title: Ning Li Obituary
Link:https://www.berryhillfh.com/guestbook/ning-li
53.
Source: berryhillfh.com
Title: Ning Li Obituary
Link:https://www.berryhillfh.com/obituary/ning-li/print
54.
Source: nij.ojp.gov
Title: using forensic intelligence analysts drive gun crime investigations
Link:https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/using-forensic-intelligence-analysts-drive-gun-crime-investigations
55.
Source: nij.ojp.gov
Title: using forensic intelligence combat serial and organized violent crimes
Link:https://nij.ojp.gov/library/publications/using-forensic-intelligence-combat-serial-and-organized-violent-crimes
56.
Source: onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Link:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jip.1531
57.
Source: ojp.gov
Link:https://ojp.gov/library/publications/crime-gun-intelligence-center-practices-lessons-learned-field
58.
Source: nij.ojp.gov
Title: statistical approach crime linkage 0
Link:https://nij.ojp.gov/library/publications/statistical-approach-crime-linkage-0
59.
Source: obits.al.com
Title: catherin keith obituary
Link:https://obits.al.com/us/obituaries/birmingham/name/catherin-keith-obituary?id=10569502
60.
Source: ojp.gov
Title: Statistical Methods for Crime Series Linkage | Office of Justice Programs
Link:https://ojp.gov/library/publications/statistical-methods-crime-series-linkage
61.
Source: nij.ojp.gov
Title: statistical approach crime linkage paper and project files
Link:https://nij.ojp.gov/library/publications/statistical-approach-crime-linkage-paper-and-project-files
62.
Source: ojp.gov
Link:https://www.ojp.gov/library/publications/statistical-approach-crime-linkage-paper-and-project-files
63.
Source: ojp.gov
Title: Statistical Approach to Crime Linkage | Office of Justice Programs
Link:https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/statistical-approach-crime-linkage
64.
Source: nij.ojp.gov
Title: law enforcement use national integrated ballistic information network nibin
Link:https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/law-enforcement-use-national-integrated-ballistic-information-network-nibin
65.
Source: nij.ojp.gov
Title: opening black box nibin process and outcome evaluation use nibin and its
Link:https://nij.ojp.gov/library/publications/opening-black-box-nibin-process-and-outcome-evaluation-use-nibin-and-its
66.
Source: ojp.gov
Link:https://www.ojp.gov/library/publications/opening-black-box-nibin-process-and-outcome-evaluation-use-nibin-and-its
67.
Source: obits.al.com
Title: corine weaver obituary
Link:https://obits.al.com/us/obituaries/mobile/name/corine-weaver-obituary?id=11737728
68.
Source: obits.al.com
Title: john barber obituary
Link:https://obits.al.com/us/obituaries/newsobserver/name/john-barber-obituary?id=12661735
69.
Source: obits.al.com
Title: hosea weaver obituary
Link:https://obits.al.com/us/obituaries/mobile/name/hosea-weaver-obituary?id=14262574
70.
Source: scribd.com
Link:https://www.scribd.com/document/933725503/4880516
71.
Source: ojp.gov
Link:https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/vicaps-role-multiagency-serial-murder-investigations
72.
Source: ojp.gov
Link:https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/statistical-approach-crime-linkage-jnl
73.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Eugene Mallove
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_Mallove
74.
Source: arabheritagememorialchapel.com
Title: amy eskridge
Link:https://www.arabheritagememorialchapel.com/m/obituaries/amy-eskridge/
75.
Source: everything.explained.today
Title: Eugene Mallove
Link:https://everything.explained.today/Eugene_Mallove/
76.
Source: extension.arizona.edu
Link:https://extension.arizona.edu/programs/natural-resource-users-law-and-policy-center-nrulpc/team
77.
Source: obits.al.com
Link:https://obits.al.com/obituaries/search?firstName=irene&lastName=schultz
78.
Source: uapmurders.com
Link:https://uapmurders.com/uaps/Details/Eugene_Mallove/
79.
Source: uapmurders.com
Link:https://uapmurders.com/uaps/Details/Ning_Li/
Additional References
80.
Source: onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Title: Online Library The practice of crime linkage: A review of the literature
Link:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jip.1531
Source snippet
Wiley Online LibraryThe practice of crime linkage: A review of the literature - Davies - 2019 - Journal of Investigative Psychology and O...
81.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SSs-GI75nF8
Source snippet
Mysterious Deaths of UFO Researchers Date Back to 1960s, Fresh Claim Emerges...
82.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Father of 11th dead or [missing scientist]({{ ‘missing-scientist/’ | relative_url }}) rejects suspicions about her death
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1d–WxTUkXE
Source snippet
What Happened to Amy Eskridge? | Anti-Gravity, Exotic Science, and Conspiracy Theories...
83.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Hp02QoYzN4
Source snippet
Father of 11th dead or missing scientist rejects suspicions about her death...
84.
Source: nist.gov
Link:https://www.nist.gov/publications/feasibility-study-measurement-system-interoperability-national-integrated-ballistic
85.
Source: www3.ce9.uscourts.gov
Link:https://www3.ce9.uscourts.gov/jury-instructions/node/475
86.
Source: shinysideout.com.au
Link:https://www.shinysideout.com.au/00-amy-eskridge.html
87.
Source: shinysideout.com.au
Link:https://www.shinysideout.com.au/13-ning-li.html
88.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/ConservativeTwins/posts/a-disturbing-story-involving-anti-gravity-researcher-amy-eskridge-is-gaining-ren/1561601222636782/
89.
Source: wegotthiscovered.com
Link:https://wegotthiscovered.com/fyi/a-scientist-claimed-to-have-created-an-anti-gravity-device-then-she-disappeared-20-years-later-her-son-explains-what-really-happened/